Next Article in Journal
Comparison of HPLC Pigment Analysis and Microscopy in Phytoplankton Assessment in the Seomjin River Estuary, Korea
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparing Environmental Advisory Councils: How They Work and Why it Matters
Previous Article in Journal
Establishing a Sustainable Sports Tourism Evaluation Framework with a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model to Explore Potential Sports Tourism Attractions in Taiwan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Decision-Maker-Oriented VS. Collaboration: China’s Public Participation in Environmental Decision-Making
Open AccessArticle

Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative

Department of Accounting and Finance, Universidad de Zaragoza, 50005 Zaragoza, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(4), 1674; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674
Received: 7 February 2020 / Revised: 17 February 2020 / Accepted: 18 February 2020 / Published: 24 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Citizen Participation in Sustainable Local Decision-Making)
This paper analyzes the award-winning e-participation initiative of the city council of Madrid, Decide Madrid, to identify the critical success factors and the main barriers that are conditioning its performance. An exploratory case study is used as a research technique, including desk research and semi-structured interviews. The analysis distinguishes contextual, organizational and individual level factors; it considers whether the factors or barriers are more related to the information and communication technology (ICT) component, public sector context or democratic participation; it also differentiates among the different stages of the development of the initiative. Results show that individual and organizational factors related to the public sector context and democratic participation are the most relevant success factors. The high expectations of citizens explain the high levels of participation in the initial stages of Decide Madrid. However, the lack of transparency and poor functioning of some of its participatory activities (organizational factors related to the ICT and democratic dimensions) are negatively affecting its performance. The software created for this platform, Consul, has been adopted or it is in the process of being implemented in more than 100 institutions in 33 countries. Therefore, the findings of this research can potentially be useful to improve the performance and sustainability of e-participation platforms worldwide. View Full-Text
Keywords: e-participation; local government; information and communication technologies (ICTs); citizen participation; transparency e-participation; local government; information and communication technologies (ICTs); citizen participation; transparency
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Royo, S.; Pina, V.; Garcia-Rayado, J. Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674

AMA Style

Royo S, Pina V, Garcia-Rayado J. Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative. Sustainability. 2020; 12(4):1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674

Chicago/Turabian Style

Royo, Sonia; Pina, Vicente; Garcia-Rayado, Jaime. 2020. "Decide Madrid: A Critical Analysis of an Award-Winning e-Participation Initiative" Sustainability 12, no. 4: 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041674

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop