Next Article in Journal
Application of Reliability Analysis for Risk Ranking in a Levee Reconstruction Project
Previous Article in Journal
Total Factor Energy Efficiency, Carbon Emission Efficiency and Technology Gap: Evidence from Sub-Industries of Anhui Province in China
Open AccessArticle

Entrepreneurial Universities and Sustainable Development. The Network Bricolage Process of Academic Entrepreneurs

1
Department of Economics and Business Administration, Faculty of Social Sciences and Work, Universidad de Málaga, Campus Teatinos s/n, 29071 Málaga, Spain
2
Hunter Centre for Entrepreneurship, University of Strathclyde, Stenhouse Building, Level 4, 199 Cathedral Street, Glasgow G4 0QU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(4), 1403; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041403 (registering DOI)
Received: 9 January 2020 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 13 February 2020 / Published: 14 February 2020
This paper studies the network bricolage process of academic entrepreneurs (AEs). Based on a qualitative study, surprisingly, it shows how these entrepreneurs still encounter institutional barriers which exist in universities, in particular regarding building the social capital needed for exploiting their business ideas, and they are not, as expected, well connected to the existing formal networks but rather to the informal ones. This paper uses the bricolage approach of entrepreneurship and the literature on academic entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial universities, and social capital. In-depth interviews with key informants were conducted. Specifically, the study reveals the existence of a relevant network bricolage process of these AEs using informal versus formal networks to develop their ventures. As policy implications, there is a need for a better support from different university levels in order to increase the engagement in entrepreneurial activities of the different individuals. Universities should take a more proactive role when fostering AE activity and solve several barriers that still exist regarding knowledge transfer and entrepreneurship (e.g., bureaucracy and lack of confidence). For AEs, they need to take a more proactive role in building networks and ‘see-sawing’ between both types of network (formal and informal). By doing this, they can overcome the lack of knowledge, build trust, and improve word-of-mouth about their companies. All of this will benefit the university knowledge exchange. As a contribution, this paper explains the behavior of individual entrepreneurs when they exploit business ideas using the networks they have at hand in order to overcome institutional barriers in universities. Furthermore, it describes the process of the selection (‘see-sawing’ metaphor) of informal versus formal networks by AEs when applying their network bricolage.
Keywords: academic entrepreneurs; network bricolage; formal networks; informal networks academic entrepreneurs; network bricolage; formal networks; informal networks
MDPI and ACS Style

Padilla-Meléndez, A.; Del Aguila-Obra, A.R.; Lockett, N.; Fuster, E. Entrepreneurial Universities and Sustainable Development. The Network Bricolage Process of Academic Entrepreneurs. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1403.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop