Next Article in Journal
Identification and Analysis of Attributes for Industrial Food Waste Management Modelling
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparison of Health and Well-Being Aspects in Building Certification Schemes
Previous Article in Journal
Impacts of Environmental Factors on Waste, Energy, and Resource Management and Sustainable Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Trends, Costs, and Benefits of Green Certification of Office Buildings: A Polish Perspective
Open AccessArticle

Cost-Effective Options for the Renovation of an Existing Education Building toward the Nearly Net-Zero Energy Goal—Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

by Ming Hu
School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Sustainability 2019, 11(8), 2444; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082444
Received: 3 April 2019 / Revised: 19 April 2019 / Accepted: 20 April 2019 / Published: 25 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Building Technologies)
A comprehensive case study on life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) was conducted on a two- story education building with a projected 40-year lifespan in College Park, Maryland. The aim of this paper was to (1) create a life cycle assessment model, using an education building to test the model, (2) compare the life cycle cost (LCC) of different renovation scenarios, taking into account added renewable energy resources to achieve the university’s overall carbon neutrality goal, and (3) verify the robustness of the LCC model by conducting sensitivity analysis and studying the influence of different variables. Nine renovation scenarios were constructed by combining six renovation techniques and three renewable energy resources. The LCCA results were then compared to understand the cost-effective relation between implementing energy reduction techniques and renewable energy sources. The results indicated that investing in energy-efficient retrofitting techniques was more cost-effective than investments in renewable energy sources in the long term. In the optimum scenario, renovation and renewable energy, when combined, produced close to a 90% reduction in the life cycle cost compared to the baseline. The payback period for the initial investment cost, including avoided electricity costs, varies from 1.4 to 4.1 years. This suggests that the initial investment in energy-efficient renovation is the primary factor in the LCC of an existing building. View Full-Text
Keywords: nearly net-zero energy; life-cycle cost analysis; renovation; cost-effective; renovation nearly net-zero energy; life-cycle cost analysis; renovation; cost-effective; renovation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hu, M. Cost-Effective Options for the Renovation of an Existing Education Building toward the Nearly Net-Zero Energy Goal—Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2444.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop