Next Article in Journal
The Influence of Hallyu on Africans’ Perceptions of Korea: The Moderating Role of Service Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Reinterpreting Sustainable Architecture: What Does It Mean Syntactically?
Previous Article in Journal
Designing Assistive Devices for Sacred Palanquin Carriers: A Glocalization Community Design
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design Elements in Apartments for Adapting to Climate: A Comparison between Korea and Singapore

Department of Housing and Interior Design, Kyung Hee University, Seoul 02447, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(8), 3244; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083244
Submission received: 2 March 2020 / Revised: 4 April 2020 / Accepted: 13 April 2020 / Published: 16 April 2020

Abstract

:
Currently, almost 80% and 50% of Singapore’s and Korea’s residents, respectively, live in apartments. Despite their earlier unfamiliarity with apartments compared with traditional housing, they have accepted apartments for the convenience they offer and as a symbol of modernity. However, the climatic conditions of these countries are extremely different. Hence, this study first examined the critical regionalism that should be considered from the environmental context, such as the geography, climate, and topography, when building apartments. Reviewing the transformation process of apartments, we can determine the types of design elements and principles developed under different climatic conditions. The representative unit plans from 1960 to 2010 were collected for analysis from Singapore’s Housing and Development Board and the private sector in Korea. The analysis revealed that Singapore’s apartments have evolved to facilitate natural ventilation. Irregular unit forms, an atrium, and the location of the utility space are unique elements. The atrium-type apartment can be considered the most regionalized design. Conversely, in Korea, the focus is on heat gain and cross-ventilation, resulting in simple square-form units oriented toward the south and double enveloped by additional windows. The staircase-type apartment predominates. Thus, this study shows that apartments evolved differently in each country, resulting in unique regionalized forms primarily determined by climatic conditions.

1. Introduction

Scholars widely accept that the form of a house can be considered a product of the regional culture [1,2]. A vernacular house is designed and built by the people who live in them to meet their specific needs, and therefore, accommodates their social values, religion, economy, and way of life. Since the basic role of housing is to provide shelter, these houses are connected to nature. They are built using local and natural materials, are adapted to the climate, and have a distinct identity. However, the rapid industrialization and urbanization in Asian metropolitan cities have destroyed indigenous houses, and apartments, a house form imported from Western countries has replaced them as the representative housing typology. Apartments were designed for mass supply in the most economical way, as simple concrete boxes. One criticism is that after the introduction of the apartment, houses worldwide lost their identity and became homogeneous.
Kenneth Frampton [3] emphasizes the critical regionalism that buildings should be in harmony with the environmental context, such as geography, climate, and topography. Their design does not involve directly copying vernacular architecture, but rather, combining modernism and traditional designs [4]. Since the 1980s, famous architects from Singapore and Malaysia have addressed the challenges of the tropical climate and, inspired by the environment, have successfully adopted sustainable technologies and created a sense of cohesive identity that transcends ethnicity and culture [5]. Unfortunately, their interest has been focused on monumental projects, and they have not given serious attention to apartments for the general public built by local companies. The style of apartments initially imported into Asian metropolitan cities was a simple, concrete, dormitory-style house. However, apartments are currently the most popular house type following a series of subtle adaptations during the past 60 years to meet the local people’s needs. Although these apartments did not attract attention from famous architects and academic scholars, conscious efforts were made to meet the changing needs and requirements of the time. The essence of knowledge gained from vernacular houses was harmoniously incorporated during this transformation. Based on this aspect, the apartment can be defined as the modern vernacular house.
As regards apartments, Singapore and Korea are similar in that the concept of apartments was imported into both countries in the same period, and then, apartments were supplied in large numbers to solve the prevalent housing shortages. Currently, almost 80% of people in Singapore and more than 50% of those in Korea live in an apartment. However, the climatic conditions of these countries differ widely. Hence, this study is based on the idea that a comparison of the transformation process of apartments in Singapore and Korea will reveal the way they were built in response to the climate and the differences in the types of design elements and principles developed under the different climatic conditions.
To comprehend the diverse nature of the house, it cannot be approached from a one-dimensional perspective and should be approached by adopting a multidisciplinary approach, such as from the climatic and sociocultural perspectives [1,2]. Many multidisciplinary factors have influenced the development of modern apartments, such as government policies, regulations, and construction costs, which cannot be excluded from such considerations. Nevertheless, this study focuses on the relationship between the house and the climate to examine the ways in which the climatic condition influenced the evolution of a new form of housing, and as a result, the manner in which the apartment was transformed in each county in adapting to the local climate. Through examining this transformation process, we can extract design elements and principles that were invented and transformed or continued from the vernacular house that is still sustained despite the rapid technological developments and the extensive sociocultural changes. In addition, this study suggests future directions for the sustainable development of housing in Asian metropolitan cities.

2. Research Method and Limitation

In this study, we use a qualitative approach based on case studies. We chose six cases from each country according to the period, which ranged from the 1960s to the 2010s. The sizes of units for Singapore were as follows: 2BR units, 60 m2; 3BR units, 82–138 m2; and 4BR units, 137 m2. The sizes of units for Korea were as follows: 2BR units, 45 m2; 3BR units, 84–85 m2; and 4BR units, 75 m2 (see Table 1).
The selection of cases is important because the cases should represent the typical unit plans for the period, and not be special cases. The cases for Singapore were selected from Teoalida’s [6] website (Teoalida has constructed and operated this website since 2009. It provides collected information and publications about the HDB history, photos, statistics, and floor plans. This site is widely cited by researchers.) and the cases for Korea were selected from representative studies [7,8] on apartments (Many studies have examined the history of apartments in Korea. For this study, we selected cases from studies by Choi and Jihn [7] and the Korea Institute of Construction Technology [8].). We analyzed the cases from the perspectives of site plans, block plans, unit plans, and façade designs. We applied a qualitative approach to each topic in a comparative analysis to determine the most pertinent elements and principles, rather than a quantitative approach.
This study focuses on architectural design, not environmental science. A scientific quantitative approach is effective in demonstrating the climatic effects of design elements. However, this study aims to understand the conceptual ideas underlying the architectural design, such as space layout, space division, and design elements, rather than show how the design elements work to control climate.

3. Understanding of Singapore and Korea

3.1. The Climate and Vernacular Housing

The climate of Singapore is hot and humid throughout the year, and the average temperature ranges from 26 to 30 °C. It has only two seasons: The wet and dry seasons. By contrast, Korea has four distinct seasons per year and an extreme temperature gap since the temperature ranges between minus 7 °C and 30 °C. Summers in Korea are very humid and hot, and winters are very dry and cold (see Figure 1).
The vernacular houses of Singapore originated from the Malay house, a timber house raised on piles. Many clever ideas were implemented to ensure a pleasant, safe living environment. The most important one is the attempt to maximize ventilation throughout the house. The lifted floor on piles allows cool air to pass beneath the floor. Windows are designed as open to facilitate cross-ventilation. The double-layered high gable roofs with an opening on top have distinct advantages in extracting heated air even when it is raining [11] (see Figure 2a).
In Korea, the houses must be built to manage the extreme temperature gap between summer and winter. A duality is found in the architectural designs of houses in Korea [12] (p. 11), that is, two different design elements coexist in the Korean vernacular house: “Ondol”, which is a heated floor for winters, and “maru,” which is a wooden floor lifted from the ground for summers. Although the national land area is small, different types of houses have been developed in each region. In the houses located in the north (the cold region), the rooms have double layers without an open space (maru) and a simple square form to retain heat. In the houses located in the south (the warm region), the rooms are aligned in a row and the maru is located in the middle. This open design is more advantageous for cross-ventilation (see Figure 2b).

3.2. The Short History of Apartments

Singapore is the first country in Southeast Asia to popularize the apartment, and 80% of its population stays in the Housing Development Board (HDB) apartments supplied by the public sector. Singapore’s housing supply rate rose from 9% in 1960 to 90% in 1990, which is a short period, and provided the foundation for the stable growth of the country. HDB has provided standard unit plans for mass supply. The standard plans were upgraded periodically, but they were too monotonous to meet residents’ diverse lifestyles when compared with private condominiums. Since the 1990s, HDB has turned its attention to providing quality housing. It offers a wider choice of housing, ranging from executive condominiums and housing cooperatives to new flat designs. A formal upgrading program has resulted in a complete change in perceptions regarding HDB housing [13].
In Korea, the apartment was introduced after the Korean War to solve the problem of a mass shortage of housing supply. The supply was led by the private sector, which is different from the case of Singapore. When apartments were first introduced, people avoided them owing to their unattractive, uniform shapes and the unfamiliar lifestyle they offered. However, through a transformation process to adapt the apartment to the Korean lifestyle, it was recognized as a representative middle-class house.
In both countries, apartments were supplied to solve the urgent housing shortage problem after the countries made a new start in the 1960s. Despite its lack of similarity with the traditional housing culture in the early period of its adoption, the apartment has been accepted by people as a home that offers convenience and is a social symbol of modernity.

4. Results: Site Plan, Block Plan, and Unit Plan

4.1. Site Plan

Since ancient times, Koreans have believed that feng shui is based on principles of nature governing the spiritual forces that operate the land as well as the underground area. Hence, the location and direction of a house were decided based on feng shui. They believe that feng shui is not only a philosophy but is also scientific knowledge. It offered them the wisdom to adjust to the local climate and geography to receive and avoid sunlight and take advantage of seasonal winds of the region. A strong belief based on feng shui was that the house should be oriented toward the south.
This strong desire for a south orientation was continued in selecting an apartment. When apartments began to be built in Korea, it was difficult to sell them if this requirement could not be met. Therefore, apartment blocks were designed as long buildings, stretching from the east to the west, to ensure that as many units as possible faced southward. Consequently, the blocks were placed in parallel, similar to military barracks. In this layout, the living rooms and bedrooms almost exclusively faced the south. In the tower-type apartments built later, the orientation of units could be varied owing to the layout. Despite this layout, the tendency to orient units toward the south prevails.
In Singapore, the orientation of blocks and the position of the courtyard and balconies were carefully considered to respond to climatic conditions [14], but apartments were not oriented toward one direction, unlike in Korea (Figure 3). As regards the site plan, most early Singapore apartments were arranged with the inner courtyard surrounded by long blocks of buildings. In this case, regardless of the orientation of the sun, the kitchen or bathroom faced the inner courtyard, whereas the public corridors faced the outside of the courtyard.

4.2. Block Designs

In both countries, the blocks of early apartments had a long corridor-type design, which was an economical way to secure high density. In Singapore, this type was transformed into the atrium type, which has been generalized since the 2000s for increasing the density. The atrium-type block means that two linear corridor-type buildings are attached back to back, and building cores, such as staircases, elevators, and the atrium, are located in between the two buildings. In this case, service spaces, such as the kitchen and the bathroom of each unit, are located around the inner atrium and are not exposed to the outside of the building. The mixture-type block plan, which appeared later, is a more advanced version of the atrium type for a building that has less density. The building is fragmented into a couple of units. The atrium is bigger and is open to the outside and thus receives more daylight and air than in the other building types.
In Korea, the long corridor type was first transformed into the staircase type and later to the tower type. The staircase-type block plan is unique to Korea. As explained in Section 4.1, Koreans desire south-oriented houses, and therefore, a long corridor-type design should be a solution, but this type is weak as regards the aspect of ensuring the privacy of units. In the staircase type, only two units share their cores and the two sides (front and back) of a unit face the outside directly. Therefore, the privacy of units is not an issue and they have increased cross-ventilation as well as a better view from both sides.
During this transformation process, the forms of unit plans within blocks were changed from narrow and deep to wider and shallow. This phenomenon can be explained as an attempt to improve the quality of the residential environment of units, such as the ventilation, the view, and access to sunlight.
In the transformation process of the block plans in Singapore, the service spaces (the kitchen and bathrooms) were consistently arranged to receive fresh air from outside and to be hidden from the façade of the buildings. However, in Korea, the rules related to the south-facing unit were maintained regardless of the block type (see Table 2 and Figure 4)

4.3. Unit Plans

4.3.1. Living Room

In Singapore’s early apartments, the living rooms were located near the entrance (back) and the service areas, such as the kitchen and the toilet, were located far away from the entrance and faced the outside (front). In this case, the temperature of the living room can be effectively reduced by blocking the sunlight, but the privacy and view of the living room are sacrificed. This layout helps to release odors and moisture in narrow, long units. This layout is unique to Singapore, and our analysis reveals that it maximizes the natural ventilation of service spaces in the hot, humid climate.
Recently, the forms of units in Singapore have been widened horizontally, and the positions of the kitchen and living room have been reversed. That is, the living room is placed in the front and the kitchen at the back near the entrance, following contemporary high-end styles that prioritize providing the best possible view from the living room. This change is driven by technological developments, such as super-high-rise building construction and mechanical ventilation (see Table 3 and Figure 5a).
In Korea, ensuring that buildings had the south-facing, wide, and shallow shape and the “two-side open unit” design that allows cross-ventilation was the rule that had to be observed throughout the study period, regardless of the block type. This rule produces a unit that has a long surface, which increases the sunlight entering the unit, secures a good view, and ensures cross-ventilation such that air passes from the front of the unit to the back (see Table 3 and Figure 5b).

4.3.2. Kitchens

In early apartment units in Singapore, kitchens were located at the front, facing the outside, and separated by a wall from the living room. This closed kitchen was dominant throughout the period. The closed kitchen is beneficial to prevent the spread of heat and moisture from the kitchen. This layout is also linked to the traditional culture (see Table 3 and Figure 6a).
In traditional Malay houses, a hierarchical division of space occurs between public and private spaces. People can enter the house from the public space (anjung, serambi) to the private space (rumah ibu, dapur) (The anjung, a covered porch where guests are greeted, social interaction takes place, and family members relax, constitutes public space. The serambi, where male guests are entertained and social and religious functions take place, is also regarded as public space. Conversely, the most private space in the house is the rumah ibu, where family members sleep, pray, and do household tasks and other daily activities. Located at the back of the house, the dapur, or kitchen, is the private space for females. The selang, which links the rumah ibu to the dapur, is considered semi-private space.). Visitors are not allowed to enter the private space unless they are family members or female guests. The kitchen (dapur) was regarded as a dirty space owing to anthropomorphism (Anthropomorphism is one of the key concepts commonly embodied in the traditional Malay houses. It is believed that the form and order of traditional houses are based on those of the human body. The houses can be divided vertically into three sections that resemble the anatomy of the human body: Roof (head), habitable space (torso), and piles (legs). The association between the house and human body also exists horizontally, with the serambi in the front of the house representing the face, and the dapur—the kitchen located to the back of the house—representing the anus. The practice of throwing away daily refuse, such as food scraps, through the back of the kitchen has been likened to the act of defecation [17].). This tradition explains why the kitchen and bathroom are located as far as possible from the entrance.
Further, in Singapore, until recently, hiring maids was a common practice. The social segregation between the owner and the maid meant that the latter’s space was separated from the main space in independent houses, and this idea was also implied in a modern apartment unit. Moreover, a recent trend is to divide dry and wet kitchens in large-sized condominiums. With this trend, closed kitchens are gradually being changed to an open kitchen, and the kitchen is recognized as a living space instead of as a utility space.
By contrast, in Korea, the location of the kitchen is not fixed. It can be located at the back or in the middle of a unit, but an open kitchen is dominant. Except the very early period, the kitchen is regarded as a living space for the family and connects the dining and living rooms. The issues related to the ventilation of the kitchen can be solved thanks to the two-side open layout and mechanical ventilation (see Table 3 and Figure 6b).

4.3.3. Bathroom

In the early Singapore apartment, the bathroom can be approached through the kitchen, which is a very unique layout, hardly found in other countries. The kitchen and bathroom are designed as one service zone and divided into a separate space from the other spaces of the unit. The design can be understood to be based on the same reasons, namely, to prevent the spread of moisture occurring in the kitchen, to comply with the anthropomorphism culture and to maintain the order found in traditional houses (see Table 3 and Figure 7a).
In Korea, the bathrooms are usually in the middle of a unit and do not have windows. During the winter, it is too cold to wash in a bathroom with a window even when heating was installed there. Therefore, a bathroom without windows and placed in the middle of the unit was favored for thermal insulation. In these circumstances, the ventilation of the bathroom relies on advanced mechanical systems (see Table 3 and Figure 7b).

5. Results: Façade Design

5.1. The Surface of Units

The surface of the Singapore apartment’s unit has many irregularities, and hence, the total length of the surface is large. These irregularities became more complex over time. This uneven form is advantageous for heat dissipation and air circulation (see Table 4 and Figure 8a). Conversely, Korea’s apartments have a comparatively simple square form, which facilitates heat preservation. The short length of the surface helps to increase insulation performance and reduce construction costs and defects (see Table 4 and Figure 8b).

5.2. Window Design

Most of the windows in Singapore apartments are single-layer, large casement windows, whereas in Korea, the apartments mostly have double-layer windows. Since the number of floors has increased to more than 30 recently, the curtain wall system of windows or system window is used in both countries. Even in the curtain wall system, residents in Korea install additional windows for thermal insulation (see Table 4).
Securing natural ventilation through windows has been common in both countries. However, because of serious air pollution and the emergence of super-high-rise apartments, windows are rarely opened. Moreover, as the popularity of the curtain wall system increased, the operation of air conditioners became more common due to the increase in cooling loads (see Table 4 and Figure 9).

5.3. Main Entrance

Most Asians take off their shoes when they enter a house. A transitional space is provided between the public corridor and the living space to take off shoes in buildings in Korea, unlike in Singapore. Singapore houses do not have a designated space called an entrance. Shoes are often placed in the public corridor. However, in some HDB apartments and condominiums, a transitional space emerged where residents remove their shoes and store them. An iron grille door is installed to protect the house from trespassers when the main entrance door is open for natural ventilation (see Table 4 and Figure 10a).
By contrast, apartments in Korea have a designated entrance space where people remove their shoes and store them, and the floor level of an entrance is lower than the level of a living room for clear distinction of in and out. In some cases, a sliding door is installed between the entrance and living room for retaining the heating energy in winter and for sound insulation (see Table 4 and Figure 10b).

5.4. Balcony, Yard, and Public Corridor

Singapore’s apartments have open balconies in front of living rooms, which are deep enough for outdoor activity. They create shade and act as an outdoor space for the residents. Korea’s balconies are shallow in terms of depth and long, and they often cover the entire surface of a unit. In the early period, the balconies were substitutes for the outdoor space of landed houses, that was used for purposes such as drying clothes and storing traditional preserved food. The balconies provide shade in summer and an air layer in winter. Nowadays, balconies are mostly renovated into an indoor space to expand the house area, but still retain heat effectively owing to the improved performance of current window systems.
A yard means a service space that is a unique space found in Asian apartments for washing and drying clothes and for extra storage and is connected with the kitchen. In Singapore, it is obligatory to expose a yard to the outdoors. In Korea, a yard is usually called a back balcony or utility space and is covered by additional windows. It is used as an additional indoor utility space for cooking food that emits strong smells and for installing a washer and dryer and an extra refrigerator for kimchi.
In a public corridor in Singapore, no windows are installed, and they are exposed to the open air. By contrast, in Korea, the public corridor was covered by a window and was designed as an indoor space (see Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13 for illustrations of these design elements and Table 4 for an analysis of the façade design).

6. Comparison: Design Elements Adapted to Climate

Through the analysis, the design elements and principles that have been developed to adapt to the climate in Korea and in Singapore are summarized as follows.

6.1. Singapore

In Singapore’s apartments, the orientation of buildings and rooms is not important. In the early period, the kitchen and the bathroom were located at the front in direct contact with the external environment for natural ventilation. The living room faced a public corridor, thus sacrificing privacy and daylight. This layout is effective in lowering the room temperature and blocking humidity, and it reflects the traditional spatial order of entrance–public space–private space.
The atrium-type block plan, which appeared in the 2000s, can be considered a well-regionalized plan to adapt to a tropical climate and a traditional culture, uniquely found in Singapore and Malaysia. Around the atrium are located the kitchen, bathroom, and yard of each unit. As the height of the building increases, the stack effect increases because of the substantial temperature differences, which enhances the ventilation of the utility space. In this block plan, the location of the kitchen and the living room in the previous HDB unit were reversed, and thus, the living room gained the view and the privacy that the kitchen used to have.
Thus, this change transformed the unit plans. The location of the living room moved from the back to the front, the location of the kitchen and the bathroom moved from the front to the back. The kitchen was changed from a closed space to open to the living room. In addition, the simple rectangular shape of a unit became more irregular with a long surface, allowing almost every room to be in contact with outside air. The primary issue in designing the apartment unit during this transformation in Singapore was to maximize the natural ventilation to match that available in vernacular houses.

6.2. Korea

Orientating as many units and rooms as possible to the south is a critical mission for successful marketing because people strongly prefer a south-oriented house. This belief originated from feng shui, but it can be explained as a way to receive more heat during winter and block the sunlight during summer. In early apartments, the buildings were located in parallel to allow the maximum number of units to face the south. Koreans love cross-ventilation, a strong wind penetrating the two opposite sides of a house during the summer. In early corridor-type buildings, this design caused privacy and security problems. To solve this issue, the building was changed from a corridor type to a staircase type.
With this change, the form of units changed from narrow and deep to wide and shallow. The wide and shallow unit form was advantageous in that it allowed locating more rooms to have south orientation and cross-ventilation. Moreover, it was possible to surround the surface of the unit with long balconies, where balconies served as a double envelope and a greenhouse. After giving priority to locating rooms in the south, the other spaces, such as the kitchen and the bathroom, had to be located at the back or in the center of a unit. In comparison with Singapore, the location of the kitchen is flexible. However, a preference developed for locating the bathroom in the center of the unit. It did not have windows so that the room temperature could be maintained. Thus, to Koreans, the thermal condition of the bathroom is more important than ventilation.
Summarizing the above discussion, the staircase-type block plan is a well-regionalized plan to adapt to a local climate and the traditional culture, uniquely found in Korea. Although it was criticized because of its uniform façade and inefficiency in elevator sharing, it was customized to satisfy the housing needs of Koreans. It can be concluded that the invention of new design elements in apartments in Korea focused on ensuring thermal preservation for winter and cross-ventilation for summer.

7. Conclusions

Singapore and Korea, with very different climates, imported the concept of the apartment from the West. The apartment was a new prototype of housing, in a similar era, but evolved in different ways in each country, resulting in unique regionalized forms.
This study hypothesized that the prime determinant of these unique forms is the climate. Through the analysis of this study, we showed that this hypothesis is true and explained the major design elements that have been developed to adapt to local climate in the process of evolution of apartment design in the study period.
As regards the aspect of the site plan, the south orientation is critical to capture solar heat in Korea, while orientation is not important in Singapore. In terms of shape, units have become wider in both countries with the progression of the study period. However, those in Singapore have become more irregular to facilitate the dissipation of heat from the inside, while those in Korea have kept simple square forms as it is easier to seal a building with additional windows (double-layer windows) to keep the heat inside.
The block plan of the two countries has evolved in opposite directions. In Singapore, the block plan has changed to facilitate more natural ventilation in public corridors. The airwell (atrium) concept of the early urban shophouse has been modified and adopted as a climatic control device in tropical cities. This atrium block plan can be widely applied, and many variations are found in high-density residential projects in other metropolitan areas with similar climatic conditions. The staircase block plan is uniquely found in Korea, and even though the density of units cannot be maximized with this type, it is preferred because it provides natural cooling in summer and captures solar energy in winter. Despite these advantages, the staircase block plan is not readily applied to other countries because the design is complicatedly intertwined with local housing policy, regulations, construction cost, and diverse sociocultural factors.
The unit plan in the two countries has also changed during the study period. Up to the 1970s, the kitchen was located at the front of the unit in Singapore, which is generally opposite to other countries, as ventilation of the kitchen was more important than that of the living room at that time. Since the 1980s, the location of the kitchen has been reversed, although ventilation is still carefully considered, with the kitchen essentially communicating with an open yard. In Korea, there have been trials to determine the optimal location for the bathroom in the unit. For ventilation and good natural light, it is advantageous to locate the bathroom at the front or back of the unit, but this makes it difficult to maintain a comfortable temperature during winter even if a heating system is installed in the bathroom. Therefore, the bathroom is generally located in the middle of the unit, without windows.
Following the active construction of super-high-rise apartments in both countries, universal techniques, such as air conditioning and the curtain wall construction system, have been widely applied. As a result, the internal space of buildings has become sealed and separated from the external space, which is in contrast to the sustainable design strategy that we discussed. With this thermal modernity [18], trials for innovation of new devices for adapting to the local climate are no longer considered necessary, and the apartments of Korea and Singapore tend to be similar with the acceptance and adoption of these universal techniques and an international lifestyle.
Despite this global trend, the housing culture of each country does not change easily, tending to retain its identity and continue as before. As a basic human need, people feel comfortable in the natural thermal environment. To meet these needs, new thermodynamic projects have emerged to break the “sealed” indoor space by forming an innovative climatic relationship between the internal and the external spaces [19]. For a sustainable future, it is important to provide a home with a naturally comfortable environment to the maximum extent possible, instead of blindly relying on technology, applying the lessons from this study.
It is not easy to comprehend the diverse nature of the apartment, but this study provides a new perspective that the design elements and principles that have evolved during the last 60 years in each country are the products that people have searched for to improve quality of life by ecological methods, and not the result of adopting popular changes in architectural design styles.
It is anticipated that the findings of this study may serve as guidelines for forthcoming global residential projects. Although the designs revealed in this study may not be directly applicable to these projects, they may be suitable to be modified for the regional context and serve as a springboard for people to realize their own identity of home. For this purpose, the research on and the applications of environmental knowledge from the vernacular architecture should be continued in diverse ways, and a careful analysis of local people’s needs should be included in designing homes.

Author Contributions

J.E.O. composed this study, designed the evaluation framework, completed analysis and visualization. S.R.J. provided her supervision of all the research process and substantially contributed to the methodological design and critical analysis. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B2010247).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rapoport, A. House Form and Culture. Prentice-Hall, Inc.: Englewood Cliff, NJ, USA, 1969. [Google Scholar]
  2. Oliver, P. Built to Meet Needs: Cultural Issues in Vernacular Houses; Architectural Press: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  3. Frampton, K. Ten points on an architecture of regionalism: A provisional polemic. In Architectural Regionalism: Collected Writings on Place, Identity, Modernity, and Tradition; Canizaro, V.B., Ed.; Princeton Architectural Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 375–385. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lefaivre, L.; Tzonis, A. Critical Regionalism: Architecture and Identity in a Globalized World; Prestel: Munich, Germany, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang, J.-H. Tropical Variants of Sustainable Architecture: A Postcolonial Perspective. In The SAGE Handbook of Architecture Theory; Crysler, C.G., Cairns, S., Heynen, H., Eds.; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA; London, UK; New Delhi, India; Singapore; Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 602–625. [Google Scholar]
  6. Teolida. HDB History and Floor Plan Evolution 1930s–2010s. Available online: http://www.teoalida.com/ (accessed on 2 March 2019).
  7. Choi, K.J.; Jihn, J. A study on the change of the apartment unit plan in national housing: Focused on institutional and social changes. J. Korean Hous. Assoc. 2015, 26, 123–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Korea Institute of Construction Technology. User-oriented design and housing supply system for better living quality in apartment housing: Suggestion of housing type and improved housing supply system. Korea Inst. Constr. Technol. 1996, 96, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  9. Weather in Singapore. Available online: http://www.climateandweather.com/weather-in-singapore (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  10. City Overview. Available online: http://english.seoul.go.kr/get-to-know-us/seoul-views/meaning-of-seoul/3-climate/ (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  11. Lim, J.Y. The Malay House: Rediscovering Malaysia’ Indigenous Shelter System; Institut Masyarakat: Penang, Malaysia, 1991. [Google Scholar]
  12. Choi, J.-S.; Chun, J.-H.; Hong, H.-O.; Kang, S.-J.; Kim, D.-N.; Min, C.-H.; Oh, H.-K.; Park, Y.-S.; Suh, J.-S. Hanoak: Traditional Korean Homes; Hollym Corp.: Seoul, Korea, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  13. Eng, T.S.; Kong, L. Public housing in Singapore: Interpreting “quality” in the 1990s. Urban Stud. 1997, 34, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Widodo, J. Sustainability lesson from Southeast Asia: Singapore Experience. Int. J. Livable Space 2016, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Singapore Statutes Online, Housing and Development Act (Chapter 129), Housing and Development (Precincts for Upgrading Works) (Home Improvement Programme) (NO. 8) ORDER 2016. Available online: https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/HDA1959-S505-2016?DocDate=20161014&ProvIds=legis#legis (accessed on 10 December 2019).
  16. Lee, S.H. Transformation of spatial distribution of commercial facilities in apartment complexes in Seoul between the late 1960s and the early 1980s. J. Korean Hous. Assoc. 2018, 29, 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  17. Ariffin, S.I. Order in Traditional Malay House Form. Ph.D. Thesis, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  18. Chang, J.-H.; Winter, T. Thermal modernity and architecture. J. Arch. 2015, 20, 92–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Walliss, J. Thermodynamic Typologies: Lesson from Singapore. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances on Sustainable Cities and Buildings Development, Porto, Portugal, 15 November 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Monthly temperature and rainfall: (a) Singapore, (b) Korea (source: revised form a: [9], b: [10]).
Figure 1. Monthly temperature and rainfall: (a) Singapore, (b) Korea (source: revised form a: [9], b: [10]).
Sustainability 12 03244 g001
Figure 2. Sustainable design of vernacular housing: (a) Malay vernacular house, source: [11], (b) Korean vernacular house: (Top) north region (bottom) south region, source: [12]. Ondol: Heated floor, maru: Wooden floor.
Figure 2. Sustainable design of vernacular housing: (a) Malay vernacular house, source: [11], (b) Korean vernacular house: (Top) north region (bottom) south region, source: [12]. Ondol: Heated floor, maru: Wooden floor.
Sustainability 12 03244 g002
Figure 3. Site plan: (a) Singapore: The service areas were located toward the courtyard, Blk336 Bukit Batok street 33, built in 1985, source: [15]. (b) Korea: The blocks were placed in parallel. Daechi Eunma Apartment, built in 1979, source: [16].
Figure 3. Site plan: (a) Singapore: The service areas were located toward the courtyard, Blk336 Bukit Batok street 33, built in 1985, source: [15]. (b) Korea: The blocks were placed in parallel. Daechi Eunma Apartment, built in 1979, source: [16].
Sustainability 12 03244 g003
Figure 4. Representative block plans: (a) Singapore: The service spaces (kitchen, bathroom, and yard) face the inner core space and the atrium in the atrium-type block plan. (b) Korea: In the staircase-type block plan, more rooms face south and cross-ventilation becomes effective.
Figure 4. Representative block plans: (a) Singapore: The service spaces (kitchen, bathroom, and yard) face the inner core space and the atrium in the atrium-type block plan. (b) Korea: In the staircase-type block plan, more rooms face south and cross-ventilation becomes effective.
Sustainability 12 03244 g004
Figure 5. The location of living rooms: (a) Singapore: Reversing the location of the living room during the period. (b) Korea: The living room is always oriented toward the south.
Figure 5. The location of living rooms: (a) Singapore: Reversing the location of the living room during the period. (b) Korea: The living room is always oriented toward the south.
Sustainability 12 03244 g005
Figure 6. The location of the kitchen: (a) Singapore: The kitchen always had outside air and was designed as closed from other spaces. (b) Korea: The location of the kitchen was not fixed, and it was designed as open to other spaces.
Figure 6. The location of the kitchen: (a) Singapore: The kitchen always had outside air and was designed as closed from other spaces. (b) Korea: The location of the kitchen was not fixed, and it was designed as open to other spaces.
Sustainability 12 03244 g006
Figure 7. The location of the bathroom: (a) Singapore: In the early period, the bathroom and toilet can be approached through the kitchen, (b) Korea: The bathrooms are always in the middle of the unit for thermal insulation and lack windows.
Figure 7. The location of the bathroom: (a) Singapore: In the early period, the bathroom and toilet can be approached through the kitchen, (b) Korea: The bathrooms are always in the middle of the unit for thermal insulation and lack windows.
Sustainability 12 03244 g007
Figure 8. Surfaces of units: (a) Singapore, (b) Korea.
Figure 8. Surfaces of units: (a) Singapore, (b) Korea.
Sustainability 12 03244 g008
Figure 9. Window types: (a) Singapore (single-layer), (b) Korea (double-layer).
Figure 9. Window types: (a) Singapore (single-layer), (b) Korea (double-layer).
Sustainability 12 03244 g009
Figure 10. The relation between the public corridor and entrance: (a) Singapore: Direct access to the living room without entrance space from outside, (b) Korea: Separated entrance space.
Figure 10. The relation between the public corridor and entrance: (a) Singapore: Direct access to the living room without entrance space from outside, (b) Korea: Separated entrance space.
Sustainability 12 03244 g010
Figure 11. Utility space: (a) Kitchen should have a yard facing the outside air in Singapore. (b) The service balcony is sealed with a window in Korea.
Figure 11. Utility space: (a) Kitchen should have a yard facing the outside air in Singapore. (b) The service balcony is sealed with a window in Korea.
Sustainability 12 03244 g011
Figure 12. The public corridor of the block: (a) The public corridor is open to the outside in Singapore. (b) In Korea, it is also common to seal public corridors using additional windows.
Figure 12. The public corridor of the block: (a) The public corridor is open to the outside in Singapore. (b) In Korea, it is also common to seal public corridors using additional windows.
Sustainability 12 03244 g012
Figure 13. Balconies, public corridor, and yard: (a) Singapore: Since the 1990s, balconies in front of the living room and a yard connected with the kitchen have appeared. Both are open and without windows. (b) Korea: Balconies are at the front and rear, and windows are installed to expand the interior space or to form air layers.
Figure 13. Balconies, public corridor, and yard: (a) Singapore: Since the 1990s, balconies in front of the living room and a yard connected with the kitchen have appeared. Both are open and without windows. (b) Korea: Balconies are at the front and rear, and windows are installed to expand the interior space or to form air layers.
Sustainability 12 03244 g013
Table 1. General information on research targets.
Table 1. General information on research targets.
PeriodGeneral DataSingaporeKorea
1960Case CodeS-60 Sustainability 12 03244 i001K-60 Sustainability 12 03244 i002
LocationAll 1960s’ and 1970s’ estate Mapo. A.
Built Year19661962
Floor Area (m2)6045
No. Bedroom22
1970Case CodeS-70 Sustainability 12 03244 i003K-70 Sustainability 12 03244 i004
LocationAll 1970s’ estatesJamsil. A.
Built Year19741976
Floor Area (m2)8275
No. Bedroom 34
1980Case CodeS-80 Sustainability 12 03244 i005K-80 Sustainability 12 03244 i006
LocationAMK, Bedok, Clememt etc.Banpo Mido A.
Built Year19801986
Floor Area (m2)12184
No. Bedroom33
1990Case CodeS-90 Sustainability 12 03244 i007K-90 Sustainability 12 03244 i008
LocationToa PayohBundang Hanshin A.
Built Year19931992
Floor Area (m2)13785
No. Bedroom43
2000Case CodeS-00 Sustainability 12 03244 i009K-00 Sustainability 12 03244 i010
LocationKallang Heights SERSTower Palace
Built Year20082002
Floor Area (m2)12185
No. Bedroom33
2010Case CodeS-10 Sustainability 12 03244 i011K-10 Sustainability 12 03244 i012
LocationToa PayohPangyo A.
Built Year20122010
Floor Area (m2)13885
No. Bedroom33
Table 2. Block plan analysis.
Table 2. Block plan analysis.
PeriodSingaporeKorea
1960–1970 Sustainability 12 03244 i013 Sustainability 12 03244 i014 Sustainability 12 03244 i015 Sustainability 12 03244 i016
1980–1990 Sustainability 12 03244 i017 Sustainability 12 03244 i018 Sustainability 12 03244 i019 Sustainability 12 03244 i020
2000 Sustainability 12 03244 i021 Sustainability 12 03244 i022 Sustainability 12 03244 i023 Sustainability 12 03244 i024
2010 Sustainability 12 03244 i025 Sustainability 12 03244 i026 Sustainability 12 03244 i027 Sustainability 12 03244 i028
Sustainability 12 03244 i029 EV; Sustainability 12 03244 i030 Atrium.
Table 3. Analysis of primary spaces in units.
Table 3. Analysis of primary spaces in units.
PeriodPlanLiving roomKitchenBathroomPlanLiving roomKitchenBathroom
1960 Sustainability 12 03244 i031 Sustainability 12 03244 i032
Living room facing corridor, closed kitchen, bathroom in the kitchen facing front outside (front).South-facing living room, closed kitchen, bathroom in the middle of a unit without window.
1970 Sustainability 12 03244 i033 Sustainability 12 03244 i034
Living room facing corridor, closed kitchen and bathroom in the kitchen facing front outside (front).South-facing living room, half-open kitchen, bathroom in the middle of the unit without window
1980 Sustainability 12 03244 i035 Sustainability 12 03244 i036
Living room facing outside (front), closed kitchen and bathroom in the kitchen facing outside (back).South-facing living room, open kitchen, bathroom in the middle of the unit without window
1990 Sustainability 12 03244 i037 Sustainability 12 03244 i038
Living room facing outside (front), closed kitchen and bathroom in the kitchen facing outside (back).South-facing living room, open kitchen, bathroom in the middle of the unit without window
2000 Sustainability 12 03244 i039 Sustainability 12 03244 i040
Living room facing outside (front), closed kitchen and bathroom in the kitchen facing outside (back).South-facing living room, open kitchen, bathroom in the middle of the unit without window
2010 Sustainability 12 03244 i041 Sustainability 12 03244 i042
Living room facing outside (front), closed kitchen facing outside (back), separated bathroom.South-facing living room, open kitchen, bathroom in the middle of the unit without window
Sustainability 12 03244 i043 Wall; Sustainability 12 03244 i044 Window.
Table 4. Analysis of façade design.
Table 4. Analysis of façade design.
PeriodSurfaceWindowEntranceBalconySurface WindowEntranceBalcony
1960 Sustainability 12 03244 i045 Sustainability 12 03244 i046
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor and open corridor. Flat and short walls, sliding double-layer windows, Separated and lowered floor entrance, open corridor
1970 Sustainability 12 03244 i047 Sustainability 12 03244 i048
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor and open corridor.Flat and short walls, sliding double-layer windows, Separated and lowered floor entrance, Closed balconies (front balcony and corridor)
1980 Sustainability 12 03244 i049 Sustainability 12 03244 i050
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor, open corridor and deep balcony in front of living roomFlat and short wall, sliding double-layer windows, separated and lowered floor entrance, closed balconies (front balcony and corridor)
1990 Sustainability 12 03244 i051 Sustainability 12 03244 i052
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor, open corridor and deep balcony in front of living roomFlat and short facade, sliding double-layer windows, separated and lowered floor entrance, closed balconies (front and back)
2000 Sustainability 12 03244 i053 Sustainability 12 03244 i054
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor, open corridor and deep balcony in front of living roomFlat and long walls, sliding double-layer windows, separated and lowered floor entrance, closed balconies
2010 Sustainability 12 03244 i055 Sustainability 12 03244 i056
Uneven wall of service space, single casement window with large opening, direct access from corridor, open corridor and deep balcony in front of living roomUneven and long walls, system widows, separated and lowered floor entrance with extra door, closed balconies
Sustainability 12 03244 i057 Single-layer window; Sustainability 12 03244 i058 Closed balcony; Sustainability 12 03244 i059 Entrance; Sustainability 12 03244 i060 Double-layer window; Sustainability 12 03244 i061 Open balcony.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ju, S.R.; Oh, J.E. Design Elements in Apartments for Adapting to Climate: A Comparison between Korea and Singapore. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083244

AMA Style

Ju SR, Oh JE. Design Elements in Apartments for Adapting to Climate: A Comparison between Korea and Singapore. Sustainability. 2020; 12(8):3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083244

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ju, Seo Ryeung, and Jeong Eun Oh. 2020. "Design Elements in Apartments for Adapting to Climate: A Comparison between Korea and Singapore" Sustainability 12, no. 8: 3244. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083244

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop