Next Article in Journal
Italian Consumers’ Willingness to Pay for Eucalyptus Firewood
Previous Article in Journal
Research on Agricultural Carbon Emissions and Regional Carbon Emissions Reduction Strategies in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
What Could China Give to and Take from Other Countries in Terms of the Development of the Biogas Industry?
Open AccessArticle

Expansion of the Waste-Based Commodity Frontier: Insights from Sweden and Brazil

1
Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8P 5C2, Canada
2
Environmental Strategy, ISM, Campus Helsingborg, Lund University, PO Box 882, SE-251 08 Helsingborg, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(7), 2628; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072628 (registering DOI)
Received: 24 February 2020 / Revised: 16 March 2020 / Accepted: 24 March 2020 / Published: 26 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Waste Technology and Management)
Waste is a valuable commodity and remains a livelihood source for waste pickers in the global South. Waste to Energy (WtoE) is often described as alternative to landfilling, as it provides cheap fuel while making waste disappear. In some European cities, this method has evolved into an impediment, slowing down the adoption of more sustainable technologies and waste prevention. These plants typically strain municipal budgets and provide fewer jobs than recycling and composting, thereby inhibiting the development of small-scale local recycling businesses. We applied the idea of ‘waste regime’ with an interdisciplinary and situated lens to provide insights to the following questions: How do different political developments in Brazil and Sweden, frame and reframe waste incineration and energy recovery, in the context of sustainability and waste management on local, regional and national levels? What forms of resistance against WtoE exist and what are the arguments of these protagonists? We evaluated the impact of WtoE and compare it with other waste management options with regard to CO2 balances and general environmental and social impacts. We conclude by suggesting more socially and environmentally appropriate ways of waste management, particularly for the context of global South cities. View Full-Text
Keywords: waste management; waste to energy; biogas; material recycling; circular economy; waste pickers; waste regime; sustainability; Brazil; Sweden waste management; waste to energy; biogas; material recycling; circular economy; waste pickers; waste regime; sustainability; Brazil; Sweden
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Gutberlet, J.; Bramryd, T.; Johansson, M. Expansion of the Waste-Based Commodity Frontier: Insights from Sweden and Brazil. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2628.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop