Creating Favorable Local Context for Entrepreneurship: The Importance of Sustainable Urban Development in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil
Abstract
:1. Introduction
What is the importance of sustainable urban development in creating favorable urban conditions for forming an entrepreneurial ecosystem in Florianópolis?
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Sustainable Urban Development
2.2. Entrepreneurship in Cities
3. Materials and Methods
Q1: “Sustainable urban development creates favorable conditions for promoting an entrepreneurial ecosystem in Florianópolis.”
4. Presentation of Results: The Case of Florianópolis
4.1. City Profile and Urban Sustainability
“First of all, we have a good quality of life, which attracts good talent, which is the basis of everything. Hence, since we have talented people who choose the city to live in, of course, adding this to the business environment built based on ecosystem associativism, and each propeller of this ecosystem doing its part, we managed to build a good environment to do business. There is also another component closely linked to the business model of these companies, which are part of the economic matrix of Florianópolis. Most of them have their business model based on providing services instead of selling a physical product. Under the Brazilian tax model, these companies pay, among other taxes, the ISS, instead of ICMS, the ISS rate of Florianópolis, the average rate, is one of the lowest in the country, in the range of 2.4%, and this is a wise decision because normally the reaction of governments and, especially in times of crisis, is to increase the tax rate. In Florianópolis, this was never on the agenda because we noticed that the lower rate attracts business and we collect more for the city, which is a very interesting phenomenon” (Interview evidence: Interviewee D—Superintendent of Science, Technology, and Innovation—CHF).
4.2. Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Florianópolis
4.3. Present Urban Conditions Capable of Promoting the Formation of an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
“I believe that the first characteristic is that we have an economy that has constantly been growing in recent years, even with the crises. If we look at the 2015 crisis and now the crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, even so, the city’s economy remains strong. Of course, some areas felt it more than others, but we can see that due to the city’s economic matrix—which is virtually based on services—the economy didn’t feel that much of an effect. Speaking of social issues, compared to other Brazilian cities, we have fewer social problems. Of course, we’re in Brazil, and with all the problems that the country has, we still have a lot to evolve, but compared to other cities, we are doing very well and proof of this is that we have the highest municipal HDI of all capitals in Brazil, and due to the city’s own economic matrix, and the very regulation of activities here, for example, not allowing heavy industries, we have a very adequate environmental preservation, that is, 52% of the city is a permanent preservation area. So, you can say that Florianópolis is a sustainable city because of that, strong economic development, a social condition among the best in the country, and preserved environment.” (Interview evidence: Interviewee D—Superintendent of Science, Technology, and Innovation (PMF)).
“The entrepreneurial ecosystem here in Floripa is very mature. Today, we only have programs linked to ACATE, which is the institution I work for. There are four innovation centers; there are incubators, there are three incubators in the city, as far as I know, there are three accelerators, there are Espaço Maker, Cocreation, and Innovation Incentive Laws, so the ecosystem, as I mentioned to you, the authors, all the authors, and the dimensions of the Florianópolis ecosystem are very well represented, both by academia and companies, such as public and private institutions. So the ecosystem here is overdeveloped, mature, and so much so that we end up serving as a reference in supporting the development of other municipalities in the state and Brazil” (Interview evidence: Interviewee F—Integration Coordinator, Associação Catarinense de Tecnologia (ACATE)).
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leite, C.; Awad, J.C.M. Cidades Sustentáveis, Cidades Inteligentes: Desenvolvimento Sustentável num Planeta Urbano; Bookman: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Alyami, Y.R. Sustainable building assessment tool development approach. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2012, 5, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Böhringer, J. Measuring the immeasurable—A survey of sustainability índices. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahl, A.L. Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 17, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gilmour, D.; Blackwood, D.; Banks, L.; Wilson, F. Sustainable development indicators for major infrastructure projects. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Munic. Eng. 2011, 164, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Angelidou, M.; Psaltoglou, A.; Komninos, N.; Kakderi, C.; Tsarchopoulos, P.; Panori, A. Enhancing sustainable urban development through smart city applications. J. Sci. Technol. Policy Manag. 2018, 9, 146–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldman, M.P. The character of innovative places: Entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity. Small Bus. Econ. 2014, 43, 9–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chapman, A.; Shigetomi, Y. Developing National Frameworks for inclusive sustainable development incorporating lifestyle factor importance. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 200, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Szulczewska-Remi, A.; Nowak-Mizgalska, H. Who really acts as an entrepreneur in the science commercialisation process: The role of knowledge transfer intermediary organisations. J. Entrep. Emerg. Econ. 2021. ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isenberg, D.J. Worthless, Impossible and Stupid: How Contrarian Entrepreneurs Create and Capture Extraordinary Value; Harvard Review Business Press: Brighton, MA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Malecki, E.J. Entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems. Geogr. Compass 2018, 12, e12359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allen, D.E.; Shooter, S.B. Big: Uniting the University Innovation Ecosystem; American Society for Engineering Education: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ratten, V. Coronavirus e negócios internacionais: Uma perspectiva de ecossistema empreendedor. Thunderbird Int. Bus. Rev. 2020, 62, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratten, V. Coronavirus (COVID-19) and the entrepreneurship education community. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ. 2020, 14, 753–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parnell, D.; Widdop, P.; Bond, A.; Wilson, R. COVID-19, Networks and Sport Gerenciando Esporte e Lazer na Imprensa. 2020. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_743036/lang--en/index.htm (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Sharifi, A.; Khavarian-Garmsir, A.R. The COVID-19 pandemic: Impacts on cities and major lessons for urban planning, design, and management. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 749, 142391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Análise Global de Dados. Briefing Executivo do Coronavírus (COVID-19) Dados Globais. 2020. Available online: https://www.globaldata.com/covid-19/ (accessed on 17 August 2019).
- Leung, T.; Sharma, P.; Adithiyangkul, P.; Hosie, P. Gender equity and public health outcomes: The COVID-19 Experience. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 116, 193–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 4th ed.; Sage Publications: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Haase, D.; Kabisch, S.; Haase, A.; Andersson, E.; Banzhaf, E.; Baró, F.; Brenck, M.; Fischer, L.K.; Frantzeskaki, N.; Kabisch, N.; et al. Greening cities—To be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat Int. 2017, 64, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. 2018 Revision of World Urbanization Prospects; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Available online: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/ (accessed on 30 July 2018).
- da Silva, A.V.B.; Serralvo, F.A.; Romaro, P. Competitividade da América Latina—Um Estudo à Luz do Modelo Porteriano. Rev. Científica Hermes 2016, 15, 198–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. In-Depth Report: Indicators for Sustainable Cities 2015. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/integration/research/newsalert/pdf/indicators_for_sustainable_cities_IR12_en.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Oliveira, G.M.; Vidal, D.G.; Ferraz, M.P. Urban lifestyles and consumption patterns. In Sustainable Cities and Communities. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Bichueti, R.S. Fatores que Condicionam a Formação de Ambientes Urbanos Inovadores em Cidades Sustentáveis. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Conselho Internacional para a Ciência (ICSU). Um Guia para Interações “ODS”: Da Ciência à Implementação; Conselho Internacional para a Ciência (ICSU): Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Galante, C.; Mazzioni, S.; Di Domenico, D.; Ronning, C. Análise dos Indicadores de Sustentabilidade nos Municípios do Oeste de Santa Catarina. Available online: http://dvl.ccn.ufsc.br/congresso_internacional/anais/6CCF/27_15.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Arcadis. Sustainable Cities Index 2018. 2020. Available online: https://www.arcadis.com/en/united-states/our-perspectives/sustainable-cities-index-2018/united-states/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Kagan, S.; Hauerwaas, A.; Holz, V.; Wedler, P. Culture in sustainable urban development: Practices and policies for spaces of possibility and institutional innovations. City Cult. Soc. 2018, 13, 32–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castree, N.; Kitchin, R.; Rogers, A. Neoliberalism. In Dictionary of Human Geography; Castree, N., Kitchin, R., Rogers, A., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 339–340. [Google Scholar]
- Brenner, N. Theses on urbanization. Public Cult. 2013, 25, 86–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bianchini, F. Cultural planning in post-industrial societies. In Cultural Planning; Østergaard, K., Ed.; Report from Conference at Centre for Urbanism; The Royal Academy of Fine Arts, the Royal Danish School of Architecture: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2004; pp. 13–24. [Google Scholar]
- Landry, C. The Art of City Making; Routledge: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Chatterton, P. Will the real creative city please stand up? City 2000, 4, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponzini, D.; Rossi, U. Becoming a creative city: The entrepreneurial mayor, network politics and the promise of an urban renaissance. Urban Stud. 2010, 47, 1037–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, A.J. Capitalism and urbanization in a new key? The cognitive-cultural dimension. Soc. Forces 2007, 85, 1465–1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulkki, S. Cities for Solving Societal challenges: Towards Human-centric Socio-economic Development? Interdiscip. Stud. J. 2014, 3, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
- Hisrich, R.D.; Peters, M.P.; Shepherd, D.A. Empreendedorismo, 9th ed.; Bookman: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Coscieme, L.; Mortensen, L.F.; Anderson, S.; Ward, J.; Donohue, I.; Sutton, P.C. Going beyond Gross Domestic Product as an indicator to bring coherence to the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Le Blanc, D. Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 23, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cavalcanti, F.R. Processo de Empreendedorismo Inovador no Polo Tecnológico de Florianópolis no Período de 1987 a 2012. Master’s Thesis, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, 2013; 142p. [Google Scholar]
- Dornelas, J.C.A. Empreendedorismo: Transformando Ideias em Negócios, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Figueiredo, M.D.; Leite, E.F. Cidades Empreendedoras: As novas visões sobre planejamento urbano e desenvolvimento econômico no Brasil. Rev. Eletrônica Adm. (REad) 2006, 12, 266–291. [Google Scholar]
- Spigel, B.; Harrison, R. Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystem. Strateg. Entrep. J. 2017, 12, 151–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delgado, M.; Porter, M.E.; Stern, S. Clusters, Convergence, and Economic Performance. Res. Policy 2014, 43, 1785–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fotopoulos, G.; Storey, D.J. Public Policies to Enhance Regional Entrepreneurship: Another Programme Failing to Deliver? Small Bus. Econ. 2018, 53, 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, M. The Competitive Advantage of Nations; Free Press: Nova York, NY, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Geissinger, A.; Laurell, C.; Sandström, C.; Eriksson, K.; Nykvist, R. Digital entrepreneurship and field conditions for institutional change—Investigating the enabling role of cities. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 146, 877–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlino, G.A.; Chatterjee, S.; Hunt, R.M. Urban density and the rate of invention. J. Urban Econ. 2007, 61, 389–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saxenian, A. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, M.C.F.R. The Software Startups Ecosystem of São Paulo, Brazil. Master’s Thesis, Instituto de Matemática e Estatística, São Paulo, Brazil, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Foster, G.; Shimizu, C. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems around the Globe and Company Growth Dynamics; Report Summary for the Annual Meeting of the New Champions 2013; World Economic Forum: Cologny, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 1–36. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_EntrepreneurialEcosystems_Report_2013.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Stam, E. Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2015, 23, 1759–1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roundy, P.T. Start-up Community Narratives: The Discursive Construction of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. J. Entrep. 2016, 25, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teixeira, C.S.; Almeida, C.G.; Ferreira, M.C.Z. Habitats de Inovação: Alinhamento Conceitual; Perse: São Paulo, Brazil, 2016; Available online: http://via.ufsc.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/e-book-habitats-de-inovacao.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Isenberg, D.J. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship; Institute of International European Affairs: Dublin, Ireland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Halabí, C.E.; Lussier, R.N. A model for predicting small firm performance. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2014, 21, 4–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grin, E.J.; Acosta, F.G.; Sarfati, G.; Alves, M.A.; Gomes, M.V.P.; Spink, P.K.; Fernandes, R.J.R. Desenvolvimento de Políticas Públicas de Fomento ao Empreendedorismo em Estados e Municípios; Fundação Getúlio Vargas: São Paulo, Brazil, 2016; 52p, Available online: https://goo.gl/ryXk9A (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Castaño, M.S.; Méndez, M.T.; Galindo, M.Á. The effect of social, cultural, and economics factors on entrepreneurship. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 1496–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Audretsch, D.B.; Heger, D.; Veith, T. Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Bus. Econ. 2015, 44, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Consortium. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2015. Available online: https://www.gemconsortium.org/file/open?fileId=49480 (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Maroufkhani, P.; Wagner, R.; Wan Ismail, W.K. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic review. J. Enterprising Communities People Places Glob. Econ. 2018, 12, 545–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Endeavor. Índice de Cidades Empreendedoras 2020. Available online: https://endeavor.org.br/ambiente/ice-2020/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Connected Smart Cities. Ranking. Resultados 2017. Available online: http://www.connectedsmartcities.com.br/resultados-do-ranking-connected-smartcities/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Hair, J.; Babin, B.; Money, A.; Samouel, P. Fundamentos de Métodos de Pesquisa em Administração; Bookman: Porto Alegre, Brazil, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Bardin, L. Análise de Conteúdo; Edições: Lisboa, Portugal, 1977; p. 70. [Google Scholar]
- IBGE. Santa Catarina e Florianópolis; Instituto Brasileiro De Geografia e Estatísticas: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Florianópolis. Revisão Plano Municipal Integrado de Saneamento Básico. 2021. Available online: https://www.pmf.sc.gov.br/arquivos/arquivos/pdf/28_01_2021_14.02.38.2702fa6dabba3692679338f9eac54d38.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Sarquis, A.B.; Fiates, G.G.S.; Hahn, A.K.; Cavalcante, F.R. Empreendedorismo inovador no polo tecnológico de Florianópolis. Rev. Eletrônica Estrateg. Neg. St. Catarina 2014, 7, 228–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Urban Systems Brasil. Ranking Connected Smart Cities. 2020. Available online: https://ranking.connectedsmartcities.com.br/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Sutto, G. Vale do Silício Brasileiro, Florianópolis tem 3% da População e 20% das Startups, em Negócios/Grandes Empresas de InfoMoney. 2019. Available online: https://www.infomoney.com.br/negocios/grandesempresas/noticia/7929302/vale-do-silicio-brasileiro-florianopolis-tem-3-da-populacao-e20-das-startups (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Ács, Z.J.; Szerb, L.; Autio, E. Global Entrepreneurship Index 2015; The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; Available online: http://thegedi.org/2015-global-entrepreneurship-index/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Carvalho, L.; Viana Noronha, A.; Mantovani, D. Hélice Tripla e Ecossistema Empreendedor: O papel da FAPESP no ecossistema empreendedor do Estado de São Paulo. Rev. Adm. Contab. Econ. Fund. 2016, 7, 84–101. [Google Scholar]
- Florianópolis. Floripa Empreendedora. 2022. Available online: http://www.pmf.sc.gov.br/sites/ef/index.php?cms=floripa+empreendedora&menu=0 (accessed on 27 July 2022).
- Floripa Amanhã. Projeto Smart Floripa 2030. 2018. Available online: http://floripamanha.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/relatorio-smart-city-floripa.pdf (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Rede De Inovação Florianópolis. Lei Municipal de Estímulos à Inovação é Tema de e-Book Gratuito Lançado pela Rede de Inovação. 2021. Available online: https://redeinovacao.floripa.br/lei-municipal-de-estimulos-a-inovacao-e-tema-de-e-book-gratuito-lancado-pela-rede-de-inovacao/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- VIA. Mobilidade em Florianópolis: Em Direção à Ressignificação das Ruas. 2020. Available online: https://via.ufsc.br/mobilidade-florianopolis/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Azevedo, C.S.I.; Teixeira, S.C. Florianópolis: Uma Análise Evolutiva do Desenvolvimento Inovador da Cidade a Partir do Seu Ecossistema de Inovação. Braz. J. Account. Manag. 2017, 6, 108–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SC Inova. Por R$ 1,86 bi, RD Station é adquirida pela Totvs. 2021. Available online: https://scinova.com.br/por-r-186-bi-rd-station-e-adquirida-pela-totvs/ (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- Ferreira, J.J.M.; Fernandes, C.I.; Kraus, S. Entrepreneurship research: Mapping intellectual structures and research trends. Stud. Appl. Econ. 2019, 13, 181–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- G1. “Ilha do Silício”: Rede de Inovação Florianópolis Faz da Capital um Polo de Tecnologia. Available online: https://g1.globo.com/sc/santa-catarina/especial-publicitario/prefeitura-municipal-de-florianopolis/florianopolis-uma-cidade-para-todos/noticia/2019/07/04/ilha-do-silicio-rede-de-inovacao-florianopolis-faz-da-capital-um-polo-de-tecnologia.ghtml (accessed on 29 June 2022).
- De Mello Rezende, G.B.; Cândido, G.A.; Lopes Rezende, H.; Silva, F.P. Sustentabilidade de Barra do Garças sob a ótica do índice de desenvolvimento sustentável para municípios. Desenvolv. Quest. 2017, 15, 203–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mason, C.; Brown, R. Entrepreneurial Ecosystems and Growth Oriented Entrepreneurship; Final Report to OECD; OECD: Paris, France, 2014; Volume 30, pp. 77–102. [Google Scholar]
- Audretsch, D.B.; Cunningham, J.A.; Kuratko, D.F.; Lehmann, E.E.; Menter, M. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: Economic, technological, and societal impacts. J. Technol. Transf. 2019, 44, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Interviewee | Occupation | Time of Each Interview |
---|---|---|
A | Professor at the Federal University of Santa Catarina—UFSC and Vice-President of the Citizen Monitoring Network of Florianópolis. | 57 min |
B | Director of Innovative Business—Superintendent of Science, Technology, and Innovation—Secretary of Tourism, Technology, and Economic Development, Municipality of Florianópolis (PMF). | 1 h 38 min |
C | Director of Programs and Projects—Superintendent of Science, Technology, and Innovation—Secretary of Tourism, Technology, and Economic Development, Municipality of Florianópolis (PMF). | 48 min |
D | Superintendent of Science, Technology, and Innovation—Secretary of Tourism, Technology and Economic Development, Municipality of Florianópolis (PMF). | 1 h |
E | Manager of Ecosystems and Innovation Environments—Director of Science, Technology, and Innovations—State Secretary for Sustainable Economic Development (SDE/SC). | 42 min |
F | Integration Coordinator—Santa Catarina Technology Association (ACATE). | 1 h 6 min |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dubou, G.; Bichueti, R.S.; Costa, C.R.R.d.; Gomes, C.M.; Kneipp, J.M.; Kruglianskas, I. Creating Favorable Local Context for Entrepreneurship: The Importance of Sustainable Urban Development in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610132
Dubou G, Bichueti RS, Costa CRRd, Gomes CM, Kneipp JM, Kruglianskas I. Creating Favorable Local Context for Entrepreneurship: The Importance of Sustainable Urban Development in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. Sustainability. 2022; 14(16):10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610132
Chicago/Turabian StyleDubou, Gabriela, Roberto Schoproni Bichueti, Carlos Rafael Röhrig da Costa, Clandia Maffini Gomes, Jordana Marques Kneipp, and Isak Kruglianskas. 2022. "Creating Favorable Local Context for Entrepreneurship: The Importance of Sustainable Urban Development in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil" Sustainability 14, no. 16: 10132. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610132