Next Article in Journal
Thorough Multianalytical Characterization and Quantification of Micro- and Nanoplastics from Bracciano Lake’s Sediments
Next Article in Special Issue
Beyond the Right of Access: A Critique of the Legalist Approach to Dissemination of Climate Change Information in Kenya
Previous Article in Journal
An Ensemble Framework to Investigate Wind Energy Sustainability Considering Climate Change Impacts
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intergenerational Dialogue, Collaboration, Learning, and Decision-Making in Global Environmental Governance: The Case of the IUCN Intergenerational Partnership for Sustainability
Article

The Outcome of the Negotiations on the Global Pact for the Environment: A Commentary

Faculty of Law, Laval University, Quebec City, QC G1V 0A6, Canada
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030877
Received: 9 December 2019 / Revised: 10 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 24 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Environmental Policy and Governance in Sustainability)
In May 2018, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the resolution “Towards a Global Pact for the Environment”. This resolution established an intergovernmental working group to discuss the opportunity to open treaty negotiations to codify the fundamental principles of international environmental law into a treaty dubbed the Global Pact for the Environment. In May 2019, the intergovernmental working group completed its mandate and adopted a set of recommendations that were formally endorsed by the United Nations General Assembly in August 2019. Contrarily to what the supporters of the Global Pact for the Environment project had hoped for, the working group only recommended the preparation of a “political declaration” without referring to the codification of the principles of international environmental law. This paper offers a critical commentary of the outcome of these negotiations. The analysis suggests that the decision to elaborate a Global Pact for the Environment would have entailed considerable risks for international environmental law and that if adopted, this instrument would not have necessarily helped to increase the problem-solving capacity of international environmental law. Based on the language used in the recommendation to prepare a “political declaration”, the paper also discusses some of the key elements that could shape and inform the upcoming negotiations of this declaration. View Full-Text
Keywords: international environmental law; environmental governance; multilateral negotiations; codification of principles international environmental law; environmental governance; multilateral negotiations; codification of principles
MDPI and ACS Style

de Lassus St-Geniès, G. The Outcome of the Negotiations on the Global Pact for the Environment: A Commentary. Sustainability 2020, 12, 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030877

AMA Style

de Lassus St-Geniès G. The Outcome of the Negotiations on the Global Pact for the Environment: A Commentary. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030877

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Lassus St-Geniès, Géraud. 2020. "The Outcome of the Negotiations on the Global Pact for the Environment: A Commentary" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030877

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop