Next Article in Journal
Individual Green Certificates on Blockchain: A Simulation Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
E-Mentoring in Higher Education: A Structured Literature Review and Implications for Future Research
Previous Article in Journal
Reporting Sustainability in China: Evidence from the Global Powers of Luxury Goods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implementation of E-Proctoring in Online Teaching: A Study about Motivational Factors
Open AccessArticle

Dashboard for Evaluating the Quality of Open Learning Courses

1
Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito 170129, Ecuador
2
Smart Learning Research Group, University of Alicante, 03690 Alicante, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(9), 3941; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093941
Received: 3 April 2020 / Revised: 1 May 2020 / Accepted: 4 May 2020 / Published: 11 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Opportunities and Challenges for the Future of Open Education)
Universities are developing a large number of Open Learning projects that must be subject to quality evaluation. However, these projects have some special characteristics that make the usual quality models not respond to all their requirements. A fundamental part in a quality model is a visual representation of the results (a dashboard) that can facilitate decision making. In this paper, we propose a complete model for evaluating the quality of Open Learning courses and the design of a dashboard to represent its results. The quality model is hierarchical, with four levels of abstraction: components, elements, attributes and indicators. An interesting contribution is the definition of the standards in the form of fulfillment levels, that are easier to interpret and allow using a color code to build a heat map that serves as a dashboard. It is a regular nonagon, divided into sectors and concentric rings, in which each color intensity represents the fulfillment level reached by each abstraction level. The resulting diagram is a compact and visually powerful representation, which allows the identification of the strengths and weaknesses of the Open Learning course. A case study of an Ecuadorian university is also presented to complete the description and draw new conclusions. View Full-Text
Keywords: quality model; dashboard; fulfillment level; open learning; e-learning quality model; dashboard; fulfillment level; open learning; e-learning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mejía-Madrid, G.; Llorens-Largo, F.; Molina-Carmona, R. Dashboard for Evaluating the Quality of Open Learning Courses. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3941.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop