Next Article in Journal
Business Education: Filling the Gaps in the Leader’s Awareness Concerning Organizational Phronesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Destination Marketing Ecosystem through Smartphone-Based Social Media: The Consumers’ Acceptance Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Sustainable Restaurant Practices in City Branding: The Case of Athens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Does Tourism Affect Economic Growth of China? A Panel Granger Causality Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Tourism Development and Economic Growth: Bibliometric Review and Analysis

by
Ana León-Gómez
1,*,
Daniel Ruiz-Palomo
2,
Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez
2 and
Mercedes Raquel García-Revilla
3
1
Ph.D. Tourism Program, University of Málaga, Campus Teatinos, 29071 Málaga, Spain
2
Department of Finance and Accounting, University of Málaga, Campus El Ejido, 29071 Málaga, Spain
3
Department of Tourism and Marketing, Distance University Madrid, 28400 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(4), 2270; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042270
Submission received: 14 January 2021 / Revised: 14 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 February 2021 / Published: 19 February 2021

Abstract

:
Over the past decade, there has been a growing interest in studying the impact of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. However, despite its recent scope, the scientific literature published so far has not evaluated the performance of the scientific activity of this relationship. Consequently, this study analyzes the 668 articles published to date in the Web of Science database on the effect that sustainable tourism development has on the overall long-term progress of the economy. To this end, we carry out an analysis of the most recognized authors, regions with the highest percentage of scientific production, most influential organizations, the co-occurrence of keywords, most prominent citations, publications, and co-authorship among the most recognized authors. The results obtained show the trend and impact of the literature published to date and the established and emerging research groups. Also, they identify key research topics in a way that provides a planning framework for further research in this field.

1. Introduction

Tourism is a constantly growing and economically important sector on a global and local level. It is of vital economic, social, and cultural importance and offers real prospects for sustainable and inclusive development [1]. Such is the importance of this sector that the number of tourist trips made each year before the arrival of COVID-19 came to surpass the world population [2]. International tourist arrivals exceeded 1.5 billion globally in 2019, representing an increase of 3.8% year-on-year [1]. Likewise, this figure is expected to continue to rise, with a forecast of 1.8 billion international tourists by 2030 [3], although this may be revised after the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic [4] (Figure 1).
After six decades of steady growth, tourism has been established as an indispensable engine of economic growth. In this sense, it should be noted that in 2019 the travel and tourism sector experienced a growth of 3.5%, surpassing the growth of the global economy of 2.5% for the ninth consecutive year [5]. From another perspective, we can see that the sector directly contributes 4.4% of GDP, 6.9% of employment, and 21.5% of exports of services in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)countries [6]. In this regard, Figure 2 shows the 15 countries with the highest percentage of contribution to GDP in terms of the travel and tourism sector.
However, the negative impacts of COVID-19 are not only limited to the loss of human lives but also include short and long-term social, economic, and political effects [7]. A longer and more intensive COVID-19 is likely to reduce global growth to 1.5% in 2020, which is half the projected growth rate before 2020, with implications for international tourism [8]. The International Monetary Fund predicts that the COVID-19 outbreak will cause a global recession in 2020 that could be worse than the one triggered by the global financial crisis of 2008–2009 [7]. Likewise, the COVID-19 outbreak will have serious consequences for international tourism, with decisive effects on the economic growth and prosperity of various nations [4,9].
The economic importance of tourism and its growth is an area that has significant value today, and therefore it is not surprising that there is a large body of literature that highlights the different impacts of tourism [2,3,7,10]. Similarly, a key aspect for tourism is sustainability, since it is considered a way to satisfy the needs of the stakeholders, taking into account economic impact as well as current and future social and environmental conditions [1,11,12]. Consequently, sustainability and the limits of its growth are a constant concern within the tourism sector [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
In recent years, various reviews of the literature on sustainable tourism development and economic growth have been completed. These reviews have identified various current topics covered in the current research literature. Each study has provided information about the field examined, but further analysis of this literature using rigorous bibliometric tools may provide more information that has not been fully understood or evaluated before. In this way, bibliometric tools can be a powerful way to identify established and emerging current areas, as well as identifying research groups and researchers to show how various areas of thought may have arisen based on institutional and author characteristics. Identifying the most influential researchers within a group paves the way for determining additional emerging fields of study by pinpointing more recent topics covered by these researchers [20].
The current study, therefore, presents a comprehensive evaluation of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth, starting with a group of more than 15,000 published articles and filtering this group to find specialized works on the proposed topic. From these results, additional insights are also gained about current research interests and possible directions for future research.

2. Conceptual Framework

The empirical literature published so far has not specified a universally accepted definition of sustainable tourism development [13], although recent evidence on the matter suggests that one of the most widely used definitions of the concept is that provided by the World Trade Organization (WTO), which defines it as a “development that meets the needs of present tourists and host regions while protecting and enhancing opportunity for the future” [21]. However, the empirical literature continues to analyze a series of fundamental questions for the development of sustainable tourism, and many relevant questions in this area remain unresolved. Without forgetting that its genesis is associated with the maintenance of environmental quality [22,23], it is of particular importance that everything done now will not harm future generations [22]. Therefore, the assessment of long-term economic, environmental, and community health is deemed necessary [24]. Thus, recently, researchers have examined the effects of sustainability within tourism [25] since it is considered a paradigm that characterizes the future of this sector [16]. For this reason, in recent years, there has been growing interest in studying this relationship, highlighting the importance and difficulty of improving sustainability in tourism [10,26] but also identifying it as a fundamental tool for competitiveness [14,27].
Studies on economic growth demonstrate the impact of the tourist impulse on the general progress of the economy in the long term [28]. To this end, many governments have been involved in the development of tourism for economic growth, because it has a great capacity to distribute wealth, contribute to the development of emerging economies, and generate income through exports [10,28,29,30,31,32]. However, it can also exert long-term negative impacts on the environment [33] and damage the future economic development of tourist destinations [10]. Therefore, tourism is a transcendental tool to promote a development proposal according to sustainability criteria [10,19,34].
In recent decades, many researchers have tried to determine the effects of sustainable tourism development on economic growth [15,19,35]. In general, this approach has been used to show the growing importance of this relationship by identifying research gaps and specific areas of interest. Linking of the literature between authors, topics, and research fields has been completed through content analysis and descriptive statistics. Although we can verify that this relationship has been widely studied in the previous literature, we consider it interesting to carry out a study of the size, growth, and distribution of existing scientific documents, as well as to delve into the structure of the groups that are interested in these documents. Therefore, the present study aims to recognize the various research currents in the literature on the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. In this way, the results will make it possible to identify areas of interest for current research and possible directions for future research.

3. Research Methodology

The main purpose of bibliometric reviews is to assess the body of existing empirical literature to determine possible research gaps and highlight the limits of knowledge [20]. The bibliometric analysis uses quantitative methods to classify data, produces representative summaries, and is recognized as a useful approach to analyzing the performance of journals, institutions, authors, and the characteristics of research topics [36]. In our study, to quantify the influence of publications, authors, and journals, we have analyzed various bibliometric indicators, including the number of publications, total citations, citations per article, the main journals, most relevant universities, and the most influential countries in the matter.
Search terms used for data collection include “Sustainable Tourism”, “Tourism Development” and “Economic Growth”. Three combinations of these keywords were also used, including (1) Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development, (2) Sustainable Tourism AND Economic Growth, (3) Tourism Development AND Economic Growth, and (4) Sustainable Tourism, Tourism Development, AND Economic Growth.

3.1. Initial Search Results

We use the search “subject, title, abstract, keywords” in the Web of Science (WoS) database because it is one of the most-used databases in the academic field, compiling data on a large scale and producing statistics based on bibliometric indicators [37,38]. Initial search attempts resulted in a total of 14,993 articles. A breakdown of the search results for the four sets of keywords is shown in Table 1.

3.2. Refinement of Search Results

Of the 14,993 articles in Table 1, we decided to refine the search so that, in our database, only articles in English, belonging to the categories of Business Economics, Social work, Social Sciences, Environmental Sciences Ecology, Sociology, Computer Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Government Law, Social Issues, Education Educational Research, and Women Studies, appear. These adjustments reduce the total number of items to 9549. Table 2 shows the number of articles after refinement for each of the four search categories. Although we observe that Sustainable Tourism, Tourism Development, and Economic Growth are topics that are highly analyzed in the existing empirical literature, we also perceive that the combination of the three terms had hardly been studied.
The concept of sustainable development has been based initially on the premise of economic growth [17]. Likewise, the sustainable development of tourism has been considered a dynamic process that constantly experiences new challenges as applied technologies and the consumption aspects of tourism change [39]. Consequently, we decided to focus our analysis on the development of sustainable tourism and economic growth, so that our research aims to develop a bibliometric study of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth.
When carrying out bibliometric analysis of a research field, the first step is to evaluate the available databases, their suitability, and the consequences of the use of one or the other [40]. For this purpose, 668 articles resulting from the search for the keywords Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development AND Economic Growth were selected. In this way, a database with 668 references in the WoS was created, which is the basis for the empirical study (Table 2).

3.3. Data Analysis

To observe the evolution of the field of empirical knowledge analyzed in this research, we have adopted an inductive approach through bibliometric analysis of scientific production [41]. Likewise, classification of the literature in this study is completed with the analysis of real data through the use of a deductive approach [20]. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to combine inductive and deductive approaches through the data collection method called triangulation, incorporating different data sources and different authors (e.g., current authors, academic experts, and industry experts) [42]. Data analysis is carried out through bibliometric analysis, the results of which are presented in Section 4.2. This analysis was performed with a VOS viewer due to its ability to work efficiently with large data sets and provide a range of visualization, analysis, and innovative research [20]. It is also an effective tool for performing scientific map analysis of journal publications as it has a powerful graphical user interface and maps display capabilities [38]. For this reason, we decided to complete the bibliometric analysis with two analyses of network visualizations: map density based on co-occurrence of keywords and map density based on network data connected by co-authorship items. Keyword term co-occurrence analysis represents the number of times that two terms occur together in a set of posts [43]. For this, map density based on the co-occurrence of keywords was used. Specifically, the full count method was applied, which means that each co-occurrence link had the same weight [44]. For its part, co-authorship network analysis shows the number of publications co-authored by at least two authors [38]. The vision of density is convenient to glimpse the common structure of the authors and highlight the most significant authors in this field [45]. For this purpose, the aforementioned map density based on network data connected by co-authorship items was used. Thus, each point in the item density display has a color that indicates the consistency of items at that point. By default, the colors are blue, green, and yellow. The greater the number of elements in the vicinity of a point and the greater the weight of the contiguous elements, the closer the color of the point will be to yellow [46].

4. Results

4.1. Initial Data Statistics

Figure 3 shows the trend in the number of articles published since 2005 because this year began a growing interest in the study of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. Although this field is still in its period of growth and expansion, these results show that there is a gradual growth in publications.
Initial statistics show that 285 journals have contributed to the publication of 668 articles. Also, it was found that 25 journals (represented in Table 3) have published 353 articles, which represents approximately 53% of all published articles. Similarly, Appendix A Table A1 shows the number of articles each year from the top 10 editorial journals that contribute to the area of sustainable tourism development and economic growth.

4.2. Bibliometric Analysis

This study is inspired by the methodology used in the previous literature on bibliometrics [47,48,49,50]. This methodology has been used to perform bibliometric analyses of specific journals [18,49,50,51] and research areas such as tourism [10,52], Kuznets environmental curves [53], environment [54,55] and economy [56,57,58]. As a consequence, a systematic quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the literature of 668 WoS publications related to the study of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth was carried out. In this bibliometric analysis, we determine the interconnections between articles by analyzing the frequency with which other articles cite another given article related to a specific study domain. Subsequently, the file was imported into a VOS viewer, and the most influential authors, articles, journals, research papers, institutions, and countries were extracted. Likewise, a mapping of appointments related to sustainable tourism development and economic growth was carried out. These results allowed us to explore the research streams of articles related to the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. Similarly, we have carried out two network analyses to complete our study, the aforementioned map density based on co-occurrence of keywords, and the map density based on network data connected by co-authorship items.
To find the most prolific and influential authors in the field of this research, the number of articles published by each author based on the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth was extracted from the database. Table 4 indicates the top ten contributing authors and the number of articles in which they were authors or co-authors. The results indicate that Zaman and Croes occupy the first and second positions on the list, respectively. It should be noted that Croes and Nijkamp are co-authors of a large number of articles with each other. Likewise, Nijkamps and Romao are co-authors of the work entitled: “Spatial impacts assessment of tourism and territorial capital: A modeling study on regional development in Europe” [59].
Although all the authors have experience in Hospitality, Leisure, Sport, and Tourism research, there are also two large subdivisions in terms of subject matter, because Hall and Nijkamp have a greater dedication in the field of Green, Sustainable Science, and Technology. In contrast, Kumar, Alola, and Romao focus their analysis on the Environmental Sciences area. Zaman, Croes, and Paramati are the authors with the greatest diversification, and their studies cover both segments. In general, the breadth of methodologies and disciplines, even among the most prolific academics, exemplifies the interdisciplinary nature of research on the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth.
Figure 4 shows the geographic locations of the organizations with the greatest contribution to the literature in the field of research analyzed in this study. The intensity of color in each country is proportional to the degree of participation of each organization. A higher density of contributing organizations can be found in China, with a participation percentage of 19.97%, followed by the USA (13.06%), Turkey (10.14%), England (8.14%), Spain (7.37%), Australia (6.14%), Pakistan (5.53%), Malaysia (5.38%) and Italy (4.3%). In general, the geographic dispersion of these organizations indicates that the research and practice of analyzing the contribution of sustainable tourism development to economic growth have attracted organizations and research centers from all over the world. It is also possible to make a further breakdown of these contributions for different regions. Appendix A Table A2 shows the contribution of each region to the literature on the contribution of sustainable tourism development to economic growth (note that articles with authors from different organizations may have been assigned to multiple regions).
The organizations with the best performance (according to the number of articles published), their geographic location, and the number of articles contributed are shown in Table 5.
Furthermore, in Figure 5 we can see that the continent with the highest number of contributing organizations in Asia.
Table 6 shows a comparison of this list with the 10 most influential main authors previously analyzed. It is observed that the University of Wah, University of Central Florida, University of the South Pacific, Istanbul Gelisim University, Universiti Utara Malaysia, and the University of Canterbury are represented respectively by the most prolific authors: Zaman, Croes, Kumar, Alola, Sharif, and Hall. Therefore, it may only take the work of one or two researchers for an organization to be classified as high performing.
For its part, joint word analysis offers information on the most-studied topics and concepts [60]. This analysis links the most-used keywords in published manuscripts to describe the conceptual framework of a research field [61]. To do this, we have created a co-occurrence map of author keywords in the analysis of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth (minimum threshold of 15 keyword occurrences), where 58 keywords (of the 2512 analyzed) have resulted. Figure 6 shows the evolution of the most-used terms.
After analyzing a set of 881 expressions (extracted from a total of 668 articles), we made Table 7, which shows the 20 main keywords used in the articles. The keywords that appeared most frequently in the literature were: Economic Growth, Tourism, and Tourism Development. The location of these three terms on the map (Figure 6) suggests their centrality as organizing concepts in the existing empirical literature. The structure of the three central groups of the map come together to form an image of the literature that is mainly concerned with the “Sustainable Development” keyword (with an occurrence factor of 44).
Finally, the 10 main articles with the highest number of citations are shown in Appendix A Table A3. The most-cited author (Hall, CM), with 612 citations, coincides with the author of the most-cited work: “Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: from first- and second-order to third-order change?” [62], who in turn ranks number six as a highly relevant author in the study of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. Likewise, the most recent work with the highest number of citations is: “The Effects of Tourism Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: A Comparison between Developed and Developing Economies” [63]. In Figure 7, we make a graphic comparison between the most influential authors in this field and the authors with the most citations. In this sense, we can conclude that all the authors with the most contributions are among the most-cited authors, except Sharif and Romao. Finally, Figure 8 shows us the timeline of the most relevant contributions.
Below, we also present a map based on researcher networks [46]. The elements of these networks have been connected through co-authorship links. To build the network we have used the WoS database’s bibliographic files to provide them as input to the VOS viewer. Figure 9 presents the analysis of 10 related co-authors according to the number of articles published jointly. The elements included in this map are researchers, and the link between these elements is the co-authorship links between them. Likewise, each link has a strength that indicates the number of publications in which two researchers have been co-authors [46]. The total strength of the bond is described as standard weight attributes that indicate the strength of an element’s bonds with others [46,64]. Four different clusters can be detected, where the largest sets consist of three elements. Zaman has the highest total bond strength, followed by Sharif, Shahbaz, Paramati, and Kumar. In turn, Zaman, Shahbaz, Paramati, and Kumar are considered influential authors in the field studied, and Zaman is the author with the greatest impact on sustainable tourism development and economic growth. In turn, these five authors are among the 13 most-cited authors in this field. Therefore, through the constructed map, it was verified that the relevance of the influence of the analyzed relationship may be due to the co-authorship between the published works. For example, Paramati and Shahbaz are especially related by their common field of research (Environmental Sciences) and have published “Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union” as co-authors [65].

5. Discussion

This research presents a structured review of the literature that studies the influence of sustainable tourism on economic growth. Bibliometric studies on sustainable tourism and the impact of tourism on the economy are found in the previous literature [10,66,67]. However, bibliometric analysis has not been completed that relates sustainable tourism and economic growth and identifies analytically and objectively emerging works, authors, and research groups.
The results of our bibliometric analysis on sustainable tourism and economic growth indicate that there is a relative concentration of the most influential works among a certain number of researchers. Authors Zaman K., Croes R., and Kumar R.R. are the ones with the highest number of publications. Other authors also have a high number of publications, such as Sharif A., Hall C.M., Nijkamp P., and Romao J. However, as the field continues to mature, numerous authors are joining this line of research, expanding the work in a variety of areas (for example, “Green and sustainable science and technology” and “Environmental science”). As a consequence, the number of citations is progressing upwards, having increased by 28% in the last five years, which shows the current significance of the analyzed relationship. These results are in line with those obtained by previous studies on sustainable tourism [25].
Furthermore, our analysis of the geographical dispersion of publications showed that China has the highest number of works (25%), followed by the United States (20%). These results are similar to those of Yoopetch and Nimsai [19] on sustainable tourism since they indicate that this research is located in emerging regions of the world (e.g., Asia). However, our results are different from those obtained by other bibliometric studies also in the exclusive field of sustainable tourism, by indicating that the United States is the country that contributes the most literature [10,66]. This difference may be because our study also considers aspects of economic growth, which is attracting organizations, research centers, and researchers from the vast majority of countries, mainly in Asia and Europe [38].
Our study also indicates that a growing interest in the study of the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth began in 2005, similar to that suggested by other previous studies on economic research [38] and on sustainable tourism [10], which confirms that there is a recent and successful period of related academic literature, specifically from 2005 to date.
On the other hand, our results detect the breadth of methodologies and disciplines used, even among the most prolific academics, which exemplifies the interdisciplinary nature of research on the influence of sustainable tourism development on economic growth. Also, it is possible that only the work of one or two researchers is necessary for an organization to be classified as high performance, and that the influence of the analyzed relationship may be due to co-authorship between published works. These results coincide with those obtained by previous studies on economic research, indicating that co-authorship analysis shows that the associations between countries/regions are relatively fixed and limited [38].
Finally, the results obtained also suggest future lines of research. We have found that research on the impact of sustainable tourism on economic growth has mainly focused on the areas of hospitality, green and sustainable technology, and environmental sciences. Therefore, it would be interesting to address new areas of study that extend the results obtained. For example, the economic impact of sustainable events, sustainable tourist destinations, and sustainable maritime tourism remains to be studied. Likewise, given that current experience is concentrated in a certain number of countries, it would be necessary to expand the number of investigations into a broad set of experiences that offer a multicultural and globally relevant points of view.

6. Conclusions

Research on sustainable tourism development and economic growth is increasing and maturing. However, there is still a significant gap, given the small number of influential articles. The evidence emerging from this study suggests that sustainable tourism development is indispensable for economic growth. Countries like China and the United States have developed this relationship, but for European countries, it is still an issue that needs further research. Likewise, and in the context of the current crisis derived from COVID-19, our findings suggest that measures to promote the development of sustainable tourism and thus improve economic growth, currently slowed by the pandemic, should be investigated. Additionally, we have also found that this relationship should be promoted from the point of view of environmental sciences.
On the other hand, an expansion of the results that we developed in this study seems necessary. The number of keywords could be expanded to include trade openness, pollution, energy consumption, globalization, and a wide variety of other relevant terms that could contribute to a more comprehensive review of the analyzed relationship. For example, pollution and globalization were the first precursors to the field of sustainable tourism development and economic growth. Expanding future research in this direction would identify many other contributions and potentially change core research areas even further. However, the inclusion of additional keywords will result in a broader set of articles that will later require innovative bibliometric analysis tools and approaches. Therefore, future research should consider that there are opportunities for further content analysis of specific and influential studies to more concretely identify research gaps and directions.
From an empirical perspective, the results of this study have implications for research that promotes policies to stimulate the development of sustainable tourism. This can be a solution to the scenarios of economic slowdowns, such as those caused by COVID-19 today. In this sense, there is a need to use more effective statistical models that allow for adequate decision-making with high impact on final results.

Author Contributions

This study has been designed and performed by all of the authors. D.R.-P. collected the data, A.L.-G. and M.A.F.-G. analyzed the data. The introduction and literature review were written by D.R.-P. and M.R.G.-R. The research methodology and initial data statistics, data analysis, and bibliometric analysis were written by M.A.F.-G. and A.L.-G. All of the authors wrote the discussion and conclusions. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of Malaga and the Cátedra de Economía y Finanzas Sostenibles.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Web of Science (WOS).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the anonymous reviewers, and the editors for their truly valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. The top 10 publishing journals contributing to the area of sustainable tourism developments and economic growth.
Table A1. The top 10 publishing journals contributing to the area of sustainable tourism developments and economic growth.
SourcePublication Year
199119921993199419951996199719981999200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Sustainability 1 113151714
Tourism Economics 2 11341314149
Tourism Management 11 1 22121 1222333 3
Current Issues in Tourism 113 132 31213
Environmental Science and Pollution Research 122 2313
Journal of Sustainable Tourism 21 322364
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research 1 1 12125142
Journal of Travel Research 2 111 122126
Annals of Tourism Research1 11 1 1 1 132 12
TourismAnalysis 11 1121 2121
Table A2. Contribution total of organizations based on their geographical regions.
Table A2. Contribution total of organizations based on their geographical regions.
Geographical RegionNumber of PapersContribution (%)
AFRICA
South Africa152.304
Egypt71.075
Mauritius60.922
Nigeria40.614
Tanzania30.461
Ghana20.307
Tunisia20.307
Botswana10.154
Cameroon10.154
Eritrea10.154
Libya10.154
Uganda10.154
Zimbabwe10.154
AMERICA
North America
United States8513.057
Canada162.458
Mexico20.307
Barbados10.154
Jamaica10.154
South America
Aruba40.614
Brazil30.461
Colombia30.461
Argentina20.307
Ecuador20.307
Peru20.307
Uruguay20.307
Chile10.154
Guyana10.154
ASIA
China13019.969
Pakistan365.530
Malaysia355.376
Taiwan274.147
India162.458
Japan152.304
Saudi Arabia131.997
Iran121.843
Indonesia91.382
South Korea91.382
United Arab Emirates71.075
Vietnam71.075
Singapore60.922
Thailand50.768
Bangladesh30.461
Kazakhstan30.461
Israel20.307
Lebanon20.307
Cambodia10.154
Jordan10.154
Laos10.154
Nepal10.154
Palestine10.154
Philippines10.154
EUROPE
Turkey6610.138
England538.141
Spain487.373
Italy284.301
France142.151
Romania142.151
Netherlands131.997
Portugal111.690
Russia101.536
Greece91.382
Finland81.229
Germany71.075
Scotland71.075
Cyprus60.922
Norway60.922
Austria50.768
Croatia50.768
Serbia50.768
Sweden50.768
Switzerland50.768
Slovenia40.614
Ukraine40.614
Denmark30.461
Poland30.461
Wales30.461
Azerbaijan20.307
Herzeg-Bosnia20.307
Bulgaria20.307
Czech Republic20.307
Iceland20.307
Lithuania20.307
Macedonia20.307
Albania10.154
Belgium10.154
Hungary10.154
Montenegro10.154
Serbia10.154
Slovakia10.154
United Kingdom10.154
OCEANIA
Australia406.144
New Zealand172.611
Fiji121.843
Marshall Island10.154
Table A3. Top 10 most-cited articles contributing to the area of sustainable tourism development and economic growth.
Table A3. Top 10 most-cited articles contributing to the area of sustainable tourism development and economic growth.
The Title of the PublicationAuthorsThe Title of the JournalYear Total Citations
Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: from first- and second-order to third-order change?[62]Journal of Sustainable Tourism2011350
Investigating the influence of tourism on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from panel analysis of the European Union[28]Tourism Management2013201
In pursuit of ecotourism[68]Biodiversity and Conservation1996172
Green, circular, bio-economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues[69]Journal of Cleaner Production2017156
Tourism and poverty reduction: Issues for small Island states[70]Tourism Geographies2008126
Emergy measures of carrying capacity to evaluate economic investments[71]Population and Environment2001125
The World Bank’s role in tourism development[72]Annals of Tourism Research2007124
The entrepreneurship factor in sustainable tourism development[73]Journal of Cleaner Production2005118
Degrowing Tourism: Decroissance, Sustainable Consumption and Steady-State Tourism[74]Anatolia-International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research2009110
The Effects of Tourism on Economic Growth and CO2 Emissions: A Comparison between Developed and Developing Economies[63]Journal of Travel Research201799

References

  1. World Tourism Organization. International Tourism and Covid-19. 2020. Available online: https://www.unwto.org/international-tourism-and-covid-19 (accessed on 5 January 2020).
  2. Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Hall, C.M.; Esfandiar, K.; Seyfi, S. A systematic scoping review of sustainable tourism indicators in relation to the sustainable development goals. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Trupp, A.; Dolezal, C. Tourism and the sustainable development goals in Southeast Asia. Austrian J. South East Asian Stud. 2020, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gössling, S.; Scott, D.; Hall, C.M. Pandemics, tourism and global change: A rapid assessment of COVID-19. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 29, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Travel & Tourism Council Global Economic Impact & Trends 2020; World Travel & Tourism Council: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://wttc.org/Research (accessed on 5 January 2020).
  6. Harba, J.N.; Parteca, M.; Bujduveanu, S. From growth, to chaos, to uncertainty: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on European Tourism. In Proceedings of the 6th BASIQ International Conference on New Trends in Sustainable Business and Consumption, Messina, Italy, 4–6 June 2020; pp. 1249–1256. [Google Scholar]
  7. Farzanegan, M.R.; Gholipour, H.F.; Feizi, M.; Nunkoo, R.; Andargoli, A.E. International tourism and outbreak of coronavirus (COVID-19): A cross-country analysis. J. Travel Res. 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Oganisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD Economic Outlook, Interim Report March 2020; OECD Economic Outlook: Paris, France, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, X. Coronavirus pandemic and tourism: Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium modeling of infectious disease outbreak. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Niñerola, A.; Sánchez-Rebull, M.-V.; Hernández-Lara, A.-B. Tourism research on sustainability: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, C.; Zhang, R.; Wang, M.; Xu, J. Measurement and prediction of regional tourism sustainability: An analysis of the Yangtze river economic zone, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. World Tourism Organization Guide for Local Authorities on Developing Sustainable Tourism. Supplementary Volume on Asia & the Pacific; Tourism and Environmental Publication: Madrid, Spain, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  13. Asmelash, A.G.; Kumar, S. Assessing progress of tourism sustainability: Developing and validating sustainability indicators. Tour. Manag. 2019, 71, 67–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cucculelli, M.; Goffi, G. Does sustainability enhance tourism destination competitiveness? Evidence from Italian destinations of excellence. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 111, 370–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Manzoor, F.; Wei, L.; Asif, M.; Haq, M.Z.; Rehman, H. The Contribution of sustainable tourism to economic growth and employment in Pakistan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pan, S.-Y.; Gao, M.; Kim, H.; Shah, K.J.; Pei, S.-L.; Chiang, P.-C. Advances and challenges in sustainable tourism toward a green economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 635, 452–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sharpley, R. Tourism, sustainable development and the theoretical divide: 20 years on. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1932–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, M.; Liao, H.; Wan, Z.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Rosen, M. Ten Years of Sustainability (2009 to 2018): A bibliometric overview. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoopetch, C.; Nimsai, S. Science mapping the knowledge base on sustainable tourism development, 1990–2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. World Tourism Organisation. Indicators of Sustainable Development for Tourism Destinations. A Guidebook; World Tourism Organisation: Madrid, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  22. Bell, S. Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable? 2nd ed.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  23. Weaver, D.; Lawton, L.; De Lacy, T.; Tourism, C. Sustainable Tourism: A Critical Analysis; Cooperative Research Centre for Sustainable Tourism Research Report Series; Research Report 1; CRC Griffith University: Brisbane, Australia, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vehbi, O.B. A model for assessing the level of tourism impacts and sustainability of coastal cities. In Strategies for Tourism Industry Micro and Macro Perspectives; InTech Open: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grilli, G.; Tyllianakis, E.; Luisetti, T.; Ferrini, S.; Turner, R.K. Prospective tourist preferences for sustainable tourism development in small island developing states. Tour. Manag. 2021, 82, 104178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Buckley, R. Sustainable tourism: Research and reality. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012, 39, 528–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Goffi, G.; Cucculelli, M.; Masiero, L. Fostering tourism destination competitiveness in developing countries: The role of sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 101–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, J.W.; Brahmasrene, T. Investigating the influence of tourism on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from panel analysis of the European Union. Tour. Manag. 2013, 38, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Higgins-Desbiolles, F. More than an “industry”: The forgotten power of tourism as a social force. Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 1192–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Berno, T.; Bricker, K. Sustainable tourism development: The long road from theory to practice. Int. J. Econ. Dev. 2001, 3, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sahli, M.; Nowak, J.-J. Does Inbound tourism benefit developing countries? A trade theoretic approach. J. Travel Res. 2007, 45, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Holzner, M. Tourism and economic development: The beach disease? Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 922–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Ahmad, F.; Draz, M.; Su, L.; Ozturk, I.; Rauf, A. Tourism and environmental pollution: Evidence from the one belt one road provinces of western China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fletcher, R. Sustaining tourism, sustaining capitalism? The tourism industry’s role in global capitalist expansion. Tour. Geogr. 2011, 13, 443–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hall, C.M. Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2019, 27, 1044–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, Z.C.; Huang, H.J.; Yang, H. Fifty years of the bottleneck model: A bibliometric review and future research directions. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2020, 139, 311–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Falagas, M.E.; Pitsouni, E.I.; Malietzis, G.A.; Pappas, G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: Strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008, 22, 338–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, X.; Xu, Z.; Škare, M. A bibliometric analysis of economic research-ekonomska istraživanja (2007–2019). Econ. Res. Istraživanja 2020, 33, 865–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Streimikiene, D.; Svagzdiene, B.; Jasinskas, E.; Simanavicius, A. Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review. Sustain. Dev. 2020, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sánchez, A.D.; de la Cruz Del Río Rama, M.; García, J.Á. Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ. 2017, 23, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Serrano, L.; Sianes, A.; Ariza-Montes, A. Using bibliometric methods to shed light on the concept of sustainable tourism. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Scheffler, M.; Brunzel, J. Destructive leadership in organizational research: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics 2020, 125, 755–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kamdem, J.P.; Duarte, A.E.; Lima, K.R.R.; Rocha, J.B.T.; Hassan, W.; Barros, L.M.; Roeder, T.; Tsopmo, A. Research trends in food chemistry: A bibliometric review of its 40 years anniversary (1976–2016). Food Chem. 2019, 294, 448–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, J.; Yuan, B.Z. Mapping of the world rice research: A bibliometric analysis of top papers during 2008–2018. Ann. Libr. Inf. Stud. 2020, 67, 56–66. [Google Scholar]
  45. Kumar, K. Mapping of nanotechnology research in animal science: Scientometric anlaysis. SSRN Electron. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Van Eck, N.J.; Waltman, L. VOSviewer Manual. 2018. Available online: https://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.8.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  47. Da Silva, S.V.; Antonio, N.; de Carvalho, J.C. Analysis of the service dominant logic network, authors, and articles. Serv. Ind. J. 2017, 37, 125–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Llanos-Herrera, G.R.; Merigo, J.M. Overview of brand personality research with bibliometric indicators. Kybernetes 2019, 48, 546–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Shah, S.H.H.; Lei, S.; Ali, M.; Doronin, D.; Hussain, S.T. Prosumption: Bibliometric analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. Kybernetes 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Vošner, H.B.; Kokol, P.; Bobek, S.; Železnik, D.; Završnik, J. A bibliometric retrospective of the journal computers in human behavior (1991–2015). Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 65, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Byington, E.K.; Felps, W.; Baruch, Y. Mapping the journal of vocational behavior: A 23-year review. J. Vocat. Behav. 2019, 110, 229–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Comerio, N.; Strozzi, F. Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools. Tour. Econ. 2019, 25, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sarkodie, S.A.; Strezov, V. A review on environmental kuznets curve hypothesis using bibliometric and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 649, 128–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Milfont, T.L.; Amirbagheri, K.; Hermanns, E.; Merigó, J.M. Celebrating half a century of environment and behavior: A bibliometric review. Environ. Behav. 2019, 51, 469–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Nita, A. Empowering impact assessments knowledge and international research collaboration—A bibliometric analysis of environmental impact assessment review journal. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2019, 78, 106283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Camón Luis, E.; Celma, D. Circular Economy. A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kraus, S.; Li, H.; Kang, Q.; Westhead, P.; Tiberius, V. The sharing economy: A bibliometric analysis of the state-of-the-art. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 2020, 26, 1769–1786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Netto, C.D.O.; Tello-Gamarra, J.E. Sharing economy: A bibliometric analysis, research trends and research agenda. J. Technol. Manag. Innov. 2020, 15, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Romão, J.; Nijkamp, P. Spatial impacts assessment of tourism and territorial capital: A modelling study on regional development in Europe. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2018, 20, 819–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Gümüş, S.; Bellibaş, M.Ş.; Gümüş, E.; Hallinger, P. Science mapping research on educational leadership and management in Turkey: A bibliometric review of international publications. Sch. Leadersh. Manag. 2020, 40, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mas-Tur, A.; Kraus, S.; Brandtner, M.; Ewert, R.; Kürsten, W. Advances in management research: A bibliometric overview of the Review of Managerial Science. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2020, 14, 933–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hall, C.M. Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? J. Sustain. Tour. 2011, 19, 649–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Paramati, S.R.; Alam, M.S.; Chen, C.-F. The effects of tourism on economic growth and CO2 emissions: A comparison between developed and developing economies. J. Travel Res. 2017, 56, 712–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Al-Ashmori, Y.Y.; Othman, I.; Rahmawati, Y. Bibliographic analysis of BIM Success Factors and Other BIM Literatures using Vosviewer: A theoretical mapping and discussion. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paramati, S.R.; Shahbaz, M.; Alam, M.S. Does tourism degrade environmental quality? A comparative study of Eastern and Western European Union. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 2017, 50, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Brida, J.G.; Matesanz Gómez, D.; Segarra, V. On the empirical relationship between tourism and economic growth. Tour. Manag. 2020, 81, 104131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Croes, R.; Ridderstaat, J.; Bąk, M.; Zientara, P. Tourism specialization, economic growth, human development and transition economies: The case of Poland. Tour. Manag. 2021, 82, 104181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Goodwin, H. In pursuit of ecotourism. Biodivers. Conserv. 1996, 5, 277–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. D’Amato, D.; Droste, N.; Allen, B.; Kettunen, M.; Lähtinen, K.; Korhonen, J.; Leskinen, P.; Matthies, B.D.; Toppinen, A. Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 168, 716–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Scheyvens, R.; Momsen, J.H. Tourism and poverty reduction: Issues for small island states. Tour. Geogr. 2008, 10, 22–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brown, M.T.; Ulgiati, S. Emergy Measures of Carrying Capacity to Evaluate Economic Investments. Popul. Environ. 2001, 22, 471–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hawkins, D.E.; Mann, S. The world bank’s role in tourism development. Ann. Tour. Res. 2007, 34, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Lordkipanidze, M.; Brezet, H.; Backman, M. The entrepreneurship factor in sustainable tourism development. J. Clean. Prod. 2005, 13, 787–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hall, C.M. Degrowing tourism: Décroissance, sustainable consumption and steady-state tourism. Anatolia 2009, 20, 46–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Comparison of international tourists before and after the pandemic.
Figure 1. Comparison of international tourists before and after the pandemic.
Sustainability 13 02270 g001
Figure 2. Top 15 largest countries in terms of travel and tourism GDP contribution.
Figure 2. Top 15 largest countries in terms of travel and tourism GDP contribution.
Sustainability 13 02270 g002
Figure 3. Articles are published every year.
Figure 3. Articles are published every year.
Sustainability 13 02270 g003
Figure 4. Geographic allocations of all contributing organizations.
Figure 4. Geographic allocations of all contributing organizations.
Sustainability 13 02270 g004
Figure 5. Contribution by university and region.
Figure 5. Contribution by university and region.
Sustainability 13 02270 g005
Figure 6. Map density based on the co-occurrence of keywords.
Figure 6. Map density based on the co-occurrence of keywords.
Sustainability 13 02270 g006
Figure 7. Comparison between the number of citations and number of publications.
Figure 7. Comparison between the number of citations and number of publications.
Sustainability 13 02270 g007
Figure 8. Timeline of the most influential studies.
Figure 8. Timeline of the most influential studies.
Sustainability 13 02270 g008
Figure 9. A map density based on network data connected by co-authorship items.
Figure 9. A map density based on network data connected by co-authorship items.
Sustainability 13 02270 g009
Table 1. The initial search results.
Table 1. The initial search results.
Search KeywordsSearch Results
(No. of Papers)
Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development10,394
Sustainable Tourism AND Economic Growth1132
Tourism Development AND Economic Growth3467
Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development AND Economic Growth976
Total14,993
Table 2. Search results after refinement.
Table 2. Search results after refinement.
Search KeywordsSearch Results
(No. of Papers)
Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development6424
Sustainable Tourism AND Economic Growth774
Tourism Development AND Economic Growth2351
Sustainable Tourism AND Tourism Development AND Economic Growth668
Total9549
Table 3. The top 25 journals that contribute to the area of sustainable tourism development and economic growth.
Table 3. The top 25 journals that contribute to the area of sustainable tourism development and economic growth.
TitlesRecords
Sustainability42
Tourism Economics34
Tourism Management32
Current Issues in Tourism30
Environmental Science and Pollution Research23
Journal of Sustainable Tourism23
Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research20
Journal of Travel Research19
Annals of Tourism Research17
Tourism Analysis13
Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes13
International Journal of Tourism Research10
Anatolia International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research9
Tourism Planning Development9
Journal of Cleaner Production8
Tourism Management Perspectives8
Tourism Planning and Development8
Anatolia7
International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology7
Journal of Destination Marketing Management6
Journal of Policy Research in Tourism Leisure and Events5
Science of The Total Environment5
Tourism5
Table 4. The top 10 contributing authors and the number of published articles.
Table 4. The top 10 contributing authors and the number of published articles.
AuthorNumber of Published Articles
Zaman K.12
Croes R.10
Kumar R.R.8
Alola A.A.7
Sharif A.7
Hall C.M.6
Nijkamp P.6
Paramati S.R.6
Romao J.6
Table 5. The top 20 contributing organizations.
Table 5. The top 20 contributing organizations.
OrganizationLocationNumber of
Papers
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCyprus22
State University System of FloridaUnited States14
University of the South PacificFiji12
Southwestern University of Finance Economics ChinaChina10
University Utara MalaysiaMalaysia10
University of Central FloridaUnited States10
Chinese Academy of SciencesChina9
Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChina9
King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia9
University of WahPakistan9
University of South Carolina United States9
Griffith UniversityAustralia8
The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityChina8
Istanbul Gelisim UniversityTurkey8
Bournemouth UniversityUnited Kingdom7
SunYat Sen UniversityChina7
Universidade Do AlgarvePortugal7
University of CanterburyNew Zealand7
Table 6. Universities of the top 10 contributing authors.
Table 6. Universities of the top 10 contributing authors.
AuthorOrganization
Zaman K.University of Wah
Croes R.University of Central Florida
Kumar R.R.University of the South Pacific
Alola A.A.Istanbul Gelisim University
Sharif A.Universiti Utara Malaysia
Hall C.M.University of Canterbury
Nijkamp P.Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Paramati S.R.Central University of Finance and Economics
Romao J.Yasuda Women’s University
Table 7. The most frequently used keywords in papers.
Table 7. The most frequently used keywords in papers.
KeywordOccurrences
Economic Growth184
Tourism161
Tourism Development97
CO2 emissions73
International Tourism65
Impact61
Energy Consumption54
Sustainable Tourism50
Sustainable Development44
China42
Growth39
Demand36
Financial Development29
Countries29
Carbon emissions29
Renewable Energy20
Consumption25
Environmental Kuznets Curve24
Malaysia23
Carbon Dioxide emissions17
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

León-Gómez, A.; Ruiz-Palomo, D.; Fernández-Gámez, M.A.; García-Revilla, M.R. Sustainable Tourism Development and Economic Growth: Bibliometric Review and Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042270

AMA Style

León-Gómez A, Ruiz-Palomo D, Fernández-Gámez MA, García-Revilla MR. Sustainable Tourism Development and Economic Growth: Bibliometric Review and Analysis. Sustainability. 2021; 13(4):2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042270

Chicago/Turabian Style

León-Gómez, Ana, Daniel Ruiz-Palomo, Manuel A. Fernández-Gámez, and Mercedes Raquel García-Revilla. 2021. "Sustainable Tourism Development and Economic Growth: Bibliometric Review and Analysis" Sustainability 13, no. 4: 2270. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042270

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop