Different Fertility Approaches in Organic Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Production Alter Floral Biomass Yield but Not CBD:THC Ratio
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The manuscript is well written with good structure, however authors are advised to add some illusterative figures
ore over, they should drew a conclusion on their work , as i did not see a conclusion section
Author Response
The manuscript is well written with good structure, however authors are advised to add some illusterative figures
more over, they should drew a conclusion on their work , as i did not see a conclusion section
Thank you for your comments. We have added additional information in Table 3 and created a new table (Table 4) to summarize our results. We have also added a conclusion section (L560-575).
Reviewer 2 Report
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Thank you for your comments. Please see the attached document for our response.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 3 Report
In my opinion, this paper may be interesting for reader of Sustainability Journal. Nevertheless, there are some items that should be addressed before acceptance:
THE TITLE OF MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE IMPROVED
However, the manuscript is framed nicely.
In keyword section Cannabis sativa should be in Italics, check in whole manuscript botanical name should be in italics
In the abstract section we and our results / findings not acceptable. Improve the sentence
Improve table 1 (Line No. 201)
Reframe the tables number (there is 2 table with 1 number)
Font of references is not as per the journal.
Introduction:
The introduction clearly state the purpose of the research.
Results
There are no major reservations to the results. The results are appropriately described.
Discussion
The Discussion is well structured; the research results are confronted with other authors’ research.
Conclusions
The conclusions are too general. Please make them more specific.
Author Response
In my opinion, this paper may be interesting for reader of Sustainability Journal. Nevertheless, there are some items that should be addressed before acceptance:
THE TITLE OF MANUSCRIPT SHOULD BE IMPROVED SE
We have updated the manuscript title.
However, the manuscript is framed nicely.
In keyword section Cannabis sativa should be in Italics, check in whole manuscript botanical name should be in italics
This has been updated throughout the manuscript.
In the abstract section we and our results / findings not acceptable. Improve the sentence
We have removed “we” and “our” from the abstract.
Improve table 1 (Line No. 201)
Table 1 has been improved.
Reframe the tables number (there is 2 table with 1 number)
Thank you for catching our mistake. The tables and figures have been double checked and mismatched ones have been changed.
Font of references is not as per the journal.
Font for references has been changed from 10pt to the correct font size of 9pt.
Introduction:
The introduction clearly state the purpose of the research.
Results
There are no major reservations to the results. The results are appropriately described.
Discussion
The Discussion is well structured; the research results are confronted with other authors’ research.
Thank you.
Conclusions
The conclusions are too general. Please make them more specific.
We have added a concluding paragraph specific to our findings (L560-575)
