Next Article in Journal
Moderating Effect of Political Embeddedness on the Relationship between Resources Base and Quality of CSR Disclosure in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Influence of Land Use/Land Cover on Surface-Water Quality of Santa Lucía River, Uruguay
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping the Sustainable Development Goals Relationships

On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

UniLaSalle, AGHYLE, 60000 Beauvais, France
Faculty of Earth Sciences and Technology, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research Education, Bali 84213, Indonesia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Deceased during peer-review.
Sustainability 2020, 12(8), 3360;
Received: 24 March 2020 / Revised: 11 April 2020 / Accepted: 15 April 2020 / Published: 21 April 2020
In recent years, the pace of the dissemination of scientific information has increased. In this context, the possibility and value of sharing open access (OA) online manuscripts in their preprint form seem to be growing in many scientific fields. More and more platforms are especially dedicated to free preprint publishing. They are published, non-peer-reviewed scholarly papers that typically precede publication in a peer-reviewed journal. They have been a part of science since at least the 1960s. In 1990, Tim Berners-Lee created the World Wide Web to help researchers share knowledge easily. A few months later, in August 1991, as a centralized web-based network, arXiv was created. arXiv is arguably the most influential preprint platform and has supported the fields of physics, mathematics and computer science for over 30 years. Since, preprint platforms have become popular in many disciplines (e.g., bioRxiv for biological sciences) due to the increasing drive towards OA publishing, and can be publisher- or community-driven, profit or not for profit, and based on proprietary or free and open source software. A range of discipline-specific or cross-domain platforms now exist, with exponential growth these last five years. While preprints as a whole still represent only a small proportion of scholarly publishing, a strong community of early adopters is already beginning to experiment with such value-enhancing tools in many more disciplines than before. The two main options for geochemists are EarthArXiv and ESSOAr. A “one size fits all” model for preprints would never work across the entire scientific community. The geochemistry community needs to develop and sustain their own model. View Full-Text
Keywords: e-print; preprint; pre-print; open access; scholarly communication e-print; preprint; pre-print; open access; scholarly communication
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pourret, O.; Irawan, D.E.; Tennant, J.P. On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3360.

AMA Style

Pourret O, Irawan DE, Tennant JP. On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3360.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pourret, Olivier, Dasapta E. Irawan, and Jonathan P. Tennant. 2020. "On the Potential of Preprints in Geochemistry: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly" Sustainability 12, no. 8: 3360.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop