Next Article in Journal
Improvement of Negative Emotion Recognition in Visible Images Enhanced by Thermal Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Modified RMR Rock Mass Classification System for Preliminary Selection of Potential Sites of High-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Engineering
Previous Article in Journal
Plenty of Planning, Scanty Guidance: Evaluating the Implementation Degree of the General Master Plan in the City of Tampere, Finland
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study on Influence of Confining Pressure on Strength Characteristics of Pressurised Frozen Sand
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Variations in Permeability and Mechanical Properties of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization

1
School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
2
Collaborative Innovation Center of Ecological Civilization, Hainan University, Haikou 570228, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
4
Deep Mining and Rock Burst Research Branch, Chinese Institute of Coal Science, Beijing 100013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15195; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215195
Submission received: 13 October 2022 / Revised: 11 November 2022 / Accepted: 14 November 2022 / Published: 16 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability in Geology and Civil Engineering)

Abstract

:
Carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS/CCS) is a strategic choice for ensuring energy security and reducing carbon dioxide emissions across the globe. The injection of CO2 into the basaltic reservoir is one strategy for the permanent disposal of carbon emissions. Basaltic rocks, which are widely distributed in Hainan Island, are capable of CO2 geological sequestration. In this study, the reaction of CO2-NaOH/Ca(OH)2-basaltic rocks under conditions of 6.0 M Pa and 30 °C was performed using basaltic samples collected from the Fushan area of the Hainan Province to evaluate the sequestration of CO2 in basalt by mineralization. Then, the effect of CO2 mineralization on the permeability and mechanical properties of basaltic rocks was evaluated using X-ray computer tomography and triaxial compression testing at 21.0 MPa. In addition, microwave technology was used to irradiate the basaltic rocks before mineralization. Changes in the permeability of basalt before and after mineralization and microwave irradiation were simulated numerically, and their effects on the mechanical strength deterioration of basalt were analyzed according to the rock mechanics using triaxial testing. Based on these results, a new method for the induction of basalt deterioration, mineralization, CO2 injectivity, and storage capacity using microwave irradiation is proposed for use in CCUS/CCS engineering.

1. Introduction

The Chinese government recently included the objectives of “Emission Peak” and “Carbon Neutrality” into their overall planning for the establishment of an ecological and sustainable society. The development of technology for use in carbon dioxide capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS/CCS) is a strategic choice aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions and ensuring energy security in the future. In China, Hainan Province has been chosen by the government as the national low-carbon pilot province, wherein the government is promoting the construction of a free-trade port. This province is comprised of 35,400 km2 of land and 2 million km2 of sea under the jurisdiction of the local authorities. Within the province, there are oil and gas-bearing strata and saltwater layers in the Weizhou Formation and Liushagang Formation in the Fushan Basin, with unique CO2 geological storage conditions and marine geological environment resources. In particular, volcanic rocks are widely found in Hainan Island, with an exposed area of about 18,000 km², accounting for 53% of the island’s area.
Basaltic rocks are the most widely distributed rocks on the planet, covering large areas of the continents and the seafloor of oceans. Basalt is rich in calcium, magnesium, and iron, which enables mineralization and the generation of solid carbonate minerals under CO2 injection. Since this method does not require low permeability strata, such as caprocks [1], basalt strata are ideal sites for the permanent disposal of CO2. Recently, Hengill geothermal power plant in southwest Iceland successfully injected CO2 into the basalt stratum to permanently store CO2 by mineralization.
Fushan Sag in Hainan Province is comprised of 78 layers of basalt strata, with a total thickness of 380 m. A CCUS pilot project in a Fushan oilfield injected supercritical CO2 into oil and gas reservoirs to improve formation pressure and displace oil and gas for production. Deep saline water layers and basalt layers are potential sites for future CCS projects. Stimulating the mineralization of rocks, geofluids, and carbon dioxide to convert them into carbonate minerals minimizes the risk of CO2 leakage and has become a popular strategy for long-term safe carbon storage. However, Hainan Province faces many practical issues due to the extensive presence of cement, petrochemical, and chemical industries, which emit CO2. In particular, with the aim of achieving zero carbon emissions, the petrochemical industry in Yangpu specifically needs to develop and apply CCS technology. However, the feasibility of the use of CO2 geological storage technology is highly dependent on the lithology and hydrogeological environment of regions with high carbon emission industries. In this study, to determine the conditions most favorable for CO2 mineralization and storage in basalt in highly industrialized areas in China, high-pressure mineralization reaction experiments using basalt, liquid CO2, and a solution NaOH and Ca(OH)2 were performed in Hainan Island. As a result, the injectability and storage of CO2 in basalt were evaluated. The reactions of basalt mineralization and basalt subjected to microwave irradiation were compared to verify the feasibility of CO2 mineralization and storage in shallow buried depths in Hainan Island.
The previous theory and the technology of CO2 mineralization and CO2 storage in basalt have made considerable advances worldwide. As early as 1990, scholars proposed mineral transformation to capture and store CO2 [2]. Silicate minerals, which are rich in calcium and magnesium, can react with CO2 to form stable carbonate minerals. Continental overflow basalt has been demonstrated to be capable of CO2 mineralization and sealing, with an internal porosity and lateral connectivity that enable CO2 injection [3]. However, the internal mineral composition, pore structure, fissure structure, and water-bearing characteristics of overflow basalt tend to vary under different environmental and geological conditions [4]. The interaction between exposed basalt and atmospheric CO2 results in a natural carbon sink. The pores on the surface of basalt associate with CO2 in the atmosphere and naturally form carbonate particles. Calcite commonly observed on the surface of common porphyry basalt is evidence of this reaction. In addition to acting as a natural carbon sink, the ability of basalt to permanently seal CO2 is the result of a chemical reaction between CO2 and the rock that produces carbonate. Matter, Kelemen [5] found that when CO2 was injected into basalt, the chemical process of mineralization included CO2 dissolution in an aqueous solution and rock dissolution in a water-soluble solution. During this reaction, the liquid and separated divalent metal cations and the carbonate ions reacted with divalent cations and formed sediments. In another study, Kelemen, Matter [6] investigated potential factors influencing the process of CO2 mineralization in basalt, including temperature, pressure, pH value, fluid flow rate, and other factors. As a result, they found that the CO2 mineralization sealing efficiency depends on the dissolution rate of rock minerals and the precipitation reaction of carbonate minerals, where pH value was a significant reaction parameter. Similarly, Park, and Fan [7] found that a low pH environment is beneficial to the dissolution of silicate minerals. Seifritz, W. [2] also found that a high pH environment is more conducive to the formation and precipitation of carbonate minerals. In addition to the literature on CO2 mineralization and sealing theory, the permeability and mechanical strength of basalt reservoirs in CCS projects are important factors that determine the injectability and engineering storage potential of CO2. Callow et al. [8] conducted X-ray CT analysis on the core samples of a basalt reservoir in Iceland for the CarbFix project and found that the vertical permeability (2.07 × 10−10 m2) was higher than the horizontal permeability (5.10 × 10−11 m2). The permeability of reservoir rocks is closely related to pore diameter, as well as pore volume and connectivity [9]. Based on Kozeny Carman’s model, the absolute permeability of reservoir rocks can be calculated by measuring porosity and pore diameter [10]. Calculating the absolute permeability of basalt in the CarbFix project, Aradóttir et al. [11] found that the storage potential of Icelandic basalt formation is 100% (5,000 tons/km2). Therefore, the characteristics and permeability of reservoir rock pores are key to evaluating carbon storage potential. However, the CO2 capacity of long-term injectable storage is significant for CCUS or CCS projects. The mechanical strength of basalt reservoirs is closely associated with the pressure needed for CO2 injection and reservoir cap stability. In general, the inner enriched connective pores, the larger fractures, and the lower strength of the reservoir would be more injectable for CO2 storage. This is related to the strength of the inner structure and rocks. The published research are not involved in comparison with rock strength before and after the reaction of the CO2 mineralization. The previous study just considered CO2 leakage risk used pressure monitoring of injection formation and the time-delay effect as key factors [12,13]. Another important consideration of CO2 geological storage is the stability of caprock and the risk of CO2 escape. Interactions between water and rocks have a significant impact on rock mechanical strength [14,15,16,17]. These water-rock interactions and mineralization dissolution in CO2 geological storage promote passive effects on rock mechanical strength. After testing fracture mechanics, Major et al. [18] concluded that water-rock interactions are beneficial in preventing fracture propagation. The propagation of subcritical fractures in mineral dissolution areas reduces the integrity of caprock [15]] and may thus impact the safety of long-term CO2 storage.
Rock modification methods, which are currently being widely used in oil and gas production and development, coalbed methane extraction, and natural gas hydrate extraction, mainly include hydraulic fracturing [19], CO2 acid fracturing [20], electromagnetic heating [21], and microbial transformation [22], among other methods. Microwave irradiation modification technology in underground engineering excavation has been proposed to improve the mechanical strength of extremely hard rock masses [23,24]. To study the effect of microwave irradiation on rocks, Zheng et al. [25] proposed the microwave fracturability index (MFI) of hard igneous rocks. Similarly, with the aim of studying the industrial applicability of microwave rock-breaking technology, Lu et al. [26] carried out experiments on the cracking of basalt using microwave irradiation. As a result, they found that the cracks generated by the microwave irradiation of basalt were mainly distributed between and within olivine and plagioclase particles. This was mainly due to the large amount of heat generated by enstatite and the volume expansion stress caused by olivine under microwave irradiation. However, these studies have mainly focused on the application of basalt microwave fracturing in underground projects, while research on basalt CO2 geo-storage technology remains scarce.
If some research tasks on the injectable evaluation of the rock reservoir could be carried out in the laboratory, these experimental results would be useful guidance for CO2 mineralization storage. In this study, the differences in the permeability and mechanical strength characteristics of basalt CO2 before and after mineralization were evaluated to address the gap in the literature. In order to evaluate the impact of CO2 mineralization on permeability and mechanical strength, the three-dimensional CT scanning and triaxial loading of the pore structure of basalt CO2 before and after mineralization were performed. In addition, basalt was subjected to microwave irradiation to study the changes in the permeability and mechanical strength of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization. In addition, the CO2 mineralization storage effect of basalt was evaluated to determine the industrial applicability of microwave-modified storage enhancement technology. Based on these findings, a microwave-modified storage technology and a waveguide design scheme for CO2 underground storage are proposed, providing a theoretical basis and technical guarantee for the commercialization and promotion of basalt CO2 mineralized storage.

2. Experimental Methodology

2.1. Experiment Design and Test Scheme

In addition to the chemical action, in the CO2 mineralization reaction of basaltic rocks, the mechanical penetration action greatly improves the speed of mineralization. In order to elucidate the mechanism of basalt CO2 mineralization, a high-pressure reactor was used to react basalt with liquid CO2 and an alkaline solution of NaOH and Ca(OH)2. The alkaline solution was used to promote the pore and fracture space clogging in basalt. Macro- and micro-porous basaltic samples were used for the mineralization experiments.
The shallower reservoir would be more economical for carbon mineralization on the premise of adequate reaction without CO2 leakage. Large basalt samples were collected from the basaltic samples (between the surface layer and a depth of 50.0 m, the cylindrical basalt preparation boreholes from the blocky rocks) in the Fushan Sag, Haikou City, Hainan Province, which were subsequently processed into six complete standard cylinder specimens (diameter, 50 mm; height, 100 mm). The samples of the macro-porous basalt group were denoted as B1, B2, and B3, while the samples of the small-pore basalt group were denoted as S1, S2, and S3, respectively. The experimental method and test flow are shown in Figure 1. For considering the CO2 injection in situ of the Fushan CCUS project, the internal temperature of the reactor body and the actual formation temperature was approximately 30 °C, and the internal pressure of the reactor body was maintained at 6.0 MPa in the experiment. The experimental conditions are listed in Table 1. The aim of this experiment was to reveal the change in the characteristics of the microstructure and thermodynamic reaction of CO2, basalt, and NaOH or Ca(OH)2 alkaline solution before and after the mineralization. X-ray CT tomography was used to analyze the internal porosity, permeability, and other physical parameters of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization. Finally, triaxial rock mechanics testing was used to compare the mechanical strength of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization under 21.0 MPa of confining pressure. By focusing on the changes in the mineralization reaction degree and mechanical strength of basalt before and after microwave irradiation, this study provides data to support the further study of basalt CO2 geological storage theory and technology application.

2.2. Experimental Apparatus and Rock Mechanics Testing

X-ray CT scanning technology was used to scan and reconstruct the internal structure of the basalt samples on the basis of cross-section imaging using a cone-shaped X-ray beam (Metrotom X-ray CT device). The principle of X-ray CT scanning is shown in Figure 2a. As shown in Figure 2b, X-ray CT was used to scan basalt before and after the CO2 mineralization reaction. The voltage used directly determines the clarity of the basalt X-ray image. In this study, a voltage of 220 kV and a current of 252 μA were used. A single cylinder can obtain 2600 slice images. The X-ray images were set to DICM format for analysis.
The rock CO2 mineralization high-pressure reactor used in this study was comprised of a steel reactor body with a CO2 inlet interface and an internal pressure valve, as well as a pressure instrument at the interface. Through the air compressor and booster pump, the interior of the reactor could be pressurized to ensure a gradual increase in the internal reactor pressure to 6.0 MPa. The temperature control system of the reactor was used to maintain an internal temperature of 30 °C. The interior of the reactor was continuously filled with CO2. A schematic representation of the reactor is provided in Figure 3, including the experimental principle of the basalt CO2 mineralization reaction (Figure 3a) and the reactor device and system (Figure 3b).
The micropore structure and mechanical strength of basalt are the basis of CO2 injectability and mineralization effect. In general, when the mechanical strength of the reservoir rock is low, the porosity is large, and the injection pressure is low, a higher amount of CO2 injection and a better storage effect can be achieved. However, with an increase in the CO2 injection and a deepening of the mineralization of the rock, the carbonate mineral components formed by basalt mineralization accumulate on the inner surface of the pores and fractures, resulting in the formation of dirt. Moreover, after CO2 is injected into the reservoir rock, the pressure of the pores rises, making it difficult to dissipate the fluid pressure in the rock pores in a short time, which decreases the CO2 injectability of basalt. This has been demonstrated to be a good method for rock material modification to improve the internal mineral, fracture structure, and mechanical strength of reservoir rock via a thermal effect. In order to explore the effect of microwave irradiation on the internal pore fissures and mechanical strength of basalt, a microwave system with a manual three-stub tuner and a power of 6 kW and 2.45 GHz was used. In the experiment, basaltic rocks before CO2 mineralization were irradiated for 2 min, and then the surface temperature of basalt was recorded by an infrared thermal imager. The microwave equipment and irradiation process are shown in Figure 4a, and the thermal infrared images of two types of basalt after microwave irradiation are shown in Figure 4b.
Basaltic rocks, liquid CO2, and a NaOH or Ca(OH)2 alkaline solution were reacted, and a triaxial mechanical system was used to test the basalt strength at a strain loading rate of 10−3/min. In addition, extensometers were used to monitor the axial and lateral strain of basalt (Figure 5a). In order to simulate the stress conditions suitable for formation pressure, the confining pressure loading was set to 21.0 MPa (Figure 5b). As a result, the stress-strain curve of basalt after CO2 mineralization was obtained, and the mechanical characteristics and strength differences of basalt before and after microwave irradiation and mineralization were compared. The brittle failure characteristics of the basalt specimens are shown in Figure 5c.

2.3. Micro-Structure Analysis of Rocks Using X-ray CT Images

2.3.1. Porosity Calculation Method

The features of the pore structure, fracture structure, and basalt matrix of different basalts were extracted from X-ray CT images using multi-threshold segmentation. Then, a CT three-dimensional reconstruction algorithm was used to reconstruct the volume of the X-ray tomographic image (Figure 6), and the total number of pixels of corresponding pores and fractures in the reconstructed volume image was counted.
Basalt porosity was calculated using the following formula:
n = 1 N 0 N 1
where N 0 is the number of pixels in each slice of the basalt matrix image obtained by multi-threshold segmentation and N 1 is the number of pixels in the whole X-ray CT slice image and the boundary. The error of pixels number is determined by the X-ray images resolution and multi-interactive thresholding.

2.3.2. Permeability Calculation Method

To accurately evaluate the difference in the conductivity of the pores and fractures in basalt to single-phase liquid CO2 before and after the CO2 mineralization reaction of basalt, X-ray multi-threshold segmentation and three-dimensional reconstruction methods were used. The change rule of the absolute permeability of basalt was calculated when the pores and fractures in basalt were connected. As it is difficult to accurately identify the calculation error caused by the air interface when X-ray CT scans the circular boundary of the cylinder sample, the cube model was selected as the scanning range in the cylinder model (Figure 7a) with dimensions of 28 × 28 × 100 mm (Figure 7b).
Absolute permeability is defined as the measure of the ability of a porous material to transmit a single-phase fluid, which is an intrinsic property of a material independent of any external condition. Absolute permeability can be derived from Darcy’s law as a constant coefficient relating fluid, flow, and geo-material parameters. Therefore, the flow of CO2 through the pores and fissures in basalt per unit of time was calculated as follows:
v CO 2 = Q CO 2 S = k μ Δ P L
where Q CO 2 is the global flow rate of liquid CO2 that goes through the porous medium (unit: m3/s); S is the cross-section of the sample which the CO2 fluid goes through (unit: m2); k is the absolute permeability of basalt reservoir to single-phase liquid CO2 (cm2) (unit: m2); μ is the dynamic viscosity of the flowing fluid (unit: Pa·s); Δ P   is the pressure difference applied around the basaltic sample (unit: Pa); L is the length of the sample in the flow direction (unit: m). Q/S is often noted v and accounts for the superficial or mean fluid flow velocity through the porous medium or Darcy’s velocity. Only single-phase fluids are considered for absolute permeability. In this study, the absolute permeability can be calculated with X-ray CT images. This experiment simulation module has been developed in AVIZO software (http://www.thermofisher.com/amira-avizo, accessed on 12 October 2022). Liquid CO2 was used as the lower dynamic viscosity of a single-phase fluid, with a cross-sectional area of S , a length of L , and a pressure difference between the inlet and outlet of liquid CO2 of Δ P . In order to simulate the matching with the CO2 injection pressure of the actual formation, the no-flow boundary was set as the condition for absolute permeability calculation with an inlet pressure of 7.0 MPa and an outlet pressure of 1.0 MPa (Figure 7c). In the experiment, the fluid viscosity of single-phase CO2, defined as μCO2, had a value of 1.47 × 10−5 Pa·s.

3. Results and Application

3.1. Enhanced Carbon Mineralization of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Microwave Irradiation

The surface characteristics of basalt samples after mineralization for basalt with two types of pores reacted with liquid CO2 and a NaOH or Ca(OH)2 solution at a temperature of 30 °C and pressure of 6.0 MPa are shown in Figure 8. The amount of mineralization and scaling on the surface of basalt samples with a large pore structure (B1, B2, and B3) was found to be larger than that of basalt samples with small pores (S1, S2, and S3). In addition, different calcification spots appeared on the surface of each basalt specimen, especially B3 and S3. After microwave irradiation, their mineralization degree was more significant because the microwave thermal effect of basalt was significant. The maximum temperatures of basalt B3 and S3 were 176.5 °C and 134.7 °C, respectively. Black hot-melt substances appeared on the surface of basalt B3 after being irradiated. Microwave irradiation changed the composition of the minerals in basalt. As a result, the strength between the basalt pore channels was reduced. Furthermore, because the high pressure inside the kettle intensifies the carbonization of basalt mineral components, the mineralization reaction and carbon fixation effect of basalt after microwave irradiation were more marked.
In order to verify the effect of microwave irradiation on the mineralization and carbon fixation of basalt, X-ray CT scanning was used to reconstruct the internal pore structure of basalt samples after mineralization (Figure 9). The changes in the volume of the connected pores before and after mineralization in the two basalt groups were compared and analyzed (Table 2). The results showed that the CO2 mineralization reaction of basalt scales block the pore channel, and the volume of connected pores after the mineralization reaction is significantly reduced. In particular, the mineralization reaction of macro-porous basalt was significant, such that the volume of the connected pores in the macro-porous basalt changed markedly before and after mineralization. In addition, basalt mass was calculated before and after the mineralization experimental reaction. Figure 10a shows the comparison of the mass after the mineralization of the two basalt groups. The basalt mineralization reaction in the NaOH and Ca(OH)2 experimental solution group was more marked, while the mineralization and carbon fixation effect of the basaltic rock with a large pore structure was more noticeable. The greatest effect was that of the basalt sample after microwave irradiation, which experienced the largest weight increase after mineralization. Furthermore, the mineralization of basalt via microwave irradiation was found to increase the carbon storage capacity by 2–3 times. Figure 10b shows the changes in the porosity of basalt before and after mineralization according to X-ray CT tomography. As a result, mineralization was found to reduce the porosity of basalt, especially after its mineralization under microwave irradiation. The porosity was reduced at most by approximately 5%. The experimental results are listed in Table 2.

3.2. Changes in Permeability of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization

X-ray CT can be used to acquire and reconstruct the internal structure of basalt before and after mineralization. In this study, Avizo software was used to reconstruct the volume of pores and fractures in basalt in three dimensions. The changes in the absolute permeability before and after the basalt mineralization reaction were evaluated using the absolute permeability experimental simulation function calculation method. Table 3 presents the absolute permeability calculations before and after the basalt mineralization reaction. The simulation results indicate that while the absolute permeability of the two basalts was very different, the absolute permeability of both basalts decreased after mineralization. Among these findings, the absolute permeability of macro-porous basalt was found to decrease more significantly after the mineralization reaction.
Table 4 lists the differences in the absolute permeability of basalt before and after the mineralization reaction. Figure 10 shows the comparison of the absolute permeability values of basalt before and after mineralization. The average absolute permeability of macro-porous basalt before mineralization was 3.90 × 10−12 m2 (~3.90 Darcy), while the average absolute permeability of macro-porous basalt after mineralization was 0.05 × 10−12 m2 (~ 0.05 Darcy). Under the same conditions, the average absolute permeability of small-pore basalt before mineralization was 0.02 × 10−12 m2 (~ 0.02 Darcy), while the average absolute permeability of small-pore basalts after mineralization was 0.007×10−12 m2 (~ 0.007 Darcy). From the three-dimensional reconstructed volume data, it can be observed that the absolute permeability of basalt was related to the connectivity of internal pores and fractures. As shown in Figure 11, the absolute permeability of the macro-porous basalt samples was significantly higher than that of basalts with a small pore structure. The mineralized deposits blocked the internal pore channel of the basalt sample, and microwave irradiation intensified the weakness of the pore structure of the macro-porous basalt. The same reaction pressure broke the pore structure of the basalt. This indicates that the scale formed by the basalt mineralization reaction blocked the pore channel, resulting in a significant decrease in the absolute permeability of the macro-porous basalt after the mineralization reaction. In the CCS project, modifying the pore structure of basalt using microwave irradiation to enhance permeability can be considered a method to improve CO2 injectability and storage.

3.3. Deterioration in the Strength of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization

In this experiment, the pressure condition of the basalts reaction in the autoclave was 6.0 MPa. According to the surface characteristics of basalt after mineralization, only the B3 and S3 specimens were found to have local cracks on the surface after being modified by microwave irradiation (Figure 8). However, according to the X-ray three-dimensional fault reconstruction images, no largescale cracks were observed. These results indicate that when the internal pressure of the autoclave is 6.0 MPa, the basaltic sample remains difficult to break. To confirm the weakening of mechanical strength and microwave response of basalt during mineralization, the triaxial rock mechanics test system was used to determine the strength of basalt at the end of the experiment. Lastly, the full stress-strain curve of basalt under the same confining pressure of 21.0 MPa was obtained (Figure 11).
As shown in Figure 12, the two types of basalt showed significant differences in terms of rock strength. Under a confining pressure of 21.0 MPa, the peak strength (σc) of small-pore basalts was 584.0 MPa, while the peak strength (σc) of macro-porous basalts was only 255.0 MPa. This indicates that the peak strength (σc) of macro-porous basalts under the same confining pressure is smaller than the peak strength of small-pore basalts. While the rock strength of the two types of basalts was found to be affected by microwave irradiation, the strength of macro-porous basalts was weakened more significantly under microwave irradiation due to their internal mineral composition. The weakening degree of basalt mechanical strength was analyzed from the reaction of rock CO2 mineralization. After reacting the basalt B2 specimen with NaOH and Ca (OH)2 solution under high pressure, it was found that under the confining pressure of 21.0 MPa, the peak strength of the macro-porous basalt B2 specimen was 141.0 MPa (Figure 11a). Under the same conditions, the weakening effect of the mechanical strength of the small-pore basalt S2 specimen was not marked, and its strength was still able to reach 572.0 MPa. This is due to the small internal pores, the poor pore connectivity, and the high rock strength. The CO2 mineralization reaction pressure was not easily transferred to the structural strength of the small pores in basalt. At the same time, there were fewer mineral components in basalt with a small pore structure, and microwave irradiation did not easily change the strength of the basalt mineral matrix. Therefore, the rock strength of small-pore basalt was significantly higher than that of large-pore basalt.

3.4. Enhanced CO2 Injection in Basaltic Rocks after Microwave Irradiation

In terms of the geological storage of CO2, basalts with a lower rock strength are better. Furthermore, basalt can achieve a good thermal response under microwave irradiation. As a result, the use of microwave technology has been proposed for rock engineering excavation. With the maturity and commercialization of the CCS project and advances in carbon storage technology, the modification of reservoir pore structures and rock strength using microwave irradiation has been gradually applied to CCUS and CCS projects. In this study, the pore structure, pore connectivity, and rock strength of two types of basalt in the early stage before and after microwave irradiation were evaluated under triaxial conditions. As a result, microwave irradiation was markedly associated with CO2 mineralization and strength weakening in basalt.
Based on these findings, we propose storage enhancement technology equipment and system design for microwave modification in CO2 underground storage. The equipment includes a microwave controller, a microwave generator, a reference pin tuner, a water-cooling system, a right-angle waveguide, and a flexible waveguide (Figure 13). Herein, a microwave power supply with a frequency band of 2.45 GHz and a power of 6 kW was selected. The microwave controller controls and shocks the microwave generator. The generated microwave will output a microwave signal through the reference pin tuner and then be led out by the right-angle waveguide and the flexible waveguide. The design of the flexible copper waveguide is shown in Figure 13 I-I, II-II, and III-III. The length of the flexible waveguide is related to the depth of the target layer of carbon sequestration. The flexible waveguide is composed of a corrugated copper tube, which is wrapped with a nitrile rubber to protect the waveguide copper tube. When in use, the flexible copper waveguide should be extended into the drilling. The quartz window of the flexible waveguide should be close to the drilling well wall. The microwave generator generates microwaves and leads them out through the quartz window at the end of the flexible copper waveguide to heat the rocks around the well wall. During this process, as the microwave has attenuation in the copper waveguide, more expensive waveguide materials and manufacturing processes are required to reduce this attenuation. Therefore, microwave irradiation reservoir reconstruction technology is applicable to the target reservoir with a low buried depth (preferably within 150 m), which is the applicable condition of the microwave modification technology proposed in this study.

4. Discussion

(1) The absolute permeability (k) is computed with a CO2 single-phase flow. The module takes a feature section using interactive thresholding of labeled images of X-ray CT as input, but each label of the image has to be part either of the solid or of the fluid phase: only one solid and one fluid phase are considered for this calculation. The solid phase is impermeable: there is no flow in it. Therefore, the labeled precise X-ray image is more important for the calculated absolute permeability.
(2) X-ray CT image analysis is applied to the sample from the main basaltic reservoir of the Fushan site in Hainan. Macro-porous basalts obtained a connected porosity and absolute permeability using X-Ray CT images analysis. In this study, the absolute permeability of basalts in the Fushan site was compared with basalts in the CarbFix site using the K–C equation and X-Ray CT images, as listed in Table 5.
(3) The results indicate that microwave modification and storage increase technology are suitable for use in CCS mineralization and storage projects, wherein the basalt well wall can be irradiated with microwaves before the injection well casing is constructed. By using this strategy, it is possible to increase the CO2 injection rate and reduce the injection well pressure, thereby improving the CO2 mineralization and both storage efficiency and capacity.

5. Conclusions

In this study, the reaction of basalts with liquid CO2 and a solution of NaOH and Ca(OH)2 under high pressure was performed, and the mineralization of CO2 in basalt via microwave irradiation was evaluated. As a result, the changes in the permeability and rock strength of basalts were compared and analyzed. In the following, the main conclusions are summarized:
(1)
Both macro- and micro-porous basalts are found within a 50.0 m depth of Fushan Sag in Hainan Province, China. After the mineralization of basalt using liquid CO2 and a NaOH and Ca(OH)2 alkaline solution under a pressure of 6.0 MPa, this reaction was found to increase the mass and decrease the porosity of both types of basalt. Among the two types of basalt evaluated, the mineralization and carbon fixation effect of macro-porous basalt was found to be more marked. In particular, microwave irradiation was found to increase the carbon storage capacity of basalt by 2–3 times.
(2)
After analyzing the X-ray CT images of the basalt samples before and after CO2 mineralization and comparing the absolute permeability with the plan, we concluded that the absolute permeability of macro-porous basalt was significantly different from that of micro-porous basalt. That is, the absolute permeability of the macro-porous basalt sample was significantly higher than that of the micro-porous basalt sample. Although the mineralized scaling deposits were found to block the pore channels on the surface of the basalt specimens, the high-pressure reaction in the process of basalt mineralization intensified the connectivity of the pore structure. In particular, microwave irradiation reduced the structural strength of the basalt pores. Among the basalt samples, macro-porous basalt was found to experience a significant thermal modification effect upon microwave irradiation, wherein mineralization easily destroyed the pore structure and connectivity. These results indicate that macro-porous basalt had a good degree of permeability and exhibited a marked mineralization effect, making it more suitable for the permanent disposal of CO2 in CCS projects.
(3)
By testing the mechanical strength of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization, the mechanical strength of macro-porous basalt under a confining pressure of 21.0 MPa was found to be significantly smaller than that of small-pore basalt. While the peak strength of both types of basalts decreased after the mineralization reaction, the weakening effect of high pressure on the rock strength of macro-porous basalt was more significant, and the microwave effect of macro-porous basalt was also highly significant. After microwave irradiation, the mineralization reaction effect of basalt was enhanced, the permeability was also enhanced, and the mechanical strength was weakened, which is conducive to CO2 storage and injection.

Author Contributions

Z.Y.: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft. H.S. and W.D.: Data curation, software. X.L.: Writing—review and editing. Q.D.: Supervision, writing—review. Q.L.: editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Supported by funding support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Approval No. 42267021), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Approval No. 52079068), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Approval No. 52109120), the Hainan Provincial Science and Technology Foundation of China (Approval No. DYF2022SHFZ106), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Approval Nos. 421RC487 and 521QN203), the Open Research Fund Program of the State Key Laboratory of Hydroscience and Engineering (Approval Nos. sklhse-2021-C-02 and sklhse-2021-C-07).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interest or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Snæbjörnsdóttir, S.Ó.; Oelkers, E.H.; Mesfin, K.; Aradóttir, E.S.; Dideriksen, K.; Gunnarsson, I.; Gunnlaugsson, E.; Matter, J.M.; Stute, M.; Gislason, S.R. The chemistry and saturation states of subsurface fluids during the in situ mineralisation of CO2 and H2S at the CarbFix site in SW-Iceland. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2017, 58, 87–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Seifritz, W. CO2 disposal by means of silicates. Nature 1990, 345, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mcgrail, B.P.; Schaef, H.T.; Ho, A.M.; Chien, Y.J.; Dooley, J.J.; Davidson, C.L. Potential for carbon dioxide sequestration in flood basalts. J. Geophys. Res. 2006, 111, B12201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alfredsson, H.A.; Oelkers, E.H.; Hardarsson, B.S.; Franzson, H.; Gunnlaugsson, E.; Gislason, S.R. The geology and water chemistry of the Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland carbon storage site. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2013, 12, 399–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Matter, J.M.; Kelemen, P.B. Permanent storage of carbon dioxide in geological reservoirs by mineral carbonation. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kelemen, P.B.; Matter, J. In situ carbonation of peridotite for CO2 storage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 17295–17300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Park, A.-H.A.; Fan, L.-S. CO2 mineral sequestration: Physically activated dissolution of serpentine and pH swing process. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2004, 59, 5241–5247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Callow, B.; Falcon-Suarez, I.; Ahmed, S.; Matter, J. Assessing the carbon sequestration potential of basalt using X-ray micro-CT and rock mechanics. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2018, 70, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Hövelmann, J.; Austrheim, H.; Jamtveit, B. Microstructure and porosity evolution during experimental carbonation of a natural peridotite. Chem. Geol. 2012, 334, 254–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ye, Z.N.; Hou, E.K.; Li, H.T.; Duan, Z.H.; Wu, F. Analysis of Gas Content and Permeability Change Pattern of a Coal Reservoir in the Tectonic Positions Based on a THM Coupled Model. Geofluids 2021, 2021, 5562545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Aradóttir, E.S.P.; Sonnenthal, E.L.; Björnsson, G.; Jónsson, H. Multidimensional reactive transport modeling of CO2 mineral sequestration in basalts at the Hellisheidi geothermal field, Iceland. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2012, 9, 24–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Benisch, K.; Bauer, S. Short- and long-term regional pressure build-up during CO2 injection and its applicability for site monitoring. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2013, 19, 220–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Grude, S.; Landrø, M.; Dvorkin, J. Pressure effects caused by CO2 injection in the Tubåen Fm., the Snøhvit field. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2014, 27, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ye, Z.; Liu, X.; Dong, Q.; Wang, E.; Sun, H. Hydro-Damage Properties of Red-Bed Mudstone Failures Induced by Nonlinear Seepage and Diffusion Effect. Water 2022, 14, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sun, H.; Liu, X.; Ye, Z.; Wang, E. Experimental investigation of the nonlinear evolution from pipe flow to fissure flow during carbonate rock failures. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021, 80, 4459–4470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gaus, I. Role and impact of CO2–rock interactions during CO2 storage in sedimentary rocks. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 2010, 4, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, X.; Li, Q.; Bai, B.; Wei, N.; Yuan, W. The geomechanics of Shenhua carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) demonstration project in Ordos Basin, China. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 8, 948–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Major, J.R.; Eichhubl, P.; Dewers, T.A.; Olson, J.E. Effect of CO2–brine–rock interaction on fracture mechanical properties of CO2 reservoirs and seals. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2018, 499, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, Q.; Lin, B.; Zhai, C. The effect of pulse frequency on the fracture extension during hydraulic fracturing. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 21, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Busch, A.; Gensterblum, Y. CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: A review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2011, 87, 49–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abdulrahman, M.M.; Meribout, M. Antenna array design for enhanced oil recovery under oil reservoir constraints with experimental validation. Energy 2014, 66, 868–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, C.F.; Li, Y.; Li, X.M.; Cao, Y.B.; Song, Y.T. The Application of Microbial Enhanced Oil Recovery Technology in Shengli Oilfield. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2015, 33, 556–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hassani, F.; Nekoovaght, P.M.; Gharib, N. The influence of microwave irradiation on rocks for microwave-assisted underground excavation. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2016, 8, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Feng, X.-T.; Zhang, J.; Yang, C.; Tian, J.; Lin, F.; Li, S.; Su, X. A novel true triaxial test system for microwave-induced fracturing of hard rocks. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2021, 13, 961–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zheng, Y.L.; Ma, Z.J.; Yang, S.Q.; Zhao, X.B.; He, L.; Li, J.C. A microwave fracturability index (MFI) of hard igneous rocks. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2021, 138, 104566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lu, G.-M.; Feng, X.-T.; Li, Y.-H.; Hassani, F.; Zhang, X. Experimental Investigation on the Effects of Microwave Treatment on Basalt Heating, Mechanical Strength, and Fragmentation. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2019, 52, 2535–2549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental method for the evaluation of the pore structure and mechanical strength of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization.
Figure 1. Experimental method for the evaluation of the pore structure and mechanical strength of basalt before and after CO2 mineralization.
Sustainability 14 15195 g001
Figure 2. X-ray tomography 3D scanning principle and X-ray CT equipment: (a) three-dimensional schematic of the design principle and (b) sectional schematic of the design principle.
Figure 2. X-ray tomography 3D scanning principle and X-ray CT equipment: (a) three-dimensional schematic of the design principle and (b) sectional schematic of the design principle.
Sustainability 14 15195 g002
Figure 3. Experimental principle and device of basalt CO2 mineralization: (a) experimental principle of basalt CO2 mineralization and (b) rock reaction kettle.
Figure 3. Experimental principle and device of basalt CO2 mineralization: (a) experimental principle of basalt CO2 mineralization and (b) rock reaction kettle.
Sustainability 14 15195 g003
Figure 4. Microwave experimental system and thermal infrared image recording of basalt: (a) microwave equipment (2.45 GHz band and 6 kW power) and (b) thermal infrared image of basalt after microwave irradiation.
Figure 4. Microwave experimental system and thermal infrared image recording of basalt: (a) microwave equipment (2.45 GHz band and 6 kW power) and (b) thermal infrared image of basalt after microwave irradiation.
Sustainability 14 15195 g004
Figure 5. Triaxial mechanical strength test of basalt after CO2 mineralization: (a) specimen setup, (b) pressure chamber setup, and (c) specimen failures.
Figure 5. Triaxial mechanical strength test of basalt after CO2 mineralization: (a) specimen setup, (b) pressure chamber setup, and (c) specimen failures.
Sustainability 14 15195 g005
Figure 6. Calculation of basalt porosity by multi-thresholding segmentation and 3D volume reconstruction: (a) X-ray image segmentation using interactive thresholding I0, (b) X-ray image segmentation using interactive thresholding I1, (c) 3D volume reconstruction and calculation.
Figure 6. Calculation of basalt porosity by multi-thresholding segmentation and 3D volume reconstruction: (a) X-ray image segmentation using interactive thresholding I0, (b) X-ray image segmentation using interactive thresholding I1, (c) 3D volume reconstruction and calculation.
Sustainability 14 15195 g006
Figure 7. Calculation of basaltic rock permeability using X-ray 3D CT images: (a) X-ray image slice, (b) 3D volume extraction, (c) absolute permeability calculation.
Figure 7. Calculation of basaltic rock permeability using X-ray 3D CT images: (a) X-ray image slice, (b) 3D volume extraction, (c) absolute permeability calculation.
Sustainability 14 15195 g007
Figure 8. Surface characteristics of the specimen after mineralization and carbon fixation reaction of basalt: (a) scaling characteristics on the surface of basaltic rock specimens with macro-porous structure and (b) scaling characteristics of basalt surface with a small pore structure.
Figure 8. Surface characteristics of the specimen after mineralization and carbon fixation reaction of basalt: (a) scaling characteristics on the surface of basaltic rock specimens with macro-porous structure and (b) scaling characteristics of basalt surface with a small pore structure.
Sustainability 14 15195 g008
Figure 9. Comparison of pore 3D reconstruction image and connected pore volume.
Figure 9. Comparison of pore 3D reconstruction image and connected pore volume.
Sustainability 14 15195 g009
Figure 10. Changes in weight and porosity of basalt after mineralization: (a) weight and (b) porosity.
Figure 10. Changes in weight and porosity of basalt after mineralization: (a) weight and (b) porosity.
Sustainability 14 15195 g010
Figure 11. Changes in absolute permeability of basaltic rocks before and after mineralization: (a) basalts with macro-porous structure and (b) basalts with a small pore structure.
Figure 11. Changes in absolute permeability of basaltic rocks before and after mineralization: (a) basalts with macro-porous structure and (b) basalts with a small pore structure.
Sustainability 14 15195 g011
Figure 12. Stress-strain curve relationships of basaltic rocks under confining pressure of 21.0 MPa: (a) test results after mineralization reaction of B1 to B3 and (b) test results after mineralization of S1 to S3.
Figure 12. Stress-strain curve relationships of basaltic rocks under confining pressure of 21.0 MPa: (a) test results after mineralization reaction of B1 to B3 and (b) test results after mineralization of S1 to S3.
Sustainability 14 15195 g012
Figure 13. Microwave equipment systems and waveguide design for reservoir rock modification.
Figure 13. Microwave equipment systems and waveguide design for reservoir rock modification.
Sustainability 14 15195 g013
Table 1. Experimental conditions of basalt CO2 mineralization.
Table 1. Experimental conditions of basalt CO2 mineralization.
NumbersReaction TimeNaOH
Solution
Ca(OH)2
Solution
Reaction
Pressure/MPa
Reaction
Temperature
Microwave Time
B124 h200 mlN/A6.030 °CN/A
B248 h200 ml200 ml6.030 °CN/A
B324 h200 ml200 ml6.030 °C2 min
S124 h200 mlN/A6.030 °CN/A
S248 h200 ml200 ml6.030 °CN/A
S324 h200 ml200 ml6.030 °C2 min
Table 2. Increase in porosity of basalt before and after mineralization.
Table 2. Increase in porosity of basalt before and after mineralization.
NumberPorosity of Basaltic RocksPore Volume of Basaltic Rocks
Before the ReactionAfter the ReactionBefore the ReactionBefore the Reaction
Pore
(%)
Effective
Porosity (%)
Pore
(%)
Effective
Porosity (%)
Pore
(mm3)
Connected Pore
(mm3)
Pore
(mm3)
Connected Pore
(mm3)
B114.0310.6313.313.2211669.378845.3711070.512682.29
B213.867.5212.587.2711527.976252.6910463.346043.08
B317.8014.3913.076.8914805.0411965.7010870.895731.21
S15.404.543.952.734491.423772.323285.392270.07
S27.325.943.352.496088.374938.072786.342070.16
S39.126.333.952.877585.515265.713285.392390.34
Table 3. Simulation results of absolute permeability of basalt before and after the reaction.
Table 3. Simulation results of absolute permeability of basalt before and after the reaction.
Absolute permeability (z-axis) simulation knBefore the Reaction
B1B2B3S1S2S3
Sustainability 14 15195 i001Sustainability 14 15195 i002Sustainability 14 15195 i003Sustainability 14 15195 i004Sustainability 14 15195 i005Sustainability 14 15195 i006
kB1 = 3.084 μm2kB2 = 1.380 μm2kB3 = 7.245 μm2kS1 = 0.013 μm2kS2 = 0.019 μm2kS3 = 0.036 μm2
Absolute permeability (z-axis) simulation knAfter the Reaction
B1B2B3S1S2S3
Sustainability 14 15195 i007Sustainability 14 15195 i008Sustainability 14 15195 i009Sustainability 14 15195 i010Sustainability 14 15195 i011Sustainability 14 15195 i012
k’B1 = 0.011 μm2k’B2 = 0.089 μm2k’B3 = 0.036 μm2k’S1 = 0.003 μm2k’S2 = 0.002 μm2k’S3 = 0.018 μm2
Table 4. Difference analysis of absolute permeability of basalt before and after mineralization reaction.
Table 4. Difference analysis of absolute permeability of basalt before and after mineralization reaction.
NameAbsolute Permeability (k/μm2) of Z-axis DirectionError (%)Simulation TimeDifference Δkn/μm2
Before the Reaction kn/μm2After the Reaction k’n/μm2
B13.0840.0110.0032.0 days3.073
B21.3800.0890.0032.0 days1.291
B37.2450.0360.0022.5 days7.209
S10.0130.0030.0024.7 days0.010
S20.0190.0020.0035.2 days0.017
S30.0360.0180.0045.6 days0.018
Table 5. The absolute permeability (k) of basalts in the Fushan site compared with the CarbFix site using the K–C equation and X-ray CT images analysis.
Table 5. The absolute permeability (k) of basalts in the Fushan site compared with the CarbFix site using the K–C equation and X-ray CT images analysis.
K is Calculated Using the K–C Equation (Unit: ×10−12 m2)K is Calculated Using X-ray CT Images (Unit: ×10−12 m2)
Basalts of the CarbFix site in Iceland [8]Basalts of the Fushan site in HainanBasalts of the
CarbFix site in Iceland [8]
Basalts of the Fushan site in Hainan
KMeanMacro-porous basalts before the reactionSmall-porous basalts after the reactionKVKHMacro-porous basalts before the reactionSmall-porous basalts after the reaction
7.7049.8027.60207.0051.003.9030.045
4.920.550.0220.007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, Z.; Liu, X.; Sun, H.; Dong, Q.; Du, W.; Long, Q. Variations in Permeability and Mechanical Properties of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215195

AMA Style

Ye Z, Liu X, Sun H, Dong Q, Du W, Long Q. Variations in Permeability and Mechanical Properties of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215195

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Zhenni, Xiaoli Liu, Huan Sun, Qinxi Dong, Weisheng Du, and Qijian Long. 2022. "Variations in Permeability and Mechanical Properties of Basaltic Rocks Induced by Carbon Mineralization" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15195. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215195

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop