Next Article in Journal
Mapping Social Impact: A Bibliometric Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Wine Routes and Sustainable Social Organization within Local Tourist Supply: Case Studies of Two Italian Regions

Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia

Department of Global Agricultural Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan
Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK
Bandung Institute of Technology, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Ganesa 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9387;
Received: 19 October 2020 / Revised: 5 November 2020 / Accepted: 8 November 2020 / Published: 11 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Social Ecology and Sustainability)
Shrimp is a major aquaculture species in Indonesia. Despite the Indonesian government’s effort to reinforce sustainability practices using a national eco-certification scheme, the uptake of stakeholders has been slow so far. This study analyzed diverse perceptions of the national eco-certification of shrimp aquaculture among stakeholders across the value chain in Indonesia. Using Q-methodology, 49 statements were selected, and they covered seven themes: conceptual understanding, priorities, motivation for eco-certification, market access, impacts of eco-certification, obstacles in Indonesia, and stakeholder involvement. Thirty respondents across the supply chain of whiteleg shrimp sorted these statements according to their level of agreement. Based on their support or opposition to eco-certification, responses were categorized into five perspectives: (1) supporter for the certification by principle, (2) market-oriented supporter, (3) collaborative supporter, (4) ambivalent self-sufficient, and (5) antagonistic business-oriented. Several reasons for stakeholder’s slow acceptance were identified. These include a limited understanding of sustainability concepts in eco-certification, uncertainty for the potential positive effects of eco-certification in terms of market access, the recognition of other priorities such as improving farm-infrastructures, and a lack of stakeholders’ participation in communication forums. The findings of this study can facilitate the process of consensus-building on eco-certification among farmers, scientists, the government, non-governmental organizations, and other stakeholders to support a viable pathway for policy development to achieve sustainable shrimp aquaculture. Ultimately, this study provides new insights on how a country in the Global South perceives eco-certification differently from the Global North. View Full-Text
Keywords: Stakeholders; perception; eco-certification; whiteleg shrimp; aquaculture; Indonesia Stakeholders; perception; eco-certification; whiteleg shrimp; aquaculture; Indonesia
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Azizah, F.F.N.; Ishihara, H.; Zabala, A.; Sakai, Y.; Suantika, G.; Yagi, N. Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9387.

AMA Style

Azizah FFN, Ishihara H, Zabala A, Sakai Y, Suantika G, Yagi N. Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia. Sustainability. 2020; 12(22):9387.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Azizah, Fahma F.N., Hiroe Ishihara, Aiora Zabala, Yutaro Sakai, Gede Suantika, and Nobuyuki Yagi. 2020. "Diverse Perceptions on Eco-Certification for Shrimp Aquaculture in Indonesia" Sustainability 12, no. 22: 9387.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop