Next Article in Journal
Who Supports International Development Cooperation in Times of Crisis? Public Opinion in Rural Spain
Next Article in Special Issue
Engaging with the Beyond—Diffracting Conceptions of T-Learning
Previous Article in Journal
Reducing Working Hours as a Means to Foster Low(er)-Carbon Lifestyles? An Exploratory Study on Swiss Employees
Article Menu
Issue 7 (April-1) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

On the Inevitable Bounding of Pluralism in ESE—An Empirical Study of the Swedish Green Flag Initiative

Swedish International Centre of Education for Sustainable Development, Uppsala University, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 2026; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11072026
Received: 9 March 2019 / Revised: 26 March 2019 / Accepted: 3 April 2019 / Published: 5 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Transgressive Learning and Transformations to Sustainability)
  |  
PDF [563 KB, uploaded 5 April 2019]
  |  

Abstract

This paper explores potential tensions in transformative learning and environmental and sustainability education (ESE) between, on the one hand, pluralistic approaches, and, on the other hand, promotion of societal change to address urgent issues. We stipulate that design of ESE inevitably contributes to a bounding of the plurality of facts and values that are acknowledged in a given learning process. Based on a frame analysis of the Swedish Green Flag initiative, we argue that such bounding by design is a key aspect of how ESE practitioners handle tensions between pluralism and urgency, either consciously or unconsciously. Given its inevitability and importance, we assert that bounding by design is insufficiently theorized in ESE literature, which might partly explain that practitioners perceive pluralistic ideals as challenging. In the empirics, we discern three justifications for bounding by design: (i) certain facts or degree of scientific consensus; (ii) objectives decided by elected bodies; and (iii) decisions taken by student and teacher representatives. We point to the theory of libertarian paternalism and a typology of democratic legitimacy as conceptual tools that can guide further scrutiny of pluralistic ESE and support practitioners in undertaking conscious and transparent bounding by design. View Full-Text
Keywords: environmental and sustainability education; transformative learning; education for sustainable development; environmental education; pluralism; libertarian paternalism; legitimacy environmental and sustainability education; transformative learning; education for sustainable development; environmental education; pluralism; libertarian paternalism; legitimacy
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hellquist, A.; Westin, M. On the Inevitable Bounding of Pluralism in ESE—An Empirical Study of the Swedish Green Flag Initiative. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2026.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top