Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Accessibility Analysis of Urban Road-to-Freeway Interchanges Based on Navigation Map Paths
Next Article in Special Issue
Planning Strategy for the Reduction of Runoff Using Urban Green Space
Previous Article in Journal
Sound Water Masking to Match a Waterfront Soundscape with the Users’ Expectations: The Case Study of the Seafront in Naples, Italy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis of Flood Damage in the Seoul Metropolitan Government Using Climate Change Scenarios and Mitigation Technologies
Hypothesis

Transitions in Urban Waterfronts: Imagining, Contesting, and Sustaining the Aquatic/Terrestrial Interface

by 1 and 2,*
1
School of Urban Studies, University of Washington—Tacoma, Tacoma, WA 98402, USA
2
Department of Landscape Architecture, College of Built Environments, University of Washington—Seattle, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 366; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010366
Received: 30 October 2020 / Revised: 30 December 2020 / Accepted: 30 December 2020 / Published: 3 January 2021
Urban waterfronts represent hybrid locations of ecological, economic, and social zones of transition and dispersal, spatially reified between land and water. Yet, through advancements in technology and the emergence of globally linked economies, the structure and function of urban waterfronts as economic and industrial drivers is becoming increasingly complex. As cities seek to redevelop their waterfronts in response to these changes, recent research and scholarship has focused on understanding the ecological, social, and economic benefits derived from urban waterfronts. This research reveals that their benefits are unevenly distributed among local and regional populations as sites of accumulated inequity and inaccessibility that are generative for only a relatively small percentage of the people living in a metropolitan area. Set within this paradoxical nexus, this paper frames a call to scientists, planners, academics, and waterfront activists to expand urban waterfront research from an indicator and benefits model to incorporate three conceptual tools for better understanding key dimensions of waterfront reclamation within the context of green infrastructure research: urban hybridity, functional performance and hierarchies of access. We explore these key dimensions in relation to the waterfront redevelopment of Tacoma, Washington, USA. By acknowledging the hybridity of urban waterfronts, we illustrate that their relative performance and accessibility require ongoing empirical study and practical intervention. Our theoretical explorations plot some of the potential areas of investigation for examining the structural and functional transitions of urban waterfronts as critical locations for green infrastructure development for the 21st century. View Full-Text
Keywords: urban waterfronts; complexity; urban hybridity; functional performance; hierarchies of access urban waterfronts; complexity; urban hybridity; functional performance; hierarchies of access
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Taufen, A.; Yocom, K. Transitions in Urban Waterfronts: Imagining, Contesting, and Sustaining the Aquatic/Terrestrial Interface. Sustainability 2021, 13, 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010366

AMA Style

Taufen A, Yocom K. Transitions in Urban Waterfronts: Imagining, Contesting, and Sustaining the Aquatic/Terrestrial Interface. Sustainability. 2021; 13(1):366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010366

Chicago/Turabian Style

Taufen, Anne, and Ken Yocom. 2021. "Transitions in Urban Waterfronts: Imagining, Contesting, and Sustaining the Aquatic/Terrestrial Interface" Sustainability 13, no. 1: 366. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010366

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop