Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks Using the LBB Method in Dongzhaigang Bay, Hainan Island, China
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Method
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Sample Collecting
2.3. Catch per Effort
2.4. The LBB Method
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Spalding, M.; Blasco, F.; Field, C. (Eds.) World Mangrove Atlas; International Society for Mangrove Ecosystems (ISEM): Okinawa, Japan, 1997; p. 178. [Google Scholar]
- Hutchison, J.; Spalding, M.; Zu Ermgassen, P. The role of mangroves in fisheries enhancement. Nat. Conserv. Wetl. Int. 2014, 54, 434. [Google Scholar]
- Torell, E.; Castro, J.; Lazarte, A.; Bilecki, D. Analysis of Gender Roles in Philippine Fishing Communities. J. Int. Dev. 2021, 33, 233–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friess, D.A.; Rogers, K.; Lovelock, C.E.; Krauss, K.W.; Hamilton, S.E.; Lee, S.T.; Lucas, R.; Primavera, J.; Rajkaran, A.; Shi, S. The state of the world’s mangrove forests: Past, present, and future. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2019, 44, 89–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barbier, E.B. Natural barriers to natural disasters: Replanting mangroves after the tsunami. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4, 124–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bosire, J.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F.; Walton, M.; Crona, B.; Lewis, R.; Field, C.; Kairo, J.; Koedam, N. Functionality of restored mangroves: A review. Aquat. Bot. 2008, 89, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froese, R.; Pauly, D. FishBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. 2022. Available online: www.fishbase.org (accessed on 2 May 2022).
- Pauly, D.; Martosubroto, P. The population dynamics of Nemipterus marginatus (Cuv. & Val.) off Western Kalimantan, South China Sea. J. Fish Biol. 1980, 17, 263–273. [Google Scholar]
- Pauly, D. Beyond our original horizons: The tropicalization of Beverton and Holt. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish. 1998, 8, 307–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gayanilo, F.C.; Sparre, P.; Pauly, D. The FAO-ICLARM Stock Assessment Tools (FiSAT) User’s Guide; FAO Computerized Information Series/Fisheries; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1996; Volume 8, p. 126. [Google Scholar]
- Froese, R.; Winker, H.; Coro, G.; Demirel, N.; Tsikliras, A.C.; Dimarchopoulou, D.; Scarcella, G.; Probst, W.N.; Dureuil, M.; Pauly, D. A new approach for estimating stock status from length frequency data. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2018, 75, 2004–2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Froese, R.; Winker, H.; Coro, G.; Demirel, N.; Tsikliras, A.C.; Dimarchopoulou, D.; Scarcella, G.; Probst, W.N.; Du-Reuil, M.; Pauly, D. A Simple User Guide for LBB (LBB_33a.R). 2019. Available online: http://oceanrep.geomar.de/44832/ (accessed on 1 September 2021).
- Chowdhury, S.R.M.; Uddin, S.; Nazrul, K.M.S.; Sultana, R. Stock Assessment for Seven Fish Species Us-ing the LBB Method from the Northeastern Tip of the Bay of Bengal, Bangladesh. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1561. [Google Scholar]
- Kindong, R.; Gao, C.; Pandong, N.A.; Ma, Q.; Tian, S.; Wu, F.; Sarr, O. Stock Status Assessments of Five Small Pelagic Species in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans Using the Length-Based Bayesian Estimation (LBB) Method. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, C.; Xian, W.; Liu, S.; Pauly, D. Assessments of 14 Exploited Fish and Invertebrate Stocks in Chinese Waters Using the LBB Method. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Liang, C.; Zhang, H.; Xian, W. Stock Assessment Using LBB Method for Eight Fish Species from the Bohai and Yellow Seas. Front. Mar. Sci. 2020, 7, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhai, L.; Li, Z.; Hu, Y.; Huang, C.; Tian, S.; Wan, R.; Pauly, D. Assessment of Coilia mystus and C. nasus in the Yangtze River Estuary, China, using a length-based approach. Fishes 2022, 7, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi, X.F. Mangrove Restoration by Water Quality Improvement: A Case of Dongzhaigang Bay. Master’s Thesis, Xiamen University, Hainan, China, 2016; p. 75. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, C.P.; Wang, W.Q.; Wang, M.; Pauly, D. Length-weight relationships and other morphological traits of fishes in the mangrove of Hainan, China. Fishes 2022. Under review. [Google Scholar]
- Beyer, J.E. On length-weight relationships, Part I: Computing the mean weight of the fish in a given length class. Fishbyte Newsl. Netw. Trop. Fish. Sci. 1987, 5, 11–13. [Google Scholar]
- Bertalanffy, L. von. A quantitative theory of organic growth (inquiries on growth laws. II). Hum. Biol. 1938, 10, 181–213. [Google Scholar]
- Beverton, R.J.H.; Holt, S.J. On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beverton, R.J.H.; Holt, S.J. Manual of Methods for Fish Stock Assessment, Part II. Tables of Yield Function; FAO Fisheries Technical Paper; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1966; Volume 38, p. 103. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Q.; Sheng, S.; Zhang, W. Age, growth and fecundity of the mudskipper Boleophthalmus pectinirostris. J. Fish China 1990, 14, 179–188. [Google Scholar]
- Rahangdale, S.; Chakraborty, S.K.; Jaiswar, A.K.; Shenoy, L.; Raje, S.G. Preliminary study on growth and mortality of Escualosa thoracata (Valenciennes, 1847) from Mumbai waters. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci. 2016, 45, 290–295. [Google Scholar]
- Hoq, M.E. An analysis of fisheries exploitation and management practices in Sundarbans mangrove ecosystem, Bangladesh. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2007, 50, 411–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Z.; Shan, X.; Jin, X.; Dai, F. Long-term variations in body length and age at maturity of the small yellow croaker (Larimichthys polyactis Bleeker, 1877) in the Bohai Sea and the Yellow Sea, China. Fish. Res. 2011, 110, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.S.; Jiang, Y.Z.; Liu, Z.L.; Dou, S.Z.; Gao, T.X. Analysis of the distribution difference of small yellow croaker between the Southern Yellow Sea and the East China Sea. Period. Ocean Univ. China 2010, 40, 1–6, (In Chinese with English Abstract). [Google Scholar]
- Zhan, B.Y. Fisheries Stock Assessment; China Agriculture Press: Beijing, China, 1995; p. 353. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Shao, G.Z. The fish database of Taiwan [EB/OL]. 2021. Available online: http://fishdb.sinica.edu.tw (accessed on 30 June 2022).
- Wu, H.; Wang, H.; Ding, S. Reproductive biology and annual reproductive cycles of two sympatric line-ages of Bostrychus sinensis with a natural habitat on southeastern coast of China. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2021, 232, 106821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pauly, D.; Wade-Pauly, S. An annotated bibliography of slipmouths (Pisces: Leiognathidae). ICLARM Bib-Liographies 1981, 2, 62. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolsky, G.V. The Ecology of Fishes; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1973; p. 532. [Google Scholar]
- Hastings, J.W. Light to hide by: Ventral luminescence to camouf1age the silhouette. Science 1971, 173, 116–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pauly, D. The Leiognathidae (Teleostei): A hypothesis relating their mean depth occurrence to the intensity of their counter-shading bioluminescence. Mar. Res. Indones. 1977, 19, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Species | n | Standard Length Range | Prior Linf | Reference (Year) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2014 | 2020 | 2009 | 2014 | 2020 | |||
Acentrogobius caninus | 1066 | - | 178 | 4.4–10.7 | - | 2.6–10.5 | 19.1 | [7] |
Acentrogobius chlorostigmatoides | 190 | 261 | 103 | 5–11.1 | 4.1–9.8 | 5.0–10.1 | 11.1 | This study |
Acentrogobius viridipunctatus | 2799 | 4361 | 1017 | 3.4–16.8 | 1.2–18.5 | 3.4–11.2 | 18.5 | This study |
Ambassis gymnocephalus | 572 | 1212 | 934 | 2.5–7 | 2.1–10.2 | 1.7–8.3 | - | - |
Boleophthalmus pectinirostris | - | 187 | 112 | - | 5.3–12.3 | 5.8–12.2 | 14.7 | [24] |
Bostrychus sinensis | - | 313 | 138 | - | 4.5–17.5 | 6.9–18.0 | 23.2 | [7] |
Brachirus orientalis | 122 | 182 | - | 3.3–14.4 | 3.4–14.1 | - | - | - |
Escualosa thoracata | - | - | 374 | - | - | 3.4–9.2 | 11.9 | [25] |
Gerres filamentosus | 216 | - | 139 | 4.2–11.5 | - | 2.5–13.8 | - | - |
Gerres lucidus | 145 | 378 | 236 | 3–10.5 | 2.8–13.4 | 2.0–11.9 | 13.4 | This study |
Glossogobius giuris | 412 | - | - | 4.8–20.1 | - | – | 22.4 | [7] |
Glossogobius olivaceus | 312 | 576 | - | 4.7–16.6 | 2.3–18.2 | – | 18.2 | This study |
Konosirus punctatus | - | 132 | - | - | 3.6–15.6 | – | 25.2 | [7] |
Leiognathus brevirostris | 466 | 568 | 316 | 2.1–10.5 | 0.8–10 | 2.0–8.3 | 12 | [7] |
Leiognathus equula | - | - | 139 | - | - | 2.5–7.7 | - | - |
Liza carinata | 704 | 1713 | - | 3.91–18.3 | 2.2–16.8 | – | 20.4 | [7] |
Liza subviridis | - | - | 498 | - | - | 3.2–21.1 | - | - |
Mugil cephalus | 930 | 1624 | - | 4.2–21.5 | 2.7–16.1 | – | - | - |
Oxyurichthys microlepis | 311 | 252 | - | 4.5–9.1 | 2.8–9.3 | – | 10 | [7] |
Oxyurichthys ophthalmonemus | - | 141 | 407 | - | 4.8–10.5 | 3.9–11.3 | 13.9 | [7] |
Sillago sihama | 346 | 689 | 356 | 5.6–13.7 | 2.6–13.5 | 3.6–12.9 | 23.5 | [7] |
Takifugu niphobles | 192 | 766 | - | 4.7–14.4 | 2.3–11.1 | - | 14.4 | This study |
Terapon jarbua | - | 110 | - | - | 2.7–10.3 | - | - | - |
Thryssa mystax | - | 111 | - | - | 3.8–11.2 | - | - | - |
Thryssa vitrirostris | 152 | - | - | 3.4–13.1 | - | - | 20.8 | [7] |
Valamugil cunnesius | - | - | 510 | - | - | 3.6–14.3 | 16.9 | [7] |
Species | Linf | F/K | Lc/Lc_opt | B/B0 | Stock Status | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2014 | 2020 | 2009 | 2014 | 2020 | 2009 | 2014 | 2020 | 2009 | 2014 | 2020 | 2009 | 2014 | 2020 | |
A. caninus | 19.4 | - | 19.1 | 11.40 | - | 8.93 | 0.53 | - | 0.49 | 0.03 | - | 0.03 | D | - | D |
A. chlorostigmatoides | 11.5 | 11.2 | 11.6 | 0.18 | 2.88 | 1.34 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.19 | 0.35 | H | D | Over |
A. viridipunctatus | 17.3 | 17.8 | 18.0 | 4.95 | 5.68 | 6.55 | 0.57 | 0.49 | 0.50 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.04 | D | D | D |
A. gymnocephalus | 6.8 | 11.9 | 8.1 | 3.01 | 15.60 | 9.97 | 1.10 | 0.52 | 0.66 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.03 | Out | D | D |
B. pectinirostris | - | 14.6 | 14.4 | - | 1.90 | 1.25 | - | 0.92 | 1.10 | - | 0.29 | 0.43 | - | Over | Over |
B. sinensis | - | 23.4 | 23.2 | - | 2.35 | 4.88 | - | 0.49 | 0.80 | - | 0.16 | 0.11 | - | Out | Out |
B. orientalis | 14.1 | 17.3 | - | 0.29 | 3.34 | - | 0.51 | 0.55 | - | 0.71 | 0.11 | - | H | D | |
E. thoracata | - | - | 11.8 | - | - | 5.81 | - | - | 0.78 | - | - | 0.11 | - | - | D |
G. filamentosus | 12.0 | - | 14.1 | 2.70 | - | 0.15 | 0.95 | - | 0.23 | 0.23 | - | 0.78 | Over | - | H |
G. lucidus | 13.4 | 13.2 | 13.3 | 6.87 | 7.75 | 6.38 | 0.55 | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.03 | D | D | D |
G. giuris | 22.2 | - | - | 7.38 | - | - | 0.43 | - | - | 0.03 | - | - | D | - | - |
G. olivaceus | 18.5 | 18.0 | - | 3.41 | 5.68 | - | 0.59 | 0.50 | - | 0.12 | 0.05 | - | D | D | - |
K. punctatus | - | 25.7 | - | - | 5.93 | - | - | 0.36 | - | - | 0.04 | - | - | D | - |
L. brevirostris | 12.0 | 11.9 | 12.1 | 4.14 | 6.68 | 13.30 | 0.56 | 0.69 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.02 | D | D | D |
L. equula | - | - | 9.3 | - | - | 0.99 | - | - | 0.24 | - | - | 0.38 | - | - | R |
L. carinata | 20.7 | 20.2 | - | 3.80 | 3.50 | - | 0.44 | 0.45 | - | 0.07 | 0.09 | - | D | D | - |
L. subviridis | - | - | 21.8 | - | - | 0.88 | - | - | 0.18 | - | - | 0.40 | - | - | R |
M. cephalus | 22.8 | 16.8 | - | 7.58 | 0.09 | - | 0.55 | 0.62 | - | 0.04 | 0.92 | - | D | H | - |
O. microlepis | 10.2 | 10.2 | - | 2.99 | 5.75 | - | 1.50 | 1.20 | - | 0.40 | 0.17 | - | Over | Out | - |
O. ophthalmonemus | - | 14.0 | 13.4 | - | 4.50 | 2.40 | - | 1.00 | 0.92 | - | 0.18 | 0.21 | - | Out | Over |
S. sihama | 23.3 | 23.0 | 23.1 | 13.30 | 15.20 | 6.94 | 0.53 | 0.51 | 0.39 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 | D | D | D |
T. niphobles | 15.0 | 13.9 | - | 4.98 | 7.59 | - | 0.77 | 0.51 | - | 0.10 | 0.02 | - | D | D | - |
T. jarbua | - | 10.5 | - | - | 0.74 | - | - | 0.96 | - | - | 0.57 | - | - | H | - |
T. mystax | - | 13.4 | - | - | 12.40 | - | - | 1.20 | - | - | 0.12 | - | - | Out | - |
T. vitrirostris | 21.1 | - | - | 9.67 | - | - | 0.44 | - | - | 0.02 | - | - | D | - | - |
V. cunnesius | - | - | 17.2 | - | - | 6.94 | - | - | 0.90 | - | - | 0.09 | - | - | D |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Jiang, C.; Wang, W.; Yan, S.; Ding, Y.; Mi, X.; Wang, M.; Pauly, D. Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks Using the LBB Method in Dongzhaigang Bay, Hainan Island, China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 9933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169933
Jiang C, Wang W, Yan S, Ding Y, Mi X, Wang M, Pauly D. Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks Using the LBB Method in Dongzhaigang Bay, Hainan Island, China. Sustainability. 2022; 14(16):9933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169933
Chicago/Turabian StyleJiang, Chengpu, Wenqing Wang, Suzhen Yan, Yipeng Ding, Xuefang Mi, Mao Wang, and Daniel Pauly. 2022. "Assessment of Tropical Fish Stocks Using the LBB Method in Dongzhaigang Bay, Hainan Island, China" Sustainability 14, no. 16: 9933. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169933