Assessment on the Suitability of Planting Non-Native Peatlands Species Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & Grimes in Rewetted Peatlands
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- (1)
- Experimentally test the response of sengon seedlings in the waterlogged condition in the nursery to understand whether sengon can grow on rewetted peat soil;
- (2)
- Describe and analyze the biophysical conditions of sengon plantation and its growth;
- (3)
- Understand the perception of the stakeholders (government and farmers) about sengon plantation on peatlands.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Method
2.2.1. Mesocosm Study in the Nursery
2.2.2. Sengon Observation and Measurement in the Field
2.2.3. Perception Study about Sengon Plantation on Peatlands
2.2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sengon Seedlings Growth
3.2. Sengon Growth Performance in the Field
3.2.1. Soil Chemical Properties
3.2.2. Sengon Growth Performance in the Community Forestry and Plantation
3.2.3. Sengon Growth Performance in Kalimantan
3.3. Sengon Community Forest Practices in Central Kalimantan
3.3.1. Characteristics of the Respondents
3.3.2. Perception on Sengon Plantation on Peatlands
3.3.3. Perception on Sengon Plantation on Peatlands
3.3.4. Technical Conditions of Respondents
3.3.5. Environmental Conditions of Sengon Farms on Peatlands
3.3.6. Opportunities and Challenges for Sengon Development on Peatlands
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- BRG (Badan Restorasi Gambut). Rencana Strategis Badan Restorasi Gambut 2016–2020; BRG: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016; p. 53. [Google Scholar]
- MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forestry). Corrective Action on Peatland Management in Indonesia: Toward Sustainable Peatland Ecosystem; MoEF: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019; p. 39.
- Biancalani, R.; Avagyan, A. Towards Climate-Responsible Peatlands Management; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Joosten, H.; Dommain, R.; Haberl, A.; Peters, J.; Silvius, M.; Wichtmann, W. Implementation. In Peatlands—Guidance for Climate Change Mitigation Through Conservation, Rehabilitation and Sustainable Use, 2nd ed.; Joosten, H., Tapio-Biström, M.L., Tol, S., Eds.; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Wetlands International: Rome, Italy, 2012; pp. 9–21. [Google Scholar]
- Wichtmann, W.; Schröder, C.; Joosten, H. (Eds.) Paludiculture as an inclusive solution. In Paludiculture—Productive Use of Wet Peatland; Schweizerbart Science Publishers: Stuttgart, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
- Uda, S.K.; Hein, L.; Adventa, A. Towards better use of Indonesian peatlands with paludiculture and low-drainage food crops. Wet. Ecol. Manag. 2020, 28, 509–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tata, H.L. Paludiculture: Can it be a trade-off between ecology and economic benefit on peatland restoration? In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 394, p. 012061. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, Z.D.; Lupascu, M.; Wijedasa, L.S. Paludiculture as a sustainable land use alternative for tropical peatlands: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 753, 142111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lampela, M.; Jauhiainen, J.; Sakkola, S.; Vasander, H. Promising native tree species for restoration of degraded tropical peatlands. For. Ecol. Manag. 2017, 394, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tampubolon, A.P.; Turjaman, M.; Osaki, M. Sago palm practices as natural aerohydro culture. In Tropical Peatland Ecomanagement; Osaki, M., Tsuji, N., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021; pp. 363–377. [Google Scholar]
- Budiman, I.; Sari, E.N.; Hadi, E.E.; Siahaan, H.; Januar, R.; Hapsari, R.D. Progress of paludiculture projects in supporting peatland ecosystem restoration in Indonesia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2020, 23, e01084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuwati, T.W.; Rachmanadi, D.; Qirom, M.A.; Santosa, P.B.; Kusin, K.; Tata, H.L. Peatland restoration in Central Kalimantan by rewetting and rehabilitation with Shorea balangeran. In Tropical Peatland Ecomanagement; Osaki, M., Tsuji, N., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2021; pp. 595–611. [Google Scholar]
- Soerianegara, I.; Lemmens, R.H.M.J. Plant Resources of South-East Asia 5 (1): Timber Trees: Major Commercial Timbers; Pudoc Scientific Publishers: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Martawidjaya, A.; Kartasujana, I.; Kadir, K. Atlas Kayu Indonesia Vol. 2; Departemen Kehutanan, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hutan: Bogor, Indonesia, 1989.
- Suharlan, A.; Sumarna, K.; Sudiono, J. Tabel Tegakan Sepuluh Jenis Kayu Industri; Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Hutan: Bogor, Indonesia, 1975.
- Siregar, U.J.; Rachmi, A.; Massijaya, M.Y.; Ishibashi, N.; Ando, K. Economic analysis of sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) community forest plantation, a fast growing spesies in East Java, Indonesia. For. Pol. Econ. 2007, 9, 822–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otsamo, R.; Adjers, G.; Hadi, T.S.; Kuusipalo, J.; Otsamo, A. Early performance of 12 shade tolerant tress species interplanted with Paraserianthes falcataria on Imperata cylindrica grassland. J. Trop. For. Sci. 1996, 8, 381–394. [Google Scholar]
- Varis, E. Stand Growth and Management Scenarios for Paraserianthes falcataria Smallholder Plantations in Indonesia. Master’s Thesis, Department of Forest Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Prematuri, R.; Turjaman, M.; Sato, T.; Tawaraya, K. Post bauxite mining land soil characteristics and its effects on the growth of Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & J.W.Grimes and Albizia saman (Jacq.) Merr. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2020, 2020, 6764380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wulandari, D.; Cheng, W.; Tawaraya, K. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculation improves Albizia saman and Paraserianthes falcataria growth in post-opencast coal mine field in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 376, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sari, R.; Prayudyaningsih, R. The role of indigenous Rhizobia on Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen seedlings in nickel post mining lands. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2019; Volume 308, p. 012039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Otsamo, A.; Adjers, G.; Hadi, T.S.; Kuusipalo, J.; Vuokko, R. Evaluation of reforestation potential of 83 tree species planted on Imperata cylindrica dominated grassland—A case study from South Kalimantan, Indonesia. New For. 1997, 14, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nugroho, Y. The rooting system of sengon laut plant (Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen) on the post-mining of C type. J. Hutan Trop. Borneo 2007, 20, 6–55. [Google Scholar]
- Yunanto, T.; Mitlohner, R.; Burger-Arndt, A. Vegetation development and the condition of natural regeneration after coal mine reclamation in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Mine Closure; Fourie, A.B., Tibbett, M., Eds.; Australian Centre for Geomechanics: Perth, Australia, 2019; pp. 1289–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Binkley, D. Bioassays of the influence of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia falcataria on soil nutrient supply and limitation. For. Ecol. Manag. 1997, 91, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garcia-Montiel, D.; Binkley, D. Effect of Eucalyptus saligna and Albizia falcataria on soil processes and nitrogen supply in Hawaii. Oecologia 1998, 113, 547–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boyden, S.; Binkley, D.; Senock, R. Competition and facilitation between Eucalyptus and nitrogen-fixing Falcataria in relation to soil fertility. Ecology 2005, 86, 992–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puspitojati, T.; Mile, M.Y.; Fauziah, E.; Darusman, D. Hutan Rakyat Sumbangsih Masyarakat Pedesaan Untuk Hutan Tanaman; Kanisius: Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Sari, R.R.; Hairiah, K.; Suyanto, S. Karakteristik hutan rakyat jati dan sengon serta manfaat ekonominya di Kabupaten Malang. J. Ekon. Pertan. Agribis. (JEPA) 2018, 2, 129–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- BPS (Statistics Indonesia Agency). Statistics of Forestry Production 2019; BPS: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2020. Available online: www.bps.go.id/ (accessed on 4 April 2021).
- Triwibowo, D.R. Harga Karet Anjlok, Petani Tanam Sengon. 2019. Available online: https://www.kompas.id/baca/ekonomi/2019/03/01/harga-karet-anjlok-petani-tanam-sengon/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- Triwibowo, D.R. Bahan Baku Utama Plywood Dari Petani Pulang Pisau. 2019. Available online: https://www.kompas.id/baca/utama/2019/08/26/bahan-baku-utama-plywood-dari-petani-pulang-pisau/ (accessed on 17 March 2021).
- PPID (Pejabat Pengelola Informasi dan Dokumentasi, KLHK). Mutualisme Perhutanan Sosial dan Industri. Available online: http://ppid.menlhk.go.id/berita_foto/browse/1793 (accessed on 17 April 2021).
- Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Kalimantan Timur. Penanaman Sengon Dalam Rangka Pembangunan Hutan Rakyat. Available online: https://dishut.kaltimprov.go.id/berita-penanaman-sengon-dalam-rangka-pembangunan-hutan-rakyat.html (accessed on 17 April 2021).
- Ritung, S.; Wahyunto, N.K.; Sukarman, H.; Suparto, T.C. Peta Lahan Gambut Indonesia Skala 1:250.000 (Indonesian Peatland Map at the Scale 1:250,000); Indonesian Center for Agricultural Land Resources Research and Development: Bogor, Indonesia, 2011. (In Indonesian) [Google Scholar]
- Wahyunto, S.; Ritung, S.; Nugroho, K.; Sulaeman, Y.; Hikmatullah, T.C.; Suparto, S. Degraded Peatlands Map for Kalimantan Dan Papua; Indonesia Climate Change Trust Fund (ICCTF)—BAPPENAS, Agency for Agricultural Research and Development, Ministry of Agriculture: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Ditjen PPKL (Direktorat Jenderal Pengendalian Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan). Laporan Kinerja Dorektorat Jenderal Pengendalian Pencemaran dan Kerusakan Lingkungan; Ditjen PPKL: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019; p. 156.
- Hartatik, W.; Subiksa, I.G.M.; Dariah, A. Sifat kimia dan fisika lahan gambut. In Pengelolaan Lahan Gambut Berkelanjutan; Nurida, N.L., Wihardjaka, A., Eds.; Balai Penelitian Tanah: Bogor, Indonesia, 2011; pp. 45–56. [Google Scholar]
- Dariah, A.; Maftuah, E.; Maswar. Karakteristik lahan gambut. In Panduan Pengelolaan Berkelanjutan Lahan Gambut Terdegradasi; Nurida, N.L., Wihardjaka, A., Eds.; Balai Penelitian Tanah: Bogor, Indonesia, 2014; pp. 16–29. [Google Scholar]
- BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik) Kabupaten Pulang Pisau. Kabupaten Pulang Pisau dalam Angka Tahun 2020; Badan Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Pulang Pisau: Pulang Pisau, Indonesia. Available online: https://pulpiskab.bps.go.id (accessed on 4 April 2021).
- Husnain; Mulyani, A. Support of land resources data in the development of food production center area (food estate) in Central Kalimantan. J. Sumberd. Lahan 2021, 1, 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinas PU (Pekerjaan Umum). Rencana Program Investasi Jangka Menengah Kabupaten Pulang Pisau; Dinas Pekerjaan Umum: Kabupaten Pulang Pisau, Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah, Indonesia, 2013; pp. 2–6. Available online: http://sippa.ciptakarya.pu.go.id (accessed on 10 May 2021).
- BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik) Provinsi Kalimantan Tengah. Statistics of Kalimantan Tengah Province, Amount of Precipitation by Month and Observation Station in Kalimantan Tengah Province, 2010–2019; BPS: Palangkaraya, Indonesia, 2021. Available online: https://kalteng.bps.go.id/ (accessed on 10 May 2021).
- Potvin, L.R.; Rodney, A.C.; Evan, S.K.; Randall, K.K.; Erik, A.L. Effects of water table position and plant functional group on plant community, aboveground production, and peat properties in a peatland mesocosm experiment (PEATcosm). Plant Soil 2015, 387, 277–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ritung, S.; Sukarman. Kesesuaian lahan gambut untuk pertanian. In Lahan Gambut Indonesia: Pembentukan, Karakteristik dan Potensi Mendukung Ketahanan Pangan; Agus, F., Anda, M., Jamil, A., Masganti, Eds.; IAARD Press: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Al-Hadad, M.F. Estimasi Riap Tegakan Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen) di IUPHHK-HTI Trans PT Belantara Subur Kalimantan Timur. Undergraduate Thesis, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hendromono. Teknik pembibitan eboni dari anakan hasil permudaan alam. J. Penelit. Hutan Tanam. 2007, 4, 69–118. [Google Scholar]
- Grickho, F.P.; Grick, B.R. Ethylene and stress flooding in plant. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 39, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Wegner, L.H. Oxygen transport in waterlogged plants. In Waterlogging Signaling and Tolerance in Plants; Mancuso, S., Shabala, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Theo, J.; Elzenga, M.; van Veen, H. Waterlogging and plant nutrient uptake. In Waterlogging Signaling and Tolerance in Plants; Mancuso, S., Shabala, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 23–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roberts, D.M.; Choi, W.G.; Hwang, J.H. Strategies for adaptation to waterlogging and hypoxia in nitrogen fixing nodules of legumes. In Waterlogging Signaling and Tolerance in Plants; Mancuso, S., Shabala, S., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 37–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- BSN (Badan Standarisasi Nasional). SNI 8420:2018 Bibit Tanaman Hutan; BSN: Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018.
- Dohong, S. Peningkatan Produktivitas Tanah Gambut yang Disawahkan dengan Pemberian Bahan Amelioran Tanah Mineral Berkadar Besi Tinggi. Ph.D. Dissertation, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, 1999; p. 171. [Google Scholar]
- Masganti; Wahyunto; Dariah, A.; Nurhayati; Yusuf, R. Karakteristik dan potensi pemanfaatan lahan gambut terdegradasi di Provinsi Riau. J. Sumberd. Lahan 2014, 8, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
- Noor, M.; Nursyamsi, D.; Alwi, M.; Fahmi, A. Prospek pertanian berkelanjutan di lahan gambut: Dari petani ke peneliti dan dari peneliti ke petani. J. Sumberd. Lahan 2014, 8, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
- Kurinobu, S.; Prehatin, D.; Mohammad, N.; Matsune, K.; Chigira, O. A Provisional growth model with a size-density relationship for a plantation of Parasianthes falcataria derived from measurements taken over 2 years in Pare, Indonesia. J. For. Res. 2007, 12, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paquit, J.C.; Rojo, M.J.A. Assessing suitable sites for Falcata (Paraserianthes falcataria (L) Nielsen) plantation in Bukidnon, Philippines using GIS. Int. J. Biosci. 2018, 12, 317–325. [Google Scholar]
- Safitri, B.; Wahyudi, W.; Christopheros. Distribusi diameter tanaman sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria) sebagai indikator pertumbuhan normal. J. Hutan Tropika 2020, 15, 43–50. [Google Scholar]
- Aminudin, H.; Safriyani, E.; Warjiyanto, W.; Sutejo, S. Pertumbuhan bibit kelapa sawit pada lahan gambut berbagai ketinggian genangan. J. Ilmu Pertanian 2015, 18, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
- Gumilar, R.A. Dimensi dan Sistem Perakaran Sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L). Nielsen) di Desa Cikarawang Kecamatan Dramaga, Kabupaten Bogor. Undergraduate Thesis, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Hairiah, K.; Sugiarto, C.; Utami, S.R.; Purnomosidhi, P.; Roshetko, J.M. Diagnosis faktor penghambat pertumbuhan akar sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria L. Nielsen) pada ultisol di Lampung Utara. Agrivita 2004, 26, 89–98. [Google Scholar]
- Nugraha, F.; Herawatiningsih, R.; Nugroho, R. Evaluasi kesesuaian lahan gambut untuk tanaman sengon sengon (Paraserianthes falcataria (L). Nielsen) di Desa Kuala Dua Kecamatan Sungai Raya Kabupaten Kubu Raya. J. Hutan Lestari 2013, 1, 141–147. [Google Scholar]
- Tata, H.L. Mixed farming systems on peatlands in Jambi and Central Kalimantan provinces, Indonesia: Should they be described as paludiculture? Mires Peat 2019, 25, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
- Lelana, N.E. Epidemiologi dan Keragaman Patogen Karat Puru Sengon di Indonesia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor, Indonesia, 2017; p. 122. [Google Scholar]
- Dohong, A.; Aziz, A.A.; Dargusch, P. A review of techniques for effective tropical peatland restoration. Wetlands 2018, 35, 275–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Site Location/Village | GPS Point | Farm Type | Planting Year | Age (Year) | Soil Type—Code of Plot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kalampangan | S 02°18′41″ E 113°59′33″ | Monoculture | September 2018 | 5 | Peatland-PS1 |
Kalampangan | S 02°18′21″ E 113°59′09″ | Monoculture | September 2018 | 2 | Peatland-PS2 |
Taruna | S 02°17′54.2″ E 114°02′21.3″ | Monoculture | 2018 | 1–2 | Peatland-Pd1 |
Tumbang Nusa | S 02°22′36.3″ E 114°07′15″ | Sengon + jelutong + pineapple | 2016 | 3 | Peatland-Pd2 |
Misik Kameloh | S 02°18′1.1″ E 114°01′46.6″ | monoculture | 2016 | 3 | Peatland-Pd3 |
S 02°18′01.1″ E 114°01′33″ | Sengon + dragon fruit | 2016 | 3 | Peatland-Pd4 | |
S 02°17′38″ E 114°01′10″ | Monoculture | 2016 | 3–4 | Peatland-Pd5 | |
Jabiren | S 02°31′14″ E 114°09′53″ | Monoculture | September 2015 | 5 | Peatland-Pm1 |
S 02°18′41″ E 114°59′33″ | Monoculture | September 2018 | 2 | Peatland-Pm2 | |
Mentaren | S 02°49′52″ E 114°13′00″ | Monoculture | March 2020 | 0.25 | Mineral soil-NAP1 |
S 02°49′31″ E 114°13′32″ | Monoculture | November 2018 | 1.7 | Mineral soil-NAP2 | |
S 02°49′33″ E 114°13′33″ | Monoculture | November 2018 | 1.7 | Mineral soil-NAP3 | |
S 02°49′13″ E 114°13′21″ | Monoculture | October 2017 | 2.75 | Mineral soil-NAP4 | |
S 02°49′14″ E 114°13′22″ | Monoculture | October 2017 | 2.75 | Mineral soil-NAP5 |
Code | Treatment | Number of Seedlings |
---|---|---|
PIo | Peat soil, no inundation | 12 |
PIr | Peat soil, inundation with artificial rainwater | 12 |
SIo | Mineral soil, no inundation | 12 |
SId | Mineral soil, inundation with distilled water | 14 |
SIr | Mineral soil, inundation with artificial rainwater | 14 |
Treatment | ΔH (cm) | ΔD (cm) |
---|---|---|
Soil + no inundation | 2.63 ± 1.13 a | 0.45 ± 0.21 b |
Soil + distilled water inundation | 1.11 ± 4.94 a | 0.70 ± 0.28 a |
Soil + rainwater inundation | 0.88 ± 0.05 b | 0.74 ± 0.43 a |
Peat + rainwater inundation | −2.80 ± 2.55 c | 0.05 ± 0.26 c |
Peat + no inundation | −7.51 ± 9.54 cd | 0.30 ± 0.19 b |
Soil Properties | Peat-Soil of Misik Kameloh | Mineral Soil of Bogor [47] |
---|---|---|
pH H2O | 3.39 | 5.80 |
pH KCl | 3.18 | 4.85 |
C organic (%) | 54.96 | 2.15 |
N total (%) | 0.55 | 0.19 |
C/N ratio | 99.93 | 11.32 |
P available (ppm) | 19.36 | 17.00 |
CEC (cmol kg−1) | 95.97 | n.a. |
Ash content (%) | 0.30 | n.a. |
No | Plot | pH_H2O | pH KCl | C-Org (%) | Ntot (%) | Pavailable (ppm) | C/N | CEC (cmol/kg) | Ash Content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Pd1 | 2.91 c | 2.80 c | 57.78 a | 1.53 a | 12.39 d | 37.76 c | 184.19 b | 0.38 d |
2 | Pd2 | 2.89 c | 2.75 c | 56.84 a | 0.65 b | 45.98 a | 87.45 a | 279.24 a | 2.01 d |
3 | Pd3 | 2.92 c | 2.78 c | 50.81 a | 0.97 a | 36.81 b | 52.38 b | 205.97 a | 12.40 |
4 | Pd4 | 2.93 c | 2.85 c | 48.94 a | 0.76 b | 42.63 a | 64.39 b | 213.82 a | 15.62 |
5 | Pd5 | 2.97 c | 2.85 c | 45.04 b | 0.81 b | 49.97 a | 55.60 b | 161.52 b | 22.35 |
6 | Pm1 | 3.83 b | 3.59 b | 21.40 c | 0.74 b | 19.80 cd | 35.96 c | 65.44 c | 63.11 b |
7 | Pm2 | 3.70 b | 3.10 b | 27.54 c | 0.75 b | 17.90 cd | 36.72 c | 90.69 c | 52.52 b |
8 | PS1 | 3.64 b | 2.24 d | 42.16 b | 1.10 a | 18.60 cd | 38.33 c | 131.94 b | 27.32 c |
9 | PS2 | 3.59 b | 1.98 d | 46.53 b | 1.16 a | 26.60 c | 40.29 c | 172.54 b | 19.79 c |
10 | NAP1 | 4.52 a | 3.81 a | 3.26 d | 0.22 c | 17.50 cd | 14.82 d | 20,49 d | 88.42 a |
11 | NAP2 | 4.13 a | 3.64 a | 2.82 d | 0.30 c | 19.95 cd | 9.40 d | 23.30 d | 88.79 a |
12 | NAP3 | 4.07 a | 3.62 a | 3.87 d | 0.31 c | 17.65 cd | 12.48 d | 28.71 d | 87.81 a |
13 | NAP4 | 4.04 a | 3.92 a | 5.11 d | 0.23 c | 19.70 cd | 22.22 d | 41.15 d | 77.73 a |
14 | NAP5 | 4.10 a | 3.75 a | 5.11 d | 0.23 c | 17.10 cd | 22.22 d | 38.90 d | 85.91 a |
Plot | Age (Year) | Growth | Peat Depth (m) | Water Level (m) | N | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter (cm) | Height (m) | |||||
Pd1 | 1 | 2.43 ± 0.63 ef | 2.93 ± 0.74 e | 3.9 | 1.05 | 30 |
Pd1 | 2 | 4.21 ± 0.88 e | 3.73 ± 0.87 e | 3.9 | n.a. | 30 |
Pd2 | 3 | 5.62 ± 1.30 e | 4.83 ± 1.13 de | 5.4 | 0.89 | 40 |
Pd3 | 3 | 6.90 ± 2.70 e | 5.45 ± 1.64 de | 3.6 | >3.60 | 30 |
Pd4 | 3 | 8.71 ± 1.96 c | 8.60 ± 2.24 c | 3.8 | 2.54 | 30 |
Pd4 | 4 | 12.08 ± 2.44 b | 11.70 ± 2.82 b | 3.8 | n.a. | 30 |
Pd5 | 3 | 8.79 ± 2.87 c | 8.02 ± 2.65 c | 3.9 | 2.3 | 30 |
Pd5 | 4 | 13.08 ± 3.95 b | 11.57 ± 3.87 b | 3.9 | n.a. | 30 |
Pm1 | 5 | 16.11 ± 5.05 a | 17.40 ± 3.84 a | 1.3 | 0.8 | 30 |
Pm2 | 3 | 12.84 ± 2.57 b | 13.85 ± 2.62 a | 1.3 | 0.92 | 30 |
PS1 | 5 | 16.84 ± 3.74 a | 16.40 ± 3.60 a | 0.25 | 0.48 | 30 |
PS2 | 2 | 4.58 ± 0.81 e | 4.23 ± 0.51 de | 0.28 | n.a. | 40 |
NAP1 | 0.25 | 0.91 ± 0.33 f | 1.05 ± 0.32 e | 0 | n.a. | 50 |
NAP2 | 1.7 | 7.60 ± 1.92 d | 7.39 ± 1.65 d | 0 | n.a. | 50 |
NAP3 | 1.7 | 9.96 ± 2.93 c | 8.38 ± 1.63 c | 0 | n.a. | 50 |
NAP4 | 2.75 | 12.77 ± 3.40 b | 15.35 ± 2.87 a | 0 | n.a. | 50 |
NAP5 | 2.75 | 11.19 ± 4.19 b | 12.78 ± 3.42 ab | 0 | n.a. | 50 |
Activity | Answer | Number of Farmers |
---|---|---|
Seedling procurement | Purchase | 10 |
Self-producing | 1 | |
Government subsidy | 1 | |
No answer | 2 | |
Spacing | 3 m × 3 m | 10 |
2 m × 2 m | 2 | |
2 m × 3 m | 1 | |
4 m × 4 m | 1 | |
Pest eradication | Untreated | 8 |
Treated | 6 | |
Pruning/mechanized | 1 | |
Girdling/killed | 1 | |
Fertilization | Yes, irregular | 9 |
Routine | 3 | |
Never | 2 |
Aspect | Answer | Number of Respondents |
---|---|---|
Technical training | Yes | 0 |
No | 14 | |
Planning and accountancy | Yes | 4 |
No | 10 | |
Mechanization | Land preparation | 1 |
Cultivation | 2 | |
None/manually | 11 | |
Marketing | Collector | 12 |
Processor | 1 | |
Collector + processor | 1 | |
Transportation quality | None | 2 |
Low | 6 | |
Medium | 3 | |
Good | 2 | |
Excellent | 1 | |
Financing | Own capital | 14 |
Subsidy from government | 1 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nuroniah, H.S.; Tata, H.L.; Mawazin; Martini, E.; Dewi, S. Assessment on the Suitability of Planting Non-Native Peatlands Species Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & Grimes in Rewetted Peatlands. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137015
Nuroniah HS, Tata HL, Mawazin, Martini E, Dewi S. Assessment on the Suitability of Planting Non-Native Peatlands Species Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & Grimes in Rewetted Peatlands. Sustainability. 2021; 13(13):7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137015
Chicago/Turabian StyleNuroniah, Hani Sitti, Hesti Lestari Tata, Mawazin, Endri Martini, and Sonya Dewi. 2021. "Assessment on the Suitability of Planting Non-Native Peatlands Species Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & Grimes in Rewetted Peatlands" Sustainability 13, no. 13: 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137015
APA StyleNuroniah, H. S., Tata, H. L., Mawazin, Martini, E., & Dewi, S. (2021). Assessment on the Suitability of Planting Non-Native Peatlands Species Falcataria moluccana (Miq.) Barneby & Grimes in Rewetted Peatlands. Sustainability, 13(13), 7015. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137015