Next Article in Journal
Environmental Assessment of a Bio-Refinery Concept Comprising Biogas Production, Lactic Acid Extraction and Plant Nutrient Recovery
Next Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Forest Management for Nontimber Products
Previous Article in Journal
Inter-University Sustainability Benchmarking for Canadian Higher Education Institutions: Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows for Technical-Level Decision-Making
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efforts toward Creating a Sustainable Business Model: An Empirical Investigation of Small-Scale Certified Forestry Firms in Taiwan
Open AccessCommunication

Forest Certification: More Than a Market-Based Tool, Experiences from the Asia Pacific Region

1
The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA 22203, USA
2
World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037, USA
3
Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0115, Japan
4
Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University, Salaya, Nakhon Pathom 73170, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(9), 2600; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11092600
Received: 30 March 2019 / Revised: 16 April 2019 / Accepted: 23 April 2019 / Published: 6 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Forest Management)
Over the last 25 years, the global area of certified forests has grown rapidly and voluntary forest certification has become recognized as an effective tool to engage international markets in improving sustainability within forest management units. However, the bulk of this growth has occurred in North America, Northern Europe, Australia, and New Zealand, with relatively limited uptake in the tropics. Since its creation, forest certification has been largely understood as a “market-based” mechanism, in contrast to government-led policies and regulations. Through the experience of the Responsible Asia Forestry and Trade (RAFT) partnership in the Asia Pacific region, we find that the framing of forest certification as voluntary and market-based, and as a mechanism to overcome governance failure, has created an artificial dichotomy. In this dichotomy, voluntary certification and regulatory measures to promote sustainable forest management are conceived of and pursued largely independently. We argue that it is more constructive to view them as complementary approaches that share a common goal of increasing sustainability across the forestry sector. In practice, forest certification interacts with conventional governance institutions and mechanisms. Understanding these interactions and their implications, as well as additional possibilities for interaction, will help in realizing the full potential of forest certification. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable forest management; voluntary; market-based; regulatory; forestry; partnership sustainable forest management; voluntary; market-based; regulatory; forestry; partnership
MDPI and ACS Style

Lewin, A.; Mo, K.; Scheyvens, H.; Gabai, S. Forest Certification: More Than a Market-Based Tool, Experiences from the Asia Pacific Region. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2600.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop