Next Article in Journal
Using Imagination to Overcome Fear: How Mental Simulation Nudges Consumers’ Purchase Intentions for Upcycled Food
Previous Article in Journal
The Figure of the Teacher-Prosumer for the Development of an Innovative, Sustainable, and Committed Education in Times of COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Planning of Green Infrastructure for Mitigation and Adaptation to Climate Change at a Regional Scale
Open AccessArticle

Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review

GREEN Research Center, Bocconi University, 20100 Milano, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Carlos Oliveira Cruz
Sustainability 2021, 13(3), 1129; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031129
Received: 30 December 2020 / Revised: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 22 January 2021
This paper critically analyses the methodologies that can be adopted to value ecosystem services (ESs) at the urban level through a literature review. While literature on ES valuation has grown in recent years, its application to urban contexts is still limited. Twenty-five papers, which include 29 different case studies, carry out an economic valuation and have undergone an in-depth analysis. The papers have been selected out of 80 papers detected through keywords. Six different valuation methodologies have been employed in the case studies. The most common ESs valued at the urban level are air quality regulation, local climate regulation, carbon sequestration and storage, and aesthetic appreciation and inspiration for culture, art, and design. The methodologies recur with different frequencies in the valuation of ESs at the urban level. Choice modeling and contingent valuation methodologies are used to value a variety of ESs, including regulating, cultural, and supporting services. Other methodologies are used to value only specific ESs. The replacement cost and damage cost avoided methodologies are used for the assessment of regulation services only; the travel cost method and contingent valuation are used for cultural services only. The results indicate that the considered valuation methodologies show different levels of appropriateness with respect to specific ES categories. Therefore, there is a need to expand the application of valuation methodologies to capture the value of all ESs provided by natural resources, in order to protect and enhance them. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban ecosystem services valuation; nature-based solutions; economic valuation urban ecosystem services valuation; nature-based solutions; economic valuation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Croci, E.; Lucchitta, B.; Penati, T. Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031129

AMA Style

Croci E, Lucchitta B, Penati T. Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(3):1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031129

Chicago/Turabian Style

Croci, Edoardo; Lucchitta, Benedetta; Penati, Tommaso. 2021. "Valuing Ecosystem Services at the Urban Level: A Critical Review" Sustainability 13, no. 3: 1129. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031129

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop