Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Strengthening Family Agriculture
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Data Collection Instrument and Actors Involved
2.3. Data Analysis Technique
- (a)
- Proposal of sustainable contributions to the region (production, distribution, and consumption): Following the content analysis techniques proposed by [17], transcripts were made of the interviews and focus groups carried out, in which the interviewees identified intervention needs. Based on these, actions were proposed to promote sustainable production and consumption in the region, as related to the model of family farming. All improvements identified for the process were considered in this phase, which is essential for the teams awareness and engagement in the change process.
- (b)
- Means of implementation to achieve the guidelines (production, distribution, and consumption): It is important to work together with institutions and local actors to build discussions related to local and regional sustainable development, with the aim of meeting the goals established by the 2030 Agenda (specifically the SDG 12). This will assist in addressing the major global problem that is the shortage, poor distribution, and lack of diversity of food. The means of implementation sought were intended to assist in practical projects and initiatives that could support people and the environment.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Views of Local Actors
3.2. Proposals with Contributions and Means of Implementation
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Benhosi, K.P.; Fachin, Z. O meio ambiente e o embate entre a preservação ambiental e o desenvolvimento tecnológico: Uma discussão de direitos fundamentais [The environment and the clash between environmental preservation and technological development: A discussion of fundamental rights]. Rev. Jurídica Cesumar 2013, 13, 237–262. [Google Scholar]
- Mauree, D.; NabonI, E.; Coccolo, S.; Perera, A.T.D.; NIK, V.M.; Scartezzini, J.L. A review of assessment methods for the urban environment and its energy sustainability to guarantee climate adaptation of future cities. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 112, 733–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rudnicka, E.; Napierała, P.; Podfigurna, A.; Męczekalski, B.; Smolarczyk, R.; Grymowicz, M. The World Health Organization (WHO) approach to healthy age-ing. Maturitas 2020, 139, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanger, L.; SovacooL, B.K.; Noorkõiv, M. Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review. Res. Policy 2020, 49, 104072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Derek, O.; Amy, C.; Farooq, U. Universal sustainable development goals under-standing the transformational challenge for developed countries, Report of a Study by Stakeholder Forum. In London: Report of a Study by Stakeholder Forum; 2015. Available online: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_-_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf (accessed on 12 January 2022).
- Lucas, B.; Francu, R.E.; Goulding, J.; Harvey, J.; Nica-Avram, G.; Perrat, B. A Note on Data-driven Actor-differentiation and SDGs 2 and 12: Insights from a food-sharing app. Res. Policy 2021, 50, 104266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Os Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável [The Sustainable Development Goals]. 2016. Available online: https://www.br.undp.org/content/brazil/pt/home/sustainable-development-goals.html (accessed on 8 January 2022).
- Rotta, E.; Lago, I.C.; Hensel, M.J.; Kazmierczak, S. Desenvolvimento e meio ambiente em planejamentos municipais: Concepções que orientam a ação dos agentes públicos [Development and environment in municipal planning: Conceptions that guide the action of public agentes]. UNIABEU 2016, 9, 96–110. [Google Scholar]
- Guirado, C.; Valldeperas, N.; Tulla, A.F.; Sendra, L.; Badia, A.; Evard, C.; Cebollada, À.; Espluga, J.; Pallarès, I.; Vera, A. Social farming in Catalonia: Rural local development, employment opportunities and empowerment for people at risk of social exclusion. J. Rural Stud. 2017, 56, 180–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dlouhá, J.; Zahradník, M. Potential for social learning in sustainable regional development: Analysis of stakeholder interaction with a focus on the role of scientists. Envigogika 2015, 10, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schaafsma, M.; Eigenbrod, F.; Gasparatos, A.; Gross-Camp, N.; Hutton, C.; Nunan, F.; Schreckenberg, K.; Turner, K. Trade-off decisions in ecosystem management for poverty alleviation. Ecol. Econ. 2021, 187, 107103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Imperiale, A.J.; Vanclay, F. Experiencing local community resilience in action: Learning from post-disaster communities. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 47, 204–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borsari, B.; Kunnas, J. Agriculture Production and Consumption; Leal Filho, W., Azul, A., Brandli, L., Özuyar, P., Wall, T., Eds.; Responsible Consumption and Production; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Caldeira, C.; De Laurentiis, V.; Corrado, S.; van Holsteijn, F.; Sala, S. Quantification of food waste per product group along the food supply chain in the European Union: A mass flow analysis. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 149, 479–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trad, L.A.B. Grupos focais: Conceitos, procedimentos e reflexões baseadas em experiências com o uso da técnica em pesquisas de saúde [Focus groups: Concepts, procedures and reflections based on experiences using the technique in health research]. Physis Rev. Saúde Coletiva 2019, 19, 777–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Masadeh, M.A.; AL-Abadneh, M.; AL-Sabi, S. Focus groups in hospitality research why they are not usedin Jordan? Eur. Sci. J. 2016, 12, 348–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bardin, L. Análise de Conteúdo, 3rd ed.; Edicoes 70-Almedina: Lisboa, Portugal, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zago, N. Rural-urban migration, youth, and higher education. Rev. Bras. Educ. 2016, 21, 61–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wilson, G.A.; Hu, Z.; Rahman, S. Community resilience in rural China: The case of Hu village, Sichuan province. J. Rural Stud. 2018, 60, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Morel, A.P.; Rezende, L.T.; Sette, R.S. Negócio Feira Livre: Análise e Discussão sob a Perspectiva do Feirante [Free Market Business: Analysis and Discussion from the Market-er’s Perspective]. Rev. Extensão Rural 2015, 22, 43–57. [Google Scholar]
- Collazos, L.E.O.; Pineda, C.F.; Mora, V.A.B.; Rojas, M.F. Moscoso. Me-so-organizations, relational capital, and rural producers’ integration into the market in a context of violence. J. Rural Stud. 2020, 80, 391–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Azcárate, M.; Maceín, J.L.C.; Bardají, I. Why buying directly from producers is a valuable choice? Expanding the scope of short food supply chains in Spain. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jacobi, P.R.; Raufflet, E.; Arruda, M.P. Educação para a sustentabilidade: Reflexão sobre paradigmas e práticas [Education for sustainability: Reflection on paradigms and practices]. Rev. Adm. Mackenzie 2011, 12, 21–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vaio, A.D.; Palladino, R.; Hassan, R.; Escobar, O. Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: A systematic literature review. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 121, 283–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Axis | Challenges | Contributions | Means of Implementation |
---|---|---|---|
Production | Climate fluctuations | Subsidies for family farmers | Improve subsidies for small farmers in case of crop loss due to the climate. |
Resilience of family farmers | Increase farmers’ resilience through government incentives. | ||
Excess of pesticides | Favor organic production | Encourage the production of organic and agroecological products. | |
Promote a sustainable production system | Disseminate the harmful effects of pesticides in food with greater emphasis through campaigns and institutions. | ||
Shortage of raw materials | Create campaigns for food reuse and processing | Value local products and promote the diversification of cultures through production of fruits and vegetables. | |
Boost food production | Reuse food to prevent waste, in the same way as donating or transforming it. | ||
Foster biodiversity | |||
Rural exodus | Increase farm income | Create projects and motivate young people to produce in the field | |
Generate business opportunities | Value the work of women farmers and generate greater income. | ||
Encourage rural activities | Anticipate scenarios from the rural exodus to avoid them. | ||
Hierarchy | Create “parents and children” campaigns | Promote dialogue and the commitment of young people in the field, aiming at property growth. | |
Provide knowledge to parents | Bring knowledge to farmer parents motivating entrepreneurship. | ||
Create entrepreneurship projects | |||
Shortage of labor | Empower young people in the field | Value young people in the countryside with programs to diversify activities, providing opportunities and favoring all age groups. | |
Empower youth with activities | Provide opportunities for young people to apply their knowledge and training in activities. | ||
Axis | Challenges | Contributions | Means of Implementation |
Commercialization | Lack of marketing points | Retake the farmers’ market | Implement or retake the Rural Producer Market in the cities. |
Stimulate street markets | Create events to sell products and strengthen PNAE (PNAE—Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar (National School Food Program) is a public program of food supplementation in schools, created in Brazil in 1955) in the region. | ||
Lack of infrastructure at the markets | Identify a better place for markets | Require public authorities to set up marketing places or promote rural producers’ markets in cities with adequate infrastructure to supply this trade. | |
Create markets in places with parking and restrooms | |||
Transport strikes | Create urban gardens | Encourage urban agriculture to help increase food production. | |
Create institutional gardens and educational and health projects with gardens | Create community and institutional gardens and diversify production. | ||
Bureaucratic challenges | Minimize bureaucracy | Reduce bureaucracy for the production and marketing of food, especially organic food. | |
Decrease taxes | Encourage the implementation of agro-industries with fewer taxes and greater agility. | ||
Food loss | Food donation projects | Encourage projects and initiatives to reduce food waste. | |
Campaigns for avoiding food waste | Promote a culture of exchange and reuse of food in society. | ||
Partnerships with agro-industries and producers | Partner with agribusinesses and producers to use raw materials. | ||
Create projects and initiatives at markets, supermarkets, and greengroceries to donate food. | |||
Devaluation of local products | Create street markets | Value the food produced in the region through street markets. | |
Create projects for local food consumption | Promote the exchange and marketing of regional foods among the community. | ||
Encourage schools, companies, and public authorities to consume local products. | |||
Axis | Challenges | Contributions | Means of Implementation |
Competitiveness | Difficulties with certification | Foster agribusiness | Differentiate the taxes of small, medium, and large agro-industries. |
Encourage certification | Facilitate the certification of organics for small properties. | ||
Create authenticity seals | Disseminate the importance of the seal for the consumption of organic products. | ||
Lack of technologies | Favor the purchase of technological equipment | Promote partnerships with public and private agencies to make more technology available in the field. | |
Conduct training and bring technological knowledge to the field | Facilitate the purchase of technological equipment to assist in field activities. | ||
Train the whole family. | |||
Media handling | Promote healthy eating campaigns in schools | Create advertising campaigns that promote healthy eating. | |
Partner with supermarkets and greengroceries to promote healthy food | Create other advertising campaigns to promote sustainable production and consumption. | ||
High food prices | Value local foods | Foster additional means of marketing and those which provide a fair price for food. | |
Foster markets | Avoid middlemen and generate direct marketing between producers and consumers. | ||
Partner with farmers and food establishments | |||
Lack of viability in organics | Favor organic food production | Potentialize consumption of organic products through markets by disseminating information with greater strength in entities and institutions. | |
Promote the distribution of organics | Create projects enabling the production of organics in cities. | ||
Disseminate the benefits of organic foods to the population | |||
Promote urban gardens Focus on agroecology and more sustainable production systems |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Dal Moro, L.; Mazutti, J.; Brandli, L.L.; Casagranda, Y.G.; Mores, G.d.V. Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148680
Dal Moro L, Mazutti J, Brandli LL, Casagranda YG, Mores GdV. Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability. 2022; 14(14):8680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148680
Chicago/Turabian StyleDal Moro, Leila, Janaina Mazutti, Luciana Londero Brandli, Yasmin Gomes Casagranda, and Giana de Vargas Mores. 2022. "Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda" Sustainability 14, no. 14: 8680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148680
APA StyleDal Moro, L., Mazutti, J., Brandli, L. L., Casagranda, Y. G., & Mores, G. d. V. (2022). Overcoming the Challenges of Sustainable Family Agriculture in Southern Brazil: Contributions to the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability, 14(14), 8680. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148680