The Green Competitiveness of Enterprises: Justifying the Quality Criteria of Digital Marketing Communication Channels
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Assessing Green Competitiveness
- (1)
- Normalization of indicators:
- -
- For stimulators:
- -
- For de-stimulators:
- (2)
- Determining the share of the indicators of the green competitiveness of enterprises using the entropy method:
- -
- Calculation of the share of the ith indicator of green competitiveness of the j the subgroup ()
- -
- Calculation of the entropy of ith indicators of green competitiveness ()
- -
- Calculation of the weighting factor of the ith indicator of green competitiveness ()
- (3)
- Integral evaluation of the green competitiveness of enterprises using the taxonomic method:
3.2. Assessing the Quality Criteria of Marketing Communication Channels
3.3. The Quality Indicators of Marketing Communication Web Channels
4. Results
5. Discussion
- Increasing the trustworthiness of companies’ websites, which will ensure the presence of companies’ sites in the top search queries, thus helping promote the green competitiveness of enterprises;
- Developing external links to companies’ web resources;
- Raising the indicator of organic traffic, which will characterize the main source of the influx of visitors to commercial web resources;
- SEO-optimization of business sites;
- Increasing the speed of loading the pages of enterprise sites;
- Increasing the parameter of the average time on a web page due to interesting and useful content;
- Optimizing the bounce rate (the percentage of users who view only one page of the company’s site and leave it without continuing to view others).
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Duffett, R. A Multi-Dimensional Approach of Green Marketing Competitive Advantage: A Perspective of Small Medium and Micro Enterprises from Western Cape, South Africa. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- New Report: The State of Digital Advertising for Multi-Location Businesses. Available online: https://www.netsertive.com/blog/new-report-the-state-of-digital-advertising-for-multi-location-businesses (accessed on 1 July 2021).
- Coles, N.; Nicolau, M.; Brüggemann, N. Developing Tools for Sustainable Product Portfolio Management; Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production: Wuppertal, Germany, 2015; p. 33. [Google Scholar]
- Dzwigol, H. Research Methods and Techniques in New Management Trends: Research Results. Virtual Econ. 2019, 2, 31–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dzwigol, H. Methodological and Empirical Platform of Triangulation in Strategic Management. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2020, 19, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Dzwigol, H.; Dzwigol-Barosz, M. Sustainable Development of the Company on the Basis of Expert Assessment of the Investment Strategy. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2020, 19, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Dzwigol, H.; Dzwigol-Barosz, M.; Miskiewicz, R.; Kwilinski, A. Manager Competency Assessment Model in the Conditions of Industry 4.0. Entrep. Sustain. Issues 2020, 7, 2630–2644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fankhauser, S.; Bowen, A.; Calel, R.; Dechezleprêtre, A.; Grover, D.; Rydge, J.; Sato, M. Who will win the green race? In search of environmental competitiveness and innovation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2013, 23, 902–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Huseynov, A.G. Impact of Environmental Innovation on Country Socio-Economic Development. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2021, 2, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polcyn, J. Eco-Efficiency and Human Capital Efficiency: Example of Small- and Medium-Sized Family Farms in Selected European Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwilinski, A. Mechanism of Formation of Industrial Enterprise Development Strategy in the Information Economy. Virtual Econ. 2018, 1, 7–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwilinski, A. Mechanism of Modernization of Industrial Sphere of Industrial Enterprise in Accordance with Requirements of the Information Economy. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2018, 4, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dagilienė, L.; Bruneckienė, J.; Jucevičius, R.; Lukauskas, M. Exploring smart economic development and competitiveness in Central and Eastern European countries. Compet. Rev. 2020, 30, 485–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziabina, Y.; Pimonenko, T.; Lyulyov, O.; Us, Y.; Proshkin, D. Evolutionary development of energy efficiency in the context of the national carbon-free economic development. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 09002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, R. Sustainability and competitiveness in Australian cities. Sustainability 2015, 7, 1840–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kolkova, A. The Application of Forecasting Sales of Services to Increase Business Competitiveness. J. Compet. 2020, 12, 90–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avinash, T.; Manvendra, S. Determinants of sustainable/green consumption: A review. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 2016, 19, 316–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kyrylov, Y.; Hranovska, V.; Boiko, V.; Kwilinski, A.; Boiko, L. International Tourism Development in the Context of Increasing Globalization Risks: On the Example of Ukraine’s Integration into the Global Tourism Industry. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 13, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cyfert, S.; Chwiłkowska-Kubala, A.; Szumowski, W.; Miśkiewicz, R. The process of developing dynamic capabilities: The conceptualization attempt and the results of empirical studies. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0249724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.Q.; Du, K.R.; Yu, Y.; Feng, C. Understanding the trend of total factor carbon productivity in the world: Insights from convergence analysis. Energy Econ. 2019, 81, 698–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.L.; Zhang, X.D.; He, F.; Yuan, R.S. Regional green development level and its spatial relationship under the constraints of haze in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuzior, A.; Kwilinski, A.; Hroznyi, I. The Factorial-Reflexive Approach to Diagnosing the Executors’ and Contractors’ Attitude to Achieving the Objectives by Energy Supplying Companies. Energies 2021, 14, 2572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kharazishvili, Y.; Kwilinski, A.; Sukhodolia, O.; Dzwigol, H.; Bobro, D.; Kotowicz, J. The Systemic Approach for Estimating and Strategizing Energy Security: The Case of Ukraine. Energies 2021, 14, 2126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miśkiewicz, R. Efficiency of Electricity Production Technology from Post-Process Gas Heat: Ecological, Economic and Social Benefits. Energies 2020, 13, 6106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pająk, K.; Kvilinskyi, O.; Fasiecka, O.; Miskiewicz, R. Energy security in regional policy in Wielkopolska region of Poland. Econ. Environ. 2017, 2, 122–138. [Google Scholar]
- Miśkiewicz, R. The Impact of Innovation and Information Technology on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Case of the Visegrád Countries. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 14, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dechezleprêtre, A.; Sato, M.; OECD Green Policies and Firms’ Competitiveness. Issue Paper: Inclusive Solutions for the Green Transition. Green Growth: Knowledge Platform. 2018, p. 31. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/GGSD_2018_Competitiveness%20Issue%20Paper_WEB.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- Cerolini, D. The Omnichannel Strategy: A New Way to Compete in Digital Market. Bachelor’s Thesis, Università Ca’ Foscari Venezia, Venice, Italy, 2017; pp. 71–80. Available online: http://dspace.unive.it/handle/10579/10174 (accessed on 10 February 2021).
- Danso, A.; Adomako, S.; Amankwah-Amoah, J. Environmental sustainability orientation, competitive strategy and financial performance. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 885–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Global Digital 2019 Reports. We are Social. Available online: https://wearesocial.com/blog/2019/01/digital-2019-global-internet-use-accelerates (accessed on 3 April 2021).
- Dementyev, V.V.; Kwilinski, A. Institutional Component of Production Costs. J. Inst. Stud. 2020, 12, 100–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Mendonca, T.R.; Zhou, Y. Environmental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large U.S. Companies. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bozhkova, V.V.; Ptashchenko, O.V.; Saher, L.Y.; Syhyda, L.O. Transformation of marketing communications tools in the context of globalization. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2018, 1, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Artyukhov, A.; Volk, I.; Vasylieva, T.; Lyeonov, S. The role of the university in achieving SDGs 4 and 7: A Ukrainian case. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 04006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwilinski, A.; Vyshnevskyi, O.; Dzwigol, H. Digitalization of the EU Economies and People at Risk of Poverty or Social Exclusion. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 13, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rosokhata, A.; Rybina, O.; Derykolenko, A.; Makerska, V. Improving the Classification of Digital Marketing Tools for the Industrial Goods Promotion in the Globalization Context. Res. World Econ. 2020, 11, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y.; Rubanov, P.; Vasylieva, T.; Lyeonov, S. The influence of industry 4.0 on financial services: Determinants of alternative finance development. Pol. J. Manag. Stud. 2019, 19, 70–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Borchers, N.S.; Enke, N. Managing strategic influencer communication: A systematic overview on emerging planning, organization, and controlling routines. Public Relat. Rev. 2021, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belanche, D.; Casaló; L. V.; Flavián, M.; Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. Understanding influencer marketing: The role of congruence between influencers, products and consumers. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 132, 186–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, P.; Wong, H.Y.; Azam, M.S. How perceived communication source and food value stimulate purchase intention of organic food: An examination of the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egaña, F.; Pezoa-Fuentes, C.; Roco, L. Article the use of digital social networks and engagement in Chilean wine industry. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1248–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiqun, Y.; Chengjun, Z.; Yu, Z. The role and path of digital marketing in tourist souvenir brands. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 03044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piñeiro-Chousa, J.; López-Cabarcos, M.Á.; Ribeiro-Soriano, D. The influence of financial features and country characteristics on B2B ICOs’ website traffic. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 59, 102332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moukarzel, S.; Caduff, A.; Rehm, M.; Del Fresno, M.; Pérez-Escamilla, R.; Daly, A.J. Breastfeeding communication strategies, challenges and opportunities in the twitter-verse: Perspectives of influencers and social network analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Petrova, M.; Sen, A.; Yildirim, P. Social media and political contributions: The impact of new technology on political competition. Manag. Sci. 2021, 67, 2997–3021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, H.; Ruan, W.J.; Jeon, Y.J.J. An integrated approach to the purchase decision making process of food-delivery apps: Focusing on the TAM and AIDA models. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 95, 102943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahmanov, F.; Mursalov, M.; Rosokhata, A. Consumer Behavior in Digital Era: Impact of COVID-19. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2021, 2, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.; Kang, S.; Lee, K.H. Evolution of digital marketing communication: Bibliometric analysis and network visualization from key articles. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 130, 552–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oncioiu, I.; Căpușneanu, S.; Topor, D.I.; Tamaș; A. S.; Solomon, A.; Dănescu, T. Fundamental power of social media interactions for building a brand and customer relations. J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2021, 16, 1702–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mangold, W.G.; Faulds, D.J. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Bus. Horiz. 2009, 52, 357–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dapko, J.L.; Boyer, S.; Harris, E. The importance of timely social media responsiveness. J. Digit. Soc. Media Mark. 2021, 8, 358–364. [Google Scholar]
- Ling, R.; Sit, H.F.; Balaji, S.; Lam, A.I.F.; Latkin, C.A.; Tucker, J.D.; Hall, B.J. Crowdsourcing to design a marketing package to promote a WHO digital mental health intervention among Chinese young adults. Internet Interv. 2021, 25, 100397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Syhyda, L. Influence of enterprise’s marketing environment on process of marketing distribution policy development. Econ. Ann. XXI 2013, 7–8, 28–32. [Google Scholar]
- Fischer, D.; Reinermann, J.-L.; Guillen Mandujano, G.; DesRoches, C.T.; Diddi, S.; Vergragt, P.J. Sustainable consumption communication: A review of an emerging field of research. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 300, 126880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saher, L.; Syhyda, L.; Korobets, O.; Berezianko, T. Closed-Loop supply chain: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 00011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’Souza, C.; Taghian, M.; Khosla, R. Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention. J. Target. Meas. Anal. Mark. 2007, 15, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tkachuk, V.I.; Zinovchuk, V.V.; Tarasovych, L.V.; Yaremova, M.I. A significance of digital marketing for promoting bio-economy in Ukrainian economy. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2020, 29, 1043–1049. [Google Scholar]
- Vorontsova, A.; Shvindina, H.; Mayboroda, T.; Mishenina, H.; Heiets, I. The impact of state regulation in a sphere of education on sustainable development of national economy. Probl. Perspect. Manag. 2020, 18, 275–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolosok, S.; Myroshnychenko, I.; Mishenina, H.; Yarova, I. Renewable energy innovation in Europe: Energy efficiency analysis. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 00021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mentel, G.; Vasilyeva, T.; Samusevych, Y.; Vysochyna, A.; Karbach, R.; Streimikis, J. The evaluation of economic, environmental and energy security: Composite approach. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2020, 19, 177–195. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105783764&origin=resultslist (accessed on 6 April 2021). [CrossRef]
- Ziabina, Y.; Pimonenko, T.; Starchenko, L. Energy Efficiency of National Economy: Social, Economic and Ecological Indicators. Socioecon. Chall. 2020, 4, 160174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlyk, V. Assessment of green investment impact on the energy efficiency gap of the national economy. Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks 2020, 4, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pavlyk, V. Institutional Determinants of Assessing Energy Efficiency Gaps in The National Economy. Socioecon. Chall. 2020, 4, 122–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bilan, Y.; Srovnalã-KovÃi, P.; Streimikis, J.; Lyeonov, S.; Tiutiunyk, I.; Humenna, Y. From shadow economy to lower carbon intensity: Theory and evidence. Int. J. Glob. Environ. Issues 2020, 19, 196–216. Available online: https://www.scopus.com/record/display.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85105821876&origin=resultslist (accessed on 2 March 2021). [CrossRef]
- Keliuotytė-Staniulėnienė, G.; Daunaravičiūtė, K. The Global Green Bond Market in the Face of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks 2021, 5, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ziabina, Y.; Kovalenko, Y. Regularities in the Development of the Theory of Energy Efficiency Management. Socioecon. Chall. 2021, 5, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vasylieva, T.; Pavlyk, V.; Bilan, Y.; Mentel, G.; Rabe, M. Assessment of energy efficiency gaps: The case for Ukraine. Energies 2021, 14, 1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Didenko, I.; Volik, K.; Vasylieva, T.; Lyeonov, S.; Antoniuk, N. Migration, environment, and country safety: Analysis of touchpoints. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2020; p. 03028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samusevych, Y.; Vysochyna, A.; Vasylieva, T.; Lyeonov, S.; Pokhylko, S. Environmental, energy and economic security: Assessment and interaction. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2021; p. 00012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Amri, A.; Oulfarsi, S.; Boutti, R.; Sahib Eddine, A.; Hmioui, A. Carbon Financial Markets Underlying Climate Change Mitigation, Pricing and Challenges: Technical Analysis. Financ. Mark. Inst. Risks 2021, 5, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, S. The Impact of Trade on Environmental Quality: A Business Ethics Perspective and Evidence from China. Bus. Ethics Leadersh. 2019, 3, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taliento, M.; Netti, A. Corporate Social/Environmental Responsibility and Value Creation: Reflections on a Modern Business Management Paradigm. Bus. Ethics Leadersh. 2020, 4, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gleim, M.R.; Smith, J.; Andrews, D.; Cronin, J., Jr. Against the Green: A Multi-method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. J. Retail. 2013, 89, 44–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petrushenko, Y.; Vadym, A.; Vorontsova, A.; Ponomarenko, O. Sustainable development goals as a tool for strategic planning in communities: A bibliometric analysis of research. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2020; p. 03005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Starchenko, L.V.; Samusevych, Y.; Demchuk, K. Social and Eco-Friendly Enterpreneurship: The Keys to Sustainability. Bus. Ethics Leadersh. 2021, 5, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baydas, A.; Yalman, F.; Bayat, M. Consumer Attitude Towards Organic Food: Determinants of Healthy Behaviour. Mark. Manag. Innov. 2021, 1, 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, A. A Study of Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Green Products. J. Adv. Manag. Sci. 2016, 4, 211–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Lai, S.B.; Wen, C.T. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. J. Bus. Ethics 2006, 67, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, K. The impact of multi-channel and multi-product strategies on firms’ risk-return performance. Decis. Support. Syst. 2018, 109, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, H.; Liu, Y.; Petruzzi, N.C. Consumer Heterogeneity, Product Quality, and Distribution Channels. Manag. Sci. 2013, 59, 1162–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Basiri, Z.; Heydari, J. A mathematical model for green supply chain coordination with substitutable products. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 145, 232–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Biswas, A. Impact of eco-labeling awareness on consumers’ product evaluation-A study in an emerging economy. Elixir Mark. Manag. 2017, 74, 26879–26885. [Google Scholar]
- The Global Omnichannel Retail Index: Omnichannel on the March. Strategy. 2017. Available online: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/gx/en/insights/2017/2017-global-omnichannel-retail-index.html (accessed on 6 May 2021).
- Cheng, X.; Long, R.; Chen, H. Green competitiveness evaluation of provinces in China based on correlation analysis and fuzzy rough set. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 85, 841–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, X.; Long, R.; Chen, H.; Li, Q. Coupling coordination degree and spatial dynamic evolution of a regional green competitiveness system—A case study from China. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 104, 489–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charles, V.; Zegarra, L. Measuring regional competitiveness through Data Envelopment Analysis: A Peruvian case. Expert Syst. Appl. 2014, 41, 5371–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razali, N.M.; Wah, Y.B. Power comparisons of Shapiro-wilk, Kolmogorov Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-darling tests. J. Stat. Modeling Anal. 2011, 2, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
- Gastwirth, J.L.; Gel, Y.R.; Miao, W. The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Stat. Sci. 2009, 24, 343–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taiminen, H.M.; Karjaluoto, H. The usage of digital marketing channels in SMEs. J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev. 2015, 22, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Key, T.M. Domains of digital marketing channels in the sharing economy. J. Mark. Channels 2017, 24, 27–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mato-Santiso, V.; Rey-García, M.; José Sanzo-Pérez, M. Managing multi-stakeholder relationships in nonprofit organizations through multiple channels: A systematic review and research agenda for enhancing stakeholder relationship marketing. Public Relat. Rev. 2021, 47, 102074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesscher, L.; Lobschat, L.; Verhoef, P.C. Do offline and online go hand in hand? Cross-Channel and synergy effects of direct mailing and display advertising. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2021, 38, 678–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Indicator | Description | Source |
---|---|---|
MegaIndex Trust Rank | Degree of trust in the company’s website | MegaIndex |
MegaIndex Domain Rank | Domain quality (number of external links to the web resource) | MegaIndex |
Number of pages in Google search | Number of website pages in search engine rankings as a source of visitors’ engagement in commercial web resources | Google Analytics |
Page Speed Insights | Number of website pages in search engine rankings as a source of visitors’ engagement in commercial web resources | Serpstat |
Average time on web page | The time that a user spends on a site | Serpstat |
Failure rate | The percentage of web users who view only one page of the enterprise site and leave it without continuing to view others | Serpstat |
W | V | z | Prob > z |
---|---|---|---|
0.95 | 1.062 | 0.119 | 0.45 |
W (0) | W (50) | W (10) |
---|---|---|
0.144 | 0.143 | 0.144 |
Indicators of the Quality of Marketing Communication Channels | Prob. | Interconnection |
---|---|---|
The degree of trust in the company’s website | 0.23 | Absent |
Domain quality | 0.53 | Absent |
The number of website pages in search engine rankings as a source of visitors’ engagement in commercial web resources | 0.87 | Absent |
The number of website pages in search engine rankings as a source of visitors’ engagement in commercial web resources | 0.23 | Absent |
The time a user spends on the site | 0.008 | Available |
The percentage of web users who view only one page of the enterprise site and leave it without continuing to view others | 0.07 | Available |
Communication Channel | Page Speed Insights | Failure Rate | Image Actions | Remarketing | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agro-industrial sector | PJSC SVF Agroton | – | X | X | X |
PJSC Zernoproduct MHP | – | X | X | X | |
PJSC APK-Invest | – | X | X | X | |
LLC RPF Urozhay | X | – | X | X | |
PJSC Oril-Leader | – | X | X | X | |
Food industry | PJSC Wimm-Bill-Dann Ukraine | – | X | X | X |
PRJSC Kremenchuk City Dairy Plant | – | – | – | – | |
PJSC Vinnytsia Confectionery Factory | X | – | – | X | |
PJSC Mondelis Ukraine | X | – | X | X | |
PJSC Kremenchukmeat | X | – | – | – | |
Machine-building industry | PJSC SKF Ukraine | X | X | – | X |
JSC Sumy plant Nasosenergomash | – | X | – | X | |
JSC Turboatom | – | X | X | X | |
PJSC Zaporizhzhya Automobile Plant | X | X | X | X | |
PJSC Motor Sich | – | X | X | X |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chen, Y.; Kwilinski, A.; Chygryn, O.; Lyulyov, O.; Pimonenko, T. The Green Competitiveness of Enterprises: Justifying the Quality Criteria of Digital Marketing Communication Channels. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413679
Chen Y, Kwilinski A, Chygryn O, Lyulyov O, Pimonenko T. The Green Competitiveness of Enterprises: Justifying the Quality Criteria of Digital Marketing Communication Channels. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413679
Chicago/Turabian StyleChen, Yang, Aleksy Kwilinski, Olena Chygryn, Oleksii Lyulyov, and Tetyana Pimonenko. 2021. "The Green Competitiveness of Enterprises: Justifying the Quality Criteria of Digital Marketing Communication Channels" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413679
APA StyleChen, Y., Kwilinski, A., Chygryn, O., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2021). The Green Competitiveness of Enterprises: Justifying the Quality Criteria of Digital Marketing Communication Channels. Sustainability, 13(24), 13679. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413679