Next Article in Journal
Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment of Floods in Austria: Mapping Homogenous Regions, Hotspots and Typologies
Next Article in Special Issue
Historical Ecology of Scandinavian Infield Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Unlocking Sustainability Potentials in Heat Treatment Processes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neoanthropocene Raising and Protection of Natural and Cultural Heritage: A Case Study in Southern Italy
Article

A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes

Department of Anthropology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(16), 6459; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166459
Received: 27 June 2020 / Revised: 23 July 2020 / Accepted: 7 August 2020 / Published: 11 August 2020
As the number of academic manuscripts explicitly referencing the Anthropocene increases, a theme that seems to tie them all together is the general lack of continuity on how we should define the Anthropocene. In an attempt to formalize the concept, the Anthropocene Working Group (AWG) is working to identify, in the stratigraphic record, a Global Stratigraphic Section and Point (GSSP) or golden spike for a mid-twentieth century Anthropocene starting point. Rather than clarifying our understanding of the Anthropocene, we argue that the AWG’s effort to provide an authoritative definition undermines the original intent of the concept, as a call-to-arms for future sustainable management of local, regional, and global environments, and weakens the concept’s capacity to fundamentally reconfigure the established boundaries between the social and natural sciences. To sustain the creative and productive power of the Anthropocene concept, we argue that it is best understood as a “boundary object,” where it can be adaptable enough to incorporate multiple viewpoints, but robust enough to be meaningful within different disciplines. Here, we provide two examples from our work on the deep history of anthropogenic seascapes, which demonstrate the power of the Anthropocene to stimulate new thinking about the entanglement of humans and non-humans, and for building interdisciplinary solutions to modern environmental issues. View Full-Text
Keywords: ecodynamics; historical ecology; Anthropology; archaeology ecodynamics; historical ecology; Anthropology; archaeology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Braje, T.J.; Lauer, M. A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166459

AMA Style

Braje TJ, Lauer M. A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes. Sustainability. 2020; 12(16):6459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Braje, Todd J., and Matthew Lauer. 2020. "A Meaningful Anthropocene?: Golden Spikes, Transitions, Boundary Objects, and Anthropogenic Seascapes" Sustainability 12, no. 16: 6459. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166459

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop