Review Reports

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Experience could be complemented with previous experiences using models with micro-concrete and other materials. Video materials and other simulation tools exist and benchmarking those against    the current could be useful to evaluate the positive innovation. The student population is not characterized (level of study, numbers, previous knowledge about topic, grades before and after the experience, etc.). The learning outcomes of the experience should be presented and assessed properly besides using an opinion survey. The verification of competences acquired is convenient to validate the usefulness of the experiment. Similitude theory is not mentioned and could help students interpret results. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please see the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

No further comments.