Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Research Design and Participants
2.2. Variable Definitions
2.3. Variables Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Sample Characteristics
3.2. Results Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Research Limitations and Prospects
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
An Assessment of Influencing Factors in Developing the Aynak Copper Mine
- Gender
- A:
- Male
- B:
- Female
- Age
- Living Location
- Social Statue
- Religious
- Do you know the Aynak Copper mine Project? (If “Yes”, Please go to the rest of this questionnaire. If “No”, your questionnaire is complete)
- A:
- Yes
- B:
- No
- How well do you know the Aynak Copper mine project?
- A:
- Very Well
- B:
- Partially Well
- C:
- Neutral
- D:
- Not too much
- E:
- Not at all
- How much do you realize that the degree of Administrative Capacity will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that Labor investment will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that Labor productivity will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that Capital investment will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that the Efficiency of capital will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that Terroristic activities will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- How much do you realize that Religious issues will influence the developing process of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Partially (61–80)
- E:
- Very much (81–100)
- What is your expectation of the Development of the Aynak Copper mine?
- A:
- None or few (0–20)
- B:
- Not too much (21–40)
- C:
- Neutral (41–60)
- D:
- Some (61–80)
- E:
- Very High (81–100)
- Any Comments to the further development of the Aynak Copper mine in Afghanistan?
References
- Zhang, Y.Z.; Yu, X.; Zhang, H.Z. Addressing the insufficiencies of the traditional development aid model by utilizing the one belt, one road initiative to sustain development in Afghanistan. Sustainability 2019, 11, 312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hughes, A.C. Understanding and minimizing environmental impacts of the belt and road initiative. Conserv. Biol. 2019, 33, 883–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Benham, A.J.; Coats, J.S.; Kovac, P. Aynak: A world-class sediment-hosted stratiform copper deposit in Afghanistan. In Proceedings of the 12th IAGOD Symposium on Understanding the Genesis of Ore Deposits to the Meet the Demands of the 21st Century, Moscow, Russia, 20–24 August 2006; pp. 245–248. [Google Scholar]
- Handelsman, S. Afghanistan’s Aynak copper deposit tender process: Case study. Bus. Ethics Eur. Rev. 2012, 21, 364–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, H.; Mei, Y.X.; Wang, H.L.; Fan, S.J. Potential and prospecting direction of copper resources in Afghanistan. Miner. Explor. 2012, 3, 700–706. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Dastgir, G.; Kawata, K.; Yoshida, Y. Effect of forced relocation on household income and consumption patterns: Evidence from the Aynak copper mine project in Afghanistan. J. Dev. Stud. 2017, 54, 2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, J. Current situation, problems and countermeasures of economic and trade cooperation between China and Afghanistan. Int. Res. Ref. 2017, 5, 7–12. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.F.; Shi, F.J.; Chen, X.F.; Ye, J.H. Distribution characteristics and potential analysis of important solid mineral resources along “One Belt and One Road”. China’s Min. 2017, 11, 35–44. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Fan, J.R.; Li, W. Analysis on the terrorist threat to the construction of “One Belt and One Road” Initiative. Acad. J. People’s Public Secur. Univ. China 2018, 1, 19–31. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xirenayi, A.L.P. Necessity of the counter-terrorism cooperation between China and South Asia. Youth 2017, 13, 179–180. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.Z.; Xu, T.; Deng, H.; Ge, J. How can we understand the “Belt and Road Initiative”. World Intellect. 2016, 20, 26–27. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Barakat, S.; Evans, M.; Zyck, S.A. Karzai’s curse–legitimacy as stability in Afghanistan and other post-conflict environments. Policy Stud. 2012, 33, 439–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Evans, M.; Barakat, S. Post-war reconstruction, policy transfer and the World Bank: The case of Afghanistan’s national solidarity programme. Policy Stud. 2012, 33, 541–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sigsgaard, M. Education and Fragility in Afghanistan: A Situational Analysis; INEE, International Institute for Educational Planning: Paris, France, 2009; p. 10. [Google Scholar]
- Petřík, J. Provincial reconstruction teams in Afghanistan: Securitizing aid through developmentalizing the military. In The Securitization of Foreign Aid; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.T.; Yao, D.X. Studies on the civilized exchanges between China and Afghanistan from the perspective of “One Belt and One Road”. Acad. J. Daqing Norm. Univ. 2019, 39, 93–99. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.L.; Ma, B.Y.; Ji, W.H.; Qiao, G.B.; Luo, Y.J.; Zhang, H.D. The cooperation among China, India, Pakistan and Afghanistan in mining. In Proceedings of the Annual Conference of China Geological Society, Kunming, China, 17–20 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F. Presidential election and its political developments in Afghanistan. Stud. West Asia Afr. 2014, 5, 12–27. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y. A brief analysis of “One Belt and One Road” economic construction between Afghanistan and China. Mod. Mark. 2018, 5, 109. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
- Ma, M.Q.; Yuan, W.; Ge, Q.S.; Yuan, W.; Yang, L.S.; Li, H.Q.; Li, M. Analysis on the big data and social development trends from perspective of “Belt and Road Initiative. Dev. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 7, 38. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, M.X.; Chen, L.K. Afghanistan and “Belt and Road Initiative”: The choices and competitions. Stud. West Asia Afr. 2016, 2, 18–33. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, H.; Cheng, J.; Wang, X. Does the Belt and Road Initiative promote sustainable development? Evidence from countries along the Belt and Road. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Khan, M.K.; Sandano, I.A.; Pratt, C.B.; Farid, T. China’s Belt and Road Initiative: A global model for an evolving approach to sustainable regional development. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kang, L.; Peng, F.; Zhu, Y.; Pan, A. Harmony in diversity: Can the One Belt One Road Initiative promote China’s outward foreign direct investment? Sustainability 2018, 10, 3264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Datzberger, S.; Nguyen, T. Deconstructing civil society Actors and Functions: On the limitations of international frameworks for fragile states. Soc. Sci. 2018, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Loschmann, C.; Parsons, C.R.; Siegel, M. Does shelter assistance reduce poverty in Afghanistan? World Dev. 2015, 74, 305–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Aslam, A.; Berkes, E.; Fukac, M.; Menkulasi, J.; Schimmelpfennig, A. Afghanistan: Balancing social and security spending in the context of a shrinking resource envelope. Asian Dev. Rev. 2014, 31, 165–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blumberg, R.L.; Cohn, S. (Eds.) Development in Crisis; Routledge: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beck, R.A. Remote sensing and GIS as counterterrorism tools in the Afghanistan war: A case study of the Zhawar Kili Region. Prof. Geogr. 2004, 55, 170–179. [Google Scholar]
- Helene, D. The Intervention in Afghanistan in 2001; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Hamidullah, S.; Tariq, S.; Shah, M.T.; Bishop, M.P.; Kamp, U.; Olsenholler, J. Baseline for monitoring water resources along Kabul and Indus Rivers of Pakistan for potential terrorist contamination. In Proceedings of the Spring 2002 Meeting of the American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC, USA, 28–31 May 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Sakena, Y. Afghanistan: Valuing character. World Policy J. 2017, 34, 4–5. [Google Scholar]
- Monten, J. Intervention, aid, and institution-building in Iraq and Afghanistan: A review and critique of comparative lessons. WIDER Work. Pap. 2013, 48, 219–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fredholm, M. Uzbek Islamic extremists in the civil wars of Tajikistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan: From radical Islamic awakening in the Ferghana Valley to terrorism with Islamic vocabulary in Waziristan eastern Orthodox encounters of identity and otherness. In Eastern Orthodox Encounters of Identity and Otherness; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edwards, D.B. Summoning Muslims: Print, politics, and religious ideology in Afghanistan. J. Asian Stud. 1993, 52, 609–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dunn, M.C. Great games and small: Afghanistan, Tajikistan and the new geopolitics of southwest Asia. Middle East Policy 1997, 5, 142–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hensman, R. Religious sentiment and national sovereignty: Resisting Talibanization. Econ. Political Wkly. 2001, 36, 2031–2033. [Google Scholar]
- Nadery, A.N. Peace or justice? Transitional justice in Afghanistan. Int. J. Transit. Justice 2007, 1, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Measurement | Min. | Max. | Mean | Percentage (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAC | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.50 | 2.4% (62) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 20.4% (524) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 20.1% (517) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 38.7% (994) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 18.1% (466) | ||||
LI | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.03 | 15.2% (390) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 21.9% (561) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 24.1% (617) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 21.9% (562) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 16.9% (433) | ||||
LP | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.06 | 14.4% (369) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 21.3% (547) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 25.2% (646) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 21.7% (555) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 17.4% (446) | ||||
CI | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.10 | 12.0% (310) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 17.4% (446) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 32.7% (840) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 23.4% (600) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 14.3% (367) | ||||
EC | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.00 | 16.5% (423) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 21.8% (561) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 23.0% (592) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 22.1% (567) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 16.3% (420) | ||||
TA | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 2.99 | 12.2% (315) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 24.6% (632) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 27.2% (699) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 23.2% (595) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 12.5% (322) | ||||
RI | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.07 | 7.4% (190) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 27.3% (702) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 27.7% (712) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 25.7% (659) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 11.7% (300) | ||||
Expectations of developing the Aynak Copper Mine | 1 = None or few (0–20) | 1 | 5 | 3.48 | 6.2% (160) |
2 = Not too much (21–40) | 12.8% (330) | ||||
3 = Neutral (41–60) | 22.3% (572) | ||||
4 = Partial (61–80) | 43.9% (1126) | ||||
5 = Very much (81–100) | 14.6% (375) |
Variables | Expectation (None or Few) | Expectation (Not too much) | Expectation (Neutral) | Expectation (Some) | Expectation (Very High) | Coefficient (S.E.) | p-Value | 95% CI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max | Min | ||||||||
DAC | |||||||||
(0–20) | 12 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 4 | −4.053 (0.276) | 0.000 | −4.593 | −3.512 |
(21–40) | 55 | 146 | 209 | 93 | 21 | −3.274 (0.146) | 0.000 | −3.560 | −2.989 |
(41–60) | 55 | 61 | 160 | 195 | 46 | −1.964 (0.138) | 0.000 | −2.235 | −1.693 |
(61–80) | 22 | 75 | 170 | 557 | 170 | −1.009 (0.118) | 0.000 | −1.240 | −0.778 |
(81–100) | 16 | 30 | 15 | 271 | 134 | ||||
LI | |||||||||
(0–20) | 12 | 48 | 80 | 193 | 57 | 0.146 (0.143) | 0.651 | −0.134 | 0.426 |
(21–40) | 22 | 75 | 129 | 252 | 83 | −0.030 (0.130) | 0.461 | −0.285 | 0.225 |
(41–60) | 42 | 81 | 148 | 261 | 85 | 0.016 (0.129) | 0.702 | −0.238 | 0.269 |
(61–80) | 31 | 89 | 133 | 232 | 77 | −0.105 (0.134) | 0.172 | −0.367 | 0.157 |
(81–100) | 53 | 37 | 82 | 188 | 73 | ||||
LP | |||||||||
(0–20) | 21 | 34 | 91 | 184 | 39 | 0.112 (0.140) | 0.497 | −0.162 | 0.386 |
(21–40) | 32 | 72 | 128 | 244 | 71 | −0.143 (0.133) | 0.086 | −0.404 | 0.118 |
(41–60) | 48 | 101 | 140 | 263 | 94 | 0.075 (0.129) | 0.165 | −0.177 | 0.327 |
(61–80) | 32 | 68 | 104 | 243 | 108 | −0.150 (0.129) | 0.100 | −0.403 | 0.102 |
(81–100) | 27 | 55 | 109 | 192 | 63 | ||||
CI | |||||||||
(0–20) | 3 | 29 | 74 | 166 | 38 | −0.239 (0.155) | 0.122 | −0.544 | 0.066 |
(21–40) | 34 | 97 | 117 | 131 | 67 | −0.224 (0.144) | 0.069 | −0.506 | 0.058 |
(41–60) | 60 | 80 | 127 | 440 | 133 | 0.108 (0.127) | 0.298 | −0.141 | 0.357 |
(61–80) | 45 | 74 | 158 | 236 | 87 | −0.055 (0.131) | 0.550 | −0.312 | 0.203 |
(81–100) | 18 | 50 | 96 | 153 | 50 | ||||
EC | |||||||||
(0–20) | 30 | 46 | 129 | 184 | 34 | −0.126 (0.138) | 0.463 | −0.396 | 0.144 |
(21–40) | 28 | 46 | 123 | 262 | 102 | 0.217 (0.133) | 0.068 | −0.044 | 0.478 |
(41–60) | 44 | 105 | 91 | 227 | 125 | 0.133 (0.133) | 0.313 | −0.127 | 0.393 |
(61–80) | 32 | 88 | 105 | 262 | 80 | 0.117 (0.130) | 0.465 | −0.138 | 0.371 |
(81–100) | 26 | 45 | 124 | 191 | 34 | ||||
TA | |||||||||
(0–20) | 5 | 12 | 21 | 182 | 95 | 3.223 (0.172) | 0.000 | 2.885 | 3.561 |
(21–40) | 55 | 146 | 209 | 93 | 21 | 2.724 (0.145) | 0.000 | 2.440 | 3.007 |
(41–60) | 55 | 61 | 160 | 195 | 46 | 2.618 (0.148) | 0.000 | 2.329 | 2.908 |
(61–80) | 38 | 111 | 160 | 205 | 81 | 1.872 (0.144) | 0.000 | 1.590 | 2.154 |
(81–100) | 73 | 67 | 95 | 77 | 10 | ||||
RI | |||||||||
(0–20) | 0 | 16 | 21 | 80 | 73 | 2.927 (0.195) | 0.000 | 2.544 | 3.310 |
(21–40) | 24 | 76 | 84 | 353 | 165 | 2.512 (0.150) | 0.000 | 2.218 | 2.806 |
(41–60) | 36 | 86 | 143 | 340 | 107 | 1.924 (0.146) | 0.000 | 1.637 | 2.210 |
(61–80) | 47 | 89 | 226 | 274 | 23 | 0.880 (0.147) | 0.000 | 0.592 | 1.169 |
(81–100) | 53 | 63 | 98 | 79 | 7 | ||||
Observations | n = 2563 | ||||||||
Df | 28 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhang, J.; Zou, B. Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041569
Zhang Y, Yu X, Zhang J, Zou B. Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan. Sustainability. 2020; 12(4):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041569
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Yanzhe, Xiao Yu, Jian Zhang, and Bowen Zou. 2020. "Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan" Sustainability 12, no. 4: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041569
APA StyleZhang, Y., Yu, X., Zhang, J., & Zou, B. (2020). Evaluation of the Obstacles to Developing the Aynak Copper Mine in Afghanistan. Sustainability, 12(4), 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041569