Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. The Methodology Used to Create the Procedure for Determining the Construction Technical Requirements for Population Protection
- Assessment of the impacts of typified hazards within the Threat Analysis for the Czech Republic,
- Evaluation of the possibility of introducing preventive measures in terms of construction and technical properties of the building,
- Evaluation of the possibility of preventive measures from the perspective of the competence of the fire brigade,
- Assessment of the insufficient solution of the given danger in the relevant regulations.
2.2. Definition of Basic Terms
2.3. Planning Proceedings in the Czech Republic in Relation to Population Protection
2.4. Industry 4.0 under the Conditions of the Czech Republic
2.5. Designation of Population Protection Requirements for Constructions
- category of construction,
- vulnerability of construction,
- external hazard of construction,
- strategic significance of construction.
- if the constructions comply with the vulnerability criteria and their limit values, the general requirements of population protection are applied to them,
- if the constructions are exposed to external hazards, specific requirements are applied to them,
- if they are constructions of a strategic significance, requirements for ensuring greater resilience (i.e., strategic requirements) are also applied to them.
2.6. Limiting Conditions of the Solution
- population protection requirements not coming within the purview of the Fire Brigade of the Czech Republic were not dealt with,
- the construction technical requirements for population protection that would significantly impact the area of the ownership rights of natural persons (partial restriction of ownership right is permissible but only in the absolutely essential cases) were not covered,
- construction-technical requirements of population protection were not designated for those types of constructions for which it is not possible to designate limit criteria or concrete requirements.
3. Process and Results
3.1. Designation of Relevant Groups of Constructions (Step A)
- assumption of the presence of a large number of people,
- assumption of the presence of persons with reduced mobility,
- assumption of the presence of persons up to the age of 15,
- assumption of the presence of persons unfamiliar with the environment in constructions with possibilities for sleeping.
- administrative constructions,
- constructions for trade,
- constructions for healthcare,
- constructions for social, cultural and religious purposes,
- schools, universities, and constructions for research,
- hotels and accommodation facilities,
- constructions for transport,
- constructions for industry,
- social care constructions,
- constructions for sport and recreation.
- constructions for healthcare,
- constructions for transport,
- constructions of emergency services.
3.2. Hazard Assessment for Relevant Groups of Constructions (Step B)
- assessment of impacts of type hazards as part of Threat Analysis for Czech Republic (criterion E),
- assessment of possibilities for the introduction of preventative measures from the aspect of construction-technical properties of construction (criterion F),
- assessment of possibilities for preventative measures from the aspect of competence of the fire brigade (criterion G),
- assessment of insufficient resolution of given hazard in relevant regulations (criterion H).
- N-01 natural flood,
- N-02 flash flood,
- A-01 special flood,
- A-02 leak of hazardous chemical substance from stationary facility,
- A-03 radiation accident,
- A-04 large-scale power cut,
- A-06 large-scale disruption to drinking water supplies.
3.3. Parameters for Selection of Relevant Constructions of Population Protection (Step C)
3.3.1. Vulnerable Constructions
3.3.2. Strategic Constructions
3.3.3. Other Relevant Constructions
- constructions suitable for locating monitoring end elements,
- constructions suitable for locating electronic warning end elements,
- constructions suitable for activities of crisis teams,
- constructions suitable for emergency survival,
- constructions intended for preferential care.
3.4. Designation of Population Protection Requirements for Relevant Constructions (Step D)
- general construction-technical requirements (designated for relevant constructions which comply with the vulnerability criteria and their limit values),
- specific construction-technical requirements (designated for relevant constructions exposed to external hazards),
- strategic construction-technical requirements (designated for relevant constructions of strategic significance).
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- European Union. A Shared Vision, a Common Approach: A Stronger Europe. Global Strategy of Foreign and Safety Policy of the European Union; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- European Union. Decision No. 1386/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, on the Union’s General Action Program on the Environment up to 2020 “Living Well within the Limits of Our Planet”. OJ L 2013, 354, 171–200. [Google Scholar]
- Council of the European Union. Review of the EU Sustainable Development Strategy (EU SDS)-Renewed Strategy; Council of the European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Office of the Government of the Czech Republic. Strategic Framework Czech Republic 2030; Office of the Government of the Czech Republic: Prague, Czech Republic, 2017.
- Pokorny, J.; Machalova, B.; Slivkova, S.; Brumarova, L.; Vlcek, V. Planning of Safety of Cities and Territory from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garau, C.; Pavan, V. Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities. Sustainability 2018, 10, 575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gociman, C.O.; Florescu, T.C.; Georgescu, E.S.; Moscu, C.I.; Stanescu, I.M. Urban Management Foundation in Risk Reduction; WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment: Alicante, Spain, 2016; Volume 204, pp. 3–14. Available online: http://library.witpress.com/viewpaper.asp?pcode=SC16-001-1 (accessed on 7 August 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- United Nations. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision United Nations; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Available online: https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2014-Report.pdf (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- Yin, B.C.L.; Laing, R.; Leon, M.; Mabon, L. An evaluation of sustainable construction perceptions and practices in Singapore. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 39, 613–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of the Interior: The Concept of Population Protection until 2020 with a View to 2030; Ministry of the Interior-General Directorate of the Fire and Rescue Service of the Czech Republic: Prague, Czech Republic, 2013.
- Nundy, S.; Mesloub, A.; Alsolami, B.M.; Ghosh, A. Electrically actuated visible and near-infrared regulating switchable smart window for energy positive building: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 301, 126854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedro, J.B.; Campos, V. Building Regulations and Existing Buildings: Setting the Requirements on Structural Safety in Portugal. In Historical Earthquake-Resistant Timber Framing in the Mediterranean Area; Cruz, H., Saporiti Machado, J., Campos Costa, A., Xavier Candeias, P., Ruggieri, N., Manuel Catarino, J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 253–262. Available online: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-39492-3_21 (accessed on 5 July 2021).
- Malerova, L. Assessment of Safety Level Risk. In Crisis Management a Leadership Perspektive; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 127–139. ISBN 978-1-63483-395-0. [Google Scholar]
- Meacham, B.J.; Van Straalen, I.J.; Ashe, B. Roadmap for incorporating risk as a basis of performance objectives in building regulation. Saf. Sci. 2021, 141, 105337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Polorecka, M.; Kubas, J.; Danihelka, P.; Petrlova, K.; Repkova Stofkova, K.; Buganova, K. Use of Software on Modeling Hazardous Substance Release as a Support Tool for Crisis Management. Sustainability 2021, 13, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Sabh, M.I. World conference on natural disaster reduction. Nat. Hazards 1994, 9, 333–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- International Strategy for Disaster Reduction. Hyogo Framework for Action 2005–2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters; Extract from the Final Report of the World Conference on Disaster Reduction; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2007; p. 25. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030; United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction: Sendai, Japan, 2015; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
- International Organization for Standardization. Available online: https://www.iso.org/home.html (accessed on 21 March 2021).
- IEC/ISO 31010 Risk Management-Risk Assessment Techniques. ISO/TC 262 Risk Management, 2019, 264p. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/72140.html (accessed on 21 March 2021).
- ISO 31000 Risk Management-Guidelines. ISO/TC 262 Risk Management. 2018. Available online: https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html (accessed on 21 March 2021).
- Allegretti, U. Civil Protection: The Fight against Earthquakes. In The Changing Administrative Law of an EU Member State; Sorace, D., Ferrara, L., Piazza, I., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Piacentini, T.; Carabella, C.; Boccabella, F.; Ferrante, S.; Gregori, C.; Mancinelli, V.; Pacione, A.; Pagliani, T.; Miccadei, E. Geomorphology-Based Analysis of Flood Critical Areas in Small Hilly Catchments for Civil Protection Purposes and Early Warning Systems: The Case of the Feltrino Stream and the Lanciano Urban Area (Abruzzo, Central Italy). Water 2020, 12, 2228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blistan, P.; Pacaiova, H. Modelling Environmental Influence on the Pipelines Integrity. In Proceedings of the 11th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2011. SGEM2011 Conference Proceedings, Albena, Bulgaria, 20–25 June 2011; Volume 2, pp. 645–652. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, J.M.; Kim, T.; Son, K. Revealing Building Vulnerability to Windstorms through an Insurance Claim Payout Prediction Model: A Case Study in South Korea. Geomat. Nat. Hazards Risk 2017, 8, 1333–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coneva, I. Civil Danger and Risk of Crisis Situation—Risk of Fire from Safety and Protection of Population as Possible Soft Targets. In Soft Target Protection; Hofreiter, L., Berezutskyi, V., Figuli, L., Zvaková, Z., Eds.; NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Act No. 239/2000 Coll., on the Integrated Rescue System, and on the Amendment of Certain Acts, as Amended. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2000-239 (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Decree No. 380/2002 Coll., on the Preparation and Implementation of Protection of the Population, as Amended. Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2002-308 (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Act of the National Council of the Slovak Republic No. 42/1994 Coll., On Civil Protection of the Population, as Amended. Available online: https://www.zakonypreludi.sk/zz/1994-42 (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- Turisova, R.; Sinay, J.; Pacaiova, H.; Kotianova, Z.; Glatz, J. Application of the EFQM Model to Assess the Readiness and Sustainability of the Implementation of I4.0 in Slovakian Companies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Structural Civil Protection (Federal Office of Civil Protection and Disaster Assistance). Available online: https://www.bbk.bund.de/DE/AufgabenundAusstattung/BaulicherBevoelkerungsschutz/baulicherbevoelkerungsschutz_node.html (accessed on 2 February 2021).
- Federal Act on Civil Protection and Civil Protection (Population and Civil Protection Act, BZG). Stand 30. November 2017. Available online: https://fedlex.data.admin.ch/filestore/fedlex.data.admin.ch/eli/cc/2020/887/20210101/de/pdf-a/fedlex-data-admin-ch-eli-cc-2020-887-20210101-de-pdf-a.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Di Ludovico, D.; Di Lodovico, L. The Regional Management Risk Plan. Knowledge, scenarios and prevention projects in a regional context. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 45, 101465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Decision No. 1313/2013/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on a Union Civil Protection Mechanism. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/CS/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013D1313&from=en (accessed on 1 October 2020).
- Directive 2011/98/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on a Single Application Procedure for a Single Permit for Third-Country Nationals to Reside and Work in the Territory of a Member State and on a Common Set of Rights for Third-CountryWorkers Legally Residing in a Member State. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32011L0098 (accessed on 1 June 2020).
- Vaidya, S.; Ambad, P.; Bhosle, S. Industry 4.0—A Glimpse. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 20, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘Industry 4.0 and Digital Transformation: Where to Go’ (COM (2016) 180 Final) (2016/C 389/07). Official Journal of the European Union. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52016AE1017&qid=1617978007821&from=CS (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Made Different—Enabling Factories of the Future. Wat Is Factory of the Future 4.0? Available online: https://www.madedifferent.be/nl/services (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- D4I—Digital for Industry. Available online: https://digital4industry.lu/ (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Industrie 2025. Available online: http://www.industrie2025.ch/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
- Culot, G.; Nassimbeni, G.; Orzes, G.; Sartor, M. Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 226, 107617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonilla, S.H.; Silva, H.R.O.; Terra da Silva, M.; Franco Gonçalves, R.; Sacomano, J.B. Industry 4.0 and Sustainability Implications: A Scenario-Based Analysis of the Impacts and Challenges. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Laciok, V.; Sikorova, K.; Fabiano, B.; Bernatik, A. Trends and Opportunities of Tertiary Education in Safety Engineering Moving towards Safety 4.0. Sustainability 2021, 13, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dvorak, Z.; Leitner, B.; Rehak, D. Critical Infrastructure Protection Specifications in the Transport Sector. MEST J. 2019, 7, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hiscock, K.; Jones, A. Assessing the Extent to Which the UK’s National Risk Register Supports Local Risk Management. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thomalla, F.; Boyland, M.; Johnson, K.; Ensor, J.; Tuhkanen, H.; Gerger Swartling, Å.; Han, G.; Forrester, J.; Wahl, D. Transforming Development and Disaster Risk. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Pruzan, P. Research Methodology: The Aims, Practices and Ethics of Science, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; ISBN 978-3-319-27167-5. [Google Scholar]
- Hennink, M.; Hutter, I.; Bailey, A. Qualitative Research Methods, 2nd ed.; SAGE Publications Ltd.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-4739-0391-3. [Google Scholar]
- Hirman, M.; Benesova, A.; Steiner, F.; Tupa, J. Project Management during the Industry 4.0 Implementation with Risk Factor Analysis. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 38, 1181–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- The Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Their Additional Protocols. Available online: https://www.icrc.org/en/document/geneva-conventions-1949-additional-protocols (accessed on 4 April 2021).
- Kavan, S.; Mudrochova, S. Special Training of Brigade Members on a Software Training Simulator. In Proceedings of the 5th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences & Arts SGEM2018; Education and Educational Research. SGEM 2018 Conference Proceedings, Albena, Bulgaria, 2–8 July 2018; Volume 18, pp. 747–754. [Google Scholar]
- Act No. 183/2006 Coll., on Spatial Planning and Building Regulations (the Building Act). Available online: https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2006-183 (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Czech Statistical Office: Classification of Constructions. Available online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/klasifikace_stavebnich_del_-cz_cc- (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Pokorny, J.; Rehak, D.; Adamec, V.; Hromada, M.; Rosenkranz, J.; Hruby, V.; Blazkova, K.; Paulus, F.; Michalcova, L.; Frohlich, T.; et al. Methodology for Population Protection in Spatial Planning and Construction Management; Ostrava VSB, Technical University of Ostrava: Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic: Initiative Industry 4.0 Approved by the Czech Government. Available online: https://www.mpo.cz/cz/prumysl/zpracovatelsky-prumysl/prumysl-4-0-ma-v-cesku-sve-misto--176055 (accessed on 20 February 2021).
- Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic: Industry Initiative 4.0. Available online: https://www.mpo.cz/assets/dokumenty/53723/64358/658713/priloha001.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2021).
- Kužma, D.; Korba, P.; Hovanec, M.; Dulina, Ľ. The Use of CAX Systems as a Tool for Modeling Construction Element in the Aviation Industry. Nase More 2016, 63, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Model Building Regulations—MBO—Federal Law, 2002. Available online: https://www.arbeitssicherheit.de/schriften/dokument/0%3A144179%2C1.html (accessed on 1 March 2021).
- Harrami, O.; McIntyre, C. Fire and fire protection in homes and public buildings. In An Analysis of Swedish Fire Statistics and fire Protection Strategies; National Centre for Learning from Accidents Swedish Rescue Services Agency: Stockholm, Sweden, 2006; 72p, Available online: https://www.kemi.se/en/publications/reports/2006/report-1-06-fire-and-fire-protection-in-homes-and-public-buildings (accessed on 20 March 2021).
- Hovanec, M. Digital factory as a prerequisite for successful application in the area of ergonomics and human factor. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2017, 18, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paulus, F. Risk Management in the Process of Ensuring the Safety of the Czech Republic. In Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice; Series, D., Ed.; Faculty of Economics and Administration: Pardubice, Czech Republic, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Paulus, F.; Kromer, A.; Petr, J.; Cerny, J. Threat Analysis for the Czech Republic; Fire and Rescue Service of the Czech Republic: Prague, Czech Republic, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- ČSN 73 0831. Fire Protection of Buildings—Assembly Rooms; Office for Technical Standardization, Metrology and State Testing: Prague, Czech Republic, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- ČSN 73 0833. Fire Protection of Buildings—Buildings for Dwelling and Lodging; Office for Technical Standardization, Metrology and State Testing: Prague, Czech Republic, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Jenčová, E.; Vagner, J.; Korba, P.; Koščák, P.; Hovanec, M. Comparison of the Accuracy of Selected Forecasting Methods. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Scientific Conference on Transport Means (Transport Means), Trakai, Lithuania, 3–5 October 2018; pp. 1494–1499. [Google Scholar]
- Anichiti, A.; Dragolea, L.L.; Tacu Hârșan, G.D.; Haller, A.P.; Butnaru, G. I Aspects Regarding Safety and Security in Hotels: Romanian Experience. Information 2021, 12, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagaj, R.; Žuromskaitė, B. Security Measures as a Factor in the Competitiveness of Accommodation Facilities. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2020, 13, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pedro, J.B.; Meijer, F.; Visscher, H. Comparison of building permit procedures in European in European Union countries. In Proceedings of the COBRA 2011—RICS Construction and Property Conference, Manchester, UK, 12–13 September 2011; pp. 415–436. Available online: https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3Ab391c687-3ecb-4017-abba-06f1539017e6 (accessed on 6 July 2021).
- Zelenakova, M.; Zvijakova, L. Selection of the Best Variant of Flood Protection. In Proceedings of CEE 2019: Advances in Resource-saving Technologies and Materials in Civil and Environmental Engineering; Blikharskyy, Z., Koszelnik, P., Mesaros, P., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 566–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dittes, B.; Spackova, O.; Schoppa, L.; Straub, D. Managing uncertainty in flood protection planning with climate projections. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 2018, 22, 2511–2526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nundy, S.; Ghosh, A.; Mesloub, A.; Albaqawy, G.A.; Alnaim, M.M. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic, energy-environment and transport sector globally and sustainable development goal (SDG). J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic. The Government Approved the Concept of Introducing the BIM Method in the Czech Republic. Available online: https://www.mpo.cz/cz/stavebnictvi-a-suroviny/bim/koncepce-zavadeni-metody-bim-v-cr-schvalena-vladou--232136/ (accessed on 20 March 2021).
Designation of Hazard | Hazard with Unacceptable Risk | Criterion | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
E | F | G | H | ||
N-01 | natural flood | yes | yes | yes | yes |
N-02 | flash flood | yes | yes | yes | yes |
N-03 | extreme wind | yes | no | no | yes |
N-04 | extreme long-term drought | yes | no | no | yes |
N-05 | extremely high temperature | yes | no | no | yes |
A-01 | special flood | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A-02 | leak of hazardous chemical substance from stationary facility | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A-03 | radiation accident | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A-04 | large-scale power cut | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A-05 | large-scale breakdown in law and order | yes | no | no | yes |
A-06 | large-scale disruption to drinking water supplies | yes | yes | yes | yes |
A-07 | disruption to functionality of important electronic communications | yes | no | no | yes |
A-08 | large-scale migration waves | yes | no | no | yes |
A-09 | large-scale disruption to gas supplies | yes | no | no | yes |
A-10 | disruption to information security of critical information infrastructure | yes | no | no | yes |
A-11 | large-scale disruption to food supplies | yes | no | no | yes |
A-12 | large-scale disruption to financial and foreign exchange system | yes | no | no | yes |
Vulnerability Criteria | Parameters of Criteria |
---|---|
assumption of presence of large number of people | >1000 people |
assumption of presence of persons with reduced mobility | >100 people |
assumption of presence of persons up to the age of 15 | >200 people |
assumption of presence of persons unfamiliar with the environment in constructions with possibilities for sleeping | >100 people |
geometry of construction | taller than 22.5 m, taller than 45 m, more than 2 above ground stories, more than 1 below ground story, more than 2 below ground stories |
Groups of Constructions | Parameters of Vulnerability Criteria |
---|---|
administrative constructions | constructions taller than 45 m or having more than 2 usable underground stories or constructions with presence of more than 1000 persons |
constructions for trade | constructions with presence of more than 1000 persons |
constructions for healthcare | constructions with more than two usable above ground stories or more than one useable underground story in which there are more than 100 persons requiring support during evacuation |
constructions for social, cultural and religious purposes | constructions in which there may be more than 1000 persons |
schools and universities | nursery school constructions in which there are more than 100 persons; primary school and secondary school constructions in which there are more than 500 persons; university constructions in which there are more than 1000 persons |
constructions for accommodation | constructions taller than 22.5 m or having more than 2 usable underground stories or constructions intended for the accommodation of more than 100 persons |
constructions for transport | constructions with presence of 1000 or more persons |
social care constructions | constructions with more than two usable above ground stories or more than one useable underground story in which there are more than 100 persons requiring support during evacuation |
constructions for sport and recreation | constructions in which there may be more than 1000 persons |
Strategic Constructions | Parameters of Criteria |
---|---|
constructions for healthcare | constructions of inpatient care providers in which acute, convalescent or long-term care is provided |
constructions for transport | central control site, national transport information center, or air traffic control construction |
constructions of emergency services | operations centers and stations of basic components of integrated rescue system |
Area | General Construction-Technical Requirements |
---|---|
population protection | requirements for warning within constructions |
requirements for ensuring deliveries of electricity | |
integrated rescue system of the Czech Republic | requirements for access roads—their parameters, load limit, number of lanes, etc. |
requirements for ensuring source of fire water—their location and capacity, pumping station |
Area | Specific Construction-Technical Requirements |
---|---|
protection from hazardous chemical substances | installation of end elements of dangerous substance monitoring and connection of those elements to emergency audio system in construction |
possibility to halt operational air-conditioning equipment, etc. | |
flood protection | requirements for connection of audio system in the construction to public warning system |
protection from radiation accidents | installation of end elements of radiation monitoring and connection of those elements to emergency audio system in construction |
possibility to halt operational air-conditioning equipment, etc. |
Area | Strategic Construction-Technical Requirements |
---|---|
detection and warning systems | allow the installation of equipment and its connection to the system for warning inhabitants, allow its maintenance |
ensure backup electricity source | |
activity of crisis teams | install backup electricity source |
strategic constructions | install backup electricity source and establish connection point |
create supplies of drinking and non-potable water |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Slivkova, S.; Brumarova, L.; Kluckova, B.; Pokorny, J.; Tomanova, K. Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179927
Slivkova S, Brumarova L, Kluckova B, Pokorny J, Tomanova K. Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic. Sustainability. 2021; 13(17):9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179927
Chicago/Turabian StyleSlivkova, Simona, Lenka Brumarova, Barbora Kluckova, Jiri Pokorny, and Katerina Tomanova. 2021. "Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic" Sustainability 13, no. 17: 9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179927
APA StyleSlivkova, S., Brumarova, L., Kluckova, B., Pokorny, J., & Tomanova, K. (2021). Safety of Constructions from the Point of View of Population Protection in the Context of Industry 4.0 in the Czech Republic. Sustainability, 13(17), 9927. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179927