Next Article in Journal
A Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach to Assess Emergency Suppliers
Previous Article in Journal
Narrative Insights Reveal the Motivations of Young Agricultural Entrepreneurs in Laos
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022

by
Dana Adriana Lupșa-Tătaru
and
Radu Lixăndroiu
*
Departament of Management and Economic Informatics, Transilvania University of Brasov, 500036 Brasov, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(20), 13112; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013112
Submission received: 2 September 2022 / Revised: 21 September 2022 / Accepted: 27 September 2022 / Published: 13 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Topic Digital Transformation and E-Government)

Abstract

:
In a world of online social life and social media development, more people are interested in developing video content-based businesses, including YouTube channels, and information sharing with the main purpose of making money. This paper conducts a multidimensional analysis of the first 100 YouTube channels (July, 2022) from each of the 17 domains identified, using SocialBalde.com. The purpose of the paper is to investigate the crucial factors to take into consideration when starting a social media business on YouTube, namely the domain and description of the channel. The objective is to equip future social media entrepreneurs with two elements that should be considered when starting an online business. We perform a two-fold analysis, by exploring correlations between data for each channel and conducting a semantical analysis of the text describing each channel. In spite of the numerous research papers related to YouTube, none of them focus on this topic, i.e., the practical transformation of information into data that can be measured with multidimensional instruments. The results have interesting implications regarding how a successful channel should be developed; we also present sustainable guidelines for social media entrepreneurs to follow during the process of starting a business. Consequently, a successful online business is partly the result of the domain chosen and the channel description.

1. Introduction

The development of social media and communication based on technology using the Internet has given rise to a new generation of entrepreneurs, also known as “social media entrepreneurship”. As technology is used in order to create and exchange extremely easy content generated by users [1], businesses have viewed social media as a means of connection with their audiences and thus use it for marketing, communication, innovation and networking [2,3,4,5,6].
The new generation of entrepreneurs has recently become an area of interest, since the model of their businesses is based on their social media network and the way they convert their social media activity into business opportunities. Social media is an environment in which consumers are empowered to create content; thus, they may become influencers—people with the power to shape other consumers’ attitudes and behaviors [7,8]. Because they possess this influence, they become drivers for marketing other brands, and thus are financially rewarded [8,9].
Most of them are paid to use their social network for targeted advertisements or sponsored content. Some are launching their own brand’s products or services, targeted directly at their audiences, and their personal brands become impactful through content creation.
Businesses select these people based on their popularity and, relatedly, based on their engagement scores and statistics, which are reflected in their audience’s reactions—likes, love, comments, shares and retweets [7,10]. The more engaged a person is, the more popular [11,12] they are and the more likely they are to have active followers [10,13]; thus, influencers can connect the promoted brand with consumers [9,14] and influence consumers’ opinions and intentions to buy.
A very special feature and also the foundation of social media entrepreneurship according to [1], p. 70 is the use of the emotional connections between these entrepreneurs and their followers in order to capitalize on these connections [15,16].
YouTube is a dominant and very large social media platform; it is different to Facebook and Twitter in terms of interest from researchers over the years. Interest has increased recently and now includes themes such as political content [17] or deception [18], the implications of the algorithm in terms of politics and culture [19,20], and the controversies regarding social media’s roles in radicalization, misconduct and abuse. Additionally, qualitative research has been conducted that examines the daily use of YouTube by professionals and nonprofessionals [21,22,23,24] as well as the importance of daily use for entertainment, politics and the economy [25,26,27,28,29].
At present, the theoretical and empirical literature on the economics of social media entrepreneurs has addressed this phenomenon to a limited extent. This paper, therefore, aims to extend our understanding of the phenomenon of social media entrepreneurs. Our research questions refer to the description accuracy of YouTube channels and to their profitability in terms of social media entrepreneurship. In order to investigate the themes of the research, the paper provides a mathematical analysis of the first 1700 channels according to SocialBlade (June 2022) from 17 different video categories.
Even if YouTube success has been examined in the specialized literature [30], not enough is known about how a channel can gain value and which special category social media entrepreneurs should choose to grow their channel in order to be successful—in terms of views, subscribers and uploads. Some studies have identified variables that have to be addressed when creating scientific video content [30], while other studies have explored the characteristics of scientific channels’ video content as means to improve engagement [31] and the type of content [32]. Some have explored the factors influencing the relations between celebrities—very famous personal brands—and users’ intention to purchase on social network services [33,34], while others have concluded that entertainment and informativeness represent the key factors of sponsored content value that affect attitudes towards social/personal brands on YouTube [35].
Our theoretical contributions consist of covering the gap in knowledge between how to choose a domain for a YouTube channel and how to write a description when starting a business. It should be noted that there has been no previous research on this topic using the methodology described and the instruments used in this research. The input we used was transformed into data that were statistically analyzed through a semantical analysis, and the data regarding subscribers, views and uploads were measured via the TOPSIS method.

2. Theoretical Background

2.1. Social Media Entrepreneurship

The modern economic and entrepreneurial theory of social media entrepreneurs is based on the development of social media platforms and the theoretical work of [36,37,38], which outlines the link between the emergence of these platforms and this division of digital media entrepreneurship. As a definition, digital media entrepreneurship emphasizes creating and selling new digital platforms and other digital products, or creating value through the use of existing digital platforms [39,40]. This paper focuses on existing social media platforms, namely YouTube. The growing importance of social media platforms for the development of social media entrepreneurship has been a very interesting topic for researchers lately [41,42,43]. As social media entrepreneurs move toward commercialization, the success and influence of social media entrepreneurs are related to the number of followers and the number of reactions (likes, love, shares, tweets, retweets and comments) [44].
Besides Facebook and Twitter, YouTube is a video-sharing social media platform that became a dominant platform in terms of hosting millions of channels, billions of videos and more than two billion active users every month. The empirical research conducted by now shows that there is some interest in the social network structure [45] and in the content analysis of the most popular videos [27]. As a platform, YouTube has evolved from video-sharing to the monetization of channels, thus generating, in 2019, USD 15 billion from advertising, representing almost 10% of Google’s overall revenue. This transformation through profitability leads to design, content and audience changes and thus to strict rules regarding advertising and the ‘professionalization’ of YouTube’s content creators. Thus, nowadays, the concept of social media entertainment [46] is used when presenting popular types of content on YouTube. Even though the YouTube video content is, to some extent, professional, it is still produced by amateurs, by star YouTubers starts, television networks or music producers, to reach large audiences, especially younger viewers.

2.2. Factors Influencing Social Media Entrepreneurship

The connection between the development of social media entrepreneurship and the followers of social media entrepreneurs was previously centered on the importance of authenticity [21,47], which is a factor that indicates whether a person is indeed what he or she claims to be [48,49]. Authenticity may be described as “being true to himself/herself”, “being real”, “actioning based on feelings” [48]. The author presented the way in which social actors, including social entrepreneurs, create a representative public image for their private identity with a believable and approved role by the followers. [49,50]. This means that authenticity is connected to follower’s perceptions of being real and sincere.
In order to be perceived as authentic, the social entrepreneurs’ strategy is to present “intimate details of their thoughts, dreams, food consumption, and they present personas that appear to be less controlled than those of highly regulated, highly consumer brand-oriented film and television celebrities” [51], p.346. As studies have shown, if the followers are consuming these aspects in a repetitive way, they feel as if they are closely connected to social media entrepreneurs [51].
Social media entrepreneurship is challenging, since the commercial goals influence authenticity [51]. Thus, if the social entrepreneur is perceived as inauthentic, their connection with followers is affected and also the business, according to self-determination theory [52,53]. In order to overcome this challenge, social media entrepreneurs have to obtain the followers’ acceptance and legitimization of commercial objectives and monetization [15].
YouTube is an important platform used by brands to promote their products and services through the influence of people’s large number of followers and the opinion’s influence of acquisition process [54,55]. YouTube is popular because the content created by these people seems to be more realistic than traditional advertising [56] and because the engagement is encouraged through commenting and social interactions [57]; therefore, this research is limited to YouTube channels only.
Since 2005, the year it was launched, YouTube has evolved from a place where amateurs post ad-free videos to a platform populated by commercial and professional videos. It is a place where an individual can develop a business from a personal brand through video content generation and monetize their influence with paid ads or their own branded products or services [58], p. 114, [59], p. 56. This opportunity of monetizing content is also a trend, and it enabled personal brand channels to grow into the source of content creators’ income [60], p. 378.
Given the critical factor of a mass audiences’ views, and the importance and attention given to these videos [61,62,63], YouTube is a state-of-the-art instrument and provides the opportunity for any creator to develop a personal brand and become a monetized social media entrepreneur [64,65].

3. Methodology

Because of the literature gap regarding the important factors needed to become a successful start-up social media entrepreneur, we formulated two hypotheses regarding the following two interconnected factors: the domain of the channel, and the description of the channel. The hypotheses of the research are as follows:
H1. 
The more accurately described a YouTube channel is, the more successful it is.
H2. 
The most successful channels are the ones from the following categories: entertaining, travel and personal vlogs. Success is defined, in this case, as the number of views, subscribers and uploads.
The first stage of the analysis consists of choosing 1700 YouTube channels. We selected 100 out of each of the 17 different categories based on their SB (Social Blade) ranking. The ranking was calculated by SB based on the number of videos uploaded, the number of subscribers and the number of views. The categories were as follows: auto and vehicles, comedy, education, entertainment, film, gaming, how to and style, made for kids, music, news and politics, nonprofit and activism, people and blogs, pets and animals, science and technology, shows, sports and travel.
The reason for using Social Blade as an instrument for this research is that SB is a new and modern instrument mostly used by YouTube start-up social media entrepreneurs; the American platform was founded in 2008 and it is widely recognized for its usefulness in statistical studies. It also offers information about subscribers and includes information such as estimated earnings and future projections, providing both numerical data and easy-to-read graphs. SB was used to analyze data from 1700 YouTube channels. SB, certificate YT, compiles data from YouTube, Twitter, Twitch, Daily Motion, Mixer, and Instagram and uses the data for statistical graphs and charts that track progress and growth. Social Blade offers statistics and is currently tracking 23+ million YouTube channels, 6+ million Twitter Profiles, 5+ million Twitch channels, 206+ thousand Daily Motion users, and 416+ thousand Mixer Streamers.
The second stage of the analysis was conducted with the following two steps: (a) multidimensional data analysis using Tableau Public for all of the 1700 channels and (b) channel description text semantic analysis, using Meaning Cloud, for 170 selected channels.
The third stage of the analysis was to use the TOPSIS method to calculate the distance from each channel’s data to an ideal positive and an ideal negative channel’s data. Using the TOPSIS method to compare the channels with an ideal represents an adequate instrument to study their hierarchy. It is a method of compensatory aggregation that compares a set of alternatives by identifying the weights for each criterion, normalizing scores for each criterion and calculating the geometric distance between each alternative and the ideal alternative, which is the best score in each criterion. The instruments—multidimensional data analysis and semantical analysis—are modern and extremely efficient for analyzing large data volumes.
The purpose was to identify the combination of factors that directly determine the success of a channel, defined, in this case, as number of views, subscribers and uploads, all leading to profit.

3.1. The Multidimensional Data Analysis

For the multidimensional data analysis, the data retrieved from SB were converted into an OLAP data cube, and then Tableau Public was used. For each of the 1700 channels, we considered the number of videos uploaded, the number of subscribers and the number of views. These numerical dimensions were used to conduct a statistical analysis; more precisely, we determined the relative correlations between the above mentioned dimensions.
Multidimensional data analysis refers to analyzing and categorizing data, based on multiple factors related to various entities, called dimensions. This method of analysis is an instrument used for different processes of mathematical modelling, with large and complex data. In this particular case, it provides insights across the gamut of YouTube channels.

3.2. The Text Semantic Analysis

From the total of 1700 channels, 170 were selected using a pace of 10 units and considering only the English described channels. We elapsed a unit if another language description was met because the semantical analysis tool, called Meaning Cloud (MC), only allows for the analysis of a few language descriptions, including English, French, Italian and Spanish.
A YouTube channel description is similar to the About Page of a website and explains to potential viewers what the content is about, including the issues tackled and the communities served.
YouTube descriptions should be a primary interest in YouTube marketing strategies, because video descriptions are important both to SEO keywords search results and to encourage viewers to spend more time on the video.
Meaning Cloud (MC) is an instrument that uses deep categorization analysis which integrates the functionality provided by the Deep Categorization API. It assigns one or more categories to a text using a detailed rule-based language that allows for very specific scenarios and patterns identification, with a combination of morphological, semantic and text rules.
Deep Categorization includes the Code (shows the code associated to the category), Label (shows the label of the category; the label is non-configurable, so it always appears in the results), Rank (shows the rank or order in which a category has been associated to a text), Relevance (shows the absolute relevance associated with the category), Relative Relevance (shows the relative relevance associated with the category) and Polarity (shows the polarity of the category detected).
The data obtained using Meaning Cloud, and consequently Deep Categorization, were analyzed for each channel by using the TOPSIS method, in order to calculate the distance of each channel’s data from a positive and a negative ideal channel’s data.
The TOPSIS method—the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution—is based on the research of [52] which considers that the ideal positive and negative solution are determined from the values of different criteria options. The options are ranked based on the distances between those two solutions—ideal positive and ideal negative ones. In order to conduct a comparative analysis, a relative distance between each solution and the positive ideal solution is calculated. Geometrically, each option is a n-dimensional space point, where n is the number of criteria. In this space, two other points are defined (positive ideal solution and negative ideal solution), related to which the relative distances of the options are determined.
The algorithm of the method consists of the following steps. The normalized matrix is obtained, using vector normalization, according to R = r i j ,   i = 1 , 2 , , m ,   j = 1 , 2 , , n . The normalized weighted matrix is obtained according to V = v i j ,   i = 1 , 2 , , m ,   j = 1 , 2 , , n , where v i j = p j r i j and P = p 1 , p 2 , , p n are the vectors of the importance coefficients (objective, subjective or aggregated). Next, the ideal positive solution (Vid) and the ideal negative solution (Vne) are determined, where V i d = V 1 i d , V 2 i d , , V n i d , V n e = V 1 n e , V 2 n e , , V n n e and V j i d = m a x 1 i m V i j , and V j n e = m i n 1 i m V i j . The distance between the options and the ideal negative solution can be determined as follows: d i i d = j = 1 n V i j V j i d 2 and d i n e = j = 1 n V i j V j n e 2 , i = 1 , 2 , , m . Then, the relative proximity to the ideal solution is calculated, according to e i i d = 1 d i i d d i i d + d i n e = d i n e d i i d + d i n e ,   i = 1 , 2 , , m , resulting in 0 s e i i d 1 .
Eventually, the V set of options is determined according to the descending values calculated in the previous step.
For the TOPSIS analysis, the label, rank, relevance, relative relevance and polarity items from MC were used, along with the Channel Type from SB. Thus, the results showed the extent to which the identified category corresponds to the category itself from SB, using MC for the description of each channel.

4. Results

The Results of The Multidimensional Data Analysis

Using a Tableau Public and comparative analysis of the SB ranking for different categories of YouTube channels, we obtained the initial results. The results show that there is a great difference between educational channels, mostly ranked A or A+ and nonprofit or activism channels, ranked B+ (Figure 1).
The following image (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) represents the analysis of all 17 YouTube channel categories from the point of view of ranking.
By analyzing the number of videos uploaded to each channel, we obtained further results. Thus, the first place is occupied by the news category, which is in agreement with the results shown in Figure 4, even though, from the point of view of the number of views, the first place is not occupied by the same category. The explanation is that most people want to be informed and when they think that they are informed, they do not play the video again, in contrast to the repeated views of music, entertainment, movies, and educational videos.
By calculating correlations between existing data, other results were obtained. Thus, there is an obvious, strong correlation between the number of subscribers and the number of views.
There is also a weak correlation between the number of videos uploaded and the number of views, which leads to the conclusion that subscribers are loyal to channels when watching their videos; however, when the content is no longer interesting to them, they unsubscribe.
There are also channels with more uploaded videos but less subscribers and less views; this signifies subscribers’ lack of interest.
There is a strong correlation (Table 1) between the number of subscribers and the views (0.920) and almost no correlation between the number of uploads and the number of views (0.095). Data are real, relevant and very up to date; thus, the results may be used by start-up social media entrepreneurs when making decisions for new sustainable managerial behaviors.
Two solutions (Table 2) were generated as a result of using a TOPSIS analysis—the positive ideal and the negative ideal; we calculated the distances between these two solutions and each of the 170 analyzed channels.
Where Channel Type vs. Label is measured as 1 or 0 after comparing the results obtained for Label to the ones of Channel Type from SB, where 1 means perfect identification and 0 means wrong identification.
In order to obtain the polarity level, the text codification was transformed into numbers from 1 to 5, where 1 is a very negative text and 5 is a very positive text (Table 3).
Based on the results, the conclusion is that the usage of key words to describe each YouTube channels category is essential. As observed in Table 1, the first two positions are occupied by the channels that have ideal values, meaning that the description is representative for the channel; thus, they are allocated to the positive category, as they send a very positive message and have 100% relevance.
In contrast, the results show YouTube channels that have no description have a maximum distance from the positive ideal.

5. Conclusions

According to the YouTube Partner program, once a channel has 1000 subscribers and more than 4000 valid public watch hours in the most recent 12 month period, it becomes eligible for greater access to YouTube resources and monetization features. Therefore, it becomes successful, according to the definition of the above research.
In order to achieve 1000 subscribers and more than 4000 valid public watch hours, the channel has to have certain features, such as the following: attractive thumbnails—the way the results of searches appear for people who decide to view a video—and a perfect pictogram for the channel—the pictogram provides a logo for branding. Another important element is a list of videos. This is the best way to keep people engaged when watching videos on a channel and a good way to minimize the chances that they leave to watch another channel’s videos. In order to engage people when they watch a YouTube channel for the first time and to make them curious about the content, it is recommended to create a trailer—which is similar to hotshots for movies. Creating constantly interesting content, with an attractive presentation, excellent branding, appropriate music and clear sound, is another way obtain more subscribers. Scheduling the videos in order to attract more views is another great way to create a successful YouTube channel, along with defining the target market by both asking what kind of content the audience wants to view and using YouTube analytics. In order to organically obtain more views, creators have to grow their list of subscribers; a simple way to do this is to ask the viewers to subscribe.
In order to establish a profitable business, a social media entrepreneur needs an entertainment, travel or personal YouTube channel on which videos are constantly uploaded; their content should be perceived as engrossing by their subscribers. A profitable social media entrepreneur, in this case, is defined as somebody who is paid to advertise products or services or launches their own products or services. To obtain a large number of subscribers and views, interesting videos should be uploaded consistently and also with a proper description of the channel so that content can easily be found in the right category.
This research bridges the existing gap in the literature by studying the importance of choosing the domain for a YouTube channel and writing a description when starting a social media business. Previous research did not touch on this topic using the methodology described and the instruments employed in this research. Even so, the paper is only a starting point, as the analysis will be continued for other social media channels as well.
The hypotheses are confirmed by the research. Thus, the more accurately described a YouTube channel is, the more looked up it is; furthermore, the most successful channels, in terms of number of views, subscribers and upload are the ones in the following categories: entertainment, travelling and personal vlogs. The research represents a starting point for any social media entrepreneur wanting to start a YouTube channel as a business. Practical implications consist of the insight that social media entrepreneurs have to pay attention to the accuracy of the channel description and should choose the proper domain to start an efficient and sustainable business. Future research will be conducted, since all social media channels provide innovative business opportunities.
Theoretical implications concern the development of social media entrepreneurship theory; one may conclude that starting a business on social media channels, such as YouTube, assisted by entrepreneurship strategies already known and enshrined (Drucker, 1999) is a new entrepreneurship strategy. As for methodological implications, social media entrepreneurs should pay attention to the description of the channel from an online-business start-up point of view.

6. Discussion

As for the limits of the study, the first would be that as educational channels and nonprofit or activism channels are managed by professionals, the videos are more structured and the concepts are very clearly explained. The factors related to the great difference of ranking can only be anticipated. The analysis of these factors, thus, will be the focus for further research papers, as distinct research will be conducted in the future.
In future studies, the results obtained within this paper will be enriched with the use of Kendall’s coefficient of concordance.
The study was conducted by only using YouTube as a source for data; if we had used different sources, the results would have been different. Additionally, the research above is centered on English YouTube channel descriptions, and if we had used other descriptions, on other languages, the ensemble images would have been more notable.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.A.L.-T. and R.L.; methodology, R.L.; formal analysis, R.L.; investigation, R.L.; resources, D.A.L.-T.; data curation, D.A.L.-T.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.L.-T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was financed by Transylvania University of Brasov, Romania.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liang, T.; Turban, E. Introduction to the Special Issue Social Commerce: A Research Framework for Social Commerce. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2011, 16, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Korzynski, P.; Mazurek, G.; Haenlein, M. Leveraging employees as spokespeople in your HR strategy: How company-related employee posts on social media can help firms to attract new talent. Eur. Manag. J. 2020, 38, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Michaelidou, N.; Siamagka, N.T.; Christodoulides, G. Usage, barriers and measurement of social media marketing: An exploratory investigation of small and medium B2B brands. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2011, 40, 1153–1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Aprilia, L.; Wibowo, S.S. The Impact of social capital on crowdfunding performance. South East Asian J. Manag. 2017, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kaminski, J.; Hopp, C.; Lukas, C. Who benefits from the wisdom of the crowd in crowdfunding? Assessing the benefits of user-generated and mass personal electronic word of mouth in computer-mediated financing. J. Bus. Econ. 2018, 88, 1133–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Paniagua, J.; Korzynski, P.; Mas-Tur, A. Crossing borders with social media: Online social networks and FDI. Eur. Manag. J. 2017, 35, 314–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wiedmann, K.P.; Von Mettenheim, W. Attractiveness, trustworthiness and expertise–social influencers ‘winning formula? J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2020, 30, 707–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hearn, A.; Schoenhoff, S. From celebrity to influencer in A Companion to Celebrity. In A companion to celebrity; Marshall, P.D., Redmond, S., Wiley: London, UK, 2016; pp. 194–212. [Google Scholar]
  9. Childers, C.C.; Lemon, L.L.; Hoy, M.G. #sponsored #ad: Agency perspective on influencer marketing campaigns. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2019, 40, 258–274. [Google Scholar]
  10. Arora, A.; Bansal, S.; Kandpal, C.; Aswani, R.; Dwivedi, Y. Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 49, 86–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Van Der Heide, B.; Lim, Y.S. On the conditional cueing of credibility heuristics: The case of online influence. Commun. Res. 2016, 43, 672–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Valsesia, F.; Proserpio, D.; Nunes, J.C. The Positive Effect of Not Following Others on Social Media. J. Mark. Res. 2020, 57, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Freberg, K.; Graham, K.; McGaughey, K.; Freberg, L.A. Who are the social media influencers? A study of public perceptions of personality. Public Relat. Rev. 2011, 37, 90–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. De Vries, L.; Gensler, S.; Leeflang, P.S.H. Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J. Interact. Mark. 2012, 26, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Mardon, R.; Molesworth, M.; Grigore, G. YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labor of tribal entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 92, 443–454. [Google Scholar]
  16. Schwemmer, C.; Ziewiecki, S. Social media Sellout: The increasing role of product promotion on YouTube. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 4, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ribeiro, M.H.; Ottoni, R.; West, R.; Almeida, V.A.F.; Meira, W. Auditing radicalization pathways on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT* ’20), Barcelona, Spain, 27–30 January 2020; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Bounegru, L.; De Pryck, K.; Venturini, T.; Mauri, M. “We only have 12 years”: YouTube and the IPCC report on global warming of 1.5 °C. First Monday 2020, 25, 10112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Airoldi, M.; Beraldo, D.; Gandini, A. Follow the algorithm: An exploratory investigation of music on YouTube. Poetics 2016, 57, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Rieder, B.; Matamoros-Fernández, A.; Coromina, Ó. From ranking algorithms to “ranking cultures”: Investigating the modulation of visibility in YouTube search results. Converg. Int. J. Res. Into New Media. Technol. 2017, 24, 50–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abidin, C. Internet celebrity: Understanding fame online; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2018; pp. 71–98. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bishop, S. Managing visibility on YouTube through algorithmic gossip. New Media Soc. 2019, 21, 2589–2606. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lange, P.G. Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 2007, 13, 361–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Sayago, S.; Forbes, P.; Blat, J. Older people’s social sharing practices in YouTube through an ethnographical lens. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual BCS Interaction Specialist Group Conference on People and Computers (BCS-HCI ’12), Birmingham, UK, 10–14 September 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kessler, F.; Schäfer, M.T. Navigating YouTube: Constituting a hybrid information management system. In The YouTube Reader; Snickars, P., Vonderau, P., Eds.; Columbia University press: Ney York, USA, 2009; pp. 275–291. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gillespie, T. The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media Soc. 2010, 12, 347–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Burgess, J.; Green, J. YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture, 2nd ed.; Wiley: London, UK, 2018; pp. 36–53. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lange, P.G. Thanks for Watching: An Anthropological Study of Video Sharing on YouTube; University Press of Colorado: Louisville, CO, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Arthurs, J.; Drakopoulou, S.; Gandini, A. Researching YouTube. Convergence 2018, 24, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Beautemps, J.; Bresges, A. What comprises a successful educational science YouTube video? A five thousand user survey on viewing behaviours and self-Perceived Importance of Various Variables Controlled by Content Creators. In New Directions in Science and Environmental Communication: Understanding the Role of Online Video-Sharing and Online Video-Sharing Platforms for Science and Research Communication; Allgaier, J., Landrum, A.R., Eds.; Frontiers media SA: Lusanne, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 5, pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  31. Brennan, E.B.A. Why should scientist be on YouTube? It’s all about bamboo, oil and ice cream. In New Directions in Science and Environmental Communication: Understanding the Role of Online Video-Sharing and Online Video-Sharing Platforms for Science and Research Communication; Allgaier, J., Landrum, A.R., Eds.; Frontiers media SA: Lusanne, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 6, pp. 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lewis, R. This is what the news Won’t show you”: YouTube creators and the reactionary politics of micro-celebrity. Telev. New Media 2020, 21, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, H.; Ko, E.; Kim, J. SNS users’ para-social relationships with celebrities: Social media effects on purchase intentions. J. Global Scholars of Marketing Sci. 2015, 25, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jaakonmäki, R.M.O.; vom Brocke, J. The Impact of Content, Context, and Creator on User Engagement in Social Media Marketing. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hilton Waikoloa Village, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2017; 50, pp. 1152–1160. [Google Scholar]
  35. Acikgoz, F.; Burnaz, S. The influence of ‘influencer marketing’ on YouTube influencers. Int. J. Internet Mark. Advert. 2021, 15, 201–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bali, A.O.; Jabar, S.; Jalal, H.; Sofi-Karim, M. Iraqi media entrepreneurs across social media: Factors and challenges. J. Digit. Media Policy 2020, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ebrahimi, P.; Kot, S.; Fekete-Farkas, M. Platform entrepreneurship: An interpretative structural modeling. Nord. J Media Manag. 2020, 1, 385–400. [Google Scholar]
  38. Dal Zotto, C.; Omidi, A. Platformization of Media Entrepreneurship: A Conceptual Development. Nord. J. Media Manag. 2020, 1, 209–233. [Google Scholar]
  39. Khajeheian, D. Enterprise as the central focus in media management research. Nord. J Media Manag. 2020, 1, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sussan, F.; Acs, Z.J. The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Bus. Econ. 2017, 49, 55–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alexy, O.T.; Block, J.H.; Sandner, P.; Ter Wal, A.L.J. Social capital of venture capitalists and start-up funding. Small Bus. Econ. 2012, 39, 835–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Liang, Y.E.; Yuan, S.-T.D. Predicting investor funding behavior using crunchbase social network features. Internet Res. 2016, 26, 74–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, S.; Berger, R. Relation between start-ups’ online social media presence and fundraising. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2017, 8, 161–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Khamis, S.; Ang, L.; Welling, R. Self-branding, ‘micro-celebrity’ and the rise of social media influencers. Celebr. Stud. 2017, 8, 191–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Paolillo, J.C. Structure and network in the YouTube core. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS ’08), Waikoloa, HI, USA, 7–10 January 2008. [Google Scholar]
  46. Cunningham, S.; Craig, D. Being ‘really real’ on YouTube: Authenticity, community and brand culture in social media entertainment. Media Int. Aust. 2017, 164, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Raun, T. Capitalizing intimacy: New subcultural forms of micro-celebrity strategies and affective labor on YouTube. Convergence 2018, 24, 99–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Goffman, E. Presentation of Self in Every Day life; Penguin books Ltd: London, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  49. Turner, R.H. The real self: From institution to impulse. Am. J. Sociol. 1976, 81, 989–1016. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vannini, P.; Franzese, A. The authenticity of self: Conceptualization, personal experience, and practice. Sociol. Compass 2008, 2, 1621–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Marwick, A.E. Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age; Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  52. Audrezet, A.; De Kerviler, G.; Guidry Moulard, J. Authenticity under threat: When social media influencers need to go beyond self-presentation. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 117, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Holland, M. How YouTube Developed into a Successful Platform for User-Generated Content. Elon J. Undergrad. Res. Commun. 2016, 7, 53–64. [Google Scholar]
  55. O’Connor, F. ‘Millenials & Youtube’: An investigation into the influence of user-generated video content on the consumer decision making process. Masters Thesis, National College of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland, August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rasmussen, L. Parasocial Interaction in the Digital Age: An Examination of Relationship Building and the Effectiveness of YouTube Celebrities. J. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 7, 280–294. [Google Scholar]
  57. Shao, G. Understanding the appeal of user-generated media: A uses and gratification perspective. Internet Res. 2009, 19, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Morreale, J. From homemade to store bought: Annoying Orange and the professionalization of YouTube. J. Consum. Cult. 2014, 14, 113–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hwang, C.-L.; Yoon, K. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: A State of the Art Survey; Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems 186; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1981; p. 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kim, J. The institutionalization of YouTube: From user-generated content to professionally generated content. Media Cult. Soc. 2012, 34, 53–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Rosenthal, S. Motivations to seek science videos on YouTube: Free-choice learning in a connected society. Int. J. Sci. Educ. Part B 2017, 8, 22–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Khan, M.L. Social media engagement: What motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 66, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Nee, R.C. Youthquakes in a post-truth era: Exploring Social media news use and information verification actions among global teens and young adults. J. Mass Commun. Educ. 2019, 74, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kozinets, R.V.; Cerone, S. Between the suit and the selfie: Executives’ lessons on the social “micro-celebrity”. GfK Mark. Intell. Rev. 2014, 6, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Drucker, P.F. Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Practice and Principles, New ed.; HarperCollins: New York, NY, USA; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of ranking different YouTube categories of channels.
Figure 1. Comparative analysis of ranking different YouTube categories of channels.
Sustainability 14 13112 g001
Figure 2. The distribution of the ranking for all the 17 categories of YouTube channels.
Figure 2. The distribution of the ranking for all the 17 categories of YouTube channels.
Sustainability 14 13112 g002
Figure 3. The number of videos uploaded on each channel.
Figure 3. The number of videos uploaded on each channel.
Sustainability 14 13112 g003
Figure 4. The number of videos uploaded vs the number of views.
Figure 4. The number of videos uploaded vs the number of views.
Sustainability 14 13112 g004
Table 1. The results of the semantic analysis of the text.
Table 1. The results of the semantic analysis of the text.
CorrelationValue
Corr Rank—Subs.−0.191
Corr Rank—Uploads−0.074
Corr Rank—Views−0.200
Corr Subs—Views0.920
Corr Uploads—Views0.095
Table 2. The TOPSIS analysis.
Table 2. The TOPSIS analysis.
UsernameRelevanceRelative RelevancePolarityPolarityType vs. Code
IDEAL+1100551
IDEAL−100 10
Table 3. Top 10 YouTube channels in terms of the distance between the ideal solution based on the description.
Table 3. Top 10 YouTube channels in terms of the distance between the ideal solution based on the description.
GradeUsernameLabelRankRelevanceRelative RelevancePolarityPolarity LevelType vs. Code d i i d d i n e e i i d
AGoldmines BollywoodEvents and Attractions > Cinemas and Events11100P+510100.4891
B+Monkey MagicMovies > Action and Adventure Movies11100P+510100.4891
AElsa ArcaNews and Politics > Crime11100P+501100.4840.99015
B+Jesus ImageNews and Politics > Politics11100P+501100.4840.99015
ANews24Business and Finance11100P+501100.4840.99015
ASOMOY TVHobbies and Interests > Collecting11100P+501100.4840.99015
A+Zee KidsTravel > Travel Type11100P+501100.4840.99015
B+AutoTopNLAutomotive > Auto Body Styles11100P411100.4540.99014
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lupșa-Tătaru, D.A.; Lixăndroiu, R. YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022. Sustainability 2022, 14, 13112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013112

AMA Style

Lupșa-Tătaru DA, Lixăndroiu R. YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022. Sustainability. 2022; 14(20):13112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lupșa-Tătaru, Dana Adriana, and Radu Lixăndroiu. 2022. "YouTube Channels, Subscribers, Uploads and Views: A Multidimensional Analysis of the First 1700 Channels from July 2022" Sustainability 14, no. 20: 13112. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013112

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop