Next Article in Journal
Impact of the Information and Communication Technologies on Students with Disabilities. A Systematic Review 2009–2019
Previous Article in Journal
Goal-Driven or Data-Driven? Inventory of Sustainability Indicator Initiatives in Rural Canada
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Government Reward-Penalty Mechanism in Dual-Channel Closed-Loop Supply Chain

Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8602; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208602
by Haitao Chen 1,†, Zhaohui Dong 1,* and Gendao Li 2,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sustainability 2020, 12(20), 8602; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208602
Submission received: 17 August 2020 / Revised: 5 October 2020 / Accepted: 12 October 2020 / Published: 17 October 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The problem undertaken at work is interesting. The concept of closed-loop supply chain management is a very popular direction of research and companies' activities. It is associated with efforts like managing production residues (by-products and waste) in such a way as to minimize the level of waste transferred to landfills or incinerators. The research problem undertaken is very current and well described. The aim of the work was properly formulated. According to the reviewer, the article is well-organized and written, but requires corrections in several places - the text should contain references to specific figures or tables, e.g. line 166.

Literature references in the text require corrections, e.g. Line 82 It should be: Chian et al. [4] ….

Line 342- Could the solution presented be applicable to the food sector?

Author Response

Dear reviewrs:

      Thanks por your kind suggestions. And my respond is at the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please refer to the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer:

      We are appreciate for your kind suggestions. Our responds are attached in the file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

This second version of the paper is an improvement. Overall, I think this paper could potentially be suitable for publication in Sustainability.

Back to TopTop