Next Article in Journal
Proposed Consecutive Uncertainty Analysis Procedure of the Greenhouse Gas Emission Model Output for Products
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Reverse Logistics Network Design Considering Multi-Level Investments for Facility Reconstruction with Environmental Considerations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Capability of the Invasive Tree Prosopis glandulosa Torr. to Remediate Soil Treated with Sewage Sludge

by
Ahmed Mahmoud Abbas
1,2,
Sameh K. Abd-Elmabod
3,4,
Soad M. El-Ashry
3,
Wagdi Saber Soliman
5,*,
Noha El-Tayeh
2 and
Jesus M. Castillo
6
1
Department of Biology, College of Science, King Khalid University, Abha 61413, Saudi Arabia
2
Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, South Valley University, Qena 83523, Egypt
3
Soil and Water Use Department, Agriculture and Biological Research Division, National Research Centre, Cairo 12622, Egypt
4
Med-Soil Research Group, Seville University, 41012 Seville, Spain
5
Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Aswan University, Aswan 81528, Egypt
6
Departmento de Biología Vegetal y Ecología, Facultad de Biología, Universidad de Sevilla, 41080 Sevilla, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2711; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092711
Submission received: 8 March 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 13 May 2019

Abstract

:
Sewage sludge improves agricultural soil and plant growth, but there are hazards associated with its use, including high metal(loid) contents. An experimental study was conducted under greenhouse conditions to examine the effects of sewage sludge on growth of the invasive tree Prosopis glandulosa, as well as to determine its phytoremediation capacity. Plants were established and grown for seven months along a gradient of sewage sludge content. Plant traits, soil properties, and plant and soil concentrations of N, P, K, Cd, Pb, Cu, Ni, Zn, Cr, Co, As, and Fe were recorded. The addition of sewage sludge led to a significant decrease in soil pH, and Ni, Co, and As concentrations, as well as an increase in soil organic matter and the concentrations of N, P, Cu, Zn, and Cr. Increasing sewage sludge content in the growth medium raised the total uptake of most metals by P. glandulosa plants due to higher biomass accumulation (taller plants with more leaves) and higher metal concentrations in the plant tissues. P. glandulosa concentrated more Cd, Pb, Cu, Zn, and Fe in its below-ground biomass (BGB) than in its above-ground biomass (AGB). P. glandulosa concentrated Ni, Co, and As in both BGB and AGB. P. glandulosa has potential as a biotool for the phytoremediation of sewage sludges and sewage-amended soils in arid and semi-arid environments, with a potential accumulation capability for As in plant leaves.

1. Introduction

Sewage sludge, a biological by-product of sewage treatments, increases organic matter and macronutrients in agricultural and degraded soils, and is widely used for plant fertilization since it offers the opportunity to recycle organic matter to soil [1,2]. However, concern has increased about the application of municipal sewage sludge for plant fertilization because of the high metal(loid) concentrations in some sewage-amended soils, with potentially deleterious impacts on the ecosystem and human health [3,4,5].
Because of the potentially dangerous consequences of the presence of metals, data concerning the cleaning techniques of sewage-amended soils are necessary. In this context, plants can be used as biotools to reduce metal loads in soils enriched with sewage sludge or even directly in municipal sewage sludges before they are added to the soil [6]. Phytoremediation is an eco-friendly and inexpensive mechanism for cleaning polluted soils compared to the high cost of chemical and physical remediation techniques, which can be harmful to ecosystems [7]. Phytoremediation simultaneously maintains the biological activity and physical structure of soils, allowing the stabilization and extraction of metals [8]. Basically, phytoremediation refers to the use of plants and associated microbes in soil to reduce pollutant concentrations and/or their toxic effects on the environment [9]. Those plants taking up higher concentrations of metals by their roots and their accumulation in the above-ground biomass (AGB) are suitable biotools for phytoextraction, while those species reducing the mobility and bioavailability of metals in the environment represent biotools for phytostabilization [10]. Recently, much interest has focused on the potential accumulation of phytotoxic metals in plant tissues [11]. Despite this screening, a limited number of such potential plants have been identified [12]. Such plants strongly express metal sequestration mechanisms, can sometimes show high internal requirements for specific metals [13], and are capable of mobilizing metals from less-soluble components in the soil [14]. Metals accumulate and distribute in plant tissues depending on the plant species, the concentration of metals in the soil, and the element species and its bioavailability, which depends on soil pH, organic matter content, and other factors [15]. Over the last decade, the potential use of trees as a suitable solution to remediate metal-contaminated soils has received increasing attention [16,17,18], especially when it is costly to use other treatments or there is no time pressure to reuse the land [19].
Some of the plants used as biotools in phytoremediation are exotic invasive species [20,21] that are able to grow where the indigenous vegetation is constrained by environmental factors, such as high levels of disturbance, salinity, drought, and pollution [22,23]. This could be the case for Prosopis glandulosa Torr. (syn. Prosopis juliflora (SW.) DC), an evergreen phreatophytic tree native to southwestern United States and northern Mexico [24]. P. glandulosa has invaded and continues to invade millions of hectares of rangeland all around the world, being rated as one of the top 100 least-wanted species worldwide [25]. P. glandulosa colonizes arid and semiarid lands, where it exhibits rapid growth, deep and extensive rooting, efficient nutrient uptake, and high biomass production [26,27]. Abiotic stress, such as drought, induces the production of metallothioneins, increasing the tolerance of P. glandulosa to metals [28]. These plant traits make P. glandulosa a suitable tree for use in the phytoremediation of saline-sodic soils and soils polluted with fluoride and metals [29,30,31,32]. However, no previous study has analysed the capability of P. glandulosa plants to tolerate, stabilize, and extract metals from sewage sludge and sewage-amended soils. The seedlings of many other species are more sensitive to metal pollution than adult plants [33].
The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerance and phytoremediation capacity of the invasive tree P. glandulosa to different concentrations of metals when growing on raw sewage sludge and sewage-amended soils. With this aim, we recorded the concentrations of nine metals in the growth medium before and seven months after planting P. glandulosa in six different treatments along a gradient of sewage sludge content ranging from 100% agricultural soil to 100% sewage sludge in a greenhouse experiment. We also recorded the concentration of those metals in different plant organs (roots, stems, and leaves) and the growth of P. glandulosa plants. We hypothesized that invasive P. glandulosa would tolerate high concentrations of metals in the growth medium, being able to phytoremediate them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material and Experimental Design

Seeds of Prosopis glandulosa were collected in September 2016 from multiple mature individuals invading the Wadi Merikwan, Gebel Elba National Park, in the southeast of Egypt (22°14′2″ E–36°36′30.1″ W)(see Ball [34] and Al-Gohary [35] for a site description). A greenhouse experiment was conducted at South Valley University (Qena, Egypt, 26°11′36.5″ N–32°44′38.4″ E) from 1 February to the end of August 2017. Seeds (one seed per pot) of P. glandulosa were sown 1 cm deep in the growth media in plastic pots (17 cm deep and 14 cm diameter). A total of 36 pots were used, including six pots (replicate) for each treatment. The growth media were prepared by mixing agricultural soil from the campus of South Valley University with different proportions of sewage sludge from the residual water treatment plant of Qena (26°09´19.8˝ N–32°46´35.8˝ E). The soil consisted of coarse sand (72%), silt (8%), and clay (18%) with a sandy loam texture, pH of 8.25, Ec of 0.87 ds/m, and organic matter content of 4.1%. Treatments were designated as T1 for agricultural soil without sewage sludge (100% soil), T2 (80% soil + 20% sewage sludge), T3 (60% soil + 40% sewage sludge), T4 (40% soil + 60% sewage sludge), T5 (20% soil + 80% sewage sludge), and T6 (100% sewage sludge). Plants were maintained under ambient light in the greenhouse and they were irrigated once a day, avoiding leaching and ensuring a soil moisture value of about 70% of its water holding capacity.

2.2. Growth Media Analyses

The analytical method was assessed using a standard reference material (soil from South Valley University and sewage sludge from Qena governorate), which was included in the triplicate analyses as a part of the quality assurance and quality control protocol (accuracy within 100 ± 10%). Reagent blanks and standards were used to ensure precision and accuracy analysis. Growth medium samples were taken from each pot before planting and after harvesting. pH was determined in a 1:5 (v/v) suspension of growth medium in water using a pH meter (Crison CM35+, Barcelona, Spain). Organic matter was measured using the LOI method [36]. Samples (1.0 g) were digested with a mixture of HCl and HNO3 for chemical analysis. The extracts used for chemical analysis followed Tisdall & Oades [37] and each sample was analyzed in triplicate. It is worth mentioning that this method was limited to the pseudo-total, not total, concentrations of metals. Total nitrogen (N) concentration was obtained using the Kjeldahl method. Phosphorous (P) concentration was measured calorimetrically using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer. The pseudo-total concentration of nine metal(loid)s, including Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), Arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe), was determined using an atomic absorption spectrometer (Thermo Scientific ICE 3200) (PerkinElmer Atomic Absorption Spectrometers Analyst 400, Waltham, MA, USA).

2.3. Plant Traits

At the end of the experiment (the end of August 2017), the number of leaves per plant of P. glandulosa was counted. Plant height was measured from the base of the main stem to the tip of the upper leaf using a ruler. After harvesting, plants were separated into leaves, stems, and roots, and dried at 80 °C for 48 h in a forced-air oven, and their dry weights (DW) were recorded.
For plant chemical analysis after harvesting, 1.0 g DW of plant samples (leaves, stems, and roots) was digested in 20 mL H2SO4 (96%) and H2O2 (30%), and their concentrations of elements (μg/g DW) were recorded, as previously reported for soil samples. Total element uptake (U) was calculated by multiplying the element concentration measured in the different plant organs (leaves, stems, and roots) by the corresponding biomass (DW) [38]. The bioconcentration factor (BCF), an index of metals extracted from soil and accumulated in plant tissues, is the ratio of plant to soil metal concentration and the translocation factor (TF), an index of metals translocated from the root to the shoot, is the ratio of plant shoot to root metal concentration [39]. A TF > 1 means that the plant has a greater capability to transport metals from the roots to aboveground biomass:
B C F = C p l a n t C s o i l
T F = C s h o o t C r o o t ,
where Cplant is the metal concentration in the plant (µg/g), Csoil is the metal concentration in soil, Cshoot is the metal concentration in the plant shoots (µg/g), and Croot is the metal concentration in roots.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistics were carried out using SPSS release 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data series were tested for homogeneity of variance, using Levene’s test, and for normality, using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Differences in plants and growth media between treatments were tested by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test as a post-hoc test. The student t-test was used to compare growth media properties before planting and after harvesting.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Sewage Sludge on Growth Media

Increasing the sewage sludge proportion acidified the growth media before planting (ANOVA, F = 30.4, P < 0.001) and after harvesting (ANOVA, F = 167.0, P < 0.001). The pH was always higher before planting than after harvesting (t-test, P < 0.05), except for T6 (t-test = 4.52, P = 0.10) (Table 1). Increasing the sewage sludge content in the growth medium provoked increases in soil organic matter before planting (ANOVA, F = 2417.4, P < 0.001) and after harvesting (ANOVA, F = 286.5, P < 0.001). Organic matter was slightly lower before planting than after harvesting for T2 (t-test = 13.5, P < 0.05), showing the opposite response for T4, T5, and T6 (t-test, P < 0.001) (Table 1).
The concentration of N, Cu, Zn, and Cr increased with increasing sewage sludge content before planting (ANOVA, P < 0.001) and after harvesting (ANOVA, P < 0.01) (Table 1). In contrast, the concentration of K decreased gradually with increasing sewage sludge content before planting (ANOVA, F = 38.91, P < 0.001) and increased for T5 and T6 after harvesting (ANOVA, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05) (Table 1). The concentration of Ni and Co decreased with increasing sewage sludge content before planting (ANOVA, P < 0.01) and after harvesting (ANOVA, P < 0.001) (Table 1). The concentration of As decreased with a higher sewage sludge content before planting, with its maximum reached for T3 (ANOVA, F = 40.7, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05), without showing significant differences between treatments after harvesting (ANOVA, P > 0.05) (Table 1). The addition of sewage sludge provoked no significant effects on the concentrations of Cd, Pb, and Fe in the growth media (ANOVA, P > 0.05) (Table 1).
Nitrogen and P concentrations in the growth media were higher after harvesting than before planting for T5 and T6, and T4, T5, and T6, respectively (t-test, P < 0.001) (Table 1). In contrast, the K concentration was lower after harvesting than before planting for T1–4 (t-test, P < 0.01) and only higher for T6 (t-test = 10.9, P < 0.001) (Table 1). The concentrations of Cu, Ni, Zn, Cr, Co, As, and Fe were lower after harvesting than before planting for every treatment (t-test, P < 0.05) (Table 1). The concentrations of Cd and Pb showed no significant differences during the experiment (Table 1).

3.2. Effect of Sewage Sludge on Plant Traits

Table 2 presents the ANOVA of plant traits under different mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge. The plants of Prosopis glandulosa were taller for T4, T5, and T6 than for T1, T2, and T3 (ANOVA, F = 16.1, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05) (Figure 1). The number of leaves per plant reached its maximum for T2 and T6 and minimum for T1 (ANOVA, F = 11.3, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05) (Figure 1). The biomass of leaves, shoots, and roots tended to be higher for T5 and T6 than for the other treatments, without showing significant differences (ANOVA, P > 0.05) (Figure 1).
The concentration of N in leaves was the highest for T2, T3, and T6 (ANOVA, F = 8.63, P < 0.01; HSD-test, P < 0.05), whereas the concentration of P was significantly higher for T6 compared to the other treatments (ANOVA, F = 20.64, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05). The foliar concentration of Cu, Ni, Zn, Cr, Co, As, and Fe increased with increasing sewage sludge content, reaching their maximum values for T4, except for Fe, which reached its maximum for T5 (ANOVA, P < 0.001) (Figure 2). No significant differences were shown among treatments for the foliar concentration of K, Cd, and Pb (ANOVA, P > 0.05) (Figure 2).
Regarding the roots, there were no significant differences between treatments for N, K, and Pb concentrations (ANOVA, P > 0.05). The concentration of P in the roots tended to increase with increasing sewage sludge content; however, it showed its maximum for T2 (ANOVA, F = 75.67, P < 0.001). The concentrations of Ni, Cr, Co, and As showed their maximum values for T3 and T6 (Figure 3). The concentration of Cd in the roots increased under T6 compared to all other treatments (ANOVA, F = 72.79, P < 0.001; HSD-test, P < 0.05), whereas the concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Fe in the roots rose with increasing sewage sludge content (ANOVA, P < 0.001) (Figure 3).
The total uptake (U) of every element by P. glandulosa increased greatly when increasing the sewage sludge content in growth medium. The highest U values were recorded for T6, where the highest accumulated metal was Fe, followed by As > Zn > Ni > Co > Cr > Cu > Pb > Ni. Under T1 (100% soil), the highest accumulated metal was As followed by Fe > Ni > Co > Cr > Zn > Pb > Cu > Cd. The metal accumulation under T6 was more than 3000-times that for Cu, 2000-times that for Cd, 1000-times that for Zn, and 600-times that for Fe when compared with T1. The other elements increased between 265- and 413-times under T6 when compared to T1 (Figure 4).
The TF was lower than 1 for Cu, Zn, Cr, and Fe metals in all treatments, but other metals showed TF values of more than 1 under some treatments (Table 3). The highest TF values were shown at T5 for Cd (4.829), T2 for Pb and Ni (4.192 and 1.157, respectively), and T4 for Co and As (1.613 and 4.098, respectively). On the other hand, the BCF increased with sewage sludge addition. The highest BCF values were shown at T6 for Cd, Pb, Ni, and Co (0.749, 0.337, 46.077, and 21.753, respectively); at T3 for Cu, Zn, and Cr (0.724, 1.046 and 0.400, respectively); and at T4 for As (4.186). The BCF of metals showed gradual increases with increasing sewage sludge content (Table 3). It is worth mentioning that the concentrations of Co and Ni in plants were more than 21- and 42-times higher, respectively, when compared to soil with T6 treatment, and were more than four-times higher for As with T3.

4. Discussion

The environmental factors, especially soil properties, are the key factors limiting metal bioavailability. Chiroma et al. [40] determined the permissible level of heavy metals in soil as follows: Cd (3 μg/g); As (20 μg/g); Co and Ni (50 μg/g); Cr, Cu, and Pb (100 μg/g); Zn (300 μg/g); and Fe (50000 μg/g). Thus, the solubility of many metals increases in acidic soils [41], whereas their availability is reduced by high levels of organic matter due to metal-organic complications [42]. In our study, organic matter increased and the growth medium tended to be more acidic when increasing its sewage sludge content, which may have resulted in reducing the negative impacts of metal availability, raising the cation exchange capacity in the soil and the nutrient accessibility for plant production due to the decomposition of the organic matter [43]. In this sense, pH decreased about 10%, organic matter content decreased about 40%, and N and P concentrations in the growth medium increased significantly after harvesting in comparison with before planting under high sewage sludge contents. Thus, the application of sewage sludge improved edaphic properties; however, it also increased the concentrations of some metals in the soil, as reported in previous studies [2,44]. Nevertheless, the presence of the least concentrated metals in the sewage sludge did not change (Cd and Pb) or were lowered (Ni, Co, and As) by its addition. Before planting Prosopis glandulosa, the recorded concentrations of Cd, Pb, Cu, and Fe in the growth medium were below their permissible limits for every treatment according to the levels set by the World Health Organization (WHO) [40]. The concentration of Co in the growth medium decreased under its permissible limit after the addition of 80%–100% of sewage sludge. The concentrations of Ni and As were higher than its permissible levels for every treatment, even when levels decreased with an increase of the sewage sludge content. The concentrations of Cr and Zn increased with the sewage sludge content in the growth medium before planting, and were always higher than its permissible level for Cr and at higher sewage sludge contents (80%–100%), for Zn (Table 1).
The plants of P. glandulosa showed a high tolerance to metals, which was reflected by taller plants with more leaves that tended to accumulate more biomass, even when grown on raw sewage sludge. P. glandulosa harbors some metal-resistant bacteria and arbuscular mycorrhizal in the rhizosphere and endosphere that improve its tolerance and efficiency of phytoremediation of metal-degraded soils [45,46]. In general, the macronutrients concentration in P. glandulosa tissues did not show clear relationships with the addition of sewage sludge. Thus, the concentration of N increased in leaves by 20%–40% at 100% sewage sludge, without showing significant differences between treatments in roots. The concentration of P increased in leaves when growing on raw sewage sludge and in the roots for 20% sewage sludge, and the concentration of K was similar for every treatment in leaves and roots. On the other hand, the abundance of Pb and Cd, the less concentrated metals in the growth medium independent of the sewage sludge content, were similar among treatments in the leaves and roots, except for Cd in roots for the highest sewage sludge contents. This may be related to the presence of a transport peptide in this species that seems to have an important role in Cd uptake [47]. In contrast, the concentration of Cu, Zn, Cr, Ni, Co, and Fe in leaves and roots increased with the addition of sewage sludge. Mokgalaka-Matlala [48] recorded the reduced growth of Prosopis sp. due to high As concentrations. P. glandulosa has a deep and extensive root system [49] that allows it to explore a high volume of soil, where it may interact with metals.
The total uptake of most metals by P. glandulosa plants increased with the addition of sewage sludge, which may be induced by an increment of their availability, probably related to the acidification and their increasing concentrations in the growth medium [4,50]. As a result of this increase in metal uptake and the tendency to accumulate more biomass at higher sewage sludge contents, the P. glandulosa plants accumulated many more metals in their biomass due to the addition of sewage sludge. Because of this, P. glandulosa was able to extract enough metals from the growth media to significantly reduce their concentration after seven months of planting. Consequently, P. glandulosa reduced the concentration of Cu, Ni, Zn, and Co to below their permissible level following the WTO standards [40].
The TF was less than 1 under all treatments for Cu, Zn, Cr, and Fe, representing a low capability to transport metals from roots to AGB. This was associated with BCF values of less than 1 for those metals, with the exception of Zn under T3 treatment. P. glandulosa concentrated more Cd, Pb, Ni, Co, and As in its AGB than in its BGB, when grown under some treatments of sewage sludge. The TF was less than 1 for all metals under T6 (100% sewage sludge). Root activity can act as a barrier for metal translocation to the photosynthetic organs [51]. The higher concentrations of metals (Cu, Zn, Cr, and Fe) in the roots, rather than ABB, pointed to the low capacity of P. glandulosa to phytoextract such metals when growing under high concentrations. Ni, Co, and As accumulation increased in both BGB and AGB with increasing sewage sludge concentration, however, the concentrations of both Ni and Co were rather low. BCF and TF also increased gradually with increases of sewage sludge concentration, these increments are suggested to be artificial since increasing the sludge concentration made it easier for the plant to uptake such metals. These results support the capability of P. glandulosa to phytostabilize such metals when growing under high concentrations. Hammond et al. [52] recorded the sequestration of As in the epidermis and the vacuoles of the roots of P. glandulosa. Although the concentration of As in soil was extremely law, its concentration in leaves increased to much more than the permissible level (1000 µg/g) in some treatments, as well as the increments of BCF and TF that suggested the promise of P. glandulosa for As phytoextraction [39,53,54]. The significant decreases of most metals’ concentration in soil after seven months of planting P. glandulosa were associated with an increase of those metals in plants and increasing BCF, representing the capability of plants to accumulate those metals in their tissues. Our results are consistent with previous findings, which showed that P. glandulosa is an effective remediator of polluted soils and tannery sludges polluted with different metals [29,30,31]. Despite the capability of P. glandulosa to remediate metals and metalloids from soil and accumulate them in plant tissue, potential accumulation was only shown for As when its content was more than 1000 μg/g under high sewage sludge contents.

5. Conclusions

In view of our results, P. glandulosa has potential for the phytoremediation of sewage sludges and sewage-amended soils, limited to sandy loam soil, when they are polluted with metals such as Cd, Zn, Ni, Co, and As, with a potential accumulation capability of As. Due to the ability of P. glandulosa to colonize semi-arid and arid lands, and because its tolerance to metals is improved by abiotic stress [28], this invasive tree could be used to remediate metal-polluted sewage sludge, agricultural soils, and mine tailings in arid and semi-arid environments. In this context, P. glandulosa shows different ecotypes with a contrasted tolerance to metals [53]. Because of the high invasive capacity of P. glandulosa [25], we recommend that, if this species is grown outside of its native range, only young plants should be used before they have reached their reproductive stage. At the same time, for phytoremediation, P. glandulosa may be used as a multipurpose crop during its cultivation, for example, for carbon storage, erosion control, and fertility maintenance, and, once removed from the remediated site, it may be valuable for energetic use in an integrated phytomanagement strategy [55].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M.A., J.M.C. and W.S.S.; methodology, S.M.E.-A.; software, S.K.A.-E.; validation, J.M.C., A.M.A. and W.S.S.; formal analysis, N.E.-T.; investigation, A.M.A., J.S.C. and W.S.S.; resources, A.M.A.; data curation, S.K.A.-E.; writing—original draft preparation, W.S.S.; writing—review and editing, J.M.C.; visualization, J.M.C.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Mansour Hussein for his work in the greenhouse facilities of South Valley University. The authors would like to express their gratitude to King Khalid University, Saudi Arabia, for providing administrative and technical support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Mosquera-Losada, M.R.; Morán-Zuloaga, D.; Rigueiro-Rodriguez, A. Effects of lime and sewage sludge on soil, pasture production, and tree growth in a six-year-old Populus Canadensis Moench silvopastoral system. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2011, 174, 145–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cerqueira, B.; Vega, F.A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Andrade, L. Effects of vegetation on chemical and mineralogical characteristics of soils developed on a decantation bank from a copper mine. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 421–422, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, M.J. Land application of sewage sludge in China. Sci. Total Environ. 1997, 197, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Dar, M.I.; Khan, F.A.; Green, I.D.; Naikoo, M.I. The transfer and fate of Pb from sewage sludge amended soil in a multi-trophic food chain: A comparison with the labile elements Cd and Zn. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 16133–16142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yuswir, N.S.; Praveena, S.M.; Aris, A.Z.; Ismail, S.N.S.; Hashim, Z. Health risk assessment of heavy metal in urban surface soil (Klang District, Malaysia). Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2015, 95, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nissim, W.G.; Cincinelli, A.; Martellini, T.; Alvisi, L.; Palm, E.; Mancuso, S.; Azzarello, E. Phytoremediation of sewage sludge contaminated by trace elements and organic compounds. Environ. Res. 2018, 164, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Pendergrass, A.; Butcher, D.J. Uptake of lead and arsenic in food plants grown in contaminated soil from Barber Orchard, NC. Microchem. J. 2006, 83, 14–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baker, A.J.M.; Reeves, R.D.; McGrath, S.P. In Situ Decontamination of Heavy Metal Polluted Soils Using Crops of Metal-Accumulating Plants—A Feasibility Study. In Situ Bioreclamation 1991, 600–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Greipsson, S. Phytoremediation. Nat. Educ. Knowl. 2011, 3, 7. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals-Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Soliman, W.S.; Sugiyama, S. Phytoremediation and tolerance capacity of moringa to cadmium and its relation to nutrients content. Pollut. Res. 2016, 35, 23–27. [Google Scholar]
  12. Krzciuk, K.; Galuszka, A. Prospecting for hyperaccumulators of trace elements: A review. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2015, 35, 522–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Shen, Z.G.; Zhao, F.J.; McGrath, S.P. Uptake and transport of zinc in the hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens and the nonhyperaccumulator Thlaspi Ochroleucum. Plant Cell Environ. 1997, 20, 898–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McGrath, S.P.; Shen, Z.G.; Zhao, F.J. Heavy metal uptake and chemical changes in the rhizosphere of Thiaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi ochroleucum grown in contaminated soils. Plant Soil 1997, 188, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sheoran, V.; Sheoran, A.S.; Poonia, P. Factors Affecting Phytoextraction: A Review. Pedosphere 2016, 26, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dickinson, N.M. Strategies for sustainable woodland on contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2000, 41, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Meers, E.; Lamsal, S.; Vervaeke, P.; Hopgood, M.; Lust, N.; Tack, F.M.G. Availability of heavy metals for uptake by Salix viminalis on a moderately contaminated dredged sediment disposal site. Environ. Pollut. 2005, 137, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. French, C.J.; Dickinson, N.M.; Putwain, P.D. Woody biomass phytoremediation of contaminated brownfield land. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 141, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pulford, I.D.; Watson, C. Phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated land by trees—A review. Environ. Int. 2003, 29, 529–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pandey, V.C. Invasive species based efficient green technology for phytoremediation of fly ash deposits. J. Geochem. Explor. 2012, 123, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Abbas, A.M.; Hammad, S.; Soliman, W.S. Influence of copper and lead on germination of three Mimosoideae plant species. Asian J. Agric. Biol. 2017, 5, 320–327. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, R.; Tang, H.J.; Yang, Y.; Chen, X. Invasive and non-invasive plants differ in response to soil heavy metal lead contamination. Bot. Stud. 2007, 48, 453–458. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mateos-Naranjo, E.; Andrades-Moreno, L.; Redondo-Gómez, S. Comparison of germination, growth, photosynthetic responses and metal uptake between three populations of Spartina densiflora under different soil pollution conditions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2011, 74, 2040–2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pasiecznik, N.M.; Felker, P.; Harris, P.J.C.; Harsh, L.N.; Cruz, G.; Tewari, J.C.; Cadoret, K.; Maldonado, L.J. The Prosopis Juliflora—Prosopis Pallida Complex: Complex: A Monograph; HDRA: Coventry, UK, 2001; p. 172. [Google Scholar]
  25. Global Invasive Species Database. 2019. Available online: http://www.iucngisd.org/gisd/100_worst.php (accessed on 10 May 2019).
  26. Andersson, S. Spread of the Introduced Tree Species Prosopis Juliflora (SW.) DC in the Lake Baringo Area, Kenya; Institutionen for Skoglif Vegetationsekologi, SLU (Swedish Agricultural University): Umea, Sweden, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  27. Abbas, A.M.; Soliman, W.S.; Mansour, A.; Taher, E.; Hassan, I.N.; Mahmoud, M.; Youssif, M.F.; Mansour, H.; Abdelkareem, M. Predicting the spatial spread of invasive Prosopis juliflora (SW.) D.C. along environmental gradients in Gabel Elba National Park, Egypt. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2016, 7, 596–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Usha, B.; Venkataraman, G.; Parida, A. Heavy metal and abiotic stress inducible metallothionein isoforms from Prosopis juliflora (SW) DC show differences in binding to heavy metals in vitro. Mol. Genet. Genom. 2009, 281, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Shukla, O.P.; Juwarkar, A.A.; Singh, S.K.; Khan, S.; Rai, U.N. Growth responses and metal accumulation capabilities of woody plants during the phytoremediation of tannery sludge. Waste Manag. 2011, 31, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Varun, M.; D’Souza, R.; Prata, J.; Paul, M.S. Phytoextraction potential of Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) DC. with specific reference to lead and cadmium. Bull. Environm. Contam. Toxicol. 2011, 87, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Saini, P.; Khan, S.; Baunthiyal, M.; Sharma, V. Effects of fluoride on germination, early growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of legume plant species Prosopis juliflora. J. Environ. Biol. 2013, 34, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Abdalla, M.A.; Elkarim, A.H.A.; Taniguchi, T.; Endo, T.; Yamanaka, N. Phytoremediation of calcareous saline-sodic soils with mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Acta Agric. Scand. B-Soil Plant Sci. 2017, 67, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Guo, L.; Cutright, T.J.; Duirk, S. Effect of citric acid, rhizosphere bacteria, and plant age on metal uptake in reeds cultured in acid mine drainage. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ball, J. The Geography and Geology of South-Eastern Egypt; Ministry of Edu. Government Press: Cairo, Egypt, 1912; p. 394.
  35. Al-Gohary, I.H. Floristic composition of eleven wadis in Gebel Elba, Egypt. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2008, 10, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
  36. Schulte, E.E.; Kaufmann, C.; Peter, J.B. The influence of sample size and heating time on soil weight loss-onignition. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 1991, 22, 159–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tisdall, J.M.; Oades, J.M. Organic matter and waters table aggregates in soils. J. Soil Sci. 1982, 33, 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Antonkiewicz, J.; Kołodziej, B.; Bielińska, E.J. The use of reed canary grass and giant miscanthus in the phytoremediation of municipal sewage sludge. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 9505–9517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Yoon, J.; Cao, X.; Zhou, Q.; Ma, L.Q. Accumulation of Pb, Cu, and Zn in native plants growing on a contaminated Florida site. Sci. Total Environ. 2006, 368, 456–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chiroma, T.M.; Ebewele, R.O.; Hymore, F.K. Comparative assessment of heavy metal levels in soil, vegetables and urban grey waste water used for irrigation in Yola and Kano. Int. Refereed J. Eng. Sci. 2014, 3, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  41. Smith, S.R. Agricultural recycling of sewage sludge and the environment. CAB Int. 1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gupta, A.K.; Sinha, S. Phytoextraction capacity of the plants growing on tannery sludge dumping sites. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 1788–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dussault, M.; Bécaert, V.; François, M.; Sauvé, S.; Deschênes, L. Effect of copper on soil functional stability measured by relative soil stability index (RSSI) based on two enzyme activities. Chemosphere 2008, 72, 755–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Arenas-Lago, D.; Vega, F.A.; Silva, L.F.O.; Andrade, M.L. Soil interaction and fractionation of added cadmium in some Galician soils. Microchem. J. 2013, 110, 681–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Solis-Dominguez, F.A.; Valentin-Vargas, A.; Chorover, J.; Maier, R.M. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant biomass and the rhizosphere microbial community structure of mesquite grown in acidic lead/zinc mine tailings. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Khan, M.U.; Sessitsch, A.; Harris, M.; Fatima, K.; Imran, A.; Arslan, M.; Shabir, G.; Khan, Q.M.; Afzal, M. Cr-resistant rhizo- and endophytic bacteria associated with Prosopis juliflora and their potential as phytoremediation enhancing agents in metal-degraded soils. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 5, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Keeran, N.S.; Ganesan, G.; Parida, A.K. A novel heavy metal ATPase peptide from Prosopis juliflora is involved in metal uptake in yeast and tobacco. Transgenic Res. 2017, 26, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Mokgalaka-Matlala, N.S.; Flores-Tavizon, E.; Castillo-Michel, H.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; Gardea-Torresdey, J.L. Toxicity of arsenic (III) and (V) on plant growth, element uptake, and total amylolytic activity of mesquite (Prosopis juliflora x P. velutina). Int. J. Phytoremediation 2008, 10, 47–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yoda, K.Y.; Tsuji, W.; Inoune, T.; Saito, T.; Abd Elbasit, M.A.M.; Eldoma, A.M.; Magzoub, M.K.; Hoshino, B.; Nawata, H.; Yasuda, H. Evaluation of the Effect of a Rain Pulse on the Initial Growth of Prosopis Seedlings. Arid Land Res. Manag. 2015, 29, 210–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Belhaj, D.; Elloumi, N.; Jerbi, B.; Zouari, M.; Abdallah, F.B.; Ayadi, H.; Kallel, M. Effects of sewage sludge fertilizer on heavy metal accumulation and consequent responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2016, 23, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yang, X.E.; Li, T.Q.; Yang, J.C.; He, Z.L.; Lu, L.L.; Meng, F.H. Zinc compartmentation in root, transport into xylem, and absorption into leaf cells in the hyperaccumulating species of Sedum alfredii Hance. Planta 2006, 224, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hammond, C.M.; Root, R.A.; Maier, R.M.; Chorover, J. Mechanisms of arsenic sequestration by Prosopis juliflora during the phytostabilization of metalliferous mine tailings. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gardea-Torresdey, J.L.; Peralta-Videa, J.R.; de la Rosa, G.; Parsons, J.G. Phytoremediation of heavy metals and study of the metal coordination by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Coordinat. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249, 1797–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Van der Ent, A.; Baker, A.J.M.; Reeves, R.D.; Pollard, A.J.; Schat, H. Hyperaccumulation of metal and metalloid trace elements: Facts and function. Plant Soil 2013, 362, 319–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Burges, A.; Alkorta, I.; Epelde, L.; Garbisu, C. From phytoremediation of soil contaminants to phytomanagement of ecosystem services in metal contaminated sites. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 384–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Plant height, number of leaves, and leaf, stem, and root biomass of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Figure 1. Plant height, number of leaves, and leaf, stem, and root biomass of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Sustainability 11 02711 g001
Figure 2. Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium(Cr), Cobalt (Co), Arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) contents in leaves of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same plant part (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Figure 2. Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium(Cr), Cobalt (Co), Arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) contents in leaves of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same plant part (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Sustainability 11 02711 g002
Figure 3. Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium(Cr), Cobalt (Co), Arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) contents in roots of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same plant part (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Figure 3. Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium(Cr), Cobalt (Co), Arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) contents in roots of Prosopis glandulosa grown on mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments for the same plant part (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Sustainability 11 02711 g003
Figure 4. Total metal content for plants of Prosopis glandulosa under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures: (T1) (control, 100% soil), (T2) (80% soil+20% sewage sludge), (T3) (60% soil+40% sewage sludge), (T4) (40% soil+60% sewage sludge), (T5) (20% soil+80% sewage sludge), and (T6) (100% sewage sludge). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Figure 4. Total metal content for plants of Prosopis glandulosa under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures: (T1) (control, 100% soil), (T2) (80% soil+20% sewage sludge), (T3) (60% soil+40% sewage sludge), (T4) (40% soil+60% sewage sludge), (T5) (20% soil+80% sewage sludge), and (T6) (100% sewage sludge). Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments (ANOVA, P < 0.05; HSD-test, P < 0.05).
Sustainability 11 02711 g004
Table 1. Soil pH and soil contents of organic matter (OM), Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) for different mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)) before planting and after harvesting of Prosopis glandulosa. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments before planting or after harvesting (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test, P < 0.05) and asterisks indicate significant differences between before planting and after harvesting (t-test, P < 0.05).
Table 1. Soil pH and soil contents of organic matter (OM), Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Zinc (Zn), Chromium (Cr), Cobalt (Co), arsenic (As), and Iron (Fe) for different mixtures of agricultural soil and sewage sludge (100% soil (T1), 80% soil + 20% sewage sludge (T2), 60:40 (T3), 40:60 (T4), 20:80 (T5), and 100% sewage sludge (T6)) before planting and after harvesting of Prosopis glandulosa. Different letters indicate significant differences between treatments before planting or after harvesting (ANOVA, P < 0.05; Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) test, P < 0.05) and asterisks indicate significant differences between before planting and after harvesting (t-test, P < 0.05).
T1T2T3T4T5T6
pHBefore planting8.25 a *7.85 b *7.29 c *7.43 c *7.12 cd *6.86 d
After harvesting7.98 a7.10 b6.85 c6.70 cd6.74 cd6.60 d
OM (%)Before planting4.10 d *5.00 d *8.03 c17.60 c *18.10 b *27.57 a *
After harvesting5.10 d5.30 d8.03 c10.44 b10.50 b16.80 a
N (%)Before planting0.19 c *0.19 c0.29 c0.52 b0.64 b *0.80 a *
After harvesting0.14 e0.20 de0.30 d0.51 c1.09 b1.71 a
P (%)Before planting0.13 c0.33 ab0.25 b0.10 c *0.30 b *0.43 a *
After harvesting0.11 e0.21 de0.31 d0.83 c1.44 b1.84 a
K (%)Before planting0.67 a *0.68 a *0.65 ab *0.53 bc *0.40 c0.24 d *
After harvesting0.26 b0.26 b0.24 b0.28 b0.47 a0.51 a
Cd (μg/g)Before planting1.34 a1.73 a *1.84 a1.37 a1.43 a1.93 a
After harvesting0.60 a0.80 a1.23 a1.23 a1.47 a0.93 a
Pb (μg/g)Before planting9.94 a15.50 a15.08 a16.47 a11.83 a13.53 a
After harvesting6.93 a7.00 a7.63 a10.37 a14.13 a8.40 a
Cu (μg/g)Before planting21.57 e *25.46 e *36.63 d *51.87 c *64.93 b *96.00 a *
After harvesting4.90 f8.63 e13.17 d24.50 c46.47 b65.45 a
Ni (μg/g)Before planting115.54 a *95.23 ab *83.70 b *87.93 b *70.47 bc *54.63 c *
After harvesting20.07 a17.13 a11.90 a2.70 b1.36 b1.21 b
Zn (μg/g)Before planting75.82 d *93.63 d *156.65 d *254.83 c *511.90 b *1530.1 a *
After harvesting20.13 e23.47 e35.93 d42.93 c59.70 b83.55 a
Cr (μg/g)Before planting116.15 d *127.90 c *129.27 c *129.87 c *141.30 b *177.3 a *
After harvesting79.33 c100.87 ab106.67 ab91.50 bc113.63 a109.6 ab
Co (μg/g)Before planting55.96 ab *59.60 a *67.74 a *48.70 ab *44.97 ab *34.23 b *
After harvesting23.23 a10.13 b26.20 a10.27 b8.40 b1.80 c
As (μg/g)Before planting0.234 a *0.280 a *0.334 a *0.235 a *0.200 a0.166 a
After harvesting0.124 c0.039 b0.140 c0.025 a0.188 d0.095 cd
Fe (μg/g)Before planting2.084 a *2.055 a *2.042 a *1.643 a *1.229 a *1.408 a *
After harvesting0.770 a0.432 ab0.384 ab0.353 b0.459 ab0.461 ab
Table 2. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for plant height (cm), number of leaves, and leaves and roots biomass of Prosopis glandulosa under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures.
Table 2. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for plant height (cm), number of leaves, and leaves and roots biomass of Prosopis glandulosa under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures.
DFSSMSF. Value
Plant height51771.6354.316.1 **
Number of leaves5623.6124.711.3 **
Leaf biomass50.4230.0852.59 *
Root biomass50.7820.1562.40 n.s.
DF: degree of freedom; SS: sum of squares; MS: mean of squares; * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.001, n.s. not significant.
Table 3. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) of metals under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures: T1 (control, 100% soil), T2 (80% soil+20% sewage sludge), T3 (60% soil+40% sewage sludge), T4 (40% soil+60% sewage sludge), T5 (20% soil+80% sewage sludge), and T6 (100% sewage sludge).
Table 3. Bioconcentration factor (BCF) and translocation factor (TF) of metals under different soil and sewage sludge mixtures: T1 (control, 100% soil), T2 (80% soil+20% sewage sludge), T3 (60% soil+40% sewage sludge), T4 (40% soil+60% sewage sludge), T5 (20% soil+80% sewage sludge), and T6 (100% sewage sludge).
CdPbCuNiZnCrCoAsFe
Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)
T10.1180.2950.2802.2350.6600.2501.2080.6610.099
T20.1630.1660.3743.1310.7240.2863.4262.4640.228
T30.0730.1700.7245.5811.0460.4001.5531.0170.369
T40.0780.1080.37025.7330.7640.3923.8164.1860.411
T50.1290.0950.21638.5760.6630.2414.0190.3020.484
T60.7490.3370.33346.0770.8220.31221.7531.6740.474
Translocation Factor (TF)
T10.5861.3930.2511.1330.5800.2711.2190.5880.141
T20.7294.1920.0511.1570.7010.4840.9930.6220.254
T31.8161.7610.2160.7470.4690.3780.7760.5930.574
T40.4850.9450.3710.9980.5960.6081.6134.0980.371
T54.8291.3730.2950.9140.3440.6251.0553.5840.330
T60.3010.1410.1370.6510.1790.4610.9360.8890.176

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbas, A.M.; Abd-Elmabod, S.K.; El-Ashry, S.M.; Soliman, W.S.; El-Tayeh, N.; Castillo, J.M. Capability of the Invasive Tree Prosopis glandulosa Torr. to Remediate Soil Treated with Sewage Sludge. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092711

AMA Style

Abbas AM, Abd-Elmabod SK, El-Ashry SM, Soliman WS, El-Tayeh N, Castillo JM. Capability of the Invasive Tree Prosopis glandulosa Torr. to Remediate Soil Treated with Sewage Sludge. Sustainability. 2019; 11(9):2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092711

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbas, Ahmed Mahmoud, Sameh K. Abd-Elmabod, Soad M. El-Ashry, Wagdi Saber Soliman, Noha El-Tayeh, and Jesus M. Castillo. 2019. "Capability of the Invasive Tree Prosopis glandulosa Torr. to Remediate Soil Treated with Sewage Sludge" Sustainability 11, no. 9: 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092711

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop