Next Article in Journal
Effect of Prior Gameplay Experience on the Relationships between Esports Gameplay Intention and Live Esports Streaming Content
Next Article in Special Issue
Illegal Waste Dumping under a Municipal Solid Waste Charging Scheme: Application of the Neutralization Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Contributions of Smart City Solutions and Technologies to Resilience against the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Techno-Economic Evaluation of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) Conversion to Energy in Indonesia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Dune Sand

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, UAE University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 8017; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148017
Submission received: 22 June 2021 / Revised: 10 July 2021 / Accepted: 13 July 2021 / Published: 18 July 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Waste Management for Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
Reutilizing industrial by-products and recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) to replace cement and natural aggregates (NA) in concrete is becoming increasingly important for sustainable development. Yet, experimental evidence is needed prior to the widespread use of this sustainable concrete by the construction industry. This study examines the performance of alkali-activated slag concrete made with RCA and reinforced with steel fibers. Natural coarse aggregates were replaced with RCA. Steel fibers were added to mixes incorporating RCA at different volume fractions. Desert dune sand was used as fine aggregate. The mechanical and durability properties of plain and steel fiber-reinforced concrete made with RCA were experimentally examined. The results showed that the compressive strength did not decrease in plain concrete mixes with 30 and 70% RCA replacement. However, full replacement of NA with RCA resulted in a 20% reduction in the compressive strength of the plain mix. In fact, 100% RCA mixes could only be produced with compressive strength comparable to that of an NA-based control mix in conjunction with 2% steel fiber, by volume. In turn, at least 1% steel fiber, by volume, was required to maintain comparable splitting tensile strength. Furthermore, RCA replacement led to higher water absorption and sorptivity and lower bulk resistivity, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and abrasion resistance. Steel fiber incorporation in RCA-based mixes densified the concrete and improved its resistance to abrasion, water permeation, and transport, thereby enhancing its mechanical properties to exceed that of the NA-based counterpart. The hardened properties were correlated to 28-day cylinder compressive strength through analytical regression models.

1. Introduction

Construction and demolition wastes (CDW) management is a global pressing issue. The massive amounts of debris generated in the demolition, construction, and renovation of structures are stretching landfill capacities and inducing economic leakages [1]. In the European Union, United Kingdom, United States, and China, over 800, 20, 500, and 200 million tons of CDW are produced annually, respectively [2,3,4,5]. Of this material, only around 20%, on average, is recycled, of which over 30% and 50% is masonry and concrete, correspondingly. Recycling of CDW offers a sustainable solution for reducing the production of these wastes while lowering the consumption rate of landfill sites and natural resources [6,7,8]. It has also been found to reduce the environmental footprint of construction [9,10]. For the past few decades, waste concrete has been reprocessed and reused as aggregate instead of natural aggregates (NA). The so-produced recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) consists of 65–70% original aggregate and 30–35% original cement paste, by volume [11]. However, the use of RCA in structural concrete has been restricted due to its lower compressive and tensile strength in comparison to those of NA-based concrete [12]. RCA concrete also experiences more drying shrinkage and has inferior durability properties [13,14,15].
Other attempts have been made to improve the sustainability of concrete by reducing the consumption of cement. Indeed, the cement industry alone is accountable for 5–7% of the global CO2 emissions [16,17], leading to an increase in the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere [18,19]. As a result, its production is becoming a critical global issue from an ecological, social, and environmental standpoint. To reduce the adverse impact of cement, it is crucial to find and utilize more sustainable substitutes. Fly ash, ground granulated blast furnace slag (or simply slag), silica fume, metakaolin, and others have partially replaced cement in conventional concrete. However, full replacement in typically hydrated concrete is not possible due to low performance. Instead, these materials can be activated in alkaline solutions to produce inorganic polymers, known as geopolymers [20].
Geopolymer or alkali-activated concrete has been found to be a suitable replacement to conventional ordinary Portland cement (OPC) concrete with equivalent or superior mechanical and durability properties [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Such performance is mainly attributed to the denser microstructure [21]. For alkali-activated slag concrete, the microstructure is typically composed of calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H), hydrotalcite, and calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) [29,30,31,32,33,34]. In addition, the alkali-activated binder provides a stronger bond at the interfacial transition zone with the aggregates [35,36]. Accordingly, it is proposed to be a superior binder to OPC in concrete made with RCA. Past research reported that the alkali-activated RCA concrete experienced lower mechanical and durability properties compared to the NA-based counterpart due to the inferior properties of RCA compared with NA [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. This loss in performance hinders its employability in engineering applications despite its potential to reduce the construction industry’s environmental footprint.
In conventional cement-based concrete made with RCA, several methods were proposed to counter the performance reduction, including fiber incorporation [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. A similar attempt has been made in alkali-activated or geopolymer mortars made with recycled fine aggregates. Nuaklong et al. [53] reported an improvement in mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymer mortar made with fine RCA upon inclusion of micro carbon fiber. This shows that fiber inclusion in alkali-activated concrete will likely improve its properties. Yet, limited information is available in the literature on the performance enhancement of alkali-activated slag concrete made with RCA through the incorporation of fiber reinforcement.
This research aims to examine the combined effect of RCA replacement and steel fiber incorporation on the mechanical and durability characteristics of alkali-activated slag concrete. The validity of empirical relations available in the literature and codified equations to predict the performance of so-produced concrete was examined. It is hypothesized that the inclusion of a certain steel fiber volume fraction could allow the full replacement of NA by RCA without compromising the performance. This study also offers cutting-edge material characterization of steel fiber-reinforced RCA alkali-activated slag concrete and plays a critical role in the development of sustainable concrete for structural applications.

2. Materials and Methods

Ten alkali-activated slag concrete mixes were proportioned and prepared. The variables included the RCA replacement percentage (30, 70, and 100%) and steel fiber volume fraction (0, 1, and 2%). Dune sand served as the fine aggregate to highlight the contribution towards sustainable development. The experimental program entailed the evaluation of hardened concrete properties. It was conducted using cubes (100 mm), cylinders (100 mm diameter × 200 mm height), and discs (100 mm diameter × 50 mm height). According to Mehta [54] and ACI Committee 201.2 [55], the durability of concrete can be estimated through its resistance to penetration of aggressive ions and abrasive loads. The former is characterized by absorption, sorptivity, bulk resistivity, and ultrasonic pulse velocity, while the latter is assessed by the Los Angeles (LA) abrasion test. This section further describes the materials used, alkali-activated slag concrete mix design, sample preparation, and experimental testing procedures.

2.1. Materials

Ground granulated blast furnace slag was employed as the main binder in the alkali-activated concrete mixes with a Blaine fineness of 4250 cm2/g and a specific gravity of 2.70. Desert dune sand served as a sustainable fine aggregate. Table 1 summarizes their chemical compositions, obtained using X-ray fluorescence, and physical properties. Further, their particle size distribution, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) spectra are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The SEM and XRD highlight the fine, irregular slag’s amorphous structure, with peaks of quartz (SiO2), mullite (3Al2O3•2SiO2), and gehlenite (Ca2Al[AlSiO7]). In turn, the dune sand is characterized by crystalline irregular particles composed mainly of quartz with traces of calcite (CaCO3), ferric oxide (Fe2O3), and aluminum oxide (Al2O3).
The coarse aggregates used in this work were in the form of natural crushed dolomitic limestone coarse aggregates and recycled concrete aggregates. The natural aggregates were obtained from a local quarry with a nominal maximum size (NMS) of 20 mm, while the recycled counterparts were sourced from a local recycling plant with a similar NMS, in their as-received conditions. Indeed, the recycling plant crushed construction and demolition waste from old concrete structures with unknown strength without chemically or mechanically treating it. The grading curves of both aggregates and their corresponding blends are illustrated in Figure 4. It is worth noting that all curves satisfied the limits set by ASTM C33 [56]. Further, the physical properties of the two types of coarse aggregates, along with the dune sand, are shown in Table 2. The dry-rodded density and specific gravity of RCA were lower than those of NA, owing to the porous mortar attached to the surface of the RCA particles. In turn, the absorption, abrasion mass loss, and soundness were higher in RCA than NA. This highlights the relatively weaker nature of the former compared to the latter. While all the properties were within the acceptable limits of the ASTM standards and/or design codes [57,58,59,60], the water absorption of RCA was found to be beyond these limits. Nevertheless, the absorption of aggregates was accounted for by attaining saturated surface dry (SSD) conditions prior to incorporation into the mixes.
The alkaline activator solution consisted of sodium hydroxide (SH) and sodium silicate (SS). The SH was in the form of 97–98% pure sodium hydroxide flakes and was dissolved in tap water to attain a solution with a molarity of 14M. This molarity was based on the optimization experiments conducted in previous research [63,64,65,66]. In comparison, the SS solution was Grade N with a mass chemical composition of 26.3% SiO2, 10.3% Na2O, and 63.4% H2O. Also, a polycarboxylic superplasticizer (SP) was used to maintain the workability of alkali-activated concrete without affecting its mechanical performance [67,68].
Double hooked-end steel fibers, shown in Figure 5, were added to the alkali-activated concrete mixes. Their geometric and physical properties, as provided by the manufacturer, are summarized in Table 3 [69]. The volume fraction was limited to 2%, as trial mixes with 3% steel fibers, by volume, could not be properly cast.

2.2. Mixture Proportioning

Table 4 summarizes the mixture proportions of alkali-activated slag concrete. A total of ten mixtures were designed to evaluate the effect of replacing NA with RCA and the incorporation of steel fibers on the performance of alkali-activated slag concrete. Replacements of NA by RCA were altered by 0, 30, 70, and 100%, while the steel fiber volume fraction varied by 0, 1, and 2%. In the absence of consistent mix design guidelines, the contents of slag, dune sand (DS), coarse aggregates (NA and RCA), SS, SH, and SP were optimized to attain a 30-MPa concrete control mix based on trial mixes. They were 300, 725, 1210, 99, 66, and 10.5 kg/m3, respectively. In turn, the steel fibers varied from 0 to 78 and 156 kg/m3, representing a 0 to 1 and 2% addition, by volume. Samples were designated as RXSFY, whereby X and Y denoted the percentage of RCA replacement, by mass, and the steel fiber volume fraction. For example, the mix made with 30% RCA and 2% steel fiber, by volume, is labeled as R30SF2.

2.3. Sample Preparation

Alkali-activated slag concrete specimens were prepared and cast under ambient laboratory conditions of 23 ± 2 °C and a relative humidity of 50 ± 5%. The alkaline activator solution was prepared 24 h prior to casting to allow for heat dissipation from the reactions of SH flakes with water and then the 14M-SH solution with the SS solution. The dry components, including the coarse aggregates, dune sand, and slag, were mixed in a pan mixer for 3 min. In mixes entailing the use of steel fibers, they were added to the dry components to ensure proper dispersion. The superplasticizer was added to the wet components prior to being gradually incorporated into the dry components of the mix. The wet and dry components were mixed in the pan mixer for another 3 min to ensure homogeneity. The fresh alkali-activated concrete was then placed in two to three layers into 100 mm diameter × 200 mm height cylinders and 100-mm cubes and vibrated on a vibrating table for 5–10 s per layer, as per ASTM C192 [70]. The cast specimens were then left to air-cure until testing age to simulate an on-site construction setting. For each test, three replicate specimens per mix were prepared.

2.4. Experimental Methods

The compressive strength of concrete was determined using a Wykeham Farrance machine with a loading capacity of 2000 kN. An axial compression load was applied to cylindrical (100 mm diameter × 200 mm height) and cube (100 mm) alkali-activated concrete specimens at a rate of 7 kN/s until failure, as per ASTM C39 [71] and BS EN 12390-3 [72], respectively. The resulting respective compressive strengths were denoted as f’c and fcu. While f’c was measured at the age of 28 days, fcu was determined at 1, 7, and 28 days.
The modulus of elasticity (Ec) indicates the concrete’s resistance to deformation under an applied compression load. As per the procedure of ASTM C469 [73], a 500-kN load cell recorded the applied load, and four 60-mm-long strain gauges attached to the sides of the 100 mm × 200 mm (diameter × height) cylinder at diametrically opposite locations recorded the strain. The modulus of elasticity was then calculated at 28 days as per Equation (1),
E c = S 2     S 1 ε 2     0.00005
where Ec is the chord modulus of elasticity in (MPa), S2 is stress corresponding to 40% of ultimate load, S1 is stress corresponding to a longitudinal strain ε1 of 50 millionths in (MPa), and ε2 is the longitudinal strain produced by stress S2. Triplicate specimens were also used to obtain an average.
The tensile splitting strength (fsp) of alkali-activated slag concrete was determined according to the procedure of ASTM C496 [74]. A Wykeham Farrance machine with a loading capacity of 2000 kN applied the load at a rate of 1 kN/s to cylindrical specimens (100 mm diameter × 200 mm height).
The water absorption was determined using 100 mm × 50 mm (diameter × height) alkali-activated slag concrete discs at the age of 28 days, as per ASTM C642 [75]. The test specimens were oven-dried for 24 h at 105 °C and weighed until a mass change of less than 0.5% was obtained. They were then placed in a water container for 24 h, after which their saturated surface dry (SSD) mass was recorded. Equation (2) was employed to calculate the water absorption:
Water   absorption   ( % ) = SSD   mass   ( g )     Oven - dried   mass   ( g ) Oven - dried   mass   ( g ) × 100 %
Sorptivity was conducted following the procedure of ASTM C1585 [76]. The test was carried out on 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete disc specimens (100 mm diameter × 50 mm height). The test specimens were first vacuum-saturated and preconditioned as per the recommendations of ASTM C1202 [77]. After obtaining the initial mass, the sample’s mass was recorded at 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 min, and then after every hour until 6 h. The absorption was calculated using Equation (3) and plotted against the square root of time. The slope of the best-fit relationship from 1 min to 6 h represented the initial sorptivity. The test was to be repeated if the regression coefficient, R2, was less than 0.98, as per ASTM C1585 [76].
Absorption ,   I   ( mm ) = Change   in   mass   at   time   t ( g ) Exposed   area   ( mm 2 ) × Density   of   water   ( g / mm 3 )
Bulk resistivity is a non-destructive test that relates the concrete’s ability to resist chloride ion diffusion under an electric current to its general quality, durability, and performance. Indeed, the durability is governed by the rate of penetration of these aggressive ions into the concrete [54]. The test was conducted on 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete cylinder samples in accordance with ASTM C1876 [78]. The bulk resistivity was calculated using Equation (4). Owing to their electrically conductive nature, steel fibers may give misleading results. As such, only plain alkali-activated concrete samples were examined.
Bulk   Resistivity   ( . cm ) = Applied   voltage   ( V ) × ( Avg .   sample   diameter   ( mm ) ) 2 1273.2 × Current   at   1   min   ( mA ) × Avg .   sample   length   ( mm )
Ultrasonic pulse velocity was used to assess the general quality and integrity of the concrete by indirectly estimating the content of voids, cracks, and imperfections in the 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete structure. The direct UPV test was carried out on three cube samples (100 mm) per mix, according to ASTM C597 [79].
The abrasion resistance test provides an estimate of the general quality and durability of concrete through its resistance to abrasion, impact, and friction [54,55]. It is mainly dependent on the strength of the binding matrix and aggregate, in addition to the bond between these two components [80,81]. The test was conducted using a Los Angeles (LA) abrasion testing machine in accordance with ASTM C1747 [82]. The mass of the 28-day disc specimens (100 mm diameter × 50 mm height) was recorded before starting the test and after each subsequent 100 revolutions. The mass loss percentage over 500 revolutions represented the alkali-activated slag concrete abrasion resistance potential.
Analytical regression models were developed using the regression data analysis tool in Microsoft Excel to correlate relevant concrete characteristics, including cylinder compressive strength, cube compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, splitting tensile strength, and ultrasonic pulse velocity. The accuracy of the developed relations was measured in terms of the correlation coefficient (R2).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Compressive Strength

The effect of RCA replacement and steel fiber inclusion on the cube compressive strength (fcu) of alkali-activated slag concrete is shown in Figure 6. At the age of 1 day, the replacement of 30% RCA had no impact on the strength of plain concrete, as presented in Figure 6a. However, higher replacements of 70 and 100% reduced the strength from 38.6 MPa to 26.4 and 21.8 MPa, representing decreases of 32 and 44%, respectively. This is primarily owed to the weak interfacial bond between the alkali-activated matrix and RCA alongside the porous nature of the RCA. Other work on alkali-activated fly ash and slag mortars and concrete made with recycled aggregates noted analogous findings [37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44]. Nevertheless, the addition of 1 and 2% steel fiber volume fractions could enhance the 1-day compressive strength by, on average, 21 and 30%, respectively, in comparison to the plain concrete, as presented in Figure 6b,c. Indeed, with up to 70% RCA replacement and 2% steel fiber volume fraction, the 1-day strength was comparable to that of the control mix. In turn, mixes having 100% RCA with and without steel fibers had lower 1-day strength than the control, owing to the predominantly negative impact of RCA.
At the age of 7 and 28 days, the replacement of NA by RCA led to strength loss of up to 23 and 20%, respectively. Similar findings were reported in alkali-activated concrete made with single or multiple binders [28,39,41]. Clearly, the impact of RCA replacement was most critical at an early age and became less apparent at a later age. This is due to the development of reaction products over time, as noted in other work [34]. The addition of steel fibers improved the respective 7- and 28-day strengths by up to 18 and 21%, on average, owing to the denser alkali-activated matrix and reduced pore space, which is attributed to the lower water absorption and sorptivity, as shown later. Furthermore, the bridging effect of the steel fibers seems to have led to an enhancement in the structural integrity of the alkali-activated slag concrete. Analogous improvement in compressive strength was noted in other studies on steel fiber-reinforced NA-based alkali-activated concrete [83,84]. Compared with the values obtained at the age of 1 day, the improvement in fcu due to steel fiber inclusion was lower, highlighting the superior effect of steel fibers at an early age. Based on these results, it can be concluded that alkali-activated slag concrete mixes incorporating dune sand could be made with up to 70% RCA without steel fibers and 100% RCA with 2% steel fibers, by volume, while sustaining insignificant loss (<3%) in 28-day cube compressive strength. In comparison, conventional 30-MPa cement-based concrete required 0, 1, and 3% steel fiber volume fractions to sustain a limited loss in compressive strength when 30, 70, and 100% NA was replaced by RCA, respectively [50]. This shows that alkali-activated slag is a more suitable binder than OPC in concrete made with more than 30% RCA, possibly due to better interlock with the RCA. Indeed, other work has found that alkali-activated binders provide a stronger bond at the interfacial transition zone with natural aggregates [35,36].
The cube compressive strength (fcu) of alkali-activated slag concrete was measured at the ages of 1, 7, and 28 days to examine strength development over time. Mixes were made with different RCA replacement percentages and steel fiber volume fractions. Table 5 presents the results. The control mix R0F0 had 1-, 7-, and 28-day compressive strengths of 38.6, 46.4, and 47.5 MPa, respectively. As such, the increase from 1 to 7 days was 20% while that from 7 to 28 days was only 2%. Clearly, the activation reaction mainly took place during the first 7 days with 1- and 7-day strengths being 81 and 98% that at 28 days. This is due to the accelerated reaction of calcium-carrying compounds in slag to form calcium aluminosilicate hydrate (C-A-S-H) and calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) gels [29,30,31,32] and the high molarity of the SH solution [85]. Yet, such a reaction seemed to slow down after 7 days. Furthermore, the strength development profile of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes incorporating RCA was examined. Higher RCA replacement percentages led to higher increases in strength from 1 to 7 days with mixes R30SF0, R70SF0, and R100SF0 exhibiting 23, 48, and 63% increases over this time period. Similar to the control mix, the main increase in strength was within the first 7 days, while a lesser increase was noted from 7 to 28 days. It appears that the weak bond between the binder matrix and RCA was responsible for the low early strength. Yet, as the activation reaction progressed, the bond improved and the strength increased. In contrast, increasing the steel fiber volume fraction led to a decrease in the strength gain within the first 7 days. In fact, the cube compressive strength (fcu) of mixes incorporating 0, 1, and 2% steel fibers, by volume, increased by, on average, 45, 33, and 31% from 1 to 7 days. Conversely, the strength increased by, on average, 11, 12, and 14% from 7 to 28 days. Apparently, steel fibers had such a significant impact on the 1-day strength, as shown earlier, that the increase in strength over time was lesser than that of plain counterparts.
In addition, Table 5 highlights the effect of RCA replacement and steel fiber incorporation on the 28-day cylinder compressive strength (f’c) of alkali-activated slag concrete. An increase in the RCA replacement percentage to 30, 70, and 100% led to respective decreases of 5, 5, and 21% in f’c, possibly owing to a weak interface between the aggregate and alkali-activated slag paste and/or poor quality and presence of voids and cracks in the RCA [50]. Compared to the 28-day cube compressive strengths, the loss in cylinder strength was more pronounced, especially for 30 and 70% RCA replacement. The addition of 1 and 2% steel fibers, by volume, enhanced f’c of the plain RCA alkali-activated slag concrete by up to 14 and 21%, respectively, thus providing evidence for the ability to reverse the negative impact of RCA replacement using steel fibers. Indeed, alkali-activated slag mixes can attain the design cylinder compressive strength of 30 MPa with 30, 70, and 100% RCA replacement in conjunction with 0, 0, and 2% steel fiber volume fractions.
The f’c-to-fcu ratio of alkali-activated slag concrete is also presented in Table 5. The control mix R0F0 had a ratio of 0.67. The replacement of NA by 30 and 70% RCA slightly decreased the ratio while 100% replacement generally had almost no impact. On the other hand, the addition of steel fibers did not significantly affect the ratio with values being in the range of plain counterparts. Apparently, the confinement effect of cubes under compressive loads was unaffected by RCA replacement. Based on these findings, it is clear that the 28-day cylinder and cube compressive strengths of alkali-activated slag concrete can be correlated. Such correlation is important to provide a prediction of one property from the other rather than measuring both properties in accordance with ASTM C39 [71] and BS EN 12390-3 [72]. The relationship between these properties is illustrated in Figure 7a and presented in Equation (5). Using this analytical relationship and with correlation coefficient R2 = 0.85, it is possible to predict f’c from fcu (or vice versa) of this work with reasonable accuracy. Compared with ordinary Portland cement concrete, which has an f’c-to-fcu ratio in the range of 0.65–0.90 [86], the ratio obtained herein is slightly lower. Yet, the accuracy of the relationship could be improved (R2 = 0.95) with the addition of an intercept, as shown in Equation (6), which could be employed for the range of fcu results presented herein.
f c = 0.63 f c u
f c = 0.48 f c u + 7.70
Past literature developed similar equations to predict the cylinder compressive strength from the cube compressive strength for conventional cement-based concrete incorporating RCA and steel fibers [49,50,87,88]. The employability of these equations for alkali-activated slag concrete is assessed. Figure 7b shows that equations by Gao, Zhang, and Nokken [49], Xiao, Li, and Zhang [87], and Xie, Guo, Liu, and Xie [88] overestimated the value of f’c, while that developed by Kachouh, El-Hassan, and El-Maaddawy [50] provided a reasonably accurate prediction. In turn, Equations (5) and (6) proposed in this study provided the highest accuracy.

3.2. Compressive Stress-Strain Response

Figure 8 illustrates typical compression stress-strain curves of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes made with RCA replacement and steel fibers. For concrete mixes made with 30, 70, and 100% RCA, the respective peak stress was, on average, 11, 22, and 20% higher with every 1% steel fiber added, by volume. Compared to cement-based concrete mixes with similar design strength, these increases in peak stress due to steel fiber inclusion are more significant [50]. In turn, the slope and peak strain (strain at peak load) increased by, on average, 20 and 147% with the addition of steel fibers, respectively. With such increases in peak strain, it is clear that the incorporation of steel fibers mainly impacted the deformability of alkali-activated RCA concrete mixes.
From Figure 8, it can also be seen that a decrease in the slope and peak stress was noted as more RCA was replaced in the mix. In fact, mixes made with 0, 1, and 2% steel fibers showed decreases in peak stress of 2.5, 1.8, and 1.3% for every 10% RCA replaced in the mixes, owing to the general weaker and porous nature of RCA and a lower concrete modulus of elasticity. Similar findings were reported in other work on cement-based concrete [50,87,89,90,91,92]. Conversely, the respective peak strains for mixes made with 0, 1, and 2% steel fibers increased by, on average, 11, 5, and 4% for every 10% RCA replacement. This is attributed to the fact that lower strength concrete has higher strain at peak load.

3.3. Modulus of Elasticity

The modulus of elasticity, Ec (in GPa), of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete is presented in Figure 9. The replacement of NA by RCA led to a decrease in the values of Ec. Plain alkali-activated slag concrete mixes made with 30, 70, and 100% RCA had 42, 44, and 56% lower Ec than that of the control mix, respectively, due to the weak interfacial bond between the aggregate and old mortar and porous structure of the RCA. Other researchers have reported similar losses in Ec upon RCA replacement [26,44,89]. Nevertheless, steel fiber inclusion could alleviate this reduction. In fact, the addition of 1% steel fiber, by volume, to mixes made with 30, 70, and 100% RCA led to respective increases in Ec of 13, 11, and 28%, while 2% steel fiber volume fraction increased Ec by 43, 36, and 32%, respectively. Such an increase in Ec is mainly attributed to the steel fibers’ ability to densify the matrix and reduce pore space, as evidenced by the water absorption results, and their bridging capabilities, which delays the initiation and propagation of microcracks under compression loading. Still, none of the mixes incorporating RCA and steel fibers could attain the modulus of elasticity of the control mix. This shows that while steel fibers could enhance the modulus of elasticity, the adverse effect of RCA replacement was more pronounced.
The modulus of elasticity and 28-day cylinder compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete were correlated. A linear regression model was developed for test results from this work using the scatter plot of Figure 10a and formulated into Equation (7) in a form similar to that proposed by ACI 363 [90]. The low correlation coefficient, R2, of 0.48 signifies a relatively high scatter between the two properties. As such, a multivariable linear regression model was proposed in the form of Equation (8) to include the effect of RCA and steel fibers (SF). From Equation (8), it can be noted that the modulus of elasticity was proportional to the 28-day cylinder compressive strength and the steel fiber volume fraction but was inversely proportional to the RCA replacement. This is indicative of the respective positive and negative effects of steel fibers and RCA on the value of Ec of alkali-activated slag concrete. With an R2 value above 0.90, Equation (8) can accurately predict Ec for the range of f’c values presented in this work.
E c = 11.4 f c     44.0
E c = 4.24 f c     0.09 RCA + 1.10 SF
The modulus of elasticity can be typically predicted from codified equations, including those of ACI Committee 318 [91], CEB-FIP [92], and AS3600 [93]. In addition, other research on plain and steel fiber-reinforced alkali-activated concrete proposed equations to relate Ec to f’c [33,34,83]. The feasibility of using these equations is evaluated while also considering the newly-developed relationship in Equation (8). Figure 10b shows that the equations of ACI Committee 318 [91], El-Hassan and Elkholy [83], and CEB-FIP [92] over-estimate the values of Ec for alkali-activated slag concrete, while the remaining [33,34,93] provided a more accurate prediction for Ec up to 20–25 GPa, beyond which the accuracy diminished. Nevertheless, Equation (8) proved to be most accurate at predicting Ec with scatter plots converging around the 45° line. It is thus clear that some codified equations and those proposed in the literature may be suitable for predicting Ec from f’c with reasonable accuracy despite the addition of steel fibers and RCA.

3.4. Splitting Tensile Strength

The tensile properties of alkali-activated slag concrete were indirectly evaluated using the 28-day splitting tensile strength (fsp), as shown in Figure 11. An increase in RCA replacement to 30, 70, and 100% led to 23, 23, and 25% lower fsp relative to that of the control mix. This adverse effect of RCA is similar to that described earlier for f’c. However, similar replacement percentages resulted in decreases in f’c of 5, 5, and 21%, respectively. This signifies that fsp was more influenced by the partial replacement of RCA replacement than f’c. Figure 11 also presents the effect of steel fiber addition on the splitting tensile strength. Compared to those of the plain concrete mixes, fsp increased by, on average, 98 and 193%, when 1 and 2% steel fibers were added, by volume, respectively, with values reaching up to 7.4 MPa. Similar enhancements in fsp were noted in other work that incorporated steel fibers in NA-based alkali-activated concrete [83,84,94]. This shows that the adverse effect of RCA cannot only be countered by steel fiber addition but can also surpass that of the control mix made with NA (3.0 MPa), owing to the fibers’ bridging effect and ability to increase the energy required for crack propagation. Furthermore, while the positive effect of steel fibers on fsp was analogous to that on f’c, the extent of improvement on fsp was superior. Indeed, the ratio of fsp-to-f’c increased with steel fiber addition, indicating that steel fibers were more influential on fsp than f’c. In conclusion, alkali-activated slag concrete made with 30, 70, and 100% RCA can be produced with equivalent fsp to that of the control provided that 1% steel fiber, by volume, is incorporated into the mix.
Codified equations are typically employed in predicting the splitting tensile strength of concrete. In turn, limited investigation has been made to correlate this mechanical property to others. In this work, a linear model was developed to relate fsp to f’c. It is illustrated in the scatter plot of Figure 12a and presented in the form of Equation (9). However, the low correlation coefficient, R2 = 0.50, shows that it is challenging to predict fsp from f’c with high accuracy. As such, Equation (10) was proposed as a multivariable linear regression relationship that incorporates steel fiber volume fraction (SF) and RCA replacement as additional parameters to enhance the accuracy (R2 = 0.97) of predicting fsp from the range of f’c values reported herein.
f s p = 4.76 f c     22.12   .
f s p = 0.55 f c     0.01 RCA + 2.13 SF .
Figure 12b depicts the experimental versus predicted splitting tensile strength. In addition to Equation (10), codified equations of ACI 318, AS3600, and CEB-FIP [91,92,93] for plain conventional cement-based concrete were utilized to assess their feasibility to predict fsp. It is clear that the codified equations can predict fsp with reasonable accuracy for values ranging between 2 and 3 MPa, beyond which the accuracy was significantly reduced. This is because these equations do not account for the effect of steel fibers or RCA. As such, these equations cannot accurately predict fsp for alkali-activated slag concrete made with RCA and steel fibers.

3.5. Water Absorption

The durability of concrete is affected by the concrete’s resistance to penetration of damaging ions. Since water is the main carrier of these aggressive ions, the water absorption capacity of concrete can indicate its durability [54]. Figure 13 shows the water absorption of alkali-activated slag concrete at the age of 28 days. The control mix (R0F0) had a water absorption of 2.1%, while those of plain mixes incorporating 30, 70, and 100% RCA were 3.3, 5.8, and 7.5%, respectively. These represent 58, 173, and 255% increases over that of the control mix. In fact, every 10% RCA replacement led to, on average, a 23% increase in water absorption, owing to the porous nature of the RCA and the adhered mortar. This finding is well-correlated and provides evidence of the decrease in mechanical properties, including compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and splitting tensile strength.
Figure 13 also highlights the impact of steel fiber addition on the water absorption of alkali-activated slag concrete. Generally, an increase in steel fiber volume fraction led to a decrease in water absorption. In fact, it was reduced by, on average, 25 and 43% upon the incorporation of 1 and 2% steel fibers, by volume, compared to plain RCA counterparts. Accordingly, it can be concluded that steel fiber inclusion can densify the binding matrix, thereby reducing the water absorption and enhancing mechanical performance. Similar findings have been reported in alkali-activated slag concrete made with natural aggregates [94].

3.6. Capillary Sorptivity

Sorptivity represents the concrete’s tendency to absorb and transport water into its microstructure through capillary action, making it an indirect tool to assess the durability of concrete. Indeed, it depends on the permeability and porosity of concrete as well as the strength of the capillary forces and the size and distribution of the pores [54,95]. Large capillary and small gel pores control the sorptivity. Because of the different sizes of these pores, two types of sorptivity are analyzed, namely initial and secondary sorptivity [96]. As the former pores are larger than the latter, water occupies them faster, causing initial sorptivity to be larger than secondary sorptivity. As such, the focus will only be on initial sorptivity.
Figure 14 presents typical plots of absorption over time and is used to find the rate of absorption or sorptivity of alkali-activated slag concrete. For plain mixes in Figure 14a, the slope of the sorptivity curve changes with time and is a function of RCA replacement. In fact, mixes made with 0, 30, 70, and 100% RCA maintained the same slope for up to 15, 90, 135, and 240 min (30, 73, 90, and 120 s0.5), respectively, before the slope started to decrease. This shows that the higher the RCA replacement, the more water penetrates to fill the large pores present in the RCA, which may be cracks or fissures that develop during the production of RCA. In addition, RCA replacement was found to be proportional to the absorption at 360 min (147 s0.5). Moreover, Figure 14b,c shows the sorptivity of mixes incorporating 1 and 2% steel fiber, by volume, respectively. Compared to the plain concrete mixes, the slope of the absorption curves did not significantly vary due to steel fiber incorporation, except for mixes made with 30% RCA, which underwent a significant decrease in the slope. In turn, the 360 min (147-s0.5) absorption value experienced little to no change. Also, the slope changed at 3, 90, and 240 min (13, 73, and 120 s0.5) for mixes made with 30, 70, and 100% RCA, respectively. As such, steel fiber-reinforced alkali-activated concrete mixes filled the larger pores faster than plain mixes due to steel fibers’ ability to restrict water movement [97] and occupy void space in the alkali-activated slag structure. Other work reported similar findings in conventional cement-based steel fiber-reinforced concrete [97,98].
The sorptivity results of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete mixes are summarized in Table 6. The replacement of NA by RCA increased the sorptivity. In plain mixes, 30, 70, and 100% RCA replacement led to 111, 256, and 356% higher sorptivity, respectively. Nevertheless, steel fiber incorporation decreased the sorptivity of RCA mixes. In fact, the addition of 1 and 2% steel fiber volume fractions reduced the sorptivity by, on average, 7.4 and 11.6%, respectively. Such a decrease with steel fiber inclusion may be due to the filling of the concrete voids [97,98] and/or an improvement in the bond within the binding matrix [99]. As such, it can be concluded that steel fiber inclusion can enhance alkali-activated slag concrete’s resistance to water permeation and transport. Similar observations were reported in other work [50,97,98].

3.7. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Bulk Resistivity

Concrete quality and durability can be indirectly assessed by the ultrasonic pulse velocity test. Figure 15a shows the results of alkali-activated slag concrete with RCA and steel fibers. Values ranged from 4.1 to 6.1 km/s. For plain concrete mixes, an increase in RCA from 0 to 30, 70, and 100% led to 5.6, 5.1, and 22.7% decreases in UPV, respectively. This is primarily due to the increase in voids and cracks with RCA replacement. As such, the corresponding mechanical properties were negatively impacted. Nevertheless, values of mixes R0F0, R30F0, and R70F0 were above 4.5 km/s, signifying excellent concrete quality based on IS 13311-1 [100]. The plain concrete mix made with 100% RCA was classified to have good quality with v = 4.1 km/s. Additionally, the effect of steel fiber incorporation on the UPV of alkali-activated slag concrete was evaluated. On average, the velocity increased by 7.7 and 15.8% when 1 and 2% steel fiber, by volume, were added. Such steel fiber-reinforced mixes were classified to have excellent concrete quality.
The UPV experimental test results were correlated to the 28-day cylinder compressive strength, f’c, of this work. A strong linear equation (Equation (11)) is obtained from Figure 15b. With a high correlation coefficient, R2, of 0.98, it is possible to accurately predict the value of f’c using the velocity, v, of a non-destructive test. Such an equation could be valuable to the construction industry to project the compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete made with RCA and steel fibers without conducting experimental destructive testing.
f c = 0.006 v
Furthermore, concrete durability can be indirectly assessed using bulk electric resistivity or simply bulk resistivity. While 10 mixes were carried out in this work, those incorporating steel fibers were discarded. This is because steel fibers are electrically conductive, rendering the results incomparable and unrepresentative of true durability. Figure 16 presents the bulk resistivity results of alkali-activated slag concrete incorporating steel fibers and RCA. While the control mix with 0% RCA had a resistivity of 8.5 kΩ.cm, those of mixes incorporating 30, 70, and 100% RCA were 6.1, 5.5, and 4.9 kΩ.cm, respectively. This represents respective decreases of 28, 35, and 42% compared with the control mix, owing to the increase in pore space in the binder matrix. Also, while the replacement of NA by RCA adversely affected the bulk resistivity, the effect was not proportional to the RCA replacement percentage. In fact, 30% RCA replacement seemed to have lowered the bulk resistivity to the point that increasing the RCA replacement percentage did not cause further severe reduction.

3.8. Abrasion Resistance

The mechanical properties of the concrete and the hardness of the aggregates govern its abrasion resistance. Figure 17 depicts the abrasion resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete, characterized by mass loss as a function of revolutions. For plain mixes made with RCA, the mass loss was mainly within the first 400 revolutions, while the control made with 0% RCA had a uniform mass loss over 500 revolutions. In fact, the control mix had a total abrasion mass loss of 33%, while mixes having 30, 70, and 100% NA replaced by RCA had total losses of 92, 97, and 100%, respectively. Such higher mass losses are associated with the inferior properties of RCA, as shown in Table 2, in addition to the weak interfacial bond between the old mortar and new paste. Similar findings were noted in conventional OPC concrete made with RCA [50,101]. Figure 17b,c show the abrasion mass loss of steel fiber-reinforced RCA alkali-activated slag concrete. The mass loss values for the mixes with steel fibers were much lower than those of their plain counterparts, indicating a much less pronounced influence of RCA on the abrasion resistance of the concrete upon inclusion of steel fibers.
From Figure 17, it can also be seen that the inclusion of 1 and 2% steel fiber decreased the abrasion mass loss by, on average, 53 and 68%, respectively. This is owed to the steel fibers’ bridging effect and ability to improve the geometric integrity and densify the binding matrix, thereby increasing the abrasion resistance. Actually, all RCA-based mixes incorporating 2% steel fiber volume fraction had comparable abrasion resistance to that of the NA-based control mix.

4. Conclusions

In this paper, the feasibility of producing alkali-activated slag concrete for structural applications while utilizing recycled concrete aggregates and steel fibers was evaluated. The hardened properties of concrete made with up to 100% RCA and reinforced with up to 2% steel fibers, by volume, were examined. Based on the experimental test results, the following conclusive remarks can be made:
  • The compressive strength development profile of the control mix showed that 81 and 98% of the 28-day cube compressive strength were attained within 1 and 7 days. Upon RCA replacement, the 1-, 7-, and 28-day cube compressive strengths were reduced by up to 44, 23, and 20%, respectively. However, this adverse effect of RCA replacement could be countered by steel fiber inclusion, with a more significant impact noted at 1 day.
  • The effect of RCA replacement and steel fiber addition on the 28-day cylinder compressive strength (f’c) is similar to that of the cube strength (fcu). The confinement effect of cubes under compressive loads was unaffected by RCA replacement. As such, f’c and fcu of alkali-activated slag concrete were related using two linear regression models to predict one property from the other with reasonably to high accuracy (R2 = 0.85 and 0.95). These relationships offer a more accurate approach in comparison with other models proposed in past literature.
  • Plain alkali-activated slag concrete mixes achieved the design cylinder compressive strength of 30 MPa with 30 and 70% RCA replacement. The plain concrete mix made with 100% RCA replacement could not achieve design strength.
  • An alkali-activated slag concrete mix could be produced with 100% RCA in combination with 2% steel fibers, by volume, while sustaining insignificant loss (<6%) in the 28-day cube and cylinder compressive strengths. Based on a comparison with data published in the literature, alkali-activated slag was found to be a more suitable binder than OPC in concrete made with more than 30% RCA.
  • The replacement of NA by RCA decreased the peak stress and increased the corresponding peak strain of alkali-activated slag concrete. Steel fiber addition increased the peak stress and further increased the peak strain. This is indicative of enhanced deformability and energy absorption capacity.
  • The slope of the compression stress-strain curves characterized the modulus of elasticity. The values of Ec decreased by up to 56% with 100% RCA replacement. The incorporation of steel fibers could enhance Ec by up to 43%. Yet, none of the mixes incorporating RCA and steel fibers could attain Ec of the control mix, highlighting a more pronounced impact of RCA replacement than steel fiber addition.
  • The splitting tensile strength of alkali-activated slag concrete decreased with RCA replacement. Yet, every 1% steel fiber added led to, on average, a 97% increase in fsp compared to plain counterparts, thus reversing the negative effect of RCA on fsp. Also, RCA replacement and steel fiber addition had a more pronounced impact on fsp than f’c. All RCA-based mixes could be produced with equivalent or superior fsp to that of the NA-based control when at least 1% steel fiber, by volume, was added.
  • Two linear regression models were developed to estimate the Ec and fsp. The prediction accuracy improved upon the inclusion of RCA replacement percentage and steel fiber volume fraction in the models. Codified equations could not provide accurate estimations of Ec and fsp.
  • The water absorption and sorptivity increased by up to 255 and 356%, respectively, upon replacing NA with RCA. Yet, it could be decreased by up to 65 and 16%, correspondingly, when steel fibers were added to the mixes. RCA replacement decreased the mechanical properties due to more pore space, i.e., higher water absorption and sorptivity, while steel fiber inclusion densified the binding matrix, i.e., less pore space, and improved the concrete’s resistance to water permeation and transport, thereby enhancing its mechanical properties.
  • The bulk resistivity and ultrasonic pulse velocity decreased by up to 42 and 23%, respectively, when NA was replaced by 100% RCA. Yet the plain mixes with 30 and 70% RCA were reported to have excellent concrete quality, while those made with 100% RCA were classified to have good concrete quality. The incorporation of steel fiber increased the UPV, resulting in excellent concrete quality for all RCA-based mixes. A linear regression model was proposed to predict UPV from f’c with high accuracy (R2 = 0.98).
  • Abrasion mass loss increased with RCA replacement. The addition of steel fibers improved the resistance, i.e., reduced the mass loss, by up to 74%. Mixes incorporating 2% steel fiber, by volume, regardless of RCA replacement, had comparable abrasion resistance to that of the NA-based control mix.
Outcomes of the study revealed that it is feasible to produce alkali-activated slag concrete made with 100% RCA, steel fibers, and desert dune sand with hardened properties comparable to those of NA-based alkali-activated slag concrete, thus promoting its use in structural applications. Indeed, the research findings are considered a stepping stone toward the development of design recommendations for cement-free RCA-based concrete with steel fibers. Future studies will focus on the flexural properties and microstructure of steel fiber-reinforced RCA alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.E.-H. and T.E.-M.; methodology, H.E.-H. and J.M.; formal analysis, H.E.-H. and J.M.; investigation, H.E.-H. and J.M.; resources, H.E.-H. and T.E.-M.; data curation, H.E.-H. and J.M.; writing—original draft preparation, H.E.-H.; writing—review and editing, H.E.-H., J.M., and T.E.-M.; supervision, H.E.-H. and T.E.-M.; project administration, H.E.-H. and T.E.-M.; funding acquisition, H.E.-H. and T.E.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by United Arab Emirates University (UAEU), grant number 31N398.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to Al Dhafra Recycling Facilities for providing the recycled concrete aggregates. The contributions of the UAEU engineers and staff are also greatly appreciated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Stoner, J.; Wankel, C. Global Sustainability Initiatives: New Models and New Approaches; Information Age Publishing: Charlotte, NC, USA, 2008; p. 248. [Google Scholar]
  2. Environmental Resources Limited. Demolition Waste; Construction Press Limited: Lancaster, UK, 1980. [Google Scholar]
  3. Gálvez-Martos, J.-L.; Styles, D.; Schoenberger, H.; Zeschmar-Lahl, B. Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 136, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Akhtar, A.; Sarmah, A.K. Construction and demolition waste generation and properties of recycled aggregate concrete: A global perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 186, 262–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xiao, J.; Li, W.; Fan, Y.; Huang, X. An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996–2011). Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 31, 364–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kong, D.; Lei, T.; Ma, C.; Jiang, J. Effect and mechanism of surface-coating pozzolanic materials around aggregate on properties and ITZ microstructure of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Muduli, R.; Mukharjee, B.B. Effect of incorporation of metakaolin and recycled coarse aggregate on properties of concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 209, 398–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bostanci, S.C.; Limbachiya, M.; Kew, H. Use of recycled aggregates for low carbon and cost effective concrete construction. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 189, 176–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Azúa, G.; González, M.; Arroyo, P.; Kurama, Y. Recycled coarse aggregates from precast plant and building demolitions: Environmental and economic modeling through stochastic simulations. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 210, 1425–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, J.; Wang, C.; Ding, T.; Akbarnezhad, A. A recycled aggregate concrete high-rise building: Structural performance and embodied carbon footprint. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 199, 868–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Shi, C.; Li, Y.; Pan, X.; Poon, C.S.; Xie, Z. Performance Enhancement of Recycled Concrete Aggregates through Carbonation. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2015, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ikea, T.; Yamane, S.; Sakamoto, A. Strength of concrete containing recycled aggregate concrete. In Proceedings of the 2nd RILEM Symposium on Demolition and Reuse of Waste, Bagneux, France, 12–15 April 1988. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hansen, T.C.; Boegh, E. Elasticity and drying shrinkage concrete of recycled-aggregate. ACI J. 1985, 82, 648–652. [Google Scholar]
  14. Akbarnezhad, A.; Ong, K.C.G.; Zhang, M.H.; Tam, C.T.; Foo, T.W.J. Microwaveassisted beneficiation of recycled concrete aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 3469–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, Z.; Jiang, T.; Zhang, J.; Kong, X.; Chen, C.; Lehman, D.E. Mechanical and durability properties of sustainable self-compacting concrete with recycled concrete aggregate and fly ash, slag and silica fume. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 231, 117115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Davidovits, J. High-Alkali Cements for 21st Century Concretes. Spec. Publ. 1994, 144, 383–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Benhelal, E.; Zahedi, G.; Shamsaei, E.; Bahadori, A. Global strategies and potentials to curb CO2 emissions in cement industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 51, 142–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Herzog, H.; Eliasson, B.; Kaarstad, O. Capturing greenhouse gases. Sci. Am. 2000, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Earth System Research Laboratory. Trends in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Available online: https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/ (accessed on 10 July 2020).
  20. Davidovits, J. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal. 1991, 37, 1633–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fernández-Jiménez, A.; Palomo, A. Composition and microstructure of alkali activated fly ash binder: Effect of the activator. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1984–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hardjito, D.; Wallah, S.E.; Sumajouw, D.M.J.; Rangan, B.V. On The development of fly ash-based geopolymer concrete. ACI Mater. J. 2004, 101, 467–472. [Google Scholar]
  23. Amran, Y.H.M.; Alyousef, R.; Alabduljabbar, H.; El-Zeadani, M. Clean production and properties of geopolymer concrete; A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bellum, R.R.; Muniraj, K.; Madduru, S.R.C. Investigation on modulus of elasticity of fly ash-ground granulated blast furnace slag blended geopolymer concrete. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 27, 718–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ismail, N.; El-Hassan, H. Development and characterization of fly ash/slag-blended geopolymer mortar and lightweight concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Rao, R.; Wang, C.; Fang, C. Effects of combined usage of GGBS and fly ash on workability and mechanical properties of alkali activated geopolymer concrete with recycled aggregate. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 164, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.; Xie, J.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Liu, F.; Fang, C. Study on the optimum initial curing condition for fly ash and GGBS based geopolymer recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 247, 118540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nuaklong, P.; Sata, V.; Chindaprasirt, P. Properties of metakaolin-high calcium fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled aggregate from crushed concrete specimens. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 161, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Al-Majidi, M.H.; Lampropoulos, A.; Cundy, A.; Meikle, S. Development of geopolymer mortar under ambient temperature for in situ applications. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 120, 198–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chi, M. Effects of dosage of alkali-activated solution and curing conditions on the properties and durability of alkali-activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Davidovits, J. Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications; Institut Géopolymère: Saint-Quentin, France, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  32. Palomo, A.; Grutzeck, M.W.; Blanco, M.T. Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future. Cem. Concr. Res. 1999, 29, 1323–1329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. El-Hassan, H.; Shehab, E.; Al-Sallamin, A. Effect of curing regime on the performance and microstructure characteristics of alkali-activated slag-fly ash blended concrete. J. Sustain. Cem. Mater. 2021, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. El-Hassan, H.; Shehab, E.; Al-Sallamin, A. Influence of different curing regimes on the performance and microstructure of alkali-activated slag concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yunsheng, Z.; Wei, S.; Zongjin, L.; Xiangming, Z.; Eddie; Chungkong, C. Impact properties of geopolymer based extrudates incorporated with fly ash and PVA short fiber. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 370–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chindaprasirt, P.; Chareerat, T.; Sirivivatnanon, V. Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2007, 29, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Huang, J.; Zou, C.; Sun, D.; Yang, B.; Yan, J. Effect of recycled fine aggregates on alkali-activated slag concrete properties. Structures 2021, 30, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Parthiban, K.; Saravana Raja Mohan, K. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the engineering and durability properties of alkali activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 133, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kathirvel, P.; Kaliyaperumal, S.R.M. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on the flexural properties of reinforced alkali activated slag concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 102, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Akçaözoğlu, S.; Ulu, C. Recycling of waste PET granules as aggregate in alkali-activated blast furnace slag/metakaolin blends. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 58, 31–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, X.S.; Collins, F.G.; Zhao, X.L.; Wang, Q.Y. Mechanical properties and microstructure analysis of fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 237–238, 20–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Shaikh, F.U.A. Mechanical and durability properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete containing recycled coarse aggregates. Int. J. Sustain. Built Environ. 2016, 5, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Xie, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Fang, C.; Li, L. Physicochemical properties of alkali activated GGBS and fly ash geopolymeric recycled concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 384–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hu, Y.; Tang, Z.; Li, W.; Li, Y.; Tam, V.W.Y. Physical-mechanical properties of fly ash/GGBFS geopolymer composites with recycled aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 226, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Afroughsabet, V.; Biolzi, L.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. Influence of double hooked-end steel fibers and slag on mechanical and durability properties of high performance recycled aggregate concrete. Compos. Struct. 2017, 181, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ali, B.; Qureshi, L.A. Influence of glass fibers on mechanical and durability performance of concrete with recycled aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 228, 116783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carneiro, J.A.; Lima, P.R.L.; Leite, M.B.; Toledo Filho, R.D. Compressive stress–strain behavior of steel fiber reinforced-recycled aggregate concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2014, 46, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Gao, D.; Zhang, L. Flexural performance and evaluation method of steel fiber reinforced recycled coarse aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 159, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gao, D.; Zhang, L.; Nokken, M. Compressive behavior of steel fiber reinforced recycled coarse aggregate concrete designed with equivalent cubic compressive strength. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 141, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Kachouh, N.; El-Hassan, H.; El-Maaddawy, T. Effect of steel fibers on the performance of concrete made with recycled concrete aggregates and dune sand. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 213, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kachouh, N.; El-Hassan, H.; El-Maaddawy, T. Influence of steel fibers on the flexural performance of concrete incorporating recycled concrete aggregates and dune sand. J. Sustain. Cem. Mater. 2020, 10, 1–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Katkhuda, H.; Shatarat, N. Improving the mechanical properties of recycled concrete aggregate using chopped basalt fibers and acid treatment. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 140, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nuaklong, P.; Wongsa, A.; Boonserm, K.; Ngohpok, C.; Jongvivatsakul, P.; Sata, V.; Sukontasukkul, P.; Chindaprasirt, P. Enhancement of mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer containing fine recycled concrete aggregate with micro carbon fiber. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 41, 102403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, J.P. Concrete Microstructure, Properties and Material; McGraw Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  55. ACI Committee 201.2. Guide to Durable Concrete; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2016; p. 87. [Google Scholar]
  56. ASTM. Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates; ASTM C33; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  57. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles machine; ASTM C131; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  58. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate; ASTM C88; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  59. ACI Committee E-701. Aggregates for Concrete; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2016; p. 30. [Google Scholar]
  60. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate; ASTM C29; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  61. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Relative Density (Specific Gravity) And Absorption of Coarse Aggregate; ASTM C127; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  62. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and coarse aggregates; ASTM C136; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  63. El-Hassan, H.; Ismail, N. Effect of process parameters on the performance of fly ash/GGBS blended geopolymer composites. J. Sustain. Cem. Mater. 2018, 7, 122–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Patankar, S.V.; Ghugal, Y.M.; Jamkar, S.S. Effect of concentration of sodium hydroxide and degree of heat curing on fly ash-based geopolymer mortar. Indian J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 2014, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sani, N.A.M.; Man, Z.; Shamsuddin, R.M.; Azizli, K.A.; Shaari, K.Z.K. Determination of excess sodium hydroxide in geopolymer by volumetric analysis. Procedia Eng. 2016, 148, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Hossain, M.S.; Lane, D.S.; Schmidt, B.N. Use of the Micro-Deval Test. for Assessing the Durability of Virginia Aggregates; Virginia Transportation Research Council: Charlottesville, VA, USA, 2007; p. 33. [Google Scholar]
  67. Montes, C.; Zang, D.; Allouche, E.N. Rheological behavior of fly ash-based geopolymers with the addition of superplasticizers. J. Sustain. Cem. Mater. 2012, 1, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Palacios, M.; Puertas, F. Effect of superplasticizer and shrinkage-reducing admixtures on alkali-activated slag pastes and mortars. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1358–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bekaert. Dramix 3D 65/35 Report; Bekaert: Zwevegem, Belgium, 2012; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  70. ASTM. Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory; ASTM C192; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  71. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM C39; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  72. British Standard BS EN 12390-3:2009. Testing Hardened Concrete-Compressive Strength of Test Specimens; British Standard: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  73. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression; ASTM C469; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  74. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens; ASTM C496; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  75. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Density, Absorption, and Voids in Hardened Concrete; ASTM C462; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes; ASTM C1585; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  77. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Electrical Indication of Concrete’s Ability to Resist Chloride Ion Penetration; ASTM C1202; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  78. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Bulk Electrical Resistivity or Bulk Conductivity of Concrete; ASTM C1876; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  79. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete; ASTM C597; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  80. Safiuddin, M.; Scott, B. Abrasion resistance of concrete-design, construction, and case study. Concr. Res. Lett. 2015, 6, 136–148. [Google Scholar]
  81. Yalcinkaya, C.; Sznajder, J.; Beglarigale, A.; Sancakoglu, O.; Yazici, H. Abrasion resistance of reactive powder concrete: The influence of water-to-cement ratio and steel micro-fibers. Adv. Mater. Lett. 2014, 5, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. ASTM. Standard Test Method for Determining Potential Resistance to Degradation of Pervious Concrete by Impact and Abrasion; ASTM C1747/C1747M–13; ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  83. El-Hassan, H.; Elkholy, S. Performance evaluation and microstructure characterization of steel fiber-reinforced alkali-activated slag concrete incorporating fly ash. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 04019223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Islam, A.; Alengaram, U.J.; Jumaat, M.Z.; Ghazali, N.B.; Yusoff, S.; Bashar, I.I. Influence of steel fibers on the mechanical properties and impact resistance of lightweight geopolymer concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 152, 964–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Temuujin, J.; Williams, R.P.; van Riessen, A. Effect of mechanical activation of fly ash on the properties of geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2009, 209, 5276–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Elwell, D.J.; Fu, G. Compression Testing of Concrete: Cylinders Versus Cubes. 1995. Available online: https://trid.trb.org/view/496307 (accessed on 10 June 2020).
  87. Xiao, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, C. Mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial loading. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1187–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Xie, J.-H.; Guo, Y.-C.; Liu, L.-S.; Xie, Z.-H. Compressive and flexural behaviours of a new steel-fibre-reinforced recycled aggregate concrete with crumb rubber. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Mesgari, S.; Akbarnezhad, A.; Xiao, J.Z. Recycled geopolymer aggregates as coarse aggregates for Portland cement concrete and geopolymer concrete: Effects on mechanical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 236, 117571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. ACI Committee 363. State of the Art Report on High-Strength Concrete; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 1992; Volume 81, pp. 364–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. ACI Committee 318. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary; American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  92. Comité Euro-International Du Béton; Federation International de la Precontrainte. CEB-FIP Model Code 1990: Design Code; Thomas Telford, Ltd.: London, UK, 1993.
  93. AS3600. Concrete Structures; Standards Australia: Sydney, Australia, 2009; p. 198. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bernal, S.; De Gutierrez, R.; Delvasto, S.; Rodriguez, E. Performance of an alkali-activated slag concrete reinforced with steel fibers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Neville, A.M. Properties of Concrete; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  96. Martys, N.S.; Ferraris, C.F. Capillary transport in mortars and concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 1997, 27, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Şanal, İ. Performance of macrosynthetic and steel fiber–reinforced concretes emphasizing mineral admixture addition. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2018, 30, 04018101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ramadoss, P.; Nagamani, K. Tensile strength and durability characteristics of high-performance fiber reinforced concrete. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2008, 41, 307–319. [Google Scholar]
  99. Tamrakar, N. The Effect of Steel Fibers Type and Content on the Development of Fresh and Hardened Properties and Durability of Self-consolidating Concrete; Ryerson University: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  100. IS 13311-1. Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete-Part 1: Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity; Bureau of Indian Standards: New Delhi, India, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  101. Wu, H.; Huang, B.; Shu, X.; Dong, Q. Laboratory evaluation of abrasion resistance of portland cement pervious concrete. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 23, 697–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of slag and dune sand.
Figure 1. Particle size distribution of slag and dune sand.
Sustainability 13 08017 g001
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of (a) slag and (b) dune sand.
Figure 2. SEM micrographs of (a) slag and (b) dune sand.
Sustainability 13 08017 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) slag and (b) dune sand.
Figure 3. XRD patterns of (a) slag and (b) dune sand.
Sustainability 13 08017 g003
Figure 4. Particle size distribution of different mixes of NA and RCA.
Figure 4. Particle size distribution of different mixes of NA and RCA.
Sustainability 13 08017 g004
Figure 5. Geometry of steel fibers.
Figure 5. Geometry of steel fibers.
Sustainability 13 08017 g005
Figure 6. Development of cubic compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Figure 6. Development of cubic compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Sustainability 13 08017 g006
Figure 7. (a) Relationship between cubic and cylinder compressive strengths and (b) predicted versus experimental cylinder compressive strength.
Figure 7. (a) Relationship between cubic and cylinder compressive strengths and (b) predicted versus experimental cylinder compressive strength.
Sustainability 13 08017 g007
Figure 8. Typical compression stress-strain curves of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes with steel fiber volume fractions of (a) 0%, (b) 1%, and (c) 2%.
Figure 8. Typical compression stress-strain curves of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes with steel fiber volume fractions of (a) 0%, (b) 1%, and (c) 2%.
Sustainability 13 08017 g008aSustainability 13 08017 g008b
Figure 9. Modulus of elasticity of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes with different RCA replacement percentages and SF volume fractions.
Figure 9. Modulus of elasticity of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes with different RCA replacement percentages and SF volume fractions.
Sustainability 13 08017 g009
Figure 10. (a) Relationship between modulus of elasticity and cylinder compressive strength and (b) predicted versus experimental modulus of elasticity.
Figure 10. (a) Relationship between modulus of elasticity and cylinder compressive strength and (b) predicted versus experimental modulus of elasticity.
Sustainability 13 08017 g010
Figure 11. Splitting tensile strength of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete.
Figure 11. Splitting tensile strength of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete.
Sustainability 13 08017 g011
Figure 12. (a) Relationship between splitting tensile and cylinder compressive strength and (b) predicted versus experimental modulus of elasticity.
Figure 12. (a) Relationship between splitting tensile and cylinder compressive strength and (b) predicted versus experimental modulus of elasticity.
Sustainability 13 08017 g012
Figure 13. Water absorption of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete.
Figure 13. Water absorption of 28-day alkali-activated slag concrete.
Sustainability 13 08017 g013
Figure 14. Capillary sorptivity of alkali-activated slag concrete over time: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Figure 14. Capillary sorptivity of alkali-activated slag concrete over time: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Sustainability 13 08017 g014
Figure 15. (a) Ultrasonic pulse velocity of alkali-activated slag concrete as a function of RCA replacement and (b) relationship between UPV and f’c.
Figure 15. (a) Ultrasonic pulse velocity of alkali-activated slag concrete as a function of RCA replacement and (b) relationship between UPV and f’c.
Sustainability 13 08017 g015
Figure 16. Bulk resistivity of alkali-activated slag concrete as a function of RCA replacement.
Figure 16. Bulk resistivity of alkali-activated slag concrete as a function of RCA replacement.
Sustainability 13 08017 g016
Figure 17. Abrasion resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete over time: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Figure 17. Abrasion resistance of alkali-activated slag concrete over time: (a) SF 0%; (b) SF 1%; (c) SF 2%.
Sustainability 13 08017 g017
Table 1. Chemical composition and physical properties of slag and dune sand.
Table 1. Chemical composition and physical properties of slag and dune sand.
OxidesMaterial (%)
SlagDune Sand
CaO42.014.1
SiO234.764.9
Al2O314.43.0
MgO6.91.3
Fe2O30.80.7
loss on ignition1.10.0
others0.216.0
Physical properties
Blaine fineness (cm2/g)4250-
specific gravity2.702.77
Table 2. Physical properties of fine and coarse aggregates.
Table 2. Physical properties of fine and coarse aggregates.
Property (Unit)ASTM TestDune SandNARCA
dry-rodded density (kg/m3)C29 [60]166316351563
absorption (%)C127 [61]-0.226.63
Los Angeles abrasion (%)C131 [57]-16.032.6
surface area (cm2/g)C136 [62]116.802.492.50
soundness (MgSO4, %)C88 [58]-1.202.78
specific gravityC127 [61]2.772.822.63
fineness modulusC136 [62]1.456.827.44
Table 3. Geometric and physical properties of steel fibers (as provided by the manufacturer [69]).
Table 3. Geometric and physical properties of steel fibers (as provided by the manufacturer [69]).
Materialdf
(mm)
lf
(mm)
Aspect Ratio
(lf/df)
Density
(g/cm3)
Fiber Network
(Fiber/kg)
ft
(MPa)
Ef
(GPa)
steel fiber0.5535657.914.5311345210
Table 4. Mix proportions of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Table 4. Mix proportions of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Mix
No.
Mix
Designation
Mass (kg/m3)
Slag 1DS 1NA 1RCA 1SS 1SH 1SP 1SF 1
1R0SF03007251210099667.50
2R30SF030072584736399667.50
3R30SF130072584736399667.578
4R30SF230072584736399667.5156
5R70SF030072536384799667.50
6R70SF130072536384799667.578
7R70SF230072536384799667.5156
8R100SF03007250121099667.50
9R100SF13007250121099667.578
10R100SF23007250121099667.5156
1 Note: DS = dune sand; NA = natural aggregates; RCA = recycled concrete aggregates; SS = sodium silicate; SH = sodium hydroxide; SP = superplasticizer; SF = steel fibers.
Table 5. Compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Table 5. Compressive strength of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Mix
No.
Mix
Designation
fcu (MPa)f’c(MPa)Increase 1–7 a (%)Increase 7–28 b (%)f’c/fcu
1-Day7-Day28-Day
1R0SF038.646.447.531.820.22.40.67
2R30SF036.945.647.830.023.64.80.63
3R30SF142.251.356.234.221.69.60.61
4R30SF243.251.859.136.419.914.10.62
5R70SF026.439.147.930.448.122.50.63
6R70SF132.545.351.431.939.413.50.62
7R70SF237.551.355.833.336.88.80.60
8R100SF021.835.637.825.063.36.20.66
9R100SF127.137.742.028.039.111.40.67
10R100SF228.639.146.430.136.718.70.65
a Percent increase in fcu from 1 to 7 days, b Percent increase in fcu from 7 to 28 days.
Table 6. Initial sorptivity of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Table 6. Initial sorptivity of alkali-activated slag concrete mixes.
Mix No.Mix DesignationRCA (%)Steel Fibers (%)Sorptivity × 10−2 (mm/√s)
1R0F0000.86
2R30F03001.86
3R30F13011.70
4R30F23021.56
5R70F07003.15
6R70F17012.94
7R70F27022.85
8R100F010004.12
9R100F110013.96
10R100F210023.75
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El-Hassan, H.; Medljy, J.; El-Maaddawy, T. Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Dune Sand. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148017

AMA Style

El-Hassan H, Medljy J, El-Maaddawy T. Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Dune Sand. Sustainability. 2021; 13(14):8017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148017

Chicago/Turabian Style

El-Hassan, Hilal, Jamal Medljy, and Tamer El-Maaddawy. 2021. "Properties of Steel Fiber-Reinforced Alkali-Activated Slag Concrete Made with Recycled Concrete Aggregates and Dune Sand" Sustainability 13, no. 14: 8017. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148017

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop