Next Article in Journal
Syndromic Surveillance among Evacuees at a Houston “Megashelter” following Hurricane Harvey
Next Article in Special Issue
Soil–Plant–Microbe Interactions Determine Soil Biological Fertility by Altering Rhizospheric Nutrient Cycling and Biocrust Formation
Previous Article in Journal
The Application of Sem–Neural Network Method to Determine the Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Online Banking Services in Vietnam
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Local Wisdom of West Timorese Farmers in Land Management

1
East Nusa Tenggara Assessment Institute of Agricultural Technology (ENT AIAT), Kupang 85362, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
2
Research Center for Ecology and Etnobiology, National Research and Innovation Agency (NRIA), Jl. Raya Jakarta-Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong 16911, West Java, Indonesia
3
Agriculture Faculty, University of Nusa Cendana, Kupang 85001, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(10), 6023; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106023
Submission received: 1 April 2022 / Revised: 8 May 2022 / Accepted: 9 May 2022 / Published: 16 May 2022

Abstract

:
This paper’s working hypothesis is that the indigenous farming practices of Timorese farmers are those most suitable and adaptable with regard to these farmers’ circumstances. Intensive farming and the acceleration of land conversion in Java lead to a reduction in favorable cropland and the degradation of soil biology. To meet the demand for food production, unfavorable areas outside Java, including marginal semi-arid areas on Timor Island, East Nusa Tenggara province, have become an important option. Unfortunately, the national crop production policy has paid less attention to the specific biophysical characteristics of the region and how local people have adapted to the diverse marginal environment. We review the literature in the areas of soil nutrition retention and soil biology, vegetation/crop diversity, and farming practices/management, including local wisdom on soil management. This paper highlights that the values of the chemical parameters of the soils in question are varied, but generally range from low to high. The existence of beneficial micro-organisms is important both for improving soil fertility and due to their association with local vegetation/crops. Traditional farming practices, such as the local agroforestry of Mamar, have effectively preserved the existence of micro-organisms that promote conservation practices, crop/vegetation diversity, and sustainable agriculture. We recommend that the expansion of croplands and crop production into marginal semi-arid areas needs to be considered and adapted while taking into consideration sustainability and environmentally sound traditional practices.

1. Introduction

Increasing food crop production is still a major challenge for agricultural development in Indonesia. The production of food crops, particularly rice as a main staple, mainly relies on the unfavorable cropland in Java or in the western parts of Indonesia in general. Moreover, rice production policy is biased towards subsidies for agro-chemical inputs, particularly fertilizers [1]. Meanwhile, rice productivity in favorable areas in Java has been reported to be stagnant [2], and the current national rice production is no longer keeping pace with the increasing human population [3].
Unfavorable cropland areas outside Java, including the dominant semi-arid area of East Nusa Tenggara province, have become important options. Nevertheless, food crop production, particularly rice in ENT, remains unchanged. The ENT province still relies on inter-island rice imports of around 100,000 tons per year to meet domestic demand [4]. This figure indicates that implementing the principles of the national food program’s bias towards agro-chemical inputs in semi-arid areas has little impact on food crop production. Indeed, agricultural programs in general have negative effects on the environment, including harming biodiversity [5] and soil biology [6,7].
The characteristics of the mosaic environment, including the diversity of vegetation/plants and local micro-organisms, are manifestations of local soil and climatic conditions [8]. For example, in the case of the Mamar Agroforestry agro-ecosystem environment, which was studied at 16 different sites, the analysis results indicate that this agro-ecosystem is an important habitat for 112 plant species [9]. There are even several local genetic resources that have been identified and registered as local varieties at the Center for Plant Varieties Protection and Licensing, Ministry of Agriculture, including corn, beans, fruits, spices, and animal feed [10].
Facing the marginal land conditions of West Timor, adaptation efforts by farmers related to food production and planting activities have led to various local knowledge and practices, including the existence of agricultural commodities that are derived from natural selection, which have been ongoing for quite some time. Other local wisdom, which relates to improving soil fertility or maintaining soil health, includes mixed planting with legumes as feed sources, such as planting Lamtoro Taramba (Leucaena leucocephala (Lam.) de Wit) or butterfly pea (Clitoria ternatea) [11], together with various nuts in one hole or so-called “Sen” [12]. Other examples include using the residues of plants such as bamboo [13], as well as the use of livestock manure from cattle barns or taken from pastures. All of these practices do not introduce external inputs.
Despite the positive aspects of employing local wisdom in farming practices, there are also farming practices that are considered counter-productive and threaten the survival of local micro-organisms and soil decomposers that benefit soil fertility. Examples of these counter-productive practices include the slash-and-burn clearing of land that is carried out before planting. Although the impact of fire on micro-organisms depends on temperature, duration, and soil moisture [14,15], the varying response of micro-organisms affects the soil recovery process [14,16,17]. The short-term impact of fire (measured a day after the fire) was found to include a decline in microbial C biomass, enzyme activities, soil respiration, and microbial activities [17,18]. However, two weeks after the fire, the levels of bacteria, soil respiration, and fungi biomass increased.
Efforts to improve soil fertility and health by combining the potential of local micro-organisms and existing local practices will trigger an increase in agricultural production by farmers. It is strongly suspected that this combination strategy will be easily adopted by farmers because it is in the familiar context of low external inputs. This article is the result of a review of various research that has been carried out in West Timor, as well as other sources of information that have relevance to the land conditions and farming systems in West Timor. The emphasis in this article is a description of soil fertility and health, the diversity of vegetation/plants, the role of farmers, and local practices that allow for adaptation to the challenges of the farming environment. The results of this review describe the role of farmers in adapting to the marginal soil environment; their approaches are expressed in the form of local wisdom that is different from that of other places.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Soil Nutrient Retention and Its Availability

Climatologically, the western part of Timor Island, East Nusa Tenggara (ENT) province, Indonesia, is classified as a semi-arid area, with a limited amount of annual rainfall; the precipitation is less than 1500 mm/year, and there are only three to four wet months per year, namely, December to March/April [19]. This differs from the dominant wet tropical climate of the western part of Indonesia. Another feature is that most of the soils are young; they are characterized by a thin solum depth of <20 cm and a sloping land surface that is due to the topography, which is dominated by hills and mountains [20]. Topographic conditions show a positive correlation with soil moisture [21]. In terms of the soil fertility of West Timor, the soil reaction (pH) is alkaline, but there are still problems with the availability of nitrogen and phosphate and the low C-organic content of the soil. This condition is a challenge for agricultural production faced by local farmers and the government in the expansion of agricultural development programs. The consequence of this challenging situation is that without being supported by sound knowledge and cultivation technology, agricultural productivity is low, and there is at times no harvest.
The altitude of West Timor is dominated by the lowland area of below 700 m above sea level (m asl), which covers 86% of the highland area above 700 m asl [19] (Figure 1). In terms of land development, West Timor is dominated by young soils, such as Entisols and Inceptisols, as well as more developed soils, such as Vertisols and Alfisols. These soils develop both from calcareous sediments and from deposit parent materials [20]. In the perspective of soil nutrient retention and nutrient availability, the values of soil chemical parameters are varied, but generally lie in the low to high category.
Regarding the presence of C-organic, it can be described that it almost varies between locations. In [22], the soils overgrown with Sandalwood (Santalum album L.) in the North Central Timor district contained 1.18% (low) and 4.39% (high) organic C-organic. Meanwhile, as reported by [23], from each type of Vertisol and Alfisol soil in the Kupang district, the C-organic values were 1.26 and 1.05% (low), respectively, including rice land in the Malaka district [24]. Similar conditions were also found in other locations in Kupang [25] in the medium category (2.85%) [26].
In terms of Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), it is generally classified as medium to high, ranging from 19.84 to 31.67 cmol(+) kg−1 [25,27]. The existence of a good CEC value is closely related to the area that is dominated by clay type 2:1 montmorillonite [28]. The characteristics of nutrient retention, such as acidity (pH H2O), C-organic, and CEC, mentioned above, are not much different from the results observed at 16 locations in the agroforestry environment in West Timor, as presented in Table 1. Table 1 shows that the value of Base Saturation (BS) is high (100%). Thus, from the perspective of soil fertility, the nutrient retention aspect is considered quite good.
Regarding the nitrogen status in Timor, some places are in the range of 0.26–0.36% (medium category) [26,27]. Furthermore, the potential P (Phosphate) and K (Potassium) statuses are in the very high category, while the available P is classified as low, as presented in Table 1. Meanwhile, at other locations, the available P status varied from very low to very high [22,26,27,31]. Thus, in the context of nutrient availability, soils in West Timor are quite varied in their availability, ranging from very low to moderate. Therefore, the handling of nutrient availability warrants further attention.
Efforts to increase the availability of P can be made, among others, through the inoculation of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSMs). Some microorganisms that can be utilized to increase P in semi-arid environments, among others, are Pantoeaa glomerans [32], Rhizobium sp. [33], Bacillus subtilis [34], Penicillium spp., Aspergillus spp., and Penicillium spp. [35]. These microorganisms secrete organic acids and make it possible for P to dissolve crops [36]. The application of organic matters and the inoculation of phosphate dissolved microorganisms will boost the inoculation effectivity of available P [37], which is in line with [38], showing that soil organic matter has a positive correlation with P availability and the amount of dissolved P microorganism, and it has a negative correlation with P total.

2.2. Soil Biology in West Timor

Soil biology is one of the major soil properties that are often considered an indicator of soil health. Two important indicators commonly used to assess soil biology properties include soil organic carbon and soil microorganisms. Soil organic carbon (SOC) plays an important role in maintaining physical, chemical, and biological properties in the soil, and therefore, the SOC has been recognized as the single most significant soil health indicator [39,40,41]. Generally, soil organic carbon in West Timor ranges from low to moderate, but mostly, the SOC is low. The low content of SOC in West Timor is very likely related to the low rainfall in the region, which limits plant growth and the deposit of plant residues in the soil, and the hot weather, which favors the decomposition process of organic matter.
Beneficial soil microorganisms, in particular, are involved in many crucial processes in the soil and in the natural fertility of soil [42,43]. For example, a non-functional group of soil microorganisms, often called the decomposer, plays an important role in the mineralization process of organic matter, leading to the release of nutrients in the soil ready for plant uptake, and a functional group of soil microorganisms, which specialize in a certain function in the soil or for plant growth. Examples of these are free living and symbiotic N2-fixing bacteria, mycorrhizas, plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), and Trichoderma. These beneficial soil microorganisms are important in supporting plant growth in West Timor where the soil is commonly less fertile, and where water becomes a limiting factor for plant growth.
Few studies have been undertaken on the potential of beneficial soil microorganisms in West Timor. The genetic biodiversity of leguminous plants in West Timor, such as wild legumes or legumes, cultivated around the farm land for food or for forage, has been explored [44]. Regarding the low fertility of the soil in West Timor, the occurrence of these leguminous plants is very important due to their role in contributing nitrogen (N) to the soil through the activity of Rhizobium in the roots. The occurrence of ingenious beneficial microorganisms involved in N fixation has also been reported [45].
The presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), the symbiotic mutualisms between the fungi and roots of higher plants [46], has been reported in the rhizosphere of many types of natural vegetation or plants in West Timor [6,47,48,49]. As the soils of West Timor are mostly calcareous and less fertile, the abundant indigenous mycorrhizal could become a biological natural supporting mechanism that could enhance plant growth in the region by improving plant nutrient absorption; most notably, phosphorus (P), which is highly adsorbed in calcareous soil. Moreover, mycorrhizal fungi are also known to improve plant resistance to drought [46]. This can help in the survival of plants under water stress commonly occurring on dryland in West Timor. Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) were found to be more abundant in the traditional farming system, where farmers perform minimum tillage and avoid the use of inorganic fertilizer, than the modern agriculture system, which involves the use of inorganic fertilizer [6]. This finding suggests that the traditional farming system in West Timor favors the health of soil biology. The potential of indigenous AMF to improve the soil phosphorus (P) availability and growth of maize with a lower amount of inorganic P in the calcareous soil of West Timor has also been recently reported [26].
The potential of indigenous plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) has also been reported as a cost-effective and safe alternative approach to improve plant growth and developments, as they are able to produce plant-growth regulators, as well as enhance the soil condition and protection from soil pests and diseases [50]. In [51], it was found that indigenous Bacillus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. were capable of reducing brown rot gummosis disease in Soe Mandarin. Bacillus sp. has also been reported to produce indol acetic acid (IAA) and increase phosphorus solubility [52]. In [53], it was also found that local Bacillus spp. had the potential to control rice leaf spot disease caused by Drecschlera oryzae. Furthermore, this study also indicated that Bacillus spp. can also stimulate plant growth. The occurrence of other types of PGPR in West Timor included Gluconacetobacter sp. [54] and Acinetobacter sp., Enterobacter sp., Klebsiella sp., and Pantoea sp. [45].
Two other potential soil microorganisms that are also important in supporting plant growth in the semi-arid land of West Timor are Trichoderma and Streptomyces. Trichoderma was found to be ubiquitous in different plants in West Timor, such as mandarin, rice, maize, tomato, and chili. Trichoderma has been found to play a number of roles in agriculture, including promoting plant growth [55,56] and inducing resistance to plant pathogens [57,58,59]. Within the context of the West Timor dryland agro-ecosystem, indigenous Trichoderma was found to be able to restrict the growth of root and basal stem rot disease of soe mandarin caused by Phytophthora palmivora [60], and also to reduce the growth of Diplodia sp. in vitro [61]. In addition, indigenous Trichoderma species from West Timor were also found to suppress brown spot disease and increase the yield and yield-contributing characteristics of upland rice [62]. In a pot experiment conducted in [62], the local Trichoderma species propagated in corn rice bran were applied to the planting media before planting, while the fungicide was applied through spraying. The study results are presented in Table 2.
Table 2 shows that three local Trichoderma species from West Timor were able to reduce the brown spot disease severity by up to 31–32% as compared to the control, but the efficacy of these Trichoderma species was still below that of the fungicide Trivia 73 WP, which reached 42.5%. Interestingly, the grain yield increase caused by the three Trichoderma species treatments was much higher than that of the fungicide treatment. This finding suggests that Trichoderma applications not only suppressed the disease but also increased the grain yield of upland rice, presumably through the mechanism of plant-growth stimulation, as reported by previous workers [55,56].
Trichoderma used as fertilizer (mixed with compost/trichocompost) also reduced the fusarium wilt of tomatoes and increased tomato growth [63], as well as increasing the growth of edamame [64]. The above study results highlight the significant role of local Trichoderma isolates that can be optimally used in maintaining and increasing the soil biological health of West Timor, thus contributing to supporting the agriculture production in the region.
Besides arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and Trichoderma, both Streptomyces pseudogriseolus and S. cellulosae bacteria were found in maize; each has potential as a biological control for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and Fusarium oxysporum, respectively; both were found in maize rhizosphere [65].
In addition to these beneficial soil microorganisms, Taopan et al. [66] found Methanotrophic bacteria in West Timor (Kupang), namely, Methylocystis rosea, Methylobacter sp., Methylocystis parvus, and Methylococcus capsulatus, in paddy rhizosphere soil, which could increase rice production and decrease methane emission.

2.3. Farming and Soil Fertilization

Although there is various local wisdom practiced by farmers in West Timor, there is a counter-productive action, “the slash-and-burn system”, which is currently still carried out by local farmers before planting. Since no study has been undertaken on the impact of slash-and-burn on the soil microbiota in West Timor, this review was based on similar studies conducted elsewhere. The effect of fire on soil microbes has been reported with various results. For instance, in [67], it was found that in a long unburnt site (45 years) of the Eucalyptus marginata forest, ectomycorrhiza levels were higher than those of the site that had remained unburnt for 6 years and 1 month. Accordingly, fire could not only eliminate the substrate of certain ectomycorrhizas, but could also have a sterilizing effect that could reduce the inoculum potential of the fungal symbionts [67]. In contrast, other authors found that the exclusion of fire from the Eucalyptus forest resulted in an adverse impact on mycorrhizal association due to soil ecological changes [68,69]. The impact of burning on soil microorganisms may be related to the time of burning [70]. The study found that the abundance and diversity soil microorganisms decreased at 2 and 4 weeks after burning, respectively, but increased 6 weeks after burning. This suggested that if the soil is left undisturbed for a long time after burning, the soil, including its microorganisms, may recover [70]. However, the capability of soil microbiota to recover after burning might be different depending on the resistance of the soil microbes to high temperatures [70,71].
Slash-and-burn resulted in changes in soil chemical properties, including reducing soil acidity and increasing some base cations [72]. Following changes in the soil chemical properties due to slash-and-burn, there were also changes in some bacteria communities’ taxa and some functional bacteria, and these changes could be considered a buffer for drastic changes in soil fertility after slash-and-burn [73]. Changes in soil chemical properties, such as a decrease soil organic C and N, as well as changes in soil biology, such as soil respiration, microbial biomass C and enzyme activities due to prescribed burning, have also been reported [18]. Despite the improvement of some soil chemical factors, such base cations, pH, and CEC due to slash-and-burn, it is a fact that soil microbes are the components of soil biology that are most affected. Thus, in the future, minimizing the frequency and intensity of the burns may need to be considered for a more sustainable farming system in West Timor dryland.
In addition to the potential of indigenous beneficial soil microorganisms found in the soil of West Timor, there are also some traditional agricultural cultivating systems practiced by local farmers that can maintain the biological health of soil, including minimum or zero tillage, as well as the use of green manure, cow manure, and a mixed-cropping planting system of leguminous plants, such as peanut, mungbean, or pigeon pea, together with non-leguminous plants, such as maize, pumpkin, and/or Siamese pumpkin. Minimum tillage or zero tillage is a conservative way to maintain land sustainability, including soil biological health [74,75]. This practice has been undertaken by farmers for a long time as a local technique to maintain soil fertility [38,76,77].
The use of manure as an organic fertilizer has also been practiced by local farmers. This approach can not only improve the biology properties of the soil but also its physical and chemical properties. The soil’s physical properties, particularly soil structure, are very important in relation to the capability of the soil to hold more water and the resistance of soil to erosion. This becomes more crucial regarding the short rainy season in West Timor and the slope topography. The application of biochar and cattle manure in the semi-arid dryland farming system of West Timor has also been found to be beneficial to soil characteristics and to increase mungbean yield [78]. Another local wisdom of West Timorese farmers is mixed planting between leguminous and non-leguminous plants as an economic strategy to meet farmers’ needs for food crops, as well as to avoid failed harvest. This local wisdom is not only beneficial from the economic perspective of the farmers, but is also ecologically beneficial for improving soil health through the use of leguminous plants. This practice has been undertaken by farmers for a long time as local wisdom to maintain soil fertility. The use of forage legumes in a mixed-cropping system with maize increased the soil nitrogen level and increased the maize yield substantially in West Timor soil conditions [79].

2.4. Crop Diversity in Upland Farming

Crop diversity including food crops, vegetables, fruits, and estate crops in West Timor is high among crop types and varieties. Crops are cultivated by farmers in West Timor based on altitude and water availability, as stated in [80,81]. Additionally, the water availability determines crop types and rotation patterns in a given region [82,83]. Crops that are cultivated at high altitude (>700 m asl) are different from those grown at low to middle altitudes (0–<700 m asl). Similarly, crops cultivated on land that has permanent water sources are different from those on dryland without water sources.
Crops cultivated at high altitudes in West Timor, such as in North Molo and Fatumnasi Subdistricts in South Central Timor District, and also in West Miomafo of the North Central Timor District, include maize (Zea mays L.), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.), potato (Solanum tuberosum L.), carrot (Daucus carota L.), kidney-bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), prey onions (Allium porrum Leek), coriander (Koriandrum sativum L.), snaps (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), garlic (Allium sativum L.), mandarin (Citrus reticulata L.), apple (Malus domestica L.), and coffee (Coffea arabica L.) [84]. Horticultural crops dominate in the highlands, and they are planted more by farmers to earn an income [85].
Crops cultivated on irrigated land at low to middle altitudes in West Timor include irrigated rice, maize, onion (Allium cepa L.), brassica (Brassica chinensis L.), chayote (Sechium edule (Jacq.) Sw.), long beans (Vigna cylindrical L.), bitter gourd (Momordica charantia L.), chili (Capsicum annum L.), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), melon (Cucumis melon L.), water melon (Citrullus lanatus L.), grape (Vitis vinifera L.), and mungbean (Phaseolus radiatus L.) [84]. Most of the vegetable crops are farmed after the main crop rice is harvested or during the dry season.
However, crops cultivated on dryland at low to middle altitudes include upland rice (Oryza sativa L.), maize (Zea mays L.), pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Durch), rice bean (Vigna umbelata Thunb), pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.), ground nut (Arachis hypogaea L.), mung bean (Vigna radiata), barley (Setaria italica L.), job’s tear (Coix lacrima-jobi L.), sorgum (Sorghum bicolor L.), banana (Musa sp.), coconut (Cocos nucifera L.), mango (Mangifera indica L.), betel nut (Areca catechu L.), betel (Piper betle L.), salaka (Salacca zalacca L.) cassava (Manihot utilissima Pohl), and cashew nut (Anacardium occidentale L.). The crop diversity determines the soil fertility and farm sustainability in a given region. Cultivating various crops in a parcel of land, on the one hand, requires different nutrients from the soil, while on the other hand, provides a low crop failure risk.
Polyculture farming is considered local Timorese knowledge, and it involves farming or planting crops that have economic, social, and ecological benefits. Farmers in some villages of the Mutis highland deal with cultivated horticultural crops, such as onion (Allium cepa), garlic (Allium sativum), potato (Solanum tuberosum), chili (Capsicum annuum), maize (Zea mays), groundnut (Arachis hypogaea), cassava (Manihot esculenta), and sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Some farmers’ groups cultivate some herbs and medicinal plants, such as ginger (Zingiber officinale), galangal (Alpinia galanga), aromatic ginger (Kaempferia galanga), turmeric (Curcuma longa), and Curcuma (Curcuma zanthorrhiza) [5,9].
Farmers simply let plants or vegetation grow naturally in the gardens of their homes and on upland farms, such as nutmeg (Myristica sp.); the ficus tree (Ficus sp.); the small cotton tree (Bombax malabarica); white-barked Acacia (Acacia leucophloea); the lac tree (Scheilechera oleosa); the betel nut palm (Areca catechu); albizia (Albizia chinensis); the helicopter tree (Gyrocarpus americanus); as well as trees for bees: Wenlandia buberkilli var. Timorensis, Todalia asiabeca, and Albizzia saponaria [9]. They also plant or sell wooden vegetations for building materials, such as mahogany trees (Swietenia machrophylla King, Swietenia mahagony L. Jacg.), white teak (Gmelina arborea (Burm F.) Merr), teak (Tectona grandis L.), suren toon/iron redwood (Toona sureni (Blume) Merr), Timoo wood (Timonius sericeus (Desf) K. Schum), the bastard poon tree—kepuh (Sterculia foetida L), blackboard trees—pulai (Alstonia scholaris (L.) R.Br, Alstonia spectabilis R.Br), jackfruit trees (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lamk and Artocarpus integra Merr), and white-barked Acacia (Acacia leucophloea), which are found in the environments surrounding their settlements. Farmers also plant horticultural crops, such as pineapple (Ananas comosus Merr), soursop (Anona muricata), jackfruit trees (Artocarpus communis Forst, Artocarpus heterophyllus Lamk, Artocarpus integra Merr), achira (Canna edulis Ker), papaya (Carica papaya L.), pummelo (Citrus maxima (Burm) Merr), Taro—ubikeladi (Colocasia esculenta Schott), coconut (Cocos nucifera), asiatic yam (Dioscorea aculcata Linn and Dioscorea alata Linn), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas Poir), mango (Mangifera indica), cassava (Manihot utilissima Pohl), banana (Musa parasidiaca Linn), avocado (Persea gratissima Gaertn), and turkey berry—terung pipit (Solanum torvum Swartz). Several NTFPs, such as betel nut palm—pinang (Areca cathecu), tamarind—asam (Tamarindus indica), and candle nut—kemiri (Aleurites moluccana) were developed around settlements, including plants that are useful for conservation, such as weeping fig—beringin (Ficus benyamina) and the blackboard tree (Alstonia scholaris), to increase the biodiversity, land conservation, and reforestation of areas around springs [86].
Based on the listed crops found in various places in Timor, most food crops were categorized as indigenous food crops cultivated for household consumption and income. The crops were planted simply following seasonality, and government intervention was very limited. Seed or planting materials were prepared by farmers themselves from the previous harvest season [87,88]. Most grains and seeds were stored in a traditional house called a Lopo, which is normally used for cooking. The smoke from firewood in the Lopo house protects the quality of seed materials, at least up to the next planting season [88,89,90].

2.5. Plant biodiversity in Local Agroforestry of Mamar

Upland farming in Timor started generally from land clearing and planting food crops for subsistence. The intensification of farming led to an increasing number of crop species, including some natural vegetations, which later developed into the so-called local agroforestry or secondary forest of Mamar. There were 112 crops/vegetation species in Mamar identified from 16 different samples, which emphasizes the important roles of Mamar [91].
These crops have a multi-strata characteristic from seedlings, saplings, poles, and trees, which indicates an important value index (IVI). At the seedling level, 85 species plants were identified, 10 of which were categorized as dominant species, namely, Pteris vitata, Piper betle, Chromobium sp., Chromolaena odorata, Corypha gebanga, Euphatorium odorata, Paspalum conyugatum, and Salanua verox. Seventy-five species had an IVI of approximately 1.13 (Albizia lebbeck) up to 9.66 (Musa paradisiaca). Based on the crop density, 10 species were classified as dense, namely, Piper betle, Pteris vitata, Leucaena leucocephala, Chromolaena odorata, Corypha gebanga, Euphatorium odorata, Paspalum conyugatum, Areca cathecu, Imperata cylindrica, and Cassia siamea.
Ninety species were found at the sapling level, five of which were classified as dominant species, such as Leucaena leucocephala (19.63), Litsea umbellifera (13.36), Arechacathecu (13.19), Chromolaena odorata (11.42), and Cananga odorata (10.10). There were 85 species that had an IVI of approximately 1.21 (Acacia auriculiformis) to 8.94 (Swietenia machrophylla). Based on the density, 10 species were considered dominant, namely, Leucaena leucocephala, Areca cathecu, Chromolaena odorata, Cananga odorata, Corypha gebanga, Macaranga tanarius, Aphanamixis polysticia, Alstonia scholaris, Sesbania grandiflora, and Jatropha curcas [30].
At the pole level, 77 crop species were found, 12 of which were found to be dominant, namely, Areca cathecu (88.81), Swietenia machrophylla (20.58), Calliandra calothyrsus (18.56), Cananga odorata (13.88), Artocarpus heterophyllus (12.70), Jatropha curcas (12.61), Antocephalus cadamba (12.07), Carica papaya (11.69), Coffea sp. (10.71), Leucaena leucocephala (10.69), Ficus albiphila (10.40), and Cocos nucifera (10.04). Sixty-five species had an IVI of approximately 2.80 (Acacia auriculiformis) up to 9,67 (Aleurites moluccana). Further, based on the density, there were 10 species that were found to be dominant, namely, Areca cathecu, Swietenia machrophylla, Cananga odorata, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Aleurites moluccana, Alstonia scholaris, Persea americana, Mangifera indica, Pterocarpus indicus, and Bambusa blumuena [30].
Sixty-nine species were found at the tree level, among which 10 species were found to be dominant, namely, Cocos nucifera (84.75), Alstonia scholaris (19.96), Aleurites moluccana (19.35), Ficus septica (17.32), Ficus benyamina (15.38), Musa paradisiaca (15.24), Mangifera indica (14.74), Toona sureni (11.62), Swietenia machrophylla (11.30), and Acacia leucophloea (10.35). Fifty-nine species had an IVI of approximately 2.09 (Bauhinia malabarica) up to 9.91 (Cananga odorata). Based on the density, there were 10 species that were found to be dominant, namely, Cocos nucifera, Aleurites moluccana, Mangifera indica, Acacia leucophloea, Swietenia machrophylla, Ficus benyamina, Artocarpus heterophyllus, Sterculia foetida, Tectona grandis, and Persea americana [30].
Cananga odorata is widely dominant in seedlings, saplings, poles and trees. Areca cathecu, Leucaena leucocephala, and Swietenia machrophylls species were dominant in saplings and poles, while some species had absolute dominance at certain levels. The vegetation dynamics of Mamar vary; dominancy of the specific crop at a certain level is not absolute. Dominance in poles and trees is not parallel to in seedlings and saplings; it is rather determined by the ability of each species to adapt and compete in using the resources needed for growth. Cocos nucifera has high dominancy at the tree level, with an IVI of 84.75, and conversely, this is very low at the seedling level, with an IVI of 3.02 and a sapling level IVI of 8.56. A similar condition occurred for Areca cathecu, which is dominant at the pole level, with an IVI of 88.81, but low at the seedling level, with an INP of 8.05, and at the sapling level, with an IVI of 13.09.
Based on the Braun–Blanquet category [92], most of the vegetation in the Mamar community was found to be occasional and frequent; some were found to be in the abundant and very abundant categories, particularly for lower vegetation. For poles and trees, species abundance was included in the rare and occasional categories, while Areca cathecu and Cocos nucifera were included in the abundant and even highly abundant categories in some samples.
Seedlings and saplings have significant value in determining structure and composition, and they have a role as trees of the future to replace the trees of the present, and also as an indicator for a sustainable ecosystem. In contrast, the reality for the Mamar community is that species dominancy in the seedling and sapling groups is not parallel with dominancy in the pole and tree groups, including dominant species at the seedling and sapling levels, which is not important economically. Most of the dominant species in the seedling and sapling groups are superior species in competition with one another that adapt to the environment. These include Salanua verox, Euphatorium odorata, Colocasia esculenta, Imperata cylindrica, Pteris vitata, Chromolaena odorata, and Piper betle [30].
Local wisdom in managing crop diversity in the local agroforestry of Mamar is pivotal for Mamar sustainability. Farmers’ intervention to diversify species determines the complexity of crop diversity in the Mamar ecosystem. Dominant species at the pole and tree levels are Areca cathecu and Cocos nucifera, which have high economic value; however, they are not dominant at the seedling and sapling levels due to frequent harvesting of these two species, which disturbs their regeneration process. On the other hand, maintaining species with low economic value in the seedling and sapling groups is a pivotal strategy to maintain sustainability and increase the productivity of the crops that have high economic value [30].
Information regarding the structure and composition of vegetation showed a high diversity of crops/vegetation in the local agroforestry of Mamar. The structure and composition of multi-strata vegetation from seedlings to trees indicated a high level of stability of Mamar as a living space and a regeneration process of vegetation in the semi-arid ecosystem. This stable structure and composition benefitted the improvement of environmental services. A challenge for long-term management is that maximal production function is difficult to reach because the Mamar community is not purely driven by economic goals, but also by social and ecological aspects, the conservation of cultural key species, and protecting water resources/springs. Therefore, ecological function as a supporting system for the productivity function, which has implications for economic function, can be applied to various vegetation to produce biomass at the surface layer [93].
  • Similarity Index on Agroforest Mamar
Similarity analysis based on the important value index, species density, and environmental factor in every site showed variation at every growth level. The observed environment factors are pH, kalium (K), phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), natrium (Na), nitrogen (N), cation exchange capacity (CEC), saturation base, slopes, altitude, and rainfall. Overall, the similarity index tended to be strong when a number of environment variables were included in the analysis (Table 3).
The similarity index (SI) showed variation in each sample at the seedling, sapling, pole, and tree levels based on the important value of the index parameter (IP) and vegetation density. Similarity tended to increase when a number of environmental factors were involved at every growth stage. The higher SI of each sample indicated the lower diversity management. This affects the output of ecological services in terms of soil fertility, habitat function, biomass, and carbon [94,95]. The semi-arid region with a marginal environment needs farmers’ intervention by increasing crop species combinations to support a stable ecosystem [96,97].

2.6. Natural Vegetation Biodiversity in Relation to Livestock Farming

The diversity of vegetation not only in the farmland in Mamar—as previously mentioned, but also in the forest and grassland—supports integrated livestock farming in the region. Although livestock may consist of cattle, buffalos, horses, goats, sheep, pigs, and chicken, the most important practice in West Timorese is raising cattle. The general vegetation biodiversity—as well as crop and forest vegetation biodiversity—that supports the integration of livestock farming in West Timor includes the natural grassland ecosystem (consisting of native grasses and herbaceous legumes), native trees (consisting of legume and non-leguminous trees) in the savannah, Ladang (upland), or in the form of forests in Mamar. Native grass species in the native grasslands in this case include Heteropogon contortus, Ischaemum timorense, Sorghum timorense, Sorghum nitidum, Cenchrus polistachyon (syn.: Pennisetum polystachion), Rottboellia exaltata, and Bothriochloa pertusa. Cenchrus polystachion [98] and Rottboellia exaltata, especially, are annuals, which are usually cut and carried during the early wet season before they start to flower and are fed to cattle in the pen, playing an important role in fodder composition in West Timor for fattening cattle, though in many places these two annuals are considered weeds [99,100,101,102,103]. Other grasses are usually free grazed or fed to the animals by tethering them in communal native pastures. Several herbaceous legumes identified as important fodder components in native pastures included Aeschynomene americana, Alysicarpus vaginalis, Desmodium timorense (a broad leaf legume), Mucuna timorense (similar to M. pruriens, but it is more hairy and itchy), and Desmanthus virgatus. There are some naturalized species which were introduced into Indonesia a long time ago as cover crops in the estate crop plantations, including Macroptilium atropurpureum (Siratro), Centrosema molle (Syn.: Centrosema pubescens), and Calopogonium muconoides, which are found to grow naturally in native pastures, at road sides, in Ladangs, and at the edge of forests and bushes. Desmodium timorense (the broad leaf Desmodium in Timor) can be found sporadically in spots of native grasslands and are grazed by free-grazing animals (both goat and cattle); however, in the North Central Timor district, farmers cut and carry this as feed to fatten cattle [104,105].
The native legume trees found in West Timor include Acasia leucophloea and Acasia nilotica, which may be grazed by free-grazing cattle and goats when the plant sizes are within the reach of the animals, while the tall-growing plants may be climbed and cut down by the farmers to feed to the animals. The leaves of A. leucophloea contain a moderate–high protein content of 15–17% [106]; they are also an important source of dry season fodder and pasture trees in Pakistan, with 25% crude protein content in seeds [107], and of plant nectar for honey bees in Timor [9]. Some naturalized species that have been present for quite a long time include Glirisidia sepium, Sesbania grandiflora, and Leucaena leucocephala subsp. leucacephala (small common Leucaena) [98]. These small trees may be directly grazed by the animals or cut and carried as feed for animals in pens or at tethering places near to farmhouses. Both of the Acacias are commonly cut and carried during the long dry season on the island. The small type of Common Leucaena has been commonly used in the farming systems, especially in the Amarasi areas, in West Timor, as an effort to prevent Lantana camara infestation in the area, to improve the soil quality, and as a pioneer plant in the slash-and-burn method to shift cultivation. The plant is grown at a high density in a plot of land and will be cut down and burnt (slash-and-burn) in the land preparation season (before the wet season) before being planted with maize in the wet season. After this, the plant will be left to regrow and cover the land plot, and will be the same at the next land preparation stage, while during this time, the plant may be cut and carried as feed to fatten cattle near the farmhouses. Later, the introduction of the giant leucaena varieties (Leucaena leucocephala subsp. glabrata) in the 1970s, such as K8, K28, and K 500 (cv Cunningham), enriched the fodder sources of livestock farmers in West Timor, especially in the Amarasi area [98]. However, upon the attack of the psyllid insect (Heteropsylla cubana), a new variety (Leucaena leucocephala cv Tarramba) that was resistant to the insect was tested, promoted, and developed, especially for ruminant feeding [105,108].
Besides the tree legumes, there are some native trees of non-leguminous plant leaves that are important in providing highly nutritional fodder, especially during the mid to end of the dry season (August to November/December), for the livestock (cattle and goats), e.g., Macaranga tanarius (local name: Busi), Schleichera oleosa (local name: Kesambi), Ceiba petandra (lokal name: Kapok), and Ficus species (local name: Beringin). These trees are important during the dry season when grasses and herbaceous legumes are scarce. These non-leguminous trees, besides providing fodder during the dry season, and timber (or large to medium branches/trunks) obtained from logging the trees, as well as other trees such as Gum Trees (Eucalyptus species), would be important in building fences for food crop land plots during the planting season to prevent free-grazing animals from damaging the cultivated plants within the plot. Besides the mentioned feed obtained from native grasslands, food crop waste, and trees from forests and Ladangs, especially as a source of protein and fiber for ruminants, the Corypha gebanga (local name: Gewang) pith has been quite an important feed as a readily available carbohydrate (RAC) or energy source included in the local wisdom of West Timorese farmers for livestock farming. The pith of the C. gebanga can provide feed for cattle, goats, pigs, and chickens [109,110].

2.7. Farmers and Farming Environment

Based on the adoption of agricultural trends, the indigenous farmers of Timor have been known to find it difficult to embrace new agricultural innovations. The level of agricultural adoption, in general, is very low, which is closely related to the intrinsic semi-arid farming environment. This is also closely related to household characteristics, in that most of the farmers do not finish primary school (almost 70%), and some do not finish junior and high school (25%) [111].
The household structure indicated that there were 243,635 households with an average number of household members, with 27% of them working as farmers (Table 4), which indicated that the number of household members working in the agriculture sector was very low, while other members had not yet entered the workforce. These data are crucial, since family size is related to the contribution to the workforce, income, and social and economic burden [112].
Table 5 shows that 76% of households received income from the agricultural sector, which is probably due to the following reasons: (a) workforce working outside the agricultural sector; (b) disguised employment; (c) young family structure; (d) more hired labor for farming activities; and (e) it has a low impact on conservation efforts and maintaining soil quality.
Almost all farmers (99.3%) in West Timor have their own farming land; however, close to half (47%) of them own a narrow piece of agricultural land and can be categorized as small farmers. Both less labor force working in farmland and small land size have negative implications for soil quality and farming environments. Small farmers with small land sizes tend to maximize crop production and are taken into consideration less in relation to environmentally sound aspects.
Most farmers in Timor practice mixed-cropping patterns as a strategy to minimize risk [113]. They plant any suitable crops on a parcel of land and, at the same time, raise livestock as an important part of the farming system [114]. Household farmers normally own food crop-farming land, horticulture, and estate-crop land. Food crops are normally cultivated in rice fields (lowland and/or rainfed) and small areas in the gardens of their homes. Horticulture crops, particularly vegetables, are cultivated in the upland and in the rice field after the rice is harvested and if there is enough water available. Estate crops are normally planted in the local agroforestry plot, so-called Mamar. Upland farmers in Timor have employed soil conservation techniques, such as terracing and planting conservation vegetations [113].

2.8. Local Wisdom on Soil Management

Prior to the arrival of the European ruler in Timor, the indigenous Timorese survived as hunters and gatherers on the less populated island and in the diverse environment [115,116]. Timorese people probably started farming in the 13th century [117], and incorporated some new food crops, which were later replaced by maize after contact with Indian and Chinese traders, and later with European traders [115,118,119]. In this section, a pearl of local wisdom refers to indigenous Timorese practices in upland farming that respect environmental and sustainability notions.
Most of the agricultural land on Timor Island is considered marginal or unfertile land/soil [118] compared to Indonesia’s western part. Coupled with low and erratic rainfall, farming, particularly food crop agriculture, encounters high risk and low productivity. Within this environment, Timorese farmers have developed farming strategies to maintain a level of food crop production for subsistence. Maintaining land productivity by local farmers is closely related to farm management, crop diversity, and crop residue management [120], while soil fertility is closely related to the length of the fallow period and succession vegetation [121].
There are three upland farming types on Timor Island [85]: (1) swidden agriculture (kebun/ladang), (2) local agroforestry (Mamar), and (3) house garden/farmyard (pekarangan/kintal). The first includes permanent plot cultivation (ladang permanent) and swidden plots or fallowed ladangs. The second refers to the dense mix of perennial crops and any other compatible plants in a relatively small parcel of land. It is considered the most stable, economic, and ecologically sound system. The last (house garden/farmyard) refers to the farmed land around or near farmers’ homes. These three types of farming reflect maximum use and compatible resources and minimize agriculture risk in marginal areas. Diversification is also a form of self-insurance [122,123,124], reducing vulnerability [125,126] and improving resilience [125,126,127].
There are five main indigenous ethnic groups settled in the western part of Timor Island, i.e., Meto, Tetun, Bunak, Kemak, and Marae [119]. The Meto ethnic group settled and dominated the western part of the island. Tetun mostly settled in the southern part of the Malaka District. Three other ethnicities settled in the Belu and Malaka districts. Although they share a common farming practice, these ethnic groups developed specific strategies to survive in their local environment.
Timorese farmers investigated suitable land for crops based on the vegetation and population density. They perceived that the denser the vegetation, the more fertile the soil. Upland farmers started land clearing for farming if they perceived that soil was productive enough to support agriculture for several years before it was fallowed to allow for natural revegetation. Besides vegetation, farmers also observed earthworm secretion as an indicator of the soil fertility.
An ancient food crop commodity in Timor was foxtail [117], followed by the introduction of a new food crop, Maize, which later became the main staple. The slash-and-burn system is a common practice in land preparation for a traditional system. There is almost no plowing—or, in other words, farmers practice minimum soil disturbance. Upland farming for food crops is conducted mainly on sloping land; therefore, minimum soil disturbance is considered to minimize soil erosion and promote the quick recovery of soil biology.
Traditional farming practices had little impact on the natural ecosystem of Timor Island, at least up to the beginning of the twentieth century. Farmers strictly controlled fire in swidden agriculture to avoid wildfire [5]. During land clearing, some vegetation remain uncut, primarily foraging three legumes. Leucaena (Leucaena leucocephala) trees are the most common and widely used for cattle feed and fertile soil recovery in swidden agriculture. This typical swidden cultivation is considered a productive system for at least forest–grassland succession and maintaining biodiversity [128].
To minimize the risk in food crop farming in Timor Island’s marginal areas, farmers practice a mixed-cropping pattern. To maintain or reduce soil fertility depletion, farmers have to combine different food crops that support one another or minimize competition in nutrient intake. Three main widely planted food crops are maize (Zea mays), pumpkin (Cucurbitaceae), and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan). The composition of the three food crops depends on farmers’ preferences in considering land and climate prediction. These three food crops also reflect the main diet of the Timorese people.

3. Discussion

Timor Island is one of the semi-arid regions mentioned in [129] that needs to be carefully considered by agricultural policymakers when implementing changes. The recognition of the marginality of Timor Island was realized through farming system research conducted in the mid-1980s [5,130,131]; however, this research was more focused on increasing crop productions, while few attempts were conducted to explore the nature of the semi-arid region and indigenous knowledge in the land management of Timorese farmers.
Local wisdom practiced in the farming activities in West Timor is a response to the marginality of the dominant environment in semi-arid areas. Actions taken, such as combining different plants or food crops in a parcel of land, have proven to be the best strategy to maintain a sufficient level of food production and, at the same time, maintain soil biology and fertility [132,133,134]. Different legume crops, both in the upland and local agroforestry of Mamar, as mentioned in [135,136,137], provide rich soil biology [138]. From this local wisdom perspective, the notions of national agricultural policy that are biased toward monoculture and chemical inputs for crop production need to be adjusted when applied in the marginal semi-arid area of Timor Island.
The diversity of vegetation in West Timor not only provides benefits for the farming systems that are suited to its semi-arid climate and relatively young soils, but the community also supports the sustainability and development of integrated livestock farming in the region. Raising different kinds of livestock that suit the agro-ecological zones is pivotal in managing synergism in the crop–livestock system.
A mixed-cropping pattern is practiced mostly to minimize risk, maintain production at least for the subsistence level, and maintain crop diversity. Farmers plant any suitable crops in a parcel of land and, at the same time, raise livestock as an important part of the farming system.
Plant production largely depends on the genotype, year, and their interaction. Profitable plant production, based on high yields, is impossible without the application of proper cultivation technology [139,140,141]. In low-fertility soils, the application of fertilizers is necessary, but sowing legumes is also important due to its role in improving nitrogen levels in soil [140,141].

4. Conclusions

Sustaining environmentally sound farming not only requires proper input, but also a deep understanding of the existing natural characteristics of the region and the indigenous knowledge practices. To overcome these unfavorable conditions, over hundreds of years, farmers have established local wisdom in managing specific sustainable farming systems. With a population increase on the island, the size and quality of land owned by farmers continues to decline, which also affects the common local wisdom practices, and further investigation is warranted regarding sustainability.
The presence of soil microorganisms in marginal semi-arid soils is considered important to maintain soil health and fertility, as well as to support plant growth. Indigenous farming practices of Timorese farmers, in general, are actually preserving the existence of microorganisms to some degree to produce a subsistence level of sustainable and environmentally sound crop production.
Local wisdom-related farming enables farmers in Timor to effectively respond to the marginal environment of Timor Island. They embrace environmentally sound farming practices in land preparation, diversify crops/vegetation via a mixed-cropping pattern, and raise livestock in a crop–livestock system. Although they are quite vigilant toward the introduced agricultural innovations, they are actually willing to embrace any agricultural innovations that suit their household circumstances and environments.
It is clear that the increasing human population requires more land to be cultivated since the traditional system cannot support high crop productivity. External agricultural interventions to increase crop productivity that undermine the stability of the farming systems and threaten the survival of local microorganisms and soil decomposers should be re-evaluated.

Author Contributions

Y.N. oversaw the review and prepared the early manuscript based on local wisdom. T.B. and A.S. drafted soil-related aspects. G.N.N., E.P. and E.Y.H. drafted the farming system and local agroforestry of Mamar. L.I., A.V.S., Y.S.M. and N.R.E.K. drafted soil biology. J.N. and D.K.H. drafted forage and livestock. B.d. and H.d. drafted socio-economic aspects of the farming system. All authors have equally contributed to this works. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The publication of the manuscript was financed by the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This paper was developed and inspired by all authors’ involvement in agricultural development and land protection/conservation in marginal semi-arid areas of Timor Island. We would like to thank the East Nusa Tenggara Assessment Institute of Agriculture Technology chairman, Nusa Cendana University, and Environment and Forestry Research and Development Institute of Kupang for allowing the authors to use resources in the respective institutions in the preparation of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the Governor of East Nusa Tenggara for financial support in the publication of this manuscript. All remaining errors are the authors’ responsibility.

Conflicts of Interest

We declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Suryana, A. Ketahanan Pangan dan Gizi Nasional Berkelanjutan: Kebijakan dan Capaian; IPB Press: Bogor, Indonesia, 2019; ISBN 978-602-440-765-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wardana, I.P.; Zaini, Z.; Sembiring, H. Sustainable Rice Production Intensification. In Toward a Resilience Food and Nutrition Security in Indonesia; Pasandaran, E., Haryono, Eds.; IAARD Press: Bogor, Indonesia, 2016; pp. 61–80. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ruslan, K. Food and Horticulture Crop Productivity in Indonesia; Center for Indonesian Policy Studies: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  4. BPS Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Penyaluran Beras (Ton). 2015–2017. Available online: https://ntt.bps.go.id/indicator/8/385/1/penyaluran-beras.html (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  5. Ngongo, Y. The Political Ecology of Agricultural Development in West Timor, Indonesia; School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland: St. Lucia, QLD, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. Ishaq, L.; Adu Tae, A.S.J.; Airthur, M.A.; Bako, P.O. Short communication: Abundance of Arbuscular Mycorrhiza asociated with corn planted with traditional and more modern farming systems in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Biodivers. J. Biol. Divers. 2017, 18, 887–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bouwman, T.I.; Andersson, J.A.; Giller, K.E. Herbicide Induced Hunger? Conservation Agriculture, Ganyu Labour and Rural Poverty in Central Malawi. J. Dev. Stud. 2021, 57, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hosang, E.Y.; Syamsuddin; Pabendon, M.; Sutherland, M. Genetic Variability in West Timor Landrace Maize Populations. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 484, p. 012007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Njurumana, G.N.; Riwu Kaho, N.P.L.B.; Iswandono, E.; Wila Huky, S.S.; Mooy, B.Z.; Fatmawati, F.; Kian, D.A.; Nomeni, Y.F. The Livelihood Challenge of Forest Honey Bee Farmers amidst COVID-19 Pandemic in Mutis, Indonesia. For. Soc. 2021, 5, 526–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hosang, E.Y.; Bombo, Y.; Basuki, T. Keragaman Plasmanutfah Padi Gogo Lokal Sumba Barat Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Bul. Plasma Nutfah 2018, 22, 93–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Kana Hau, D.; Nulik, J. Improving the supply of forage and staple food of smallholder farmers in therural marginal dry land of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 232, 02003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Abolla, N.B.C.; Sartohadi, J.; Utami, S.N.H.; Basuki, T. Improvement of Soil Quality through Minimum Tillage for Sen Cropping Pattern in Indonesia. Indian J. Agric. Res. 2019, 54, 205–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bamualim, A.; Triastono, J.; Hosang, E.; Basuki, T.; Field, S.P. Bamboo as a Fallow Crop on Timor Island, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia. In Voices from the Forest: Integrating Indigenous Knowledge into Sustainable Upland Farming; Cairns, M., Ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2010; p. 4. ISBN 9781136522284. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barreiro, A.; Díaz-Raviña, M. Fire impacts on soil microorganisms: Mass, activity, and diversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sci. Health 2021, 22, 100264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fultz, L.M.; Moore-Kucera, J.; Dathe, J.; Davinic, M.; Perry, G.; Wester, D.; Schwilk, D.W.; Rideout-Hanzak, S. Forest wildfire and grassland prescribed fire effects on soil biogeochemical processes and microbial communities: Two case studies in the semi-arid Southwest. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2016, 99, 118–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barreiro, A.; Martín, A.; Carballas, T.; Díaz-Raviña, M. Long-term response of soil microbial communities to fire and fire-fighting chemicals. Biol. Fertil. Soils 2016, 52, 963–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barreiro, A.; Lombao, A.; Martín, A.; Cancelo-González, J.; Carballas, T.; Díaz-Raviña, M. Soil Heating at High Temperatures and Different Water Content: Effects on the Soil Microorganisms. Geosciences 2020, 10, 355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Armas-Herrera, C.M.; Martí, C.; Badía, D.; Ortiz-Perpiñá, O.; Girona-García, A.; Mora, J.L. Short-term and midterm evolution of topsoil organic matter and biological properties after prescribed burning for pasture recovery (Tella, Central Pyrenees, Spain). Land Degrad. Dev. 2018, 29, 1545–1554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Basuki, T.; DeRosari, B.; Syamsuddin; Hosang, E.Y.; Ngongo, Y.; Nulik, J.; Tay, Y.; Abolla, M.S.; Suek, Y.; Kotta, H.Z.; et al. Grand Design Pembangunan Pertanian Lahan Kering Kepulauan Nusa Tenggara Timur; Dinas Pertanian Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur dan Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian Nusa Tenggara Timur: Kupang, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  20. Basuki, T.; Nulik, J. Peta Agroecological Zone (AEZ) Skala Tinjau Mendalam Untuk Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur, 2nd ed.; Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian; Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian (BPTP) NTT: Kupang, Indonesia, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yu, B.; Liu, G.; Liu, Q.; Huang, C.; Li, H. Effects of topographic domain and land use on spatial variability of deep soil moisture in the semi-arid Loess Plateau of China. Hydrol. Res. 2019, 50, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Kurniawan, H.; Soenarno; Prasetiyo, N.A. Kajian Beberapa Aspek Ekologi Cendana (Santalum album Linn.) pada Lahan Masyarakat di Pulau Timor. J. Penelit. Hutan Dan Konserv. Alam 2013, 10, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Soetedjo, I.P. Various dosages of active powder of cassava improved sustainability of physical and chemical characteristics of Vertisol and Alfisol on dryland farming system. Trop. Drylands 2019, 3, 29–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sukristiyonubowo; Riyanto, D.; Widodo, S. Pengaruh Teknologi Pemupukan terhadap Kualitas Tanah, Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Padi Varitas Ciherang yang Ditanam pada Sawah Bukaan Baru di Dusun Kleseleon, Kabupaten Malaka, Nusa Tenggara Timur. J. Lahan Suboptimal 2019, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Mateus, R.; Kantur, D.; Moy, L.M. Pemanfaatan Biochar Limbah Pertanian sebagai Pembenah Tanah untuk Perbaikan Kualitas Tanah dan Hasil Jagung di Lahan Kering. J. Agrotrop 2017, 7, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ishaq, L.; Taea, A.S.J.A.; Airthur, M.A.; Bako, P.O. Effect of single and mixed inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and phosphorus fertilizer application on corn growth in calcareous soil. Biodiversitas 2021, 22, 1920–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nur, M.S.M.; Arsa, I.G.B.A.; Malaipada, Y. The effect of cattle manure and mineral fertilizers on soil chemical properties and tuber yield of purple-fleshed sweet potato in the dryland region of East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Trop. Drylands 2019, 3, 56–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ritung, S.; Suryani, E. 57 Karakteristik Tanah dan Kesesuaian Lahan Tanaman Tebu di Kecamatan Kunduran, Blora, Jawa Tengah. J. Tanah Dan Iklim 2013, 37, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Petunjuk Teknis Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air dan Pupuk, 2nd ed.; Prasetyo, B.H., Santoso, D., Retno, L., Eds.; Balai Penelitian Tanah: Bogor, Indonesia, 2009; ISBN 978-602-8039-21-5. [Google Scholar]
  30. Njurumana, G. Pola Pengelompokan Komunitas Mamar di Timor; Gadjah Mada University: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  31. Lio, F.X.S.; Dewi, M.P.S. Karst vegetation in the natural habitat of sandalwood (Santalum album) at various altitude places in Timor Island, Indonesia. Biodiversitas 2018, 19, 1703–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saadouli, I.; Mosbah, A.; Ferjani, R.; Stathopoulou, P.; Galiatsatos, I.; Asimakis, E.; Marasco, R.; Daffonchio, D.; Tsiamis, G.; Ouzari, H.-I. The Impact of the Inoculation of Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria Pantoea agglomerans on Phosphorus Availability and Bacterial Community Dynamics of a Semi-Arid Soil. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Jindal, R.; Chakraborty, D. Phosphate solubilizing activity of Rhizobium sp. isolated from Vigna mungo grown in semi-arid. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ahmad, I.; Ahmad, M.; Hussain, A.; Jamil, M. Integrated use of phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus subtilis strain IA6 and zinc-solubilizing Bacillus sp. strain IA16: A promising approach for improving cotton growth. Folia Microbiol. 2021, 66, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Devi, D.; Gupta, S.B.; Mishra, B.K.; Sheshma, M.K. Isolation and identification of phosphate solubilizing filamentous fungi from semi-arid region of Rajasthan (India). J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2020, 9, 1784–1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Billah, M.; Khan, M.; Bano, A.; Hassan, T.U.; Munir, A.; Gurmani, A.R. Phosphorus and phosphate solubilizing bacteria: Keys for sustainable agriculture. Geomicrobiol. J. 2019, 36, 904–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Adnan, M.; Shah, Z.; Fahad, S.; Arif, M.; Alam, M.; Khan, I.A.; Mian, I.A.; Basir, A.; Ullah, H.; Arshad, M.; et al. Phosphate-Solubilizing Bacteria Nullify the Antagonistic Effect of Soil Calcification on Bioavailability of Phosphorus in Alkaline Soils. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sharma, S.B.; Chowdhury, A. Phosphorus transitions in traditional eco-knowledge versus chemical based agri-amendment systems of stress-prone semi-arid tropics: Finding the real game-changer. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Weil, R.; Magdoff, F. Significance of Soil Organic Matter to Soil Quality and Health. In Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2004; pp. 13–56. ISBN 978-0849312946. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nunes, M.R.; van Es, H.M.; Veum, K.S.; Amsili, J.P.; Karlen, D.L. Anthropogenic and Inherent Effects on Soil Organic Carbon across the U.S. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Deb, S.; Bhadoria, P.B.S.; Mandal, B.; Rakshit, A.; Singh, H.B. Soil organic carbon: Towards better soil health, productivity and climate change mitigation. Clim. Change Environ. Sustain. 2015, 3, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Altomare, C.; Tringovska, I. Beneficial Soil Microorganisms, an Ecological Alternative for Soil Fertility Management. In Genetics, Biofuels and Local Farming Systems. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; Lichtfouse, E., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Germany, 2011; pp. 161–214. ISBN 978-94-007-1520-2. [Google Scholar]
  43. Jacoby, R.; Peukert, M.; Succurro, A.; Koprivova, A.; Kopriva, S. The Role of Soil Microorganisms in Plant Mineral Nutrition—Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Koten, B.B.; Wea, R.; Hadisutanto, B.; Salli, M.K.; Semang, A. Kemampuan Tumbuh Kembali Legum Arbila (Phaseolus lunatus L.) Pasca Gembala pada Berbagai Dosis Inokulum dan Umur Mulai Digembala di Lahan Kering. Bul. Peternak. 2017, 41, 439–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Napitupulu, T.P.; Kanti, A.; Sudiana, I.M. The Phsyiological Character of Bacteria Isolated from Banana’s Rhizosphere from Malaka, East Nusa Tenggara, and Their Role on Plant Growth Promotion on Marginal Land. Ber. Biol. 2019, 18, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pareira, M.S.; Mansur, I.; Wulandari, D.D. Pemanfaatan FMA dan Tanaman Inang untuk Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan Bibit Cendana (Santalum album Linn.). J. Silvikultur Trop. 2018, 9, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ishaq, L. Short Communication: Presence of arbuscular mycorrhiza in maize plantation land cultivated with traditional and improved land management. Asian J. Agric. 2018, 2, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Ishaq, L.; Adu Tae, A.S.J.; Airthur, M.A.; Mau, A.A.; Tara, E. Abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with some perennial plants in Timor island and its compatibilty to maize. In Proceedings of the International Dryland Conference, Kupang, Indonesia, 11–14 February 2019. [Google Scholar]
  50. Jain, R.; Saxena, J.; Sharma, V. The ability of two fungi to dissolve hardly soluble phosphates in solution. Mycology 2017, 8, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Simamora, A.V.; Hahuly, M. Effect of combined use of Bacillus, Pseudomonas and Trichoderma spp. in the control of brown-rot gummosis in SoE Mandarin. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resources, Malang, Indonesia, 2–4 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  52. Fallo, G.; Mubarik, N.R. Triadiati Potency of auxin producing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria from dryland in rice paddy field. Res. J. Microbiol. 2015, 10, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hahuly, M.V.; Simamora, A.V.; Nenotek, P.S. Eksplorasi Bacillus spp. dari Risosfer Padi Gogo untuk Mendapatkan Isolat Potensial sebagai Pemacu Pertumbuhan dan Pengendali Patogen Bercak Cokelat Padi Drechslera oryzae; Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Nusa Cendana: Kupang, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hazra, F.; Pratiwi, E. Isolation, Characterization, and Molecular Identification of Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria from Several Tropical Soils. J. Trop. Soils 2013, 18, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Stewart, A.; Hill, R. Applications of Trichoderma in Plant Growth Promotion. In Biotechnology and Biology of Trichoderma; Gupta, V.K., Schmoll, M., Herrera-Estrella, A., Upadhyay, R.S., Druzhinina, I., Tuohy, M.G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 415–428. ISBN 978-0-444-59576-8. [Google Scholar]
  56. Puyam, A. Advent of Trichoderma as a bio-control agent—A review. J. Appl. Nat. Sci. 2016, 8, 1100–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mohiddin, F.A.; Khan, M.R.; Khan, S.M.; Bhat, B.H. Why Trichoderma is Considered Super Hero (Super Fungus) Against the Evil Parasites? Plant Pathol. J. 2010, 9, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Khalili, E.; Sadravi, M.; Naeimi, S.; Khosravi, V. Biological control of rice brown spot with native isolates of three Trichoderma species. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Okon Levy, N.; Meller Harel, Y.; Haile, Z.M.; Elad, Y.; Rav-David, E.; Jurkevitch, E.; Katan, J. Induced resistance to foliar diseases by soil solarization and Trichoderma harzianum. Plant Pathol. 2015, 64, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Simamora, A.V.; Stukely, M.J.C.; Barber, P.A.; Hardy, G.E.S.; Burgess, T.I. Age-related susceptibility of Eucalyptus species to Phytophthora boodjera. Plant Pathol. 2017, 66, 501–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Moi, F.D. Uji Antagonis Trichoderma spp. Asal Rizosfer Tanaman Jeruk Keprok Soe Terhadap Diplodia sp. Secara In Vitro; Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Nusa Cendana: Kupang, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  62. Mau, Y.S.; Ndiwa, A.S.S.; Arsa, I.G.B.A. Efficacy of Indigenous Trichoderma Isolates from West Timor against Brown Spot (Dreschlrea oryzae) on Two Upland Rice Varieties under a Screen House Condition; Research and Community Service Institute of the University of Nusa Cendana: Kupang, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  63. Abanat, F.Y.R. Uji Kemampuan Trichokompos dalam Menekan Pertumbuhan Layu Layu Fusarium pada Tanaman Tomat; Agriculture Faculty, University of Nusa Cendana: Kupang, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  64. Pratama, G.C.G. Aplikasi Trichokompos dalam Meningkatkan Pertumbuhan dan Hasil Tanaman Edamame (Glycine max (L). Merrill); Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Nusa Cendana: Kupang, Indonesia, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fatmawati, U.; Lestari, Y.; Meryandini, A.; Nawangsih, A.A.; Wahyudi, A.T. Isolaon of acnomycetes from maize rhizosphere from Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara Province, and evaluaon of their anbacterial, anfungal, and extracellular enzyme acvity. Indones. J. Biotechnol. 2018, 23, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Taopan, R.A.; Rusmana, I.; Santosa, D.A. The Effect of Methanotrophic Bacteria Application on Paddy Growth and Methane Emission in Rainfed Rice of Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 3, 1759–1764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Malajczuk, M.; Hingston, F. Ectomycorrhizae Associated With Jarrah. Aust. J. Bot. 1981, 29, 453–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Archibald, R.; Bradshaw, J.; Bowen, B.; Close, D.; Mccaw, L.; Drake, P.; Hardy, G. Understorey thinning and burning trials are needed in conservation reserves: The case of Tuart (Eucalyptus gomphocephala D.C.). Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2010, 11, 108–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Close, D.C.; Davidson, N.J.; Swanborough, P.W. Fire history and understorey vegetation: Water and nutrient relations of Eucalyptus gomphocephala and E. delegatensis overstorey trees. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 262, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Adeniyi, A.S. Effects of slash and burning on soil microbial diversity and abundance in the tropical rainforest ecosystem, Ondo State, Nigeria. Afr. J. Plant Sci. 2010, 4, 322–329. [Google Scholar]
  71. Steven, B.; Phillips, M.L.; Belnap, J.; Gallegos-Graves, L.V.; Kuske, C.R.; Reed, S.C. Resistance, Resilience, and Recovery of Dryland Soil Bacterial Communities Across Multiple Disturbances. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 648455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chungu, D.; Ng’andwe, P.; Mubanga, H.; Chileshe, F. Fire alters the availability of soil nutrients and accelerates growth of Eucalyptus grandis in Zambia. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 1637–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Navarrete, A.A.; Tsai, S.M.; Mendes, L.W.; Faust, K.; de Hollander, M.; Cassman, N.A.; Raes, J.; van Veen, J.A.; Kuramae, E.E. Soil microbiome responses to the short-term effects of Amazonian deforestation. Mol. Ecol. 2015, 24, 2433–2448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Conservation Agriculture. Available online: https://www.fao.org/conservation-agriculture/en (accessed on 7 May 2022).
  75. Bouwman, T.I.; Andersson, J.A.; Giller, K.E. Adapting yet not adopting? Conservation agriculture in Central Malawi. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2021, 307, 107224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Triastoningtias, M.N.E. Conservation of agriculture land based on local wisdom in Serang Village Purbalingga Regency. J. Nat. Resour. Environ. Manag. 2021, 11, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hikmah, N.I. Local Wisdom of Farmers on the Northern Slopes of Ungaran Mountain to Reduce Erosion on Agricultural Land (Case Study in Persen Hamlet, Sekaran Village). In Proceedings of the International Conference on Rural Studies in Asia, Semarang, Indonesia, 11–12 October 2018; Gunawan, W., Wijaya, A., Akhiroh, N.S., Eds.; Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; Volume 313, pp. 290–293. [Google Scholar]
  78. Taolin, R.I.C.O.C.O.; Berek, A.K.; Neonbeni, E.Y.; Ceunfin, S.; Kapitan, O.B.; Seran, M.Y. Improving mungbean growth in a semiarid dryland system with agricultural waste biochars and cattle manure. J. Degrad. Min. Lands Manag. 2018, 6, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hosang, E.; Nulik, J.; Kana Hau, D.; Abi, Y.; Bell, L. Nitrogen contribution from forage legumes in maize farming system in West Timor Indonesia. In Proceedings of the International Nitrogen Initiative Conference “Solutions to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency for the World”, Melbourne, Australia, 4–8 December 2016; International Nitrogen Initiative: Melbourne, Australia, 2016; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  80. Azkiyah, D.R. Tohari Effect of Altitude on Growth, Yield and Steviol Glycosides Content of Stevia Plant (Stevia rebaudiana). Vegetalika 2019, 8, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Fauzi; Subositi, D. Respon Pertumbuhan, Produksi dan Kualitas Daun Duduk (Desmodium triquetrum (L.) D.C.) terhadap Ketinggian Tempat Budidaya. J. Jamu Indones. 2019, 4, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Makarim, A.K.; Ikhwani, M.M. Rasionalisasi Pola Rotasi Tanaman Pangan Berbasis Ketersediaan Air. Iptek Tanam. Pangan 2017, 12, 83–90. [Google Scholar]
  83. Nowak, A.; Nowak, S.; Nobis, M.; Nobis, A. Crop type and altitude are the main drivers of species composition of arable weed vegetation in Tajikistan. Weed Res. 2015, 55, 525–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Mubdik, M.A. Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penentuan Jenis Tanaman Pertanian Berdasarkan Ketinggian dan Curah Hujan Menggunakan Rule Based System; Fakultas Sains dan Teknologi Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim: Malang, Indonesia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ngongo, Y.; Markus, J.E.R. Agricultural Innovations and Adaptation Strategies among Upland Communities in the State Boundaries of Kupang District (Indonesia) and Oecusse Enclave (East Timor). Int. J. Trop. Drylands 2020, 4, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Njurumana, G.N.; Pujiono, E.; da Silva, M.M.; Oematan, O.K. Ecological performance of local initiatives on water resources management in Timorese communities, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of Indonesia Forestry Researchers—Stream 2 Managing Forest and Natural Resources, Meeting Sustainable and Friendly Use, Bogor, Indonesia, 7–8 September 2021; IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 2021; Volume 914, p. 012031. [Google Scholar]
  87. Basuki, T.; DeRosari, B. Pemanfaatan Kearifan Lokal dan Teknologi Pertanian Mendukung Pembangunan Pertanian Wilayah. In Pembangunan Pertanian Wilayah Berbasis Kearifan Lokal Dan Kemitraan; Pasandaran, E., Syakir, M., Heriawan, R., Yufdy, M.P., Eds.; IAARD Press: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017; pp. 63–88. ISBN 978-602-344-200-3. [Google Scholar]
  88. Derosari, B.; Basuki, T. Status dan Perbaikan Sistem Perladangan di Lahan Kering Menuju Pertanian Transisi Maju di NTT. In Kesiapan Daerah Mendukung Pertanian Modern; Pasandaran, E., Djufry, F., Suradisastra, K., Setioko, A.R., Thaher, R., Hendayana, R., Eds.; IAARD Press: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019; pp. 361–384. ISBN 9786023442836. [Google Scholar]
  89. Windi, Y.; Whittaker, A. Indigenous round houses versus “healthy houses”: Health, place and identity among the Dawan of West Timor, Indonesia. Health Place 2012, 18, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Chen, Y.R.; Lim, Y.L.; Wang, M.H.; Chen, C.Y. “Conical hut”: A basic form of house types in Timor Island. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. ISPRS Arch. 2015, 40, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Njurumana, G.N. Agroforest Mamar Dan Konservasi Keragaman Hayati Tumbuhan Di Nusa Tenggara Timur. In Proceedings of the Prosiding Seminar Nasional Agroforestri III, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 29 May 2012; Kuswantoro, W., Prasetyo, E., Sulistyati, T., Devy, W., Priambodo, Eds.; Balai Penelitian Teknologi Agroforestry, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kehutanan: Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 2012; pp. 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  92. Wikum, D.A.; Shanholtzer, G.F. Application of the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale for vegetation analysis in land development studies. Environ. Manag. 1978, 2, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Aragón, S.; Salinas, N.; Nina-Quispe, A.; Qquellon, V.H.; Paucar, G.R.; Huaman, W.; Porroa, P.C.; Olarte, J.C.; Cruz, R.; Muñiz, J.G.; et al. Aboveground biomass in secondary montane forests in Peru: Slow carbon recovery in agroforestry legacies. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 28, e01696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lelamo, L.L. A review on the indigenous multipurpose agroforestry tree species in Ethiopia: Management, their productive and service roles and constraints. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Soh, M.C.K.; Mitchell, N.J.; Ridley, A.R.; Butler, C.W.; Puan, C.L.; Peh, K.S.H. Impacts of Habitat Degradation on Tropical Montane Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Map for Identifying Future Research Priorities. Front. For. Glob. Chang. 2019, 2, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Byun, C.; Oh, M.; Lee, E.J.; Kang, H. Seed density is as important as limiting similarity, diversity effect, and propagule pressure in plant restoration to control invasion. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 144, 105712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Walder, M.; Armstrong, J.E.; Borowicz, V.A. Limiting similarity, biotic resistance, nutrient supply, or enemies? What accounts for the invasion success of an exotic legume? Biol. Invasions 2019, 21, 435–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nulik, J.; Bamualim, A. Pakan Ruminansia Besar di Nusa Tenggara; Balai Pengakajian Teknologi Pertanian Nusa Tenggara Timur dan Eastern Island Veterinary Services Project: Kupang, Indonesia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  99. Saputra, D.; Sembodo, D.R.; Manik, T.K. Effect of Rainfall Intensity on Glyphosate Herbicide Effectiveness in Controlling Ageratum conyzoides, Rottboellia exaltata, and Cyperus rotundus Weeds. Agromet 2020, 34, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. da Silva Maia, S.; Ribeiro-Rocha, P.R.; Santiago-Castro, T.; Costa da Silva, I.K.E.; Ferreira-Barreto, G.; Torres de Souza, L.; Murga-Orrillo, H.; Abanto-Rodríguez, C. Interferencia de Cenchrus echinatus y Rottboellia exaltata en el crecimiento del frijol caupí. Bioagro 2020, 33, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sagala, D.; Mualim, L.; Darmadi, D. Kompetisi Antara Tanaman Sorgum Dengan Rottboellia. J. Agroqua Media Inf. Agron. Dan Budid. Perair. 2011, 9, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Samedani, B.; Juraimi, A.S.; Anwar, M.P.; Rafii, M.Y.; Awadz, S.A.S.; Anuar, A.R. Competitive ability of some cover crop species against Asystasia gangetica and Pennisetum polystachion. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil Plant Sci. 2012, 62, 571–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Samedani, B.; Juraimi, A.S.; Anwar, M.P.; Rafii, M.Y.; Awadz, S.A.S.; Anuar, A.R. Phytotoxic effects of Pueraria javanica litter on growth of weeds Asystasia gangetica and Pennisetum polystachion. Allelopath. J. 2013, 32, 191–202. [Google Scholar]
  104. Nulik, J.; Kana Hau, D. Legum Herba Pakan Andalan dan Berkualitas Mendukung Pengembangan Ternak Sapi; Rachmat, H., Ed.; Agro Indo Mandiri: Bogor, Indonesia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  105. Nulik, J. Inovasi Teknologi Hijauan Pakan Berbasis Legum di Lahan Kering Iklim Kering Mendukung Pengembangan Ternak Sapi; Karmawati, E., Inounu, I., Eds.; IAARD Press: Bogor, Indonesia, 2021; ISBN 9786023443031. [Google Scholar]
  106. Lawa, E.D.W.; Chuzaemi, S.; Hartutik, M. White Kabesak (Acacia Leucophloea RoxB) Leaves Utilization in Concentrate on Fermentation Products and In Vitro Gas Production. J. Trop. Life Sci. 2020, 10, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zia-Ul-Haq, M.; Ćavar, S.; Qayum, M.; Khan, I.; Ahmad, S. Chemical composition and antioxidant potential of Acacia leucophloea Roxb. Acta Bot. Croat. 2013, 72, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kana Hau, D.; Nulik, J. Leucaena in West Timor, Indonesia: A case study of successful adoption of cv. Tarramba. Trop. Grassl. Forrajes Trop. 2019, 7, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  109. Bamualim, A.M. Pengembangan Teknologi Pakan Sapi Potong di Daerah Semi-Arid Nusa Tenggara. Pengemb. Inov. Pertania 2011, 4, 175–188. [Google Scholar]
  110. Katipana, N.; Kana Hau, D.; Nulik, J.; Manafe, J.; Hartati, E. Manfaat Biji Asam, Biji Kosambi dan Putak Sebagai Sumber Energi Pakan Konsentrat Terhadap Parameter Rumen Sapi Bali. In Proceedings of the Prosiding Seminar Nasional, Bogor, Indonesia, 26–27 July 2006; Balai Besar Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian: Jawa Barat, Indonesia, 2006; pp. 371–375. [Google Scholar]
  111. BPS Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur Dalam Angka 2018; BPS Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur: Kupang, Indonesia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  112. Umboh; DeRosari, B.; Sintya, J.K. Produksi Dan Alokasi Pangan Pada Rumahtangga Tani Di Agroekosistem Yang Berbeda. In Proceedings of the Seminar Nasional Agroinovasi Mendukung Kedaulatan Pangan, Manado, Indonesia, 9 September 2015; pp. 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  113. DeRosari, B.; Basuki, T. Tata Kelola Lahan Kering di Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. In Sumber Daya Lahan dan Air. Prospek Pengembangan dan Pengelolaan; Pasandaran, E., Heriawan, R., Syakir, M., Eds.; IAARD Press: Bogor, Indonesia, 2016; pp. 30–53. ISBN 978-602-344-157-0. [Google Scholar]
  114. Kuchimanchi, B.R.; Bosch, R.R.; De Boer, I.J.M.; Oosting, S.J. Understanding farming systems and their economic performance in Telangana, India: Not all that glitters is gold. Curr. Res. Environ. Sustain. 2022, 4, 100120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Dampier, W. A Voyage to New Holland; James, S., Ed.; Nonsuch Publishing: Singapore, 2006; ISBN 978-1-84588-194-8. [Google Scholar]
  116. O’Connor, S.; Spriggs, M.; Veth, P. Excavation at Lene Hara Cave establishes occupation in East Timor at least 30,000–35,000 years ago. Antiquity 2002, 76, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Chandra, A.; Dargusch, P.; McNamara, K.E. How might adaptation to climate change by smallholder farming communities contribute to climate change mitigation outcomes? A case study from Timor-Leste, Southeast Asia. Sustain. Sci. 2016, 11, 477–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shepherd, C.; Palmer, L. The modern origins of traditional agriculture: Colonial policy, swidden development, and environmental degradation in eastern Timor. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Southeast Asia 2015, 171, 281–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Fox, J.J. Glimpses of An Ethohistory of Timor. In Crossing Histories and Ethnographies: Following Colonial Historicities in Timor-Leste; Roque, R., Traube, E.G., Eds.; Berghahn Books: New York, NY, USA, 2019; p. 372. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ngongo, Y.; Kotta, N.; Matitaputty, P.R. Strengthening Archipelago Food Security and Food Sovereignty in ENT-Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Proceedings of the Reframing Food Sovereignty After Covid-19 2021, Semarang, Indonesia, 20 October 2020; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; Volume 803, p. 012032. [Google Scholar]
  121. Iskandar, J.; Iskandar, B.S.; Partasasmita, R. Site selection and soil fertility management by the Outer Baduy People (Banten, Indonesia) in maintaining swidden cultivation productivity. Biodiversitas J. Biol. Divers. 2018, 19, 1334–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Barrett, C.; Reardon, T.; Webb, P. Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: Concepts, dynamics, and policy implications. Food Policy 2001, 26, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ullah, R.; Jourdain, D.; Shivakoti, G.P.; Dhakal, S. Managing catastrophic risks in agriculture: Simultaneous adoption of diversification and precautionary savings. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2015, 12, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Knapp, L.; Wuepper, D.; Dalhaus, T.; Finger, R. Revisiting the diversification and insurance relationship: Differences between on– and off-farm strategies. Clim. Risk Manag. 2021, 32, 100315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. McCord, P.F.; Cox, M.; Schmitt-Harsh, M.; Evans, T. Crop diversification as a smallholder livelihood strategy within semi-arid agricultural systems near Mount Kenya. Land Use Policy 2015, 42, 738–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lin, B.B. Resilience in agriculture through crop diversification: Adaptive management for environmental change. BioScience 2011, 61, 183–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Howden, S.M.; Soussana, J.-F.; Tubiello, F.N.; Chhetri, N.; Dunlop, M.; Meinke, H. Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 19691–19696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Peluso, N.L. The Real and Imagined Role of Culture in Development: Case Studies from Indonesia; Dove, M.R., Ed.; University of Hawaii Press: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  129. Basuki, T.; Hau, D.K.; Nulik, J.; Hosang, E.Y.; DeRosari, B.; Ngongo, Y. The Existence of Farming Types in Dryland Agriculture in Timor, Indonesia. In Advances in Biological Sciences Research, Proceedings of the 9th International Seminar on Tropical Animal Production (ISTAP 2021), Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 21–22 September 2021; Suhardi, Safitri, A., Ismanto, A., Masangkay, F., Eds.; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2022; Volume 18, pp. 301–307. [Google Scholar]
  130. McWilliam, A. A Plague on Your House? Some Impact of Chromolaena odorata on Timorese Livelihood. Hum. Ecol. 2000, 28, 451–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Fox, J.J. Harvest of the Palm: Ecological Change in Eastern Indonesia; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2013; ISBN 9780674331884. [Google Scholar]
  132. Dybzinski, R.; Fargione, J.E.; Zak, D.R.; Fornara, D.; Tilman, D. Soil fertility increases with plant species diversity in a long-term biodiversity experiment. Oecologia 2008, 158, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Furey, G.N.; Tilman, D. Plant biodiversity and the regeneration of soil fertility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2111321118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Prober, S.M.; Wiehl, G. Relationships among soil fertility, native plant diversity and exotic plant abundance inform restoration of forb-rich eucalypt woodlands Diversity and Distributions. Divers. Distrib. 2012, 18, 795–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Njurumana, G.N.; Sadono, R.; Marsono, D. Irham Ecosystem Services of Indigenous Kaliwu Agroforestry System in Sumba, Indonesia. In E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of the RUBIS International Workshop on the Resilience of Rubber-Based Agroforestry Systems in the Context of Global Change, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 5–9 April 2021; Asih Purwestri, Y., Subandiyah, S., Montoro, P., Dyah Sawitri, W., Restu Susilo, K., Yoga Prasada, I., Wirakusuma, G., Dewi, A., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 305, p. 04002. [Google Scholar]
  136. Pujiono, E.; Sri Raharjo, S.A.; Njurumana, G.N.; Prasetyo, B.D.; Rianawati, H. Sustainability status of agroforestry systems in Timor Island, Indonesia. In E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of the RUBIS International Workshop on the Resilience of Rubber-based Agroforestry Systems in the Context of Global Change, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 5–9 April 2021; Asih Purwestri, Y., Subandiyah, S., Montoro, P., Dyah Sawitri, W., Restu Susilo, K., Yoga Prasada, I., Wirakusuma, G., Dewi, A., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; Volume 305, p. 04003. [Google Scholar]
  137. Ngaji, A.U.K.; Baiquni, M.; Suryatmojo, H.; Haryono, E. Sustaining subsistence culture in Mamar agroforestry management in West Timor, is it possible? In E3S Web of Conferences, Proceedings of the 1st Geosciences and Environmental Sciences Symposium (ICST 2020),Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 7–8 September 2020; Haryono, E., Lavigne, F., Che Omar, R., White, B., Cardenas Tristan, A., Rahmawati Hizbaron, D., Fitria Putri, R., Eds.; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2020; Volume 200, p. 02023. [Google Scholar]
  138. Ngaji, A.U.K.; Baiquni, M.; Suryatmojo, H.; Haryono, E. Assessing the sustainability of traditional agroforestry practices: A case of mamar agroforestry in kupang-indonesia. For. Soc. 2021, 5, 438–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Kolarić, L.; Popović, V.; Živanović, L.; Ljubičić, N.; Stevanović, P.; Šarčević Todosijević, L.; Simić, D.; Ikanović, J. Buckwheat Yield Traits Response as Influenced by Row Spacing, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Potassium Management. Agronomy 2021, 11, 2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Popovic, V.; Vuckovic, S.; Jovovic, Z.; Rakascan, N.; Kostic, M.; Ljubicic, N.; Mladenovic-Glamoclija, M.; Ikanovic, J. Genotype by year interaction effects on soybean morpho-productive traits and biogas production. Genetika 2020, 52, 1055–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jovanovic-Todorovic, M.; Popovic, V.; Vučković, S.; Jankovic, S.; Mihailovic, A.; Ignjatov, M.; Strugar, V.; Lončarević, V. Impact of row spacing and seed rate on the production characteristics of the perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and their valorisation. Not. Bot. Horti Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 2020, 48, 1495–1503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. West Timor, based on elevation ranging from lowland to highland.
Figure 1. West Timor, based on elevation ranging from lowland to highland.
Sustainability 14 06023 g001
Table 1. The range of minimum, maximum and average values of soil chemical parameters, at 16 observation sites in West Timor.
Table 1. The range of minimum, maximum and average values of soil chemical parameters, at 16 observation sites in West Timor.
Soil Chemical ParametersMinimumMaximumAverageCategory *
pH (H2O)7.108.207.83Slightly alkaline
pH (KCl)6.107.907.11Neutral
C (%)1.538.793.07High
N (%)0.130.470.23Medium
P-potential (P2O5 HCl 25%) (mg/100 g)11.00155.0076.44Very high
K potential (K2O HCl 25%) (mg/100 g)25.00316.00105.75Very high
P-available (P2O5 Olsen) (ppm)8.0045.0017.19High
Exchangeable Ca (cmol(+)/kg)27.1452.0041.35Very high
Exchangeable Mg (cmol(+)/kg)0.396.242.20High
Exchangeable K (cmol(+)/kg)0.111.970.65High
Exchangeable Na (cmol(+)/kg)0.100.310.24Low
Cation Exchange Capacity (cmol(+)/kg)11.2644.7624.51High
Base Saturation (%)100.00100.00100.00Very high
Note: * Categories were classified based on [29]: pH H2O: slightly alkaline (7.6–8.5); pH K2O: neutral (6.6–7.5); C: high (3–5%); N: medium (0.21–0.50%); P-potential (P2O5 HCl 25%): very high (>60 mg/100 g); K potential (K2O HCl 25%): very high (>60 mg/100 g); P-available (P2O5 Olsen): high (16–20 ppm); exchangeable Ca: very high (>20 cmol(+)/kg); exchangeable Mg: high (2.1–8.0 cmol(+)/kg); exchangeable K: high (0.6–1.0 cmol(+)/kg); exchangeable Na: low (0.1–0.3 cmol(+)/kg); CEC: high (25–40 cmol(+)/kg); base saturation: very high (>80%). Source: [30].
Table 2. The effect of local Trichoderma species and from West Timor on brown spot disease (D. oryzae) and the yield of upland rice cv. Inpago 7.
Table 2. The effect of local Trichoderma species and from West Timor on brown spot disease (D. oryzae) and the yield of upland rice cv. Inpago 7.
Disease Control TreatmentAUDPC (%/Day) *Efficacy (%)Grain Yield per Plant (g)A Grain Yield Increase (%) **
T. viride913.69 a31.51 a30.7 ab23.5
T. harzianum905.49 a32.12 a28.8 a16.1
T. hamatum907.84 a31.94 a34.3 c38.3
Fungicide Trivia 73 WP766.81 a42.52 b26.5 a6.70
Control (without disease control)1333.97 b 24.8 a
Note: AUDPC: area under the disease progress curve. Lowercase denotes a comparison within the same column, and uppercase indicates a comparison within the same row. Values within the same column/row with the identical lowercase or uppercase are not significantly different based on the LSD (0.05) post hoc test. * Determined as the percentage of decrease in AUDPC from that of the control treatment. ** Determined as the percentage of increase in grain yield per plant from that of the control treatment. Source [62].
Table 3. Dynamic changes in similarity index based on the important value index (IVI) and density of plants and environment factors (EFs) in the Mamar ecosystem.
Table 3. Dynamic changes in similarity index based on the important value index (IVI) and density of plants and environment factors (EFs) in the Mamar ecosystem.
No.GroupsRange of Index Similarity
IVI (Plants) IVI + EFDensity (Plants) Density + EF
1Seedlings8.5–59.4437.80–71.559.10–57.8739.54–72.02
2Saplings15.34–69.8741.00–75.8612.07–62.0441.24–72.37
3Poles19.42–66.9344.25–72.3010.52–60.1444.28–73.26
4Trees25.05–68.5949.04–79.8223.97–69.5747.05–79.78
Source: Processed from a plant biodiversity survey on the Mamar ecosystem [30].
Table 4. Number of household farmers in West Timor, ENT.
Table 4. Number of household farmers in West Timor, ENT.
Regency/CityNumber of HH FarmersHousehold MemberNumber of Farmers
ManWomenTotalAverage HH MemberManWomenTotal%
Kupang59,601122,624122,151244,7754.1153,81512,35366,16827.03
TTS99,877183,627187,716371,3433.7284,47621,938106,41428.66
TTU45,91391,08594,920186,0054.0539,935973949,67426.71
Belu25,67757,97559,600117,5754.5821,903784129,74425.30
KupangTown12,56729,77229,37959,1514.7110,700243313,13322.20
West Timor243,635485,083493,766978,8494.02210,82954,304265,13327.09
Note: HH: households. Source: Survey of Agriculture and Livestock 2017 [111].
Table 5. Income source of households in West Timor, ENT.
Table 5. Income source of households in West Timor, ENT.
DistrictNumber of HouseholdIncomeNumber of Household Own LandNumber of Household Own No Land
Farming%Non-Farming%
Kupang59,60145,18275.8114,41924.1959,07230,755
TTS99,87785,64285.7514,23514.2599,87454,447
TTU45,91332,80071.4413,11328.5645,90116,621
Belu25,67718,00970.14766829.8625,46911,095
Kupang town12,567282722.50974077.5011,61110,605
West Timor243,635184,46075.7159,17524.29241,927112,918
Source: Agricultural Survey 2018 [111].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ngongo, Y.; Basuki, T.; deRosari, B.; Hosang, E.Y.; Nulik, J.; daSilva, H.; Hau, D.K.; Sitorus, A.; Kotta, N.R.E.; Njurumana, G.N.; et al. Local Wisdom of West Timorese Farmers in Land Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106023

AMA Style

Ngongo Y, Basuki T, deRosari B, Hosang EY, Nulik J, daSilva H, Hau DK, Sitorus A, Kotta NRE, Njurumana GN, et al. Local Wisdom of West Timorese Farmers in Land Management. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ngongo, Yohanis, Tony Basuki, Bernard deRosari, Evert Y. Hosang, Jacob Nulik, Helena daSilva, Debora Kana Hau, Alfonso Sitorus, Noldy R. E. Kotta, Gerson N. Njurumana, and et al. 2022. "Local Wisdom of West Timorese Farmers in Land Management" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 6023. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop