Next Article in Journal
Working to Reduce Food Waste: Investigating Determinants of Food Waste amongst Taiwanese Workers in Factory Cafeteria Settings
Next Article in Special Issue
Strategies and Governance for Implementing Deep Decarbonization Plans at the Local Level
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure on the Future Earnings Response Coefficient (ASEAN Banking Analysis)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trend Analysis of Urban Heat Island Intensity According to Urban Area Change in Asian Mega Cities
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 12
Issue 22
10.3390/su12229666
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Interactive Effect of Government Financial Support and Firms’ Innovative Efforts on Company Growth: A Focus on Climate-Tech SMEs in Korea

Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9666; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229666
by DaEun Kim 1, Sungchan Yeom 2 and Myeong Chul Ko 3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9666; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229666
Submission received: 16 October 2020 / Revised: 13 November 2020 / Accepted: 15 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Climate Change Mitigation and Urban Sustainable Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The topic of the paper is innovative and the processing of the paper is in accordance with current state of knowledge in scientific community.

The literature sources are contemporary, so the literature review forms an adequate basis for the upcoming research.

The title is well formulated and it covers the content of the paper.

The abstract contains main required components.The paper is written in accordance with traditional IMRD (introduction, methodology, results, discussion) structure of scientific papers.

The methods are stated clearly, but it is not possible to consider them as sufficient as the main formulas of statistical tests are missing. Discussion in its traditional structure should be enriched by constructive comparison of results of own research with contemporary state of knowledge formulated so far.

The level of the author’s knowledge is satisfying. It is obvious that authors are well oriented in the topic and that they use appropriate terms.

Writing style is clear and understandable and it is declared that authors have enough experience with publishing in journals indexed in world reputable databases.

Overall, I was interested to read this manuscript.

The scientific value of the paper should be highlighted by critical construction of framework conditions of research outcome´s application as well as detected barriers and future prospective of research.

Authors should develop their discussion and provide a clear theoretical contribution to the knowledge.

I wish the authors the best of luck with their future research.

 

 

 

Author Response

Please, see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Some of the sources appear to be outdated, given the ambitions of the article.

There are minor linguistic inaccuracies, chiefly pertaining to the use of tenses (present perfect / past tense, most notably). Punctuation (such as the use of the comma) should also be improved - e.g. line 198.

 

Author Response

Please, see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop