Next Article in Journal
Assessment of the Ecological Niche of Photovoltaic Agriculture in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Corporate Social Responsibility: Understanding the Mining Stakeholder with a Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
Transformation of Biomass Waste into Sustainable Organic Fertilizers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Protection of Design in the Textile Industry in Order to Improve the Economic Aspect of Sustainable Development of Serbia—Comparative Overview of the Laws of the European Union and Croatia
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sustainability 2019, 11(8), 2267; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082267

Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability

Department of Service Management, FernUniversität in Hagen, 58084 Hagen, Germany
Received: 7 March 2019 / Revised: 2 April 2019 / Accepted: 10 April 2019 / Published: 15 April 2019
  |  
PDF [735 KB, uploaded 22 April 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Given their intermediary role and resulting influence on other industries, banks are pivotal in achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs), for which they approach ecological and social challenges in numerous ways. This study aims at creating a typology of the sustainability strategies that banks implement. To this end, 26 in-depth interviews were conducted within the German banking industry to detect patterns in the sustainable practices of these financial institutions. The strategy types identified are narrow, peripheral, balanced, and integrative, which are similar in structure but substantially different with respect to the kind of practices. Specifically, three main features distinguish these strategies. First, banks focus on either their core businesses or the peripheries of their business. Second, banks can concentrate on social or environmental issues. Third, within the peripheries of their businesses, banks can support external sustainability projects in terms of finances or content. It is also found that the choice of strategy is driven by varying combinations of business, social, and environmental motives. I thus explore the ways by which financial institutions contribute to the realization of the SDGs. The typology established in this work improves understanding with regards to the implementation of sustainability strategies and serves as inspiration to sustainability managers of banks. It also adds to sustainability research in the service context, which, unlike the manufacturing industry, is a widely under-researched setting. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability; SDGs; banking industry; case study; typology; CSR; financial services; sustainable banking sustainability; SDGs; banking industry; case study; typology; CSR; financial services; sustainable banking
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Zimmermann, S. Same Same but Different: How and Why Banks Approach Sustainability. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2267.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top