Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Methods and Materials
3. The Social Investment Approach
4. Flaws and Pre-Conditions of Social Investment
- Leaving out/behind non-productive people/people outside of labour markets (e.g., frail people, people with disabilities and/or illnesses): n the SI approach, the participation to labour market is the key for the social inclusion. For example, non-employed persons in charge of taking care of family’s dependent members are at risk of poverty and social exclusion even more so under the investment scheme [28].
- Complexity of individual responsibility: Putting responsibility at the centre of SI means to possibly foster conditional and disciplinary policies. Given the thin line between (a lack of) effort and societal circumstances, defining individual responsibility is neither simple nor straightforward. “A narrow view of responsibility denies the context-specific nature of human agency and the unequal distribution of opportunities, which in itself shapes the range of choices open to people” [21] (p. 7).
- Cementing inequalities (Matthew effect): Under the Matthew effect, social groups with already high socio-economic status benefit the most from investment policies [29]. Without careful policy design, SI would fortify social inequalities instead of fostering social mobility. Childcare policies are an explicative example of this effect. Most childcare services are only available to those families with two already working parents. However, dual earner-ship is not equally dispersed. Lower income households with only one parent working will be more likely to be excluded from these conditioned services. In these ways, investment in education and childcare may then exacerbate inequalities and existing divisions between socio-economic groups [30,31] and also among territories [32,33].
- Education system and labour market should share the same orientation towards high skill employment and work interdependently. Structural disconnection between these two systems can lead to mismatches between skill demand and education, resulting in poor employability and social integration.
- Both households and labour markets should show relatively high levels of gender parity. This is necessary to avoid gendered Matthew effects in care-work conciliation and work–life balance.
- Labour market and social protection systems should strive to include people in the labour market by providing them with opportunities for requalification and by ensuring good-quality employment to prevent social exclusion.
5. The Neglected Territorial Dimension of Social Investment
5.1. Delivery of Capacitating Services
5.2. Institutional Rescaling
5.3. Spatial Disparities
5.4. Knowledge Societies
6. Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References and Note
- Morel, N.; Palier, B.; Palme, J. (Eds.) Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Hemerijck, A. Social Investment Uses; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Nolan, B. What use is “social investment”? J. Eur. Soc. Policy 2013, 23, 459–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kazepov, Y.; Cefalo, R. The territorial dimension of Social Investment. In Handbook of Urban Social Policy; Kazepov, Y., Cucca, R., Barberis, E., Mocca, E., Eds.; Edward Elgar: Cheltenham, UK, 2021; forthcoming. [Google Scholar]
- Cordini, M.; Cefalo, R.; Boczy, T. Social Investment Perspective and Its Territorial Dimension; LPS-DASTU: Milano, Italy, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Rhoades, E.A. Literature reviews. Volta Rev. 2011, 111, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Towards Social Investment for Growth and Cohesion; COM (2013) 83 final; European Commission: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2013; Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0083 (accessed on 23 June 2021).
- ESPON European Territorial Review-Territorial Cooperation for the Future of Europe. ESPON EGTC: Luxembourg, 2017. Available online: https://www.espon.eu/european-territorial-review (accessed on 23 June 2021).
- ESPON. Inner Peripheries: National Territories Facing Challenges of Access to Basic Services of General Interest; ESPON: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Demeterova, B.; Fischer, T.; Schmude, J. The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, R.; Pacchi, C. In search of territorial cohesion: An elusive and imagined notion. Soc. Incl. 2020, 8, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Esping-Andersen, G.; Gallie, D.; Hemerijck, A.; Myles, J. Why We Need a New Welfare State; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Giddens, A. The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy; Polity Press: Cambridge, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Hemerijck, A.; Burgoon, B.; Di Pietro, A.; Vydra, S. Assessing Social Investment Synergies (ASIS); European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2016; Available online: https://iefp.eapn.pt/docs/Avaliar-as-sinergias-de-investimento-social.pdf (accessed on 23 June 2021).
- Bouget, D.; Frazer, H.; Marlier, E.; Sabato, S.; Vanherecke, B. Social Investment in Europe: A Study of National Policies; ESPN: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Dräbing, V.; Nelson, M. Addressing Human capital Risks and the Role of Institutional Complementarities. In Social Investment Uses; Hemerijck, A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 128–139. [Google Scholar]
- Ranci, C. (Ed.) Social Vulnerability in Europe. The New Configuration of Social Risks; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Cefalo, R.; Kazepov, Y. Investing over the life course: The role of lifelong learning in a social investment strategy. Stud. Educ. Adults 2018, 50, 203–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De la Porte, C.; Jacobsson, K. Social investment or recommodification? Assessing the employment policies of the EU member states. In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State; Morel, N., Palier, B., Palme, J., Eds.; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2011; pp. 117–149. [Google Scholar]
- Lundvall, B.; Lorenz, E. Social investment in the globalising learning economy—A European perspective. In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State; Morel, N., Palier, B., Palme, J., Eds.; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2012; pp. 235–259. [Google Scholar]
- Cantillon, B.; Van Lancker, W. Three Shortcomings of the Social Investment Perspective. Soc. Policy Soc. 2013, 12, 553–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nelson, M.; Stephens, J.D. Do social investment policies produce more and better jobs? In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges; Morel, N., Palier, B., Palme, J., Eds.; The Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- León, M.; Pavolini, E. ‘Social Investment’ or Back to ‘Familism’: The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family and Care Policies in Italy and Spain. South Eur. Soc. Politics 2014, 19, 353–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, K.J. Promoting social investment through work-family policies: Which nations do it and why? In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State; Morel, N., Palier, B., Palme, J., Eds.; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2012; pp. 153–180. [Google Scholar]
- Cronert, A.; Palme, J. Social Investment at Crossroads “The Third Way” or “The Enlightened Path” Forward? In Decent Incomes for All: Improving Policies in Europe; Cantillon, B., Goedemé, T., Hills, J., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2018; pp. 201–222. [Google Scholar]
- Garritzmann, J.L.; Häusermann, S.; Palier, B.; Zollinger, C. WoPSI—The World Politics of Social Investment. An International Research Project to Explain Variance in Social Investment Agendas and Social Investment Reforms across Countries and World Regions; LIEPP: Paris, France, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Solga, H. Education, economic inequality and the promises of the social investment state. Socio-Econ. Rev. 2014, 12, 269–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saraceno, C. A Critical Look to the Social Investment Approach from a Gender Perspective. Soc. Politics 2015, 22, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonoli, G.; Cantillon, B.; Van Lancker, W. Social investment and the Matthew effect: Limits to a strategy In Social Investment Uses; Hemerijck, A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 66–76. [Google Scholar]
- Checchi, D.; van de Werfhorst, H.; Braga, M.; Meschi, E. The Policy Response: Education. Changing Inequalities and Societal Impacts. In Changing Inequalities in Rich Countries: Analytical and Comparative Perspectives; Nolan, B., Salverda, W., Checchi, D., Marx, I., McKnight, A., Tóth, I.G., van de Werfhorst, H.G., Eds.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 294–317. [Google Scholar]
- Di Stasio, V.; Solga, H. Education as social policy: An introduction. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 2017, 27, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatinelli, S.; Semprebon, M. The vertical division of responsibility for social services within and beyond the State: Issues in empowerment, participation and territorial cohesion. In Social Services Disrupted. Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity; Martinelli, F., Anttonen, A., Matzke, M., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA, 2017; pp. 114–133. [Google Scholar]
- Verbist, G.; Matsaganis, M. The Redistributive Capacity of Services in the EU. For Better for Worse, for Richer for Poorer. Labour Market Participation, Social Redistribution and Income Poverty in the EU; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Abrassart, A.; Bonoli, G. Availability, Cost or Culture? Obstacles to childcare services for low income families. J. Soc. Policy 2015, 44, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Van Vliet, O.; Wang, C. Social Investment and Poverty Reduction: A Comparative Analysis across Fifteen European Countries. J. Soc. Policy 2015, 44, 611–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, E. Territorial Cohesion: An EU concept. Eur. J. Spat. Dev. 2016, 60, 1–30. [Google Scholar]
- Kazepov, Y.; Ranci, C. Making Social Investment Work: A Comparative Analysis of the Socio-Economic Preconditions of Social Investment Policies; SISEC Conference: Milan, Italy, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cefalo, R.; Boczy, T.; Kazepov, Y.; Arlotti, M.; Cordini, M.; Parma, A.; Ranci, C.; Sabatinelli, S. COHSMO Project Report on Literature Review on Social Investment. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Kenworthy, L. Enabling Social Policy. In Social Investment Uses; Hemerijck, A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 89–96. [Google Scholar]
- Martinelli, F.; Anttonen, A.; Matzke, M. (Eds.) Social Services Disrupted; Changes, Challenges and Policy Implications for Europe in Times of Austerity; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, Northampton, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Andreotti, A.; Mingione, E.; Polizzi, E. Local Welfare Systems. A Challenge for Social Cohesion. Urban Stud. 2012, 49, 1925–1940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moulaert, F. (Ed.) The International Handbook on Social Innovation: Collective Action, Social Learning and Transdisciplinary Research; Edward Elgar: Aldershot, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kazepov, Y.; Barberis, E. The territorial dimension of social policies and the new role of cities. In Handbook of European Social Policy; Patricia, K., Noemi, L.-B., Eds.; Edward Elgar Publishing: Cheltenham, UK; Northampton MA, USA, 2017; pp. 302–318. [Google Scholar]
- Baines, S.; Bassi, A.; Csoba, J.; Sipos, F. (Eds.) Innovative Social Investment; Policy Press: Bristol, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Purcell, M.; Brown, J. Against the local trap: Scale and the study of environment and development, Progress. Dev. Stud. 2005, 5, 279–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatinelli, S. Aspetti critici dell’innovazione sociale nel contesto italiano. Prospett. Soc. E Sanit. 2015, XLV, 9–12. [Google Scholar]
- Kazepov, Y. (Ed.) Rescaling Social Policies: Towards Multilevel Governance in Europe; Routledge: London, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Ranci, C.; Brandsen, T.; Sabatinelli, S. Social Vulnerability in European Cities. In The Role of Local Welfare in Times of Crisis; Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kröger, S. Five Years down the Road. An Evaluation of the Streamlining of the Open Method of Coordination in the Social Policy Field; OSE Briefing Paper; The European Social Observatory: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Iammarino, S.; Rodriguez-Pose, A.; Storper, M. Regional inequality in Europe. Evidence, theory and policy implications. J. Econ. Geogr. 2018, 53, 898–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marelli, E.; Patuelli, R.; Signorelli, M. Regional unemployment in the EU before and after the global crisis. Post-Communist Econ. 2012, 24, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Charron, N.; Dijkstra, L.; Lapuente, V. Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe. A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions. Soc. Indic. Res. 2015, 122, 315–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dijkstra, L. My Region, My Europe, Our Future. Seventh Report on Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Cefalo, R.; Scandurra, R.; Kazepov, Y. Youth Labor Market Integration in European Regions. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, A.; Cantillon, B.; Marlier, B.; Nolan, B. Social Indicators: The EU and Social Inclusion; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Barca, F. An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy; Independent Report Prepared at the Request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy; European Communities: Bruxells, Belgium, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Barca, F.; McCann, P.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. J. Reg. Sci. 2012, 52, 134–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabatinelli, S. Politiche per Crescere. In La Prima Infanzia tra Cura e Investimento Sociale; Il Mulino: Bologna, Italy, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lundvall, B. The Learning Economy and the Economics of Hope; Anthem Press: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wren, A. Social investment and the Service Economy Trilemma. In Social Investment Uses; Hemerijck, A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2017; pp. 97–107. [Google Scholar]
- Storper, M. Separate Worlds? Explaining the current wave of regional economic polarization. J. Econ. Geogr. 2018, 18, 247–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Medeiros, E.; van der Zwet, A. Sustainable and Integrated Urban Planning and Governance in Metropolitan and Medium-Sized Cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalleberg, A.L. Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2009, 74, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Berman, E.; Bound, J.; Machin, S. Implications of skill-biased technological change: International evidence. Q. J. Econ. 1998, 113, 1245–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fratesi, U.; Rodríguez-Pose, A. The crisis and regional employment in Europe: What role for sheltered economies? CAMRES 2016, 9, 33–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Finegold, D. Creating self-sustaining, high-skill ecosystems. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 1999, 15, 60–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dalziel, P. Regional skill ecosystems to assist young people making education employment linkages in transition from school to work. Local Econ. 2015, 30, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- OECD. Local Economic and Employment Development (LEED)—Designing Local Skills Strategies; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Scandurra, R.; Cefalo, R.; Kazepov, Y. School to work outcomes during the Great Recession, is the regional scale relevant for young people’s life chances? J. Youth Stud. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abrahams, G. What “Is” Territorial Cohesion? What Does It “Do”? Essentialist Versus Pragmatic Approaches to Using Concepts. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, 22, 2134–2155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- European Commission. Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an Inclusive, Smart and Sustainable Europe of Diverse Regions. Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers Responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development; European Commission: Bruxells, Belgium, 2011; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2011/territorial-agenda-of-the-european-union-2020 (accessed on 23 June 2021).
- Böhme, K.; Doucet, P.; Komornicki, T.; Zaucha, J.; Świątek, D. How to Strengthen the Territorial Dimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and EU Cohesion Policy; Report Based on the Territorial Agenda 2020; Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union: Warsaw, Poland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Faludi, A. Territorial Cohesion and Subsidiarity under the European Union Treaties: A Critique of the ‘Territorialism’ Underlying. Reg. Stud. 2013, 47, 1594–1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- European Commission. Green Paper on Territorial Cohesion. Turning Territorial Diversity into Strength; European Commission: Bruxelles, Belgium, 2008; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/information/publications/communications/2008/green-paper-on-territorial-cohesion-turning-territorial-diversity-into-strength, (accessed on 23 June 2021).
- Marques, T.S.; Saraiva, M.; Santinha, G.; Guerra, P. Re-Thinking Territorial Cohesion in the European Planning Context. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 2018, 42, 547–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Humer, A. Researching social services of general interest: An analytical framework derived from underlying policy systems. Eur. Spat. Res. Policy 2013, 21, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Medeiros, E.; Rauhut, D. Territorial Cohesion Cities: A policy recipe for achieving Territorial Cohesion? Reg. Stud. 2018, 60, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Daly, G.; Gonzalez, A.; Gleeson, J.; McCarthy, E.; Adams, N.; Pinch, P.; KITCASP. Key Indicators for Territorial Cohesion and Spatial Planning; Final Report Part D Appendix, B.; ESPON & National University of Ireland: Luxembourg, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Dao, H.; Plagnat Cantoreggi, P.; Rousseaux, V. Operationalizing a con-tested concept. Indicators of territorial cohesion. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2017, 25, 638–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaucha, J.; Böhme, K. Measuring territorial cohesion is not a mission impossible. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020, 28, 627–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodríguez-Pose, A. The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2018, 11, 189–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Working Definitions of Territorial Cohesion | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COHSMO | Balanced Development & Accessibility to Services | Polycentric Development and Advancement of Economic Growth | Place-Based Approach | Empowering regional governments | Integration & co-ordination between Policies | |
Political Participation | Vertical Collaboration | Horizontal Collaboration | ||||
Marques et al. | Social and territorial solidarity and equity | Diversity and Specificity of territorial policies | Territorial Organisation | Territorial Governance | ||
ESPON KITCASP | Social Cohesion and Quality of Life | Economic Competitiveness and Resilience | Integrated Spatial Development | Environmental Resource Management | ||
Medeiros | Social and Economic Cohesion | Polycentrism | Cooperation/Governance | Environmental Sustainability |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cordini, M.; Boczy, T.; Cefalo, R. Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137085
Cordini M, Boczy T, Cefalo R. Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13):7085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137085
Chicago/Turabian StyleCordini, Marta, Tatjana Boczy, and Ruggero Cefalo. 2021. "Place-Sensitive Social Investment and Territorial Cohesion: Implications for Sustainability" Sustainability 13, no. 13: 7085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137085