Time Allocation between Paid and Unpaid Work among Men and Women: An Empirical Study of Indian Villages
, Surabhi Mittal 2, Namrata Singha Roy 3 and Sanghamitra Kanjilal-Bhaduri 4Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The topic of manuscript is very interesting. Differences between men and women are a serious global problem.
The data used in the paper are from 2014, which in my opinion is not very current.
Some tables are behind the margins of the page, so it was not possible to view them completely.
Author Response
Please see the attachment
Author Response File: 
Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Theory: The authors have not used any theory in the paper. A theory would help authors to explain their findings—for example, reasons for the gender gap in economic and non-economic activities. Authors can explain the reasons for such differences using Time Availability Perspective or Patriarchal Theory. Analysis: The analysis section is very clumsy. The headings of the table need to be more clear. The authors started the analysis section with exploratory analysis, explaining results presented through graphs in percentages. The authors then presented their findings ( assuming regression co-efficient) in Tables. However, the way authors have written their analysis; it looked like they are explaining descriptive statistics, not regression co-efficient. The analysis section needs major revision. In your description, please refer to the table number. I feel that the authors need to rewrite the analysis section. As the authors explain their findings, they provide reasons for such findings using theory/ies. That make analysis more meaningful.Author Response
please see the attachment
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
The authors have improved the paper significantly. The revised version has addressed my concerns.
This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.
