Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Monument Protection and Conservation in Poland
2.2. Cultural Heritage Potential
2.3. Assessment of Complex Phenomena
3. Materials and Methods
- NID—National Institute of Cultural Heritage [35],
- CRFNP—Central Register of Nature Protection Measures, General Directorate for Environmental Protection [36],
- MriRW—Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development [37],
- PIPRL—Polish Chamber of Regional and Local Products [38],
- BDL—Local Data Bank, Central Statistical Office, Statistics Poland [39].
3.1. Statistical Analysis
3.2. Spatial Presentation of Data
4. Results
Typology of Voivodeships Regarding Cultural Heritage Potential
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Limitations and Further Research
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Manfriani, C.; Gualdani, G.; Goli, G.; Carlson, B.; Certo, A.; Mazzanti, P.; Fioravanti, M. The Contribution of IoT to the Implementation of Preventive Conservation According to European Standards: The Case Study of the “Cannone” Violin and Its Historical Copy. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaafar, M.; Noor, S.M.; Rasoolimanesh, S.M. Perception of young local residents toward sustainable conservation programmes: A case study of the Lenggong World Cultural Heritage Site. Tour. Manag. 2015, 48, 154–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uchwała Nr 125 Rady Ministrów z dnia 24 czerwca 2014 r. W Sprawie Krajowego Programu Ochrony Zabytków i Opieki Nad Zabytkami; Ministry of Culture National Heritage and Sport of the Republic of Poland (Ministerstwo Kultury, Dziedzictwa Narodowego i Sportu): Warsaw, Poland, 2014; p. 733. Available online: https://bip.mkdnis.gov.pl/pages/legislacja/programy-wieloletnie/krajowy-program-ochrony-zabytkow-i-opieki-nad-zabytkami.php (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Uchwała Nr 82 Rady Ministrów z dnia 13 sierpnia 2019 r. W Sprawie Krajowego Programu Ochrony Zabytków i Opieki Nad Zabytkami na Lata 2019-2022; Ministry of Culture National Heritage and Sport of the Republic of Poland (Ministerstwo Kultury, Dziedzictwa Narodowego i Sportu): Warsaw, Poland, 2019; p. 808. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WMP20190000808 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Murzyn-Kupisz, M.; Działek, J. Cultural heritage in building and enhancing social capital. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2013, 3, 35–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, K.; Altenburg, K. Cultural Landscapes in Asia-Pacific: Potential for Filling World Heritage Gaps. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 2006, 12, 267–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Safiullin, L.N.; Gafurov, I.R.; Shaidullin, R.N.; Safiullin, N.Z. Socio-economic development of the region and its historical and cultural heritage. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 400–404. [Google Scholar]
- Hausmann, A. Cultural Tourism: Marketing Challenges and Opportunities for German Cultural Heritage. Int. J. Herit. Stud. 2007, 13, 170–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtorf, C. The Changing Contribution of Cultural Heritage to Society. Mus. Int. 2011, 63, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, S.; Chung, N.; Lee, W. Preserving the Culture of Jeju Haenyeo (Women Divers) as a Sustainable Tourism Resource. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Snowball, J.D.; Courtney, S. Cultural heritage routes in South Africa: Effective tools for heritage conservation and local economic development? Dev. S. Afr. 2010, 27, 563–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roders, A.A.P.; Van Oers, R. Bridging cultural heritage and sustainable development. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2011, 1, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ismagilova, G.; Safiullin, L.; Gafurov, I. Using Historical Heritage as a Factor in Tourism Development. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 188, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lak, A.; Gheitasi, M.; Timothy, D.J. Urban regeneration through heritage tourism: Cultural policies and strategic management. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2019, 18, 386–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hełpa-Liszkowska, K. Dziedzictwo kulturowe jako czynnik rozwoju lokalnego. Stud. Oeconomica Posnaniensia 2013, 1, 255. [Google Scholar]
- Santos, P.; Serna, S.P.; Stork, A.; Fellner, D. The Potential of 3D Internet in the Cultural Heritage Domain. In Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency XV; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; Volume 8355, pp. 1–17. ISBN 9783662446300. [Google Scholar]
- Remondino, F. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 1104–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cerra, D.; Plank, S.; Lysandrou, V.; Tian, J. Cultural Heritage Sites in Danger—Towards Automatic Damage Detection from Space. Remote Sens. 2016, 8, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Abankina, T. Regional development models using cultural heritage resources. Int. J. Cult. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2013, 7, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Günlü, E.; Pırnar, I.; Yağcı, K. Preserving cultural heritage and possible impacts on regional development: Case of İzmir. Int. J. Emerg. Transit. Econ. 2009, 2, 213–229. [Google Scholar]
- Lussetyowati, T. Preservation and Conservation through Cultural Heritage Tourism. Case Study: Musi Riverside Palembang. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 184, 401–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Megeirhi, H.A.; Woosnam, K.M.; Ribeiro, M.A.; Ramkissoone, H.R.; Denley, T.J. Employing a value-belief-norm framework to gauge Carthage residents’ intentions to support sustainable cultural heritage tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1351–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Hagla, K.S. Sustainable urban development in historical areas using the tourist trail approach: A case study of the Cultural Heritage and Urban Development (CHUD) project in Saida, Lebanon. Cities 2010, 27, 234–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buonincontri, P.; Marasco, A.; Ramkissoon, H. Visitors’ Experience, Place Attachment and Sustainable Behaviour at Cultural Heritage Sites: A Conceptual Framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lenzerini, F. Terrorism, Conflicts and the Responsibility to Protect Cultural Heritage. Int. Spect. 2016, 51, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzeion, B.; Levermann, A. Loss of cultural world heritage and currently inhabited places to sea-level rise. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, 034001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prus, B.; Wilkosz-Mamcarczyk, M.; Salata, T. Landmarks as Cultural Heritage Assets Affecting the Distribution of Settlements in Rural Areas—An Analysis Based on LIDAR DTM, Digital Photographs, and Historical Maps. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 1778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wójcik-Leń, J.; Leń, P.; Mika, M.; Kryszk, H.; Kotlarz, P. Studies regarding correct selection of statistical methods for the needs of increasing the efficiency of identification of land for consolidation—A case study in Poland. Land Use Policy 2019, 87, 104064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kościółek, M. Wykorzystanie analizy wielowymiarowej do badania zróżnicowania potencjału innowacyjnego Polski. Metod. Ilościowe Bad. Ekon. 2015, 16, 194–201. [Google Scholar]
- Król, K. Forgotten agritourism: Abandoned websites in the promotion of rural tourism in Poland. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2019, 10, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Śledzik, K. Wykorzystanie unitaryzacji zerowanej do analizy porównawczej przewagi konkurencyjnej spółek z sektora „High-Tech” i „Medium High-Tech”. Zarządzanie Finans. 2014, 2, 255–274. [Google Scholar]
- Gabryjończyk, K.; Gabryjończyk, P. Zróżnicowanie rozwoju sektora kultury w województwie świętokrzyskim. Tur. Rozw. Reg. 2020, 14, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walesiak, M. Problemy decyzyjne w procesie klasyfikacji zbioru obiektów. Pr. Nauk. Akad. Ekon. Wrocławiu 2004, 13, 52–71. [Google Scholar]
- Statistics Poland. Area and Population in the Territorial Profile in 2020; Standards and Registers Department: Warsaw, Poland, 2020; Available online: http://bit.ly/GUS-stat (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- NID—National Heritage Institute, National Heritage Board of Poland. Available online: https://mapy.zabytek.gov.pl/nid (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- CRFNP—Central Register Nature Protection Measures, General Directorate for Environmental Protection. Available online: http://crfop.gdos.gov.pl/CRFOP/search.jsf (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- MriRW—Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development. Available online: https://www.gov.pl/web/rolnictwo/lista-produktow-tradycyjnych12 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- PIPRL—Polish Chamber of Regional and Local Products (Polska Izba Produktu Regionalnego i Lokalnego). Available online: http://www.produktyregionalne.pl/jakosc.php?body=article&name=produkty-posiadajace-znak&lang=pl (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Local Data Bank, Central Statistical Office, Statistics Poland. Available online: https://bdl.stat.gov.pl (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- The Act of 16 April 2004 on the Nature Conservation (Ustawa z Dnia 16 Kwietnia 2004 r. o Ochronie Przyrody). 2020, Item 55, as Amended. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200000055 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- UNESCO. Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2003; Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- The Act of 23 July 2003 on the on the Protection and the Care of Monuments (Ustawa z Dnia 23 Lipca 2003 r. o Ochronie Zabytków i Opiece nad Zabytkami). 2021, Item 710, as Amended. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20031621568 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- The Act of 27 March 2003 on Spatial Planning and Development (Ustawa z Dnia 27 Marca 2003 r. o Planowaniu i Zagospo-Darowaniu Przestrzennym). 2021, Item 741, as Amended. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDu20030800717 (accessed on 8 June 2021).
- Król, K. Digital cultural heritage of rural tourism facilities in Poland. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2020. Unpublished work. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kukula, K.; Bogocz, D. Zero unitarisation method and its application in ranking research in agriculture. Econ. Reg. Stud. (Studia Ekonomiczne i Regionalne) 2014, 7, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
- Spiegel, M.R.; Stephens, L.J. Schaum’s Outline on Theory and Practice of Statistics, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Jajuga, K.; Walesiak, M. Standardisation of Data Set under Different Measurement Scales. In Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium; Decker, R., Gaul, W., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2000; pp. 105–112. [Google Scholar]
- Prus, B.; Król, K.; Gawroński, K.; Sankowski, E.; Hernik, J. From Classic (Analogue) to Digital Forms of Cultural Heritage Protection in Poland. In Digital Cultural Heritage; Kremers, H., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; pp. 255–278. [Google Scholar]
- Jenks, G.F. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr. 1967, 7, 186–190. [Google Scholar]
- Amit-Cohen, I.; Sofer, M. Cultural heritage and its economic potential in rural society: The case of the kibbutzim in Israel. Land Use Policy 2016, 57, 368–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebejer, J. Urban heritage and cultural tourism development: A case study of Valletta’s role in Malta’s tourism. J. Tour. Cult. Chang. 2019, 17, 306–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H.; Uysal, M.S. The effects of perceived authenticity, information search behaviour, motivation and destination imagery on cultural behavioural intentions of tourists. Curr. Issues Tour. 2011, 14, 537–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H. Authenticity, satisfaction, and place attachment: A conceptual framework for cultural tourism in African island economies. Dev. S. Afr. 2015, 32, 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKercher, B.; Ho, P.S. Assessing the tourism potential of smaller cultural and heritage attractions. J. Sustain. Tour. 2006, 14, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Egusquiza, A.; Zubiaga, M.; Gandini, A.; de Luca, C.; Tondelli, S. Systemic Innovation Areas for Heritage-Led Rural Regeneration: A Multilevel Repository of Best Practices. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Šťastná, M.; Vaishar, A.; Brychta, J.; Tuzová, K.; Zloch, J.; Stodolová, V. Cultural Tourism as a Driver of Rural Development. Case Study: Southern Moravia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krogmann, A.; Ivanič, P.; Kramáreková, H.; Petrikovičová, L.; Petrovič, F.; Grežo, H. Cultural Tourism in Nitra, Slovakia: Overview of Current and Future Trends. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perić, B.Š.; Šimundić, B.; Muštra, V.; Vugdelija, M. The Role of UNESCO Cultural Heritage and Cultural Sector in Tourism Development: The Case of EU Countries. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drabarczyk, K. Zrównoważony rozwój województw—Analiza porównawcza. Zesz. Nauk. Politech. Częstochowskiej Zarządzanie 2017, 25, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paluch, Ł.; Zuzek, D. Ocena poziomu rozwoju infrastruktury służącej kształtowaniu i ochronie środowiska w wo-jewództwach Polski. Stud. Ekon. 2017, 334, 120–130. [Google Scholar]
- Rogalska, E. Multiple-criteria analysis of regional entrepreneurship conditions in Poland. Equilib. Q. J. Econ. Econ. Policy 2018, 13, 707–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Variable Code | Description of Diagnostic Variable | Source of Data * |
---|---|---|
X1 | The number of objects on the UNESCO World Heritage List | NID |
X2 | The number of historic monuments | NID |
X3 | The number of immovable monuments | NID |
X4 | The number of archaeological monuments | NID |
X5 | The number of nature monuments | CRFNP |
X6 | The number of products on the List of Traditional Products | MRiRW |
X7 | The number of products with Protected Designation of Origin | MRiRW |
X8 | The number of products with Protected Geographical Indications | MRiRW |
X9 | The number of products registered as Traditional Speciality Guaranteed | MRiRW |
X10 | The number of products registered in the National Quality System—Quality Tradition | PIPRL |
X11 | The number of producers registered in the National Quality System—Quality Tradition | PIPRL |
X12 | The number of museums and their branches | BDL |
X13 | The number of cultural centres, community centres, clubs and similar institutions per ten thousand residents | BDL |
X14 | The number of public libraries per ten thousand residents | BDL |
X15 | The number of readers registered with public libraries (per year) | BDL |
X16 | The performing arts and exhibition index (residents per 1 seat in theatres and music venues) | BDL |
X17 | The performing arts and exhibition index—audience in theatres and music venues, visitors to museums and their branches, participants in events in cultural centres, community centres, and visitors to exhibitions per thousand residents | BDL |
X18 | Residents per 1 seat in permanent cinemas | BDL |
X19 | The number of mass gatherings—shows and plays | BDL |
X20 | Total revenues by public budgeting divisions—Culture and protection of national heritage | BDL |
X21 | Voivodeship spendings—Culture and protection of national heritage | BDL |
Diagnostic Variable | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sum of normalised values | 2.400 | 2.683 | 6.757 | 4.127 | 7.200 | 5.195 | 6.176 |
Per cent | 15.000 | 16.768 | 42.232 | 25.795 | 44.998 | 32.470 | 38.599 |
Diagnostic variable | X8 | X9 | X10 | X11 | X12 | X13 | X14 |
Sum of normalised values | 4.877 | 5.370 | 7.763 | 4.444 | 7.263 | 4.706 | 6.569 |
Per cent | 30.481 | 33.565 | 48.517 | 27.777 | 45.395 | 29.411 | 41.054 |
Diagnostic variable | X15 | X16 | X17 | X18 | X19 | X20 | X21 |
Sum of normalised values | 4.318 | 5.202 | 3.697 | 12.600 | 4.000 | 2.333 | 4.691 |
Per cent | 26.989 | 32.514 | 23.103 | 78.750 | 25.000 | 14.583 | 29.321 |
Rank | Voivodeship | Cultural Heritage Potential AI | Cultural Heritage Potential ST | Population * |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Małopolskie | 13.1713158 | 21.92000519 | 3,410,901 |
2 | Mazowieckie | 11.3112070 | 15.06676148 | 5,423,168 |
3 | Podkarpackie | 9.7895145 | 10.26446884 | 2,127,164 |
4 | Wielkopolskie | 9.1276507 | 7.699738633 | 3,498,733 |
5 | Dolnośląskie | 8.5641316 | 5.089155545 | 2,900,163 |
6 | Lubelskie | 7.3111501 | 1.179882265 | 2,108,270 |
7 | Pomorskie | 7.1667594 | −0.220268448 | 2,343,928 |
8 | Łódzkie | 6.4160522 | −1.933342186 | 2,454,779 |
9 | Śląskie | 5.9489512 | −4.736941736 | 4,517,635 |
10 | Kujawsko-Pomorskie | 5.3778104 | −6.019256378 | 2,072,373 |
11 | Zachodniopomorskie | 5.2231312 | −6.372984176 | 1,696,193 |
12 | Opolskie | 4.9199822 | −7.120963088 | 982,626 |
13 | Warmińsko-Mazurskie | 4.8485128 | −7.528951511 | 1,422,737 |
14 | Podlaskie | 4.7717880 | −7.720062789 | 1,178,353 |
15 | Świętokrzyskie | 4.3824129 | −9.055139431 | 1,233,961 |
16 | Lubuskie | 4.0409788 | −10.51210221 | 1,011,592 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Król, K. Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland. Sustainability 2021, 13, 6637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126637
Król K. Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland. Sustainability. 2021; 13(12):6637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126637
Chicago/Turabian StyleKról, Karol. 2021. "Assessment of the Cultural Heritage Potential in Poland" Sustainability 13, no. 12: 6637. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126637