Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Geneva Convention [10] (1958—United Nations Geneva Convention on the Continental Shelf) is the first document relating to the removal of offshore installations. In particular, the Art. 5 of this convention states that “all abandoned or unused installations must be removed.” However, the Convention does not identify the parts of the infrastructure to be removed; it follows that, at least for the conduct, the Convention does not establish a strict obligation to remove.
- United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) [11], which aims to protect and preserve the marine environment as well as conserve and manage living marine resources. The article specifies that: “Every installation or structure that has been abandoned or disused must be removed to guarantee the safety of navigation, taking into account all the generally accepted international standards issued by the competent international organization in this regard. It is carried out with due regard to fishing, the protection of the marine environment, the rights and duties of other States. Adequate information must be provided in relation to the depth, positioning, and size of installations or structures not completely removed.”
- IMO Conventions (International Maritime Organization) [12], whose main objective is the promotion of cooperation between countries on navigation issues.
- London Convention on the Prevention of Pollution of the Seas Following Discharges [13] (1972): Explicitly regards the sale of offshore platforms at sea, even if only partially, contemplating a general ban on the discharge of any “waste or other materials in any form or condition except as otherwise specified”; it lists the specific substances and types of waste and the management methods;
- Oslo (1972) and Paris (1992) Conventions (OSPAR: Convention for the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping from Ships and Aircraft, signed in Oslo on 15 February 1972, succeeded by the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment of the North-East Atlantic, signed in Paris on 9 September 1992) [14], which adopted a document in 1998 related to the disposal of disused installations and how to implement the necessary measures to protect the north-east Atlantic against the adverse effects of human activities;
2. Mineral Accretion Technology
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.2. Hanstholm Experiment and Monitoring
3.3. Laboratory Experiment
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Field Experiments in the Hanstholm Harbor
4.2. Weight of the Mineral Deposition
4.3. Laboratory Experiments
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Leporini, M.; Marchetti, B.; Corvaro, F.; Polonara, F. Reconversion of offshore oil and gas platforms into renewable energy sites production: Assessment of different scenarios. Renew. Energy 2019, 135, 1121–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Truchon, S.P.; Brzuzy, L.P.; Fawcett, D.; Fonseca, M. Innovative assessments for selecting offshore-platform-decommissioning alternatives. Oil Gas. Facil. 2015, 4, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Techera, E.J.; Chandler, J. Offshore installations, decommissioning and artificial reefs: Do current legal frameworks best serve the marine environment? Mar. Policy 2015, 59, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elenco Delle Piattaforme Marine e Strutture Assimilabili—Ministero dello sviluppo economico DGS-UNMIG—Dati al 31 dicembre 2018—Aggiornamento del 15 marzo 2019. Available online: https://unmig.mise.gov.it/images/dati/piattaforme.pdf (accessed on 22 November 2019).
- Fowler, A.M.; Jørgensen, A.M.; Svendsen, J.C.; Macreadie, P.I.; Jones, D.O.; Boon, A.R.; Dahlgren, T.G. Environmental benefits of leaving offshore infrastructure in the ocean. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 16, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martins, I.D.; Moraes, F.F.; Távora, G.; Soares, H.L.F.; Infante, C.E.; Arruda, E.F.; Lourenço, M.I. A review of the multicriteria decision analysis applied to oil and gas decommissioning problems. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2019, 184, 105000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sommer, B.; Fowler, A.M.; Macreadie, P.I.; Palandro, D.A.; Aziz, A.C.; Booth, D.J. Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas structures—Environmental opportunities and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 658, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Day, M.D.; Gusmitta, A. Decommissioning of offshore oil and gas installations. In Environmental Technology in the Oil Industry; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 257–283. [Google Scholar]
- Macreadie, P.I.; Fowler, A.M.; Booth, D.J. Rigs-to-reefs: Will the deep sea benefit from artificial habitat? Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 455–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- State Parties/Signatories: Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949. In International Humanitarian Law; International Committee of the Red Cross: Geneva, Switzerland, 22 January 2007.
- Despagnet, F. Cours de Droit International Public, 3rd ed.; Larose et Tenin: Paris, France, 1905. [Google Scholar]
- International Maritime Organization. Available online: http://www.imo.org (accessed on 13 December 2019).
- London Convention; International Maritime Organization: London, UK, 30 September 2016.
- OSPAR Convention. Available online: https://www.ospar.org/convention (accessed on 15 January 2020).
- Tavoso, M.A. The Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution and Sustainable Development; MAP Technical Reports Series; UNEP: Nairobi, Kenya, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Jaron, A. Basle Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes. Gewasserschutz Wasser Abwasser 1995, 152, 12-1. [Google Scholar]
- Ehlers, P. The Baltic Sea area: Convention on the protection of the marine environment of the Baltic Sea area (Helsinki Convention) of 1974 and the revised convention of 1992. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1994, 29, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Energy Mare. Available online: http://www.energymare.eu (accessed on 15 January 2020).
- DTU Mechanical Engineering. Available online: https://www.mek.dtu.dk/english/research/feature_articles/mermaid. (accessed on 15 January 2020).
- Structural Design of Wave Energy Devices (SDWED) 2010–2014. Available online: https://www.civil.aau.dk/Project+websites/sdwed/ (accessed on 15 January 2020).
- ISMAR—Institute of Marine Sciences. Available online: http://www.ismar.cnr.it/projects/international-projects/copy11_of_project-001/theseus-project?set_language=en&cl=en (accessed on 20 January 2020).
- MUSES—Multi Use in European Seas. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/horizon-2020/projects/h2020-energy/blue-growth/muses. (accessed on 20 January 2020).
- Azzellino, A.; Lanfredi, C.; Contestabile, P.; Ferrante, V.; Vicinanza, D. Strategic environmental assessment to evaluate WEC projects in the perspective of the environmental cost-benefit analysis. In Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Maui, HI, USA, 19–24 June 2011; International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers: Mountain View, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Contestabile, P.; Lauro, E.D.; Galli, P.; Corselli, C.; Vicinanza, D. Offshore wind and wave energy assessment around Malè and Magoodhoo Island (Maldives). Sustainability 2017, 9, 613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gazzetta Ufficiale Della Repubblica Italiana. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2019/03/08/19A01522/sg (accessed on 18 November 2019).
- PlaCE. Available online: https://bluegrowth-place.eu/ (accessed on 10 January 2020).
- Goreau, T.; Prong, P. Biorock electric reefs grow back severely eroded beaches in months. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2017, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Strömberg, S.M.; Lundälv, T.; Goreau, T.J. Suitability of mineral accretion as a rehabilitation method for cold-water coral reefs. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2010, 395, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ersdal, G.; Hörnlund, E. Assessment of offshore structures for life extension. In Proceedings of the ASME 2008 27th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Estoril, Portugal, 15–20 June 2008; American Society of Mechanical Engineers: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 277–284. [Google Scholar]
- Hilbertz, W.H.; Goreau, T.J. Method of Enhancing the Growth of Aquatic Organisms, and Structures Created Thereby. U.S. Patent No. 5,543,034, 6 August 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Sabater, M.G.; Yap, H.T. Growth and survival of coral transplants with and without electrochemical deposition of CaCO3. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2002, 272, 131–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goreau, T.J. Marine Electrolysis for Building Materials and Environmental Restoration. In Electrolysis; InTech Publishing: Rijeka, Croatia, 2012; pp. 273–290. [Google Scholar]
- Calero, J.C.; Llorca, M.C.; Terradillos, P.G. Influence of different ways of chloride contamination on the efficiency of cathodic protection applied on structural reinforced concrete elements. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 793, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karoui, H.; Riffault, B.; Jeannin, M.; Kahoul, A.; Gil, O.; Amor, M.B.; Tlili, M.M. Electrochemical scaling of stainless steel in artificial seawater: Role of experimental conditions on CaCO3 and Mg(OH)2 formation. Desalination 2013, 311, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, T.; Neville, A.; Yuan, M. Assessing the effect of Mg2+ on CaCO3 scale formation–bulk precipitation and surface deposition. J. Cryst. Growth 2005, 275, 1341–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hilbertz, W. Electrodeposition of minerals in sea water: Experiments and applications. IEEE J. Ocean Eng. 1979, 4, 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Schuhmacher, H.; Van Treeck, P.; Eisinger, M.; Paster, M. Transplantation of coral fragments from ship groundings on electrochemically formed reef structures. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Coral Reef Symposium, Bali, Indian, 23–27 October 2000; Volume 2, pp. 983–990. [Google Scholar]
- Deslouis, C.; Falaras, P.; Gil, O.; Jeannin, M.; Maillot, V.; Tribollet, B. Influence of clay on calcareous deposit in natural and artificial sea water. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 3173–3180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morse, J.W.; Arvidson, R.S.; Lüttge, A. Calcium carbonate formation and dissolution. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 342–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Standard ASTM D1141; American Society for Testing and Materials: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1999; Volume 11.
- van Treeck, P.; Schuhmacher, H. Artificial reefs created by electrolysis and coral transplantation: An approach ensuring the compatibility of environmental protection and diving tourism. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 1999, 49, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margheritini, L.; Møldrup, P.; Jensen, R.L.; Frandsen, K.M.; Antonov, Y.I.; Kawamoto, K.; de Jonge, L.W.; Bjørgård, T.L.; Simoson, M.E.; Vaccarella, R. Coral Relief Materials: Comparative Physical-Chemical Properties of a Biorock, a High-Voltage Sea Deposit, and Coral Reef Samples. Submitt. Sci. Rep. 2020. [Google Scholar]
Ion | Concentration, g/kg | Percent Free Ion, % |
---|---|---|
Cl− | 19.353 | 100 |
Na+ | 10.784 | 98 |
Mg2+ | 1.284 | 89 |
SO42− | 2.712 | 38 |
Ca2+ | 0.412 | 89 |
K− | 0.399 | 98 |
HCO3− | 0.107 * | 79 |
ICP Elements | mg/L |
---|---|
Ca | 481.4 |
Mg | 1269 |
Na | 7252 |
K | 757.9 |
Sr | 6.2 |
Composition after 2 Weeks | Composition after 3 Months |
---|---|
Aragonite: 65.9 Brucite: 33.2% | Aragonite: 75.8% Brucite: 23.3% |
Calcite: 0.8% | Calcite: 0.8% |
FINE GRID | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Squared shaped, plates | ||||
Side 1 (cm) | Side 2 (cm) | Weight before (g) | Weight after (g) | Gain (g) |
9.5 | 10 | 13.25 | 27.97 | 14.72 |
Squared section, columns | ||||
10 | 13.5 | 26.41 | 12.91 |
WIDE GRID | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Squared shaped, plates | ||||
Side 1 (cm) | Side 2 (cm) | Weight before (g) | Weight after (g) | Gain (g) |
9.5 | 10 | 9.0 | 17.3 | 8.3 |
Round section, columns | ||||
9.5 | 3 | 8.5 | 20.43 | 11.93 |
BOX WITH SMALL STONES | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Squared shaped, plates | |||||
Side 1 (cm) | Side 2 (cm) | Side 3 (cm) | Weight before (g) | Weight after (g) | Gain (g) |
5.5 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 45.25 | 59.45 | 14.2 |
Run | Anode | Temperature (°C) | Constant Current (A) | Water | Material Weight (g) | Material Composition |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | DSA | 7 | 0.31 | ASTM | 3.9815 | A: 2.6% B: 97.3% C: 0.0% |
2 | DSA | 22 | 0.25 | ASTM | 2.6434 | A: 58.9% B: 40.9% C: 0.2% |
2N | DSA | 22 | 0.22 | ASTM | 2.7212 | A: 44.1% B: 55.9% C: 0.0% |
3 | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.25 | ESBJ | 3.7891 | A: 6.8% B: 93.2% C: 0.0% |
3N | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.22 | ESBJ | 2.5981 | A: 49.1% B: 50.8% C: 0.1% |
5 | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.31 | ASTM | 3.4643 | A: 28.8% B: 71.1% C: 0.0% |
5NY | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.31 | ASTM | 12.9968 | A: 0.2% B: 99.8% C: 0.0% |
7 | Pt-Ti | 7 | 0.25 | ASTM | 2.3055 | A: NA B: NA C: NA |
7N | Pt-Ti | 7 | 0.22 | ASTM | 2.0922 | A: 75.9% B: 24.1% C: 0.0% |
8 | DSA | 7 | 0.25 | ESBJ | 2.8110 | A: 35.7% B: 64.3% C: 0.0% |
8N | DSA | 7 | 0.22 | ESBJ | 1.9526 | A: 41.5% B: 58.3% C: 0.2% |
9 | Pt-Ti | 7 | 0.31 | ESBJ | 3.0697 | A: 30.0% B: 69.9% C: 0.0% |
10 | DSA | 7 | 0.31 | ESBJ | 2.6577 | A: 14.7% B: 85.3% C: 0.0% |
11 | DSA | 22 | 0.31 | ASTM | 9.8694 | A: 1.5% B: 98.5% C: 0.0% |
12 | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.31 | ESBJ | 3.4800 | A: 22.0% B: 78.0% C: 0.0% |
13 | DSA | 7 | 0.22 | ASTM | 0.9534 | A: 80.4% B: 19.5% C: 0.0% |
15 | DSA | 22 | 0.22 | ESBJ | 2.8917 | A: 21.3% B: 78.6% C: 0.1% |
20 | DSA | 22 | 0.31 | ESBJ | 8.0931 | A: 2.7% B: 97.2% C: 0.0% |
22 | Pt-Ti | 7 | 0.22 | ESBJ | 1.3819 | A: 81.0% B: 19.0% C: 0.0% |
26 | Pt-Ti | 22 | 0.22 | ASTM | 0.9650 | A: 99.4% B: 0.6% C: 0.0% |
32 | Pt-Ti | 7 | 0.31 | ASTM | 2.9358 | A: 36.0% B: 63.9% C: 0.0% |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Margheritini, L.; Colaleo, G.; Contestabile, P.; Bjørgård, T.L.; Simonsen, M.E.; Lanfredi, C.; Dell’Anno, A.; Vicinanza, D. Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093742
Margheritini L, Colaleo G, Contestabile P, Bjørgård TL, Simonsen ME, Lanfredi C, Dell’Anno A, Vicinanza D. Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology. Sustainability. 2020; 12(9):3742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093742
Chicago/Turabian StyleMargheritini, Lucia, Giuseppina Colaleo, Pasquale Contestabile, Trine Larsen Bjørgård, Morten Enggrob Simonsen, Caterina Lanfredi, Antonio Dell’Anno, and Diego Vicinanza. 2020. "Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology" Sustainability 12, no. 9: 3742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093742
APA StyleMargheritini, L., Colaleo, G., Contestabile, P., Bjørgård, T. L., Simonsen, M. E., Lanfredi, C., Dell’Anno, A., & Vicinanza, D. (2020). Development of an Eco-Sustainable Solution for the Second Life of Decommissioned Oil and Gas Platforms: The Mineral Accretion Technology. Sustainability, 12(9), 3742. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093742