Next Article in Journal
Improving the Impact of Green Construction Management on the Quality of Highway Engineering Projects
Next Article in Special Issue
Vulnerability Analysis of Intercity Multimode Transportation Networks; A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta
Previous Article in Journal
Study on Surrounding Rock-Bearing Structure and Associated Control Mechanism of Deep Soft Rock Roadway Under Dynamic Pressure
Previous Article in Special Issue
Analysis and Optimization Strategy of Travel System for Urban Visually Impaired People

Swedish and Scottish National Transport Policy and Spend: A Social Equity Analysis

by 1,2,* and 2,3
Transport Research Institute, Edinburgh Napier University, 10 Colinton Rd, Edinburgh EH10 5DT, UK
K2 Swedish Knowledge Centre for Public Transport, SE-22236 Lund, Sweden
Department of Technology and Society, Transport and Roads, Lund University, P.O. Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(7), 1894;
Received: 29 January 2019 / Revised: 19 March 2019 / Accepted: 25 March 2019 / Published: 29 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Accessibility and Transportation Equity)
The topic of social equity in transport planning has been dealt with, in particular, by authors such as Martens (2012) and Martens and Golob (2012) using a social justice based-approach. However, such an approach, whilst valuable and analytically rigorous (based as it is on accessibility modelling), does not consider a wide range of possible other social impacts of transport, as set out in a framework first put forward by Geurs et al. (2009). This paper uses Geurs’ analytical framework to consider two empirical case studies: The National Transport Strategy for Scotland, adopted in January 2016, together with associated national level spending plans; and Sweden’s 2014–2025 National Transport Plan. The paper will first summarise the contents of each document before analysing them in relation to the categories of social impact that Geurs (2009) identifies, and assess how, in relation to each category of impact, various social groups will benefit or disbenefit. A range of projects (planned) to be delivered by the two national strategies is then analysed in relation to the criteria. This analysis shows that the two national strategies/plans are in their distribution of spending, and the projects funded are generally working away from greater social equity in their distributional impacts. View Full-Text
Keywords: social; equity; national; transport policy; funding social; equity; national; transport policy; funding
MDPI and ACS Style

Rye, T.; Wretstrand, A. Swedish and Scottish National Transport Policy and Spend: A Social Equity Analysis. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1894.

AMA Style

Rye T, Wretstrand A. Swedish and Scottish National Transport Policy and Spend: A Social Equity Analysis. Sustainability. 2019; 11(7):1894.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rye, Tom, and Anders Wretstrand. 2019. "Swedish and Scottish National Transport Policy and Spend: A Social Equity Analysis" Sustainability 11, no. 7: 1894.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop