1. Introduction
Environmental pollution is getting worse and worse in almost every country globally [
1]. Climate change, environmental pollution, resource scarcity, biodiversity loss, and population growth are urgent factors that threaten the earth’s life. When facing the increasing risk of climate change, the sustainable development model becomes more and more critical. Many countries worldwide have transitioned to a sustainable development model to balance economic growth, environmental protection, and social welfare. The circular economy (CE) is considered one of the best solutions to support sustainable development [
2]. The CE is utilized because the earth is a closed economic system, and all business activities of production and consumption must be based on a secure dual system. In a CE, the economy and the environment are linked together in a closed circle. However, the concept of CE is still controversial. The most widely accepted definition is the flow of resources, and the efficient use of raw materials and energy are core features of this concept. The CE model brings many benefits compared with the traditional linear economic model [
3]. For developing countries, the transition to a CE represents the nation’s responsibility to address the challenges posed by environmental pollution and climate change while enhancing its capacity and competitiveness of the economy. The CE uses used materials instead of generating waste disposal costs; minimizes the exploitation of natural resources, making the most of the value of resources; and reduces waste and emissions into the environment [
4]. For society, the CE helps reduce social costs in managing and protecting the environment and responding to climate change, creating new markets, new job opportunities, and improving people’s health [
3]. For businesses, the CE reduces the risks of overproduction and resource scarcity crises, creates motivation to invest, innovates technology, reduces production costs, and increases the supply chain.
After 35 years of renovation, Vietnam has become a bright growth spot in the region and the world with many remarkable achievements [
5]. Vietnam’s economy has grown in size, but the quality of growth has also improved and, with this, the material and spiritual life has also improved. However, Vietnam faces many challenges in resource depletion, pollution, environmental degradation, and climate change. Currently, Vietnam ranks 4th in the world in plastic waste, with 1.83 million tons/year. The volume of daily-life solid waste generated is more than 61,000 tons/day, of which up to 71% of the total waste volume (equivalent to 43 thousand tons/day) is treated by the burial method [
6]. Many resources are currently severely depleted, particularly coal. Since 2015, Vietnam has had to import coal. It is forecasted that by 2030, it will be necessary to import up to 100 million tons of coal per year [
7]. According to the World Bank (WB) calculations, environmental pollution could cost Vietnam up to 3.5% of GDP by 2035. In particular, Vietnam is among the countries which are most vulnerable to climate change [
8]. It is forecasted that climate change and natural disasters could cause damage to up to 11% of Vietnam’s GDP by 2030 [
9]. Therefore, to implement sustainable development goals and international commitments, the approach to the model transformation from a “linear economy” to a “circular economy” should be considered a priority in the new development stage of Vietnam. In facing the opportunities brought by the CE, Vietnam has made many positive actions to facilitate the development of the CE model. Over the years, the Vietnamese government has issued many policies to transform the growth model towards sustainability, strengthen the management of natural resources, protect the environment in response to climate change, and increase recycling and reuse of waste [
10].
However, the understanding and the willingness of Vietnamese people to participate in the CE is the issue that needs the most attention. Vietnam’s transition to a CE cannot succeed without people’s willingness to participate. Therefore, this study investigates people’s willingness to participate in the CE based on behavioral theory. This study has empirical significance because it uses the theory of planned behavior to quantify the factors that influence the degree of participation in the CE [
11]. In addition, this study also contributes theoretically because it provides implications for the government in finding ways to approach people’s behavior and attitudes in participating in the CE. Previous studies have focused on the CE, not on the point of view of participants in the CE in Vietnam. Moreover, this study will also provide policy suggestions towards clean and sustainable production in Vietnam. The industrial output of the CE model can help improve productivity and ecological efficiency, enhance environmental management, and facilitate movement towards sustainable development [
12]. The transition to a CE requires the participation of almost all segments of society, from consumers to businesses and other stakeholders [
2]. Investigating the factors affecting the willingness to participate in the CE will be the motivating factors for the state and the enterprises in making the transition to the CE soon.
2. Literature Review
Geng and Doberstein [
13] described the CE as a closed circular flow of matter throughout the economic system. This economic development model is approached based on sustainable economic development, protection of the natural environment, and improvement of social welfare. Geng, Zhu, Doberstein, & Fujita [
14] argued that CE is a concept related to the 3R principle in the production and use of products. The 3Rs are “reduce,” “reuse,” and “recycle.” Reduction is the reduction of resource consumption and waste production; reuse and recycling involve processing wastes generated from the manufacturing process and converting them into raw materials for other products or finished products. The CE aims to improve the process of production and consumption by offering more advanced packaging technologies, more straightforward packaging, more efficient home appliances, and a simpler lifestyle toward environmental protection goals.
According to Saavedra et al. [
12], the CE model reduces waste, and the raw materials must be returned to the production process. Accordingly, CE policy researchers must focus on waste treatment, including process-based approaches to waste removal. Research by Hauschild et al. [
15] also shows that opportunities to reduce waste in the production process and the product life cycle require manufacturers to reallocate resources, retrain workers, and reconfigure the machine system.
Dijk et al. [
16] proposed a mixed policy to stimulate resource efficiency, emphasizing primary and complementary policy instruments such as raw material taxes, expanded producer liability, and other requirements of technical demand. Wilts and O’Brien [
17] proposed a similar policy mix-based analytical approach to understanding better resources in the EU, such as the design of tools, policy synergies, and policy consistency. Hughes and Ekins [
18] have also argued that mixed policies for efficient use of resources should be holistic and mutually reinforcing across policy domains and focus on win-win scenarios. Watkins et al. [
19] provided qualitative environmental assessments of land use and other policies. However, this study also argued that cultural and behavioral change conditions are essential targets in monitoring and regulation.
The integrated policy-based analytical approach argues that no single policy can foster the complementarity between the sectors and sectors needed for the transition to a CE. Domenech and Bahn-Walkowiak [
20] provide an overview of EU policies on the effective use of human resources for economic incentives and procedures in the context of CE adoption. The study finds that policy-binding goals must still focus primarily on the output side of resource flows (i.e., waste) while the input side is completely ignored or addressed through goals. Targets are ambitious, optional, and scattered throughout policy documents. The authors suggest that complex targeting will also affect the acceleration of the transition to a CE. Other studies on the CE transition through resource efficiency include raw materials in the Asia Pacific region, producer responsibility to delegate power, and responsibility for the industry. Wang and Zhou [
21] also analyzed barriers to resource efficiency-based investment and stakeholder frameworks for implementing reverse logistics.
Gray [
22] argued that the CE offers significant benefits in improving resource use efficiency, especially urban and industrial waste, and balancing economic, environmental, and social factors. A CE can optimize natural resources by improving efficiency and transitioning from open energy and material cycles to closed material cycles, as well as minimizing waste in industrial production. Furthermore, the inner circle economy is becoming an economic strategy rather than a purely environmental strategy. According to Feng and Yan [
23], the CE is the new business model expected to bring more sustainable development to economies. Cainelli et al. [
24] also show that the CE creates new business opportunities from recycled products and services. Reducing, reusing, recycling materials, as well as improving and innovating value chains and supply chains, will attract investors toward a cleaner industrial production method [
23,
25].
Over the years, studies on CE have been carried out, and many conceptual frameworks of CE have been formed. The 3R Principle is one of the schools within the framework of CE practice. The 3R has also been supplemented with other principles such as “recovery,” translating into the broader concept of 4R as reduce, reuse, recycle and recover [
26]. Jawahir and Bradley [
27] proposed redesigning and redefining data to have a 6R framework that includes reducing, reusing, recycling, recovering, redesigning, and reproducibility to provide a closed product life cycle system as the basis for sustainable production. However, it has been suggested that further expansion of the “3R” frameworks may create some confusion in the documentation and application of heterogeneous concepts around the CE principles.
CE studies have also been carried out in many countries around the world. Levitzke’s research [
28] provides examples of CE development in South Australia. The CE builds on the ‘reduce, reuse and recycle’ hierarchy of wastes mainly in Australia’s states and territories over the past decade [
29]. Furthermore, South Australia’s achievements in solid waste recycling and recovery are also central to developing a low-carbon economy. Employment opportunities related to developing aspects of the CE are highlighted [
28]. The study also estimated the environmental and social impact of the CE by assessing 2030 greenhouse gas emissions and employment outcomes in Australia. The report describes the interdependence between 78 industries and shows that the output of one industry can also become the input of another [
29]. The CE consists of material efficiency, renewables, and energy efficiency. Assumptions regarding “material efficiency” and “renewable and efficient” are made to quantify greenhouse gas emissions and employment impacts of the transition to a CE [
30]. These assumptions relate to the life of the materials, the efficiency of renewable energy, and alternative fuels to fossil fuels.
In 2018, the Kenya Manufacturers Association introduced a plastic bottle recycling initiative to celebrate World Environment Day [
31]. KAM’s plastic bottle initiative has led to the establishment of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) recycling company called PETCO Kenya which will ensure the sustainable management of plastic materials through recycling and reuse of water. All private domestic producers will be represented in PETCO to ensure the initiative’s nationwide dissemination. PETCO Kenya aims to recover and recycle materials at a rate of 70% of total plastic materials by 2030. The recycling and reuse of plastic bottles in Kenya have led to business initiatives. Urban residents, especially those living in informal settlements, often use reusable plastic bottles to create miniature gardens with plants such as ginger, peppers, and onions.
Awareness of the CE is also one of the necessary factors for the transition to a CE. Research by Langen and Passaro [
32] has assessed CEs and the level of awareness of three related groups: researchers, economists, and managers. This study developed comprehensive literature on CE perception to design questionnaires, compare results, and create a more detailed analytical and interpretive framework regarding the awareness of the transition to a CE. The study results show that all three stakeholders see CE as a “zero waste” economy and, in a broader sense, a model for redesigning the current socioeconomic status that utilizes multiple renewable materials. Managers focus more on realizing CE toward economic growth and job creation. The researchers expect increased environmental benefits from the transition to a CE. However, all three stakeholder groups share a vision that CE is in the early stages of transition. The researchers also suggest that a successful transition to CE depends on the management of the process. Researchers emphasize a top-down holistic approach to CE, while economists and managers follow a bottom-up approach [
2]. This study also shows that implementing CE will be costly for governments, businesses, and users. Therefore, during this period, policy interventions played a leading role in disseminating positive perceptions about the concept and model of the CE.
Research by Almulhim and Abubakar [
4] has shown that CE has been recognized globally as a sustainable development strategy of each country to face resource shortage or environmental pollution challenges. Although community behavior and lifestyles play an essential role in the transition to a CE, there is little research exploring the role and perceptions, attitudes, and community lifestyle during the transition to CE. Therefore, this study collected data on residents in the urban area of Saudi Arabia. Research results show that most people have limited awareness of CE. In addition, the study also indicates that CE awareness is positively related to educational attainment.
Similarly, in Vietnam, awareness of CE is still in its infancy, and empirical studies on the perception of CE are almost nowhere to be found. This gap research can be good for the authors when researching the factors affecting the transition to a CE in Vietnam.
5. Discussion and Conclusion
This study examines the factors affecting people’s willingness to participate in the CE in Vietnam. Experimental results show that ATI has a significant effect on IP. In today’s social context, individuals are always looking for personal identity in their groups. They tend to be influenced by each other to match the rest of the group they are in. Thus, the opinions of individuals influence other individuals. Mkhize and Ellis [
46] tried to adopt environmentally friendly behaviors such as buying green products. Therefore, ATI has a significant impact on purchasing CE products. The results of this study are also consistent with previous research showing that the attitude towards a decision significantly affects the level of willingness to buy CE products, which also meant that they were willing to participate in the CE. Therefore, relevant policymakers should carefully consider promoting individuals’ participation in the CE. Policymakers need to pay more attention to people’s groups such as family, friends, and mainstream media. Another policy implication is that it is necessary to distinguish population groups according to different criteria such as occupation, education level, and age to assess people’s willingness to participate in the CE.
The research results also show a positive relationship between the level of willingness to participate in the CE and concern for the environment (ATE). Individuals who have environmental sacrifice are more likely to express their intention to buy green products. Kurrbanov et al. [
47] stated that concern for the environment is a typical attitude towards the environment. A positive attitude towards the environment also encourages individuals to look for options for eco-friendly products and fit daily necessities. Cardoos et al. [
48,
49] also showed individuals’ level of willingness to sacrifice money, level of willingness to sacrifice life, and level of willingness to pay taxes to achieve the goal of environmental protection. As the willingness to sacrifice money to protect the environment increased, the level of payment for green products also increased. Individuals in this category will also be more willing to replace products of the linear economy with CE products. They will also be glad to bear the effects of this change. From these two aspects, the increase in environmental protection will lead to the rise of ATE. Environmental protection attitudes also play a guiding role in purchasing and selling green products. Based on these findings, policymakers need to develop appropriate policies to promote the spirit of dedication of the people. The government needs to balance practical difficulties with efficiency to develop appropriate ways to encourage people to participate more deeply in the CE. Key stakeholders involved in the CE include consumers, governments, and businesses. CE consumption is also an essential aspect of assessing people’s participation in the CE. One of the purposes of the CE is to limit the use of non-renewable materials and increase the use of renewable materials, converting waste into raw materials. Muranko et al. [
25] argued that consumers buying and selling green products is indispensable to the CE. The intention or need to buy and sell products in a CE drives businesses to produce products and services in a CE. Individuals’ purchasing behavior of CE products can be called participating in the CE. Therefore, the greater the intention to buy green products, the higher the willingness to participate in the CE.
The BOE that impacts IP also shows that individuals intend to purchase CE products when they perceive these products/services to provide more excellent economic benefits. Individuals always seek to maximize their utility when making consumption-related decisions. Research by Lee and Chen-Yu [
50] has shown that the lower the product price, the higher the purchase intention. If consumers perceive the price of green products to be lower than that of traditional products with the same usability, they will choose CE products. Thus, previous studies have shown that price, discount, and other economic factors positively impact consumer purchase intention. Therefore, the task posed to policymakers is the pricing policy for products of the CE. Policymakers need to have policies to support prices, adjust tax rates, and support production supply chains to reach the ultimate goal of reducing production costs and thus stimulating consumer interest in CE products.
However, the limitation of the present study is that the factors affecting participation in the circular economy are still few. There are still many other factors that can affect the willingness of individuals and businesses to participate in the circular economy.