Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theories and Hypotheses
2.1. Greenwashing and Brand Avoidance
2.2. The Mediating Effect of Brand Hypocrisy
2.3. The Moderating Effect of CSR–CA Belief
3. Methods
3.1. Participants and Procedure
3.2. Measures
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Validation
4.2. Descriptive Analysis
4.3. Hypotheses Testing
5. Discussion
5.1. Theoretical Contributions
5.2. Practical Implications
5.3. Limitations and Future Directions
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Davcik, N.S.; Sharma, P. Impact of product differentiation, marketing investments and brand equity on pricing strategies: A brand level investigation. Eur. J. Mark. 2015, 49, 760–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Huang, A.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y. Greenwash and green purchase behaviour: The mediation of green brand image and green brand loyalty. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2020, 31, 194–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nemes, N.; Scanlan, S.J.; Smith, P.; Smith, T.; Aronczyk, M.; Hill, S.; Lewis, S.L.; Montgomery, A.W.; Tubiello, F.N.; Stabinsky, D. An integrated framework to assess greenwashing. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, T.T.H.; Yang, Z.; Nguyen, N.; Johnson, L.W.; Cao, T.K. Greenwash and green purchase intention: The mediating role of green skepticism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parguel, B.; Benoît-Moreau, F.; Larceneux, F. How sustainability ratings might deter ‘greenwashing’: A closer look at ethical corporate communication. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 102, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ji, X.; Cai, L. Greenwash, moral decoupling, and brand loyalty. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2021, 49, 10038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaidi, S.M.M.R.; Yifei, L.; Bhutto, M.Y.; Ali, R.; Alam, F. The influence of consumption values on green purchase intention: A moderated mediation of greenwash perceptions and green trust. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci. 2019, 13, 826–848. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.A.; Lee, M.S. Prepurchase determinants of brand avoidance: The moderating role of country-of-origin familiarity. J. Glob. Mark. 2014, 27, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knittel, Z.; Beurer, K.; Berndt, A. Brand avoidance among Generation Y consumers. Qual. Mark. Res. 2016, 19, 27–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Japutra, A.; Ekinci, Y.; Simkin, L. Self-congruence, brand attachment and compulsive buying. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 99, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Portal, S.; Abratt, R.; Bendixen, M. The role of brand authenticity in developing brand trust. J. Strateg. Mark. 2019, 27, 714–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, A.; Bairrada, C.; Peres, F. Brand communities’ relational outcomes, through brand love. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2019, 28, 154–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, G.; Agarwal, J.; Malhotra, N.K.; Varshneya, G. Does brand experience translate into brand commitment?: A mediated-moderation model of brand passion and perceived brand ethicality. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 95, 479–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khamitov, M.; Wang, X.; Thomson, M. How well do consumer-brand relationships drive customer brand loyalty? General-izations from a meta-analysis of brand relationship elasticities. J. Consum. Res. 2019, 46, 435–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fetscherin, M. The five types of brand hate: How they affect consumer behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 101, 116–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Odoom, R.; Kosiba, J.P.; Djamgbah, C.T.; Narh, L. Brand avoidance: Underlying protocols and a practical scale. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2019, 28, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fetscherin, M.; Sampedro, A. Brand forgiveness. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2019, 28, 633–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, M.A.; Ashraf, R.; Malik, A. Do identity-based perceptions lead to brand avoidance? A cross-national investigation. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 2019, 31, 1095–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, M.S.; Motion, J.; Conroy, D. Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, D.; Mitra, S.; Zhang, H. Research note—When do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical inves-tigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inform. Syst. Res. 2016, 27, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Guèvremont, A. Brand hypocrisy from a consumer perspective: Scale development and validation. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2019, 28, 598–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maehle, N.; Otnes, C.; Supphellen, M. Consumers’ perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality. J. Consum. Behav. 2011, 10, 290–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thompson, C.J.; Arsel, Z. The Starbucks brandscape and consumers’ (anticorporate) experiences of glocalization. J. Consum. Res. 2004, 31, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, H.; Hur, W.; Yeo, J. Corporate brand trust as a mediator in the relationship between consumer perception of CSR, corporate hypocrisy, and corporate reputation. Sustainability 2015, 7, 3683–3694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, S.; Bhaduri, G.; Ha-Brookshire, J.E. What to say and what to do: The determinants of corporate hypocrisy and its nega-tive consequences for the customer–brand relationship. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2020, 30, 481–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arli, D.; van Esch, P.; Northey, G.; Lee, M.S.W.; Dimitriu, R. Hypocrisy, skepticism, and reputation: The mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2019, 37, 706–720. [Google Scholar]
- Öberseder, M.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Gruber, V. “Why don’t consumers care about CSR?”: A qualitative study exploring the role of CSR in consumption decisions. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 104, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Singhapakdi, A.; Lee, D.; Sirgy, M.J.; Senasu, K. The impact of incongruity between an organization’s CSR orientation and its employees’ CSR orientation on employees’ quality of work life. J. Bus. Res. 2015, 68, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaduri, G.; Jung, S.; Ha-Brookshire, J.E. Effects of CSR messages on apparel consumers’ Word-of-Mouth: Perceived Corporate Hypocrisy as a Mediator. Cloth. Text. Res. J. 2021, 0887302X211055984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sen, S.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsi-bility. J. Mark. Res. 2001, 38, 225–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pritchard, M.; Wilson, T. Building corporate reputation through consumer responses to green new products. J. Brand Manag. 2018, 25, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habel, J.; Schons, L.M.; Alavi, S.; Wieseke, J. Warm glow or extra charge? The ambivalent effect of corporate social respon-sibility activities on customers’ perceived price fairness. J. Mark. 2016, 80, 84–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yuen, K.F.; Thai, V.V.; Wong, Y.D. Are customers willing to pay for corporate social responsibility? A study of individual-specific mediators. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2016, 27, 912–926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, H.; Li, Y. CSR and service brand: The mediating effect of brand identification and moderating effect of service quality. J. Bus. Ethics 2011, 100, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gatti, L.; Seele, P.; Rademacher, L. Grey zone in—Greenwash out. A review of greenwashing research and implications for the voluntary-mandatory transition of CSR. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 4, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- TerraChoice. The Seven Sins of Greenwashing; TerraChoice Environmental Marketing Inc.: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Lane, E.L. Green marketing goes negative: The advent of reverse greenwashing. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 2012, 3, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghasrodashti, E.K. Explaining brand switching behavior using pull–push–mooring theory and the theory of reasoned action. J. Brand Manag. 2018, 25, 293–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Xiao, Z. The dual effects of consumer satisfaction on brand switching intention of sharing apparel. Sustainability 2022, 14, 4526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scott, W.R. Institutions and Organizations, 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Hogg, M.A.; Abrams, D.; Brewer, M.B. Social identity: The role of self in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Process. Intergr. Relat. 2017, 20, 570–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Klipfel, J.A.; Barclay, A.C.; Bockorny, K.M. Self-Congruity: A determinant of brand personality. J. Mark. Dev. Compet. 2014, 8, 130–143. [Google Scholar]
- Kucuk, S.U. Negative double jeopardy revisited: A longitudinal analysis. J. Brand Manag. 2010, 18, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wagner, T.; Lutz, R.J.; Weitz, B.A. Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions. J. Mark. 2009, 73, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wagner, T.; Korschun, D.; Troebs, C. Deconstructing corporate hypocrisy: A delineation of its behavioral, moral, and attributional facets. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 114, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arli, D.; Grace, A.; Palmer, J.; Pham, C. Investigating the direct and indirect effects of corporate hypocrisy and perceived corporate reputation on consumers’ attitudes toward the company. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2017, 37, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walsh, G.; Mitchell, V. The effect of consumer confusion proneness on word of mouth, trust, and customer satisfaction. Eur. J. Mark. 2010, 44, 838–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polonsky, M.J.; Grau, S.L.; Garma, R. The new greenwash?: Potential marketing problems with carbon offsets. Int. J. Bus. Stud. 2010, 18, 49–54. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Y.; Chang, C. Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 114, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antonetti, P.; Maklan, S. Social identification and corporate irresponsibility: A model of stakeholder punitive intentions. Br. J. Manag. 2016, 27, 583–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sudbury-Riley, L.; Kohlbacher, F. Moral avoidance for people and planet: Anti-consumption drivers. Manag. Decis. 2018, 56, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Poon, P.; Huang, G. Corporate ability and corporate social responsibility in a developing country: The role of product involvement. J. Glob. Mark. 2012, 25, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chernev, A.; Blair, S. Doing well by doing good: The benevolent halo of corporate social responsibility. J. Consum. Res. 2015, 41, 1412–1425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olsen, M.C.; Slotegraaf, R.J.; Chandukala, S.R. Green claims and message frames: How green new products change brand attitude. J. Mark. 2014, 78, 119–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, X.; Bhattacharya, C.B. Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. J. Mark. 2006, 70, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shin, H.; Casidy, R.; Yoon, A.; Yoon, S. Brand trust and avoidance following brand crisis: A quasi-experiment on the effect of franchisor statements. J. Brand Manag. 2016, 23, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siew, S.; Minor, M.S.; Felix, R. The influence of perceived strength of brand origin on willingness to pay more for luxury goods. J. Brand Manag. 2018, 25, 591–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kent, R.J.; Allen, C.T. Competitive interference effects in consumer memory for advertising: The role of brand familiarity. J. Mark. 1994, 58, 97–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Models | χ2 | df | χ2/df | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Five-factor model: GW, CB, BH, BA, BF | 543.503 | 265 | 2.051 | 0.936 | 0.058 | 0.0745 |
Four-factor model: GW + BH, CB, BA, BF | 905.328 | 269 | 3.366 | 0.853 | 0.087 | 0.0943 |
Three-factor model: GW + BH + BA, CB, BF | 1169.534 | 272 | 4.300 | 0.792 | 0.102 | 0.0967 |
Two-factor model: GW + CB + BH + BA, BF | 2216.359 | 274 | 8.089 | 0.551 | 0.150 | 0.1598 |
One-factor model: GW + CB + BH + BA + BF | 2485.017 | 275 | 9.036 | 0.489 | 0.159 | 0.1655 |
Items | SRW | CR | AVE |
---|---|---|---|
Greenwashing
| 0.796 0.752 0.752 0.822 0.683 | 0.8737 | 0.5814 |
CSR–CA belief
| 0.728 0.763 0.671 0.764 0.738 0.837 0.528 0.695 | 0.8949 | 0.5191 |
Brand hypocrisy
| 0.823 0.802 0.828 | 0.8582 | 0.6687 |
Brand avoidance
| 0.752 0.729 0.716 0.845 0.752 0.868 | 0.9021 | 0.6071 |
Brand familiarity
| 0.793 0.722 0.819 | 0.8221 | 0.6070 |
Variables | Mean | S.D. | GE | AG | ED | HI | BI | BN | BF | GW | CB | BH | BA |
GE | 0.56 | 0.497 | |||||||||||
AG | 2.42 | 0.970 | −0.018 | ||||||||||
ED | 1.99 | 0.879 | 0.009 | 0.107 | |||||||||
HI | 2.36 | 0.912 | −0.031 | 0.257 ** | −0.006 | ||||||||
BI | 0.48 | 0.500 | 0.224 ** | −0.017 | −0.015 | −0.021 | |||||||
BN | 0.56 | 0.497 | −0.038 | −0.137 * | 0.052 | −0.019 | −0.171 ** | ||||||
BF | 4.61 | 1.475 | −0.088 | 0.086 | −0.011 | −0.044 | −0.158 ** | 0.011 | (0.779) | ||||
GW | 3.73 | 1.315 | −0.034 | −0.048 | 0.027 | 0.033 | 0.077 | 0.010 | −0.289 ** | (0.762) | |||
CB | 3.93 | 1.299 | −0.118 * | −0.100 | −0.127 * | 0.083 | 0.024 | 0.018 | −0.157 ** | 0.114 * | (0.720) | ||
BH | 3.58 | 1.482 | 0.001 | −0.223 ** | 0.023 | −0.064 | 0.142 ** | 0.099 | −0.320 ** | 0.450 ** | 0.157 ** | (0.818) | |
BA | 3.43 | 1.382 | 0.039 | −0.035 | −0.022 | 0.078 | 0.244 ** | −0.053 | −0.340 ** | 0.490 ** | 0.165 ** | 0.649 ** | (0.779) |
Variables | Brand Avoidance | Brand Hypocrisy | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | |
Control variables | |||||
GE | −0.0023 [−0.976, 0.929] | 0.0117 [−0.0683, 0.0916] | 0.0307 [−0.0496, 0.1111] | −0.0261 [−0.1232, 0.0710] | −0.0003 [−0.0979, 0.0973] |
AG | −0.0112 [−0.1091, 0.866] | 0.0789 [−0.0046, 0.1624] | 0.0902 * [0.0071, 0.1733] | −0.1680 ** [−0.2678, −0.0683] | −0.1481 ** [−0.2477, −0.0486] |
ED | −0.0293 [−0.1266, 0.0640] | −0.0433 [−0.1216, 0.0350] | −0.0308 [−0.1091, 0.0474] | 0.0261 [−0.0690, 0.1212] | 0.0425 [−0.0524, 0.1374] |
HI | 0.0616 [−0.0344, 0.1577] | 0.0825 * [0.0018, 0.01631] | 0.0672 [−0.0134, 0.1478] | −0.0388 [−0.1367, 0.0591] | −0.0577 [−0.1553, 0.0399] |
BI | 0.1795 *** [0.0821, 0.2769] | 0.1250 ** [0.0428, 0.2072] | 0.1114 ** [0.0295, 0.1933] | 0.1016 * [0.0023, 0.2008] | 0.0823 [−0.0166, 0.1813] |
BN | −0.0237 [−0.1187, 0.0713] | −0.0711 [−0.1512, 0.0090] | −0.0700 [−0.1492, 0.0092] | 0.0883 [−0.0086, 0.1851] | 0.0868 [−0.0089, 0.1826] |
BF | −0.1873 *** [−0.2856, −0.0891] | −0.0883* [−0.1724, −0.0041 | −0.0755 [−0.1595, 0.0084] | −0.1846 *** [−0.2848, −0.0845] | −0.1618 ** [−0.2621, −0.0615] |
Independent variable | |||||
GW | 0.4203 *** [0.3233, 0.5172] | 0.2164 *** [0.1278, 0.3049] | 0.2306 *** [0.1422, 0.3189] | 0.3800 *** [0.2812, 0.4788] | 0.3848 *** [0.2867, 0.4830] |
Mediating variable | |||||
BH | 0.5365 *** [0.4443, 0.6288] | 0.5134 *** [0.4207, 0.6060] | |||
Moderating variable | |||||
CB | 0.0445 [−0.0357, 0.1246] | 0.0742 [−0.0228, 0.1712] | |||
Interaction | |||||
GW * CB | −0.1057 ** [−0.1817, −0.0296] | −0.1229 ** [−0.2143, −0.0316] | |||
F-score (df1, df2) | 18.1548(8,308) *** | 37.5052(9, 307) *** | 32.1108(11, 305) *** | 16.0311(8, 308) *** | 14.0414(10, 306) *** |
R2 | 0.3204 | 0.5237 | 0.5366 | 0.2940 | 0.3145 |
Mediating Variable | First Stage | Second Stage | Direct Effect | Indirect (Mediating) Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brand hypocrisy | 0.3800 [0.2812, 0.4788] | 0.5365 [0.4443, 0.6288] | 0.2164 [0.1278, 0.3049] | 0.2039 [0.1443, 0.2739] |
Moderating Variable | First Stage | Second Stage | Direct Effect | Indirect (Mediating) Effect |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mean − S.D. | 0.5078 [0.3690, 0.6465] | 0.5134 [0.4207, 0.6060] | 0.3362 [0.2126, 0.4598] | 0.2607 [0.1849, 0.3443] |
Mean | 0.3848 [0.2867, 0.4830] | 0.5134 [0.4207, 0.6060] | 0.2306 [0.1422, 0.3189] | 0.1976 [0.1373, 0.2638] |
Mean + S.D. | 0.2619 [0.1327, 0.3911] | 0.5134 [0.4207, 0.6060] | 0.1249 [0.0157, 0.2340] | 0.1345 [0.0594, 0.2151] |
Difference | −0.1229 [−0.2143, −0.0316] | —— | −0.1057 [−0.1817, −0.0296] | −0.0631 [−0.1119, −0.0178] |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xiao, Z.; Wang, Y.; Guo, D. Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127204
Xiao Z, Wang Y, Guo D. Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12):7204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127204
Chicago/Turabian StyleXiao, Zengrui, Ying Wang, and Dongjie Guo. 2022. "Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model" Sustainability 14, no. 12: 7204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127204
APA StyleXiao, Z., Wang, Y., & Guo, D. (2022). Will Greenwashing Result in Brand Avoidance? A Moderated Mediation Model. Sustainability, 14(12), 7204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127204