Next Article in Journal
Review of Whole System Simulation Methodologies for Assessing Mobility as a Service (MaaS) as an Enabler for Sustainable Urban Mobility
Next Article in Special Issue
Determining Optimal Dry Port Location for Seaport Rijeka Using AHP Decision-Making Methodology
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainability Goals and Firm Behaviours: A Multi-Criteria Approach on Italian Agro-Food Sector
Article

The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development

1
Logistic Department, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia
2
Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
3
Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Tamás Bányai and Marc A. Rosen
Sustainability 2021, 13(10), 5590; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105590
Received: 15 April 2021 / Revised: 7 May 2021 / Accepted: 14 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dry Port Management and Sustainable Regional Development)
The development of intermodal transportation (IT) systems is of vital importance for the sustainability of logistics activities. The existing research point at individual directions of action for system improvement and increase of IT participation in overall transportation, thus reducing negative impacts of logistics on sustainability. However, there is a lack of research defining complex scenarios that unite existing ideas and concepts of IT system development and improvement. Accordingly, this article deals with the definition and selection of the most appropriate IT development scenario for the region of Southeastern Europe. Six different potential scenarios that differ in the network configuration, the required level of logistics infrastructure development, the role of different IT terminal categories, the involvement of different transportation modes, and goods flows’ transformation degree, are defined. The scenarios are analyzed according to four stakeholder groups and twelve defined criteria. A novel hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model, based on fuzzy Delphi, fuzzy Factor Relationship (FARE), and fuzzy Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) methods, is developed for solving the problem. The definition and analysis of the problem, the way of establishing the scenarios, as well as the development of a novel hybrid model are the main contributions of this article. A significant contribution is also the consideration of the Dry Port (DP) concept for the first time in the context of river ports. The results indicate that the scenario referring to the development of the IT core network with the Danube DP terminals is potentially the most appropriate scenario for the Southeastern Europe IT system. View Full-Text
Keywords: intermodal system; intermodal terminal; scenario; dry port; river port; southeastern Europe; MCDM; fuzzy Delphi; fuzzy FARE; fuzzy MARCOS intermodal system; intermodal terminal; scenario; dry port; river port; southeastern Europe; MCDM; fuzzy Delphi; fuzzy FARE; fuzzy MARCOS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Tadić, S.; Kovač, M.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105590

AMA Style

Tadić S, Kovač M, Krstić M, Roso V, Brnjac N. The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development. Sustainability. 2021; 13(10):5590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105590

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tadić, Snežana, Milovan Kovač, Mladen Krstić, Violeta Roso, and Nikolina Brnjac. 2021. "The Selection of Intermodal Transport System Scenarios in the Function of Southeastern Europe Regional Development" Sustainability 13, no. 10: 5590. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105590

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop