Next Article in Journal
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Historic Constructions in the Downtown of Mexico City
Previous Article in Journal
Accurate Sizing of Residential Stand-Alone Photovoltaic Systems Considering System Reliability
Article

Who Is Connected with Whom? A Social Network Analysis of Institutional Interactions in the European CCA and DRR Landscape

1
Hellenic Ministry of Environment and Energy, 11251 Athens, Greece
2
Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici, 30175 Venice, Italy
3
Barcelona Supercomputing Centre (BSC-CNS), 08034 Barcelona, Spain
4
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research – UFZ, 04318 Leipzig, Germany
5
Dipartimento di Economia—Universita’ Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, 30121 Venice, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(3), 1275; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031275
Received: 20 December 2019 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 3 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
Communication and collaboration are critical for designing and implementing responses to climate change impacts and related disasters. This acknowledgement has increased interest in understanding social and institutional networks for climate change adaptation (CCA) and disaster risk reduction (DRR). In this study, we used Social Network Analysis (SNA) to explore institutional interactions within and across the communities of the aforementioned domains in Europe. Firstly, we investigated the type and intensity of interactions. We calculated SNA metrics to assess the roles of different actors and applied cluster analysis to identify actors with similar patterns of connections. SNA showed that communication is often more intensive within the two communities, while collaboration is frequent around topics related to both CCA and DRR. Cluster analysis revealed that actors tied with DRR were more closely connected, while actors tied with CCA and those with mixed connections showed no obvious clustering affinity. The European Climate Adaptation Platform, Climate-ADAPT, had the highest value for various SNA metrics, reflecting its popularity in the network and its potential for enhancing interactions among its actors. Finally, SNA was complemented by qualitative interviews, which emphasised the importance of connecting CCA and DRR in organisational mission and vision statements. View Full-Text
Keywords: social network analysis; institutional actors; climate change adaptation; disaster risk reduction; Europe social network analysis; institutional actors; climate change adaptation; disaster risk reduction; Europe
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Karali, E.; Bojovic, D.; Michalek, G.; Giupponi, C.; Schwarze, R. Who Is Connected with Whom? A Social Network Analysis of Institutional Interactions in the European CCA and DRR Landscape. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031275

AMA Style

Karali E, Bojovic D, Michalek G, Giupponi C, Schwarze R. Who Is Connected with Whom? A Social Network Analysis of Institutional Interactions in the European CCA and DRR Landscape. Sustainability. 2020; 12(3):1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031275

Chicago/Turabian Style

Karali, Eleni, Dragana Bojovic, Gabriela Michalek, Carlo Giupponi, and Reimund Schwarze. 2020. "Who Is Connected with Whom? A Social Network Analysis of Institutional Interactions in the European CCA and DRR Landscape" Sustainability 12, no. 3: 1275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12031275

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop