Next Article in Journal
Land-Use and Health Issues in Malagasy Primary Education—A Delphi Study
Previous Article in Journal
Urban Video Surveillance as a Tool to Improve Security in Public Spaces
Open AccessArticle

Social Life-Cycle Assessment: A Review by Bibliometric Analysis

Department of Business Administration (ADO), Applied Economics II and Fundaments of Economic Analysis, Rey-Juan-Carlos University, 28032 Madrid, Spain
Department of Sciences and Methods for Engineering, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
Gruppo Ceramiche Gresmalt, Via Mosca 4, 41049 Sassuolo, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2020, 12(15), 6211;
Received: 2 July 2020 / Revised: 20 July 2020 / Accepted: 22 July 2020 / Published: 1 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Role of Social Life Cycle Assessment in Sustainability)
This study examined the literature on social life-cycle assessment (S-LCA) published in the last 15 years (2003–2018) using bibliometric methods. Applying scientific mapping and analyzing publication performance, the study describes the structure of and trends in S-LCA publications in terms of related subject categories, authors, journals, countries, and highly cited articles. Challenges and research gaps in the S-LCA literature were also explored. The content of related papers published in the ISI Web of Science databases was examined to identify the main themes investigated, evolution of publication activity, and most representative elements. Analyses were conducted with SciMAT software. This tool enables researchers to map research specialties by extracting qualitative information in the specialized literature and representing it using quantitative measures. The results show rapid and exponential growth of the S-LCA research line in the past ten years, with a clear upward trend in related publications (mostly case studies), especially after publication of the UNEP/SETAC Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products in 2009: 66% of all articles published on S-LCA were published during the period 2015–2018, primarily by European authors. The findings also delineate S-LCA as a highly fragmented research field that has been applied to diverse sectors (agriculture, bioenergy, transport, water management, chemical products, electronics, etc.), mainly in non-European countries. Critical questions concerning methods, framework, paradigms, and indicators remain to be resolved. This study provides insight into the publication performance of S-LCA, characterizing its intellectual structure and salient authors and works. In identifying hotspots in the S-LCA research, the study provides a useful state-of-the-art reference guide for academics and reveals critical research gaps and potential research avenues for future studies to advance in consolidating the discipline. View Full-Text
Keywords: Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA); bibliometric methods; science mapping; co-word analysis; social impacts Social Life-Cycle Assessment (S-LCA); bibliometric methods; science mapping; co-word analysis; social impacts
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Huertas-Valdivia, I.; Ferrari, A.M.; Settembre-Blundo, D.; García-Muiña, F.E. Social Life-Cycle Assessment: A Review by Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6211.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop