Next Article in Journal
Quantity Measurement Cost and Reliability of Cereal Commodity Trade: Evidence from Ethiopia
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study of the Pedestrianized Zone for Tourists: Urban Design Effects on Humans’ Thermal Comfort in Fo Shan City, Southern China
Previous Article in Journal
Cultural Ecosystem of the Seediq’s Traditional Weaving Techniques—A Comparison of the Learning Differences Between Urban and Indigenous Communities
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of N Addition Frequency and Quantity on Hydrocotyle vulgaris Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wetland Microcosms

1
School of Nature Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2
Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, A11, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(6), 1520; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061520
Submission received: 23 January 2019 / Revised: 5 March 2019 / Accepted: 9 March 2019 / Published: 13 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Environments: Issues, Processes, and Solutions)

Abstract

:
(1) Background: Increased attention has been paid to atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition caused by human activities. N deposition quantity has seriously affected plant productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in wetlands, but the effects of N deposition frequency remain unclear. (2) Methods: We assembled microcosms, which contained vegetative individuals (ramets) of Hydrocotyle vulgaris and soil and subjected them to three frequencies (N addition 1, 2, and 14 times during the experimental period) crossed with three quantities (5, 15, and 30 g N m−2 yr−1) for 90 days. (3) Results: The quantity of N addition significantly increased the root, stem biomass, and ramets number of H. vulgaris, but decreased the spike biomass. N addition quantity significantly promoted N2O emission and inhibited CH4 emission but had no significant effect on CO2 emission. The increasing frequency of N addition significantly promoted the root-to-shoot ratio and decreased N2O emission under high N addition quantity. (4) Conclusions: In conclusion, N addition alters the reproductive strategy of H. vulgaris and enhances its invasiveness, promoting N2O emission but not the CO2 equivalent of the H. vulgaris-soil system.

1. Introduction

In recent years, more attention has been paid to the increasing atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition caused by human activities [1]. N deposition has continued to increase over the past 50 years [2], influencing the structure and function of various ecosystems [3,4,5]. At present, N deposition flux in China is about 2.1 g N m−2 yr−1, and that in Zhejiang Province is about 5 g N m−2 yr−1 [6]. It is projected that N deposition will increase in China by 2 to 3 times by 2100 [7]. In order to alleviate the contradiction between climate change and sustainable development of the wetland ecosystem, and understand the greenhouse gas emission mechanism, it is important to study the effect of atmospheric N deposition on plant growth and greenhouse gas emissions from the wetlands.
N is an essential element for plant growth, and N-limitation can affect physiological activities and development [8,9]. N deposition can increase plant biomass and decrease the root-to-shoot ratio within a certain supply range [10]. An increase in N availability may facilitate the successful invasion of exotic plants into new plant communities [11]. N deposition alters CO2 emission through an increase in plant biomass, a decrease in the C/N ratio of litter, and the mitigation of N restriction on microbial metabolism [12]. N deposition can affect CH4 flux by altering the activity of methanogens and methanotrophs [3,13], affecting the allocation of plant biomass, and thereby the impact on CH4 production, oxidation, and transport [10,14]. In addition, N deposition can increase N2O flux in wetlands because the growth and biomass accumulation of plants with N availability provide soil microorganisms with a more labile C source, which can be used as an energy source for denitrification [15,16].
Although the effects of N deposition on plant growth and greenhouse gas emissions have been extensively documented, results from the frequency of N deposition are controversial. N deposition frequency influences the resource acquisition of plants, which may provide an opportunity for plants to adapt to changes in nutritional conditions [17]. We predict that the effect of N deposition frequency on plants may be mediated by the quantity of N deposition. For example, under the conditions of low N deposition, the biomass of Alternanthera sessilis was higher in high-, compared to low-frequency N deposition, respectively [18]. Furthermore, the influence on different plant species varies with N deposition frequency. For example, high frequency of N deposition can improve the biomass accumulation and root growth of forbs or grasses, but not of legumes [19]. Previous studies showed that there was an ephemeral peak of N2O emissions after N addition [20]. Therefore, greenhouse gas emissions may be related to the frequency of N deposition. Results from modelling showed that a high frequency of N deposition can decrease CH4 emission and increase CO2 and N2O emissions [21]. More results from experiments are needed to observe some general patterns in the effects of N availability on the emission of greenhouse gases.
Many studies have investigated the effects of N quantity on plant productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in wetlands. However, the effects of the frequency of N supply remain unclear. In this study, the H. vulgaris microcosms were subjected to three frequencies (2, 4, and 12 times with an N addition every 30, 15, and 5 days) with a respective three N quantities (adding 5, 15, and 30 g N m−2 a−1) for 90 days. We aimed to test the following two hypotheses: (1) Increasing the quantity of N addition could promote the growth of H. vulgaris, which may be mediated by the frequency of N addition; (2) quantity and frequency of N addition could interactively affect greenhouse gas emissions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Microcosm Set-up

Hydrocotyle vulgaris is a perennial clonal herb [22]. The species can recruit ramets through sprouts from nodes by asexual reproduction, and seeds can also be produced for sexual reproduction [23]. H. vulgaris was introduced to China in the 1990s as a horticultural ornamental plant [24]. H. vulgaris can expand quickly in some wetlands in China, and it is considered a highly invasive species due to its ability to block rivers and canals and replace native species [24]. In this experiment, plants of H. vulgaris were collected from the Xixi wetland in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China, and they were propagated vegetatively in a greenhouse at the Forest Science Co. Ltd. of Beijing Forestry University in Beijing. We selected 226 similar-sized single node ramets with a leaf and a few roots. For the initial measurement, 10 ramets were used, and 216 ramets were used for the assembled 54 microcosms in the experiment. The average initial dry mass was 0.13 ± 0.01 g (mean ± s.e, n = 10). The field soil contained 5.8 ± 0.005 mg C g−1, 0.57 ± 0.006 mg total N g−1, and 0.58 ± 0.04 mg total P g−1.

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment was a factorial design with three quantities (low, medium, and high N quantity) crossed with three frequencies (low, medium, and high N frequency). Based on N deposition in the Eastern Zhejiang Province, China, and N addition quantities used in previous studies [25], we set 5, 15, and 30 g N m−2 yr−1, which referred to low, medium, and high N, respectively [6]. After transplantation for 8 days, we applied three frequencies of N addition, i.e., N addition every 5 days (high frequency, 14 times), every 30 days (medium frequency, twice), and once (low frequency) during the whole experiment to simulate the wet deposition frequency of N in summer in the Zhejiang Province. There were nine treatments, and each treatment had six replicates (pots), 54 pots in total. For N addition treatment, ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) mixed with 200 mL of deionized water was sprayed and then rinsed with 200 mL of deionized water.
The experiment was carried out in the greenhouse of Forest Science Co. Ltd. of Beijing Forestry University from 6 June to 3 September 2016. The soil moisture content remained around 60%, and the air temperature was 27–36 °C during the experimental period.

2.3. Measurement of Growth Index

The number of ramets was counted and the leaf area of H. vulgaris was measured when plants were harvested (obtained by WinFOLIA Pro 2004a, Regent Instruments, Inc., QC, Canada). Then, we separated the roots, stems, stalk, leaves, and spikes. The plant samples were oven dried at 70 °C for 72 h and weighed, and biomass was expressed as g pot−1.

2.4. Measurement of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

We measured the greenhouse gas emissions from the microcosms (pots with soil and ramets) four times during the experiment. Gas sampling was carried out once every 15 days after the first N addition. The measurement was performed using a static opaque chamber and gas chromatography [26]. The chamber was formed by an opaque, one-end sealed PVC tube with a diameter of 16 cm and a height of 50 cm. The chamber was sealed for 90 min to capture greenhouse gases before the measurements. Gas samples (40 mL) were collected at 30 min intervals over 90 min using plastic syringes. All samples were collected between 9:00 and 15:00 and then analyzed using gas chromatography (Agilent 7890A, Agilent Co., Santa Clara, CA, USA) within 24 h. CO2 and CH4 were analyzed by a flame ionization detector (FID) to analyze the concentration, and N2O was analyzed by an electron capture detector (ECD), the carrier gas was N2, the operating temperature of FID was 300 °C, and the ECD was 350 °C.
The fluxes of the three greenhouse gases were calculated from the slope of the linear regression between the gas concentration and the sampling time (0, 30, 60, and 90 min after chamber closure). The formula for the fluxes is [27]:
F = M P T 0 V 0 P 0 T H d c d t
where F is the emission flux (mg m−2 h−1); M is the molar mass of the gas. P0 and T0 are the air pressure and temperature under standard conditions, 110.325 k Pa and 273.15 K, respectively. V0 is the molar volume of the target compound under standard conditions and is 22.41 L mol−1. H is the height of the gas-sampling box (m). P and T are the air pressure (kPa) and temperature (K) at the sampling point, and dc is the concentration change of the target gas in the collection box within dt.

Estimation of CO2 Equivalent

According to the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report, the warming effect of CH4 is 25 times greater than that of CO2 and the warming effect of N2O is 298 times that of CO2 [28], based on the 100-year scale. We used the CO2 equivalent to show the combined effect of the three greenhouse gases. CO2 equivalent is calculated as:
CO 2 equivalent = EM ( CH 4 ) × 25 + EM ( N 2 O ) × 298 + EM ( CO 2 )
where EM (CH4) is the cumulative emissions of CH4 during the experiment, EM (N2O) is the cumulative emissions of N2O during the experiment, and EM (CO2) is the cumulative emissions of CO2 during the experiment.
EM is calculated as:
EM = i = 1 n ( F i + F i 1 ) 2 × ( t i t i 1 ) × S × 24
where EM is the cumulative emissions, F is the gas flux, t is the number of days from the beginning of the experiment, i is the number of measurements, and S is the area of each pot.

2.5. Data Analysis

A two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey tests, was used to examine the effects of the quantity (low, medium, and high quantity) and frequency (low, medium, and high frequency) of N addition and their interaction in the growth of H. vulgaris (biomass, root/shoot, No. of ramets, leaf area, specific leaf area) and the greenhouse gas emissions (CO2, CH4, N2O, and CO2 equivalent) from the H. vulgaris soil system. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between the biomass of H. vulgaris and the greenhouse gas emissions. Prior to the analyses, the data were tested for normality and underwent Levene’s test. All data satisfied normal distribution and homogeneity of variance. All data analysis was conducted in the statistical software SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Effects were considered to be significant if p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of the Quantity and Frequency of N Addition on the Growth of Hydrocotyle Vulgaris

The quantity and frequency of N addition had a significant interactive effect on the total biomass and stem biomass (Table 1). Under high frequency of N addition, the total biomass and stem biomass were significantly lower in the low, compared to the medium N quantity treatment. We did not find a significant difference between the three quantity treatments in either the low or medium frequency treatment (Figure 1A,F). The frequency of N addition significantly affected the root-to-shoot ratio and did not impact other growth indexes of H. vulgaris (Table 1). High and medium N quantity increased the root-to-shoot ratio (Figure 2A), decreased the spike biomass of H. vulgaris (Table 1, Figure 1E), and increased the root biomass under high-frequency treatment (Figure 1B). High quantity of N addition significantly increased the number of ramets and leaf area (Table 1, Figure 2E,C), and increased SLA under the low-frequency treatment (Figure 2D).

3.2. Effects of N addition Quantity and Frequency on Greenhouse Gas Emissions

The significant interactive effect between frequency and quantity of N addition affected N2O emission from the H. vulgaris microcosms (Table 2). N2O emission was significantly higher in high- than in low- and medium-quantity N treatments, respectively (Figure 3A). CH4 emission was significantly higher in low- than in high-quantity N treatments with a low frequency, and it was also higher in low- than in medium- and high-quantity N treatments with a high frequency (Figure 3B). We did not find any significant effect of N frequency or N quantity on CO2 emissions from the H. vulgaris microcosms (Figure 3C). There was no significant effect of N addition frequency and quantity on the CO2 equivalent (Figure 3D).

3.3. The Relationship between Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Biomass of H. Vulgaris

Cumulative emission of CO2 was significantly positively correlated with leaf biomass (p = 0.004, Figure 4A). In addition, the cumulative emission of CH4 was linearly positively correlated with spike biomass (p < 0.001, Figure 4C). In contrast, the cumulative emission of N2O was linearly negatively correlated with spike biomass (p = 0.001, Figure 4B).

4. Discussion

4.1. Effects of N Addition Quantity and Frequency on the Growth of H. Vulgaris

N addition directly promoted the growth of H. vulgaris in our study. High N addition significantly increased the root and stem biomass, the root-to-shoot ratio (R/S), the number of ramets, leaf area, and the specific leaf area of H. vulgaris. The results indicated that the growth of H. vulgaris benefited from sufficient nutrient conditions, which was consistent with previous findings [29]. Our results also confirmed that appropriate N addition can promote plant growth, thus increasing plant productivity [10].
Notably, the increase in belowground biomass and R/S in our study provided evidence to support the optimal partitioning theory rather than isometric theory [30,31]. In order to adapt to the changing habitat conditions, H. vulgaris allocated more biomass to the root and stem systems in the high and medium N addition treatments. The N-mediated increase in R/S may be due to the experimental period and the stage of plant development [32,33]. A previous study showed that the R/S of herbs increased with N addition for two years, and then decreased after four years [34]. Therefore, we proposed that the short-term N addition, which increased the R/S, could change the adaptive strategy of H. vulgaris in response to the increasing N availability. This seems plausible, as the roots and stems are the asexual reproductive organs of H. vulgaris, therefore, reproduction could become particularly important when the plant growth was assured.
High N addition increased the number of ramets of H. vulgaris and reduced the plant’s ability to spike, which could be a reproductive strategy of H. vulgaris to increase performance. The selection of the reproductive strategy of clonal plants depends on their own genetic condition and the abundance of resources [35]. There is an obvious trade-off in resource investment between sexual and asexual reproduction. Increasing the allocation of resources to asexual reproduction may be a reproductive strategy for clone plants in sufficient nutrient conditions [35,36]. High N addition can promote clone reproduction and increase the risk of H. vulgaris invasion. This may further corroborate the foregoing statement, which indicates the adaptive strategy of H. vulgaris to the increase in availability of soil N.
The quantity and frequency of N addition had a significant interactive effect on the total biomass and stem biomass of H. vulgaris. The results were consistent with a previous study [18]. Under low-quantity N addition, the total and stem biomass were significantly lower in the high- compared to the medium- and low-frequency N treatments. However, the frequency of N addition did not affect the growth of H. vulgaris in the medium- and high-quantity N treatment groups. A possible explanation is that the medium quantity of N addition (15 g N m−2 yr−1) was able to meet the demand of the plants, and the frequency of N addition may not affect the growth of plants that have sufficient resources [18].

4.2. Effects of the Quantity and Frequency of N Addition on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Microcosms

N2O emission is an important pathway of the soil nitrification–denitrification process [37,38]. N addition significantly increased N2O emission in our study, which was consistent with the results from previous studies [16,39,40]. N addition can provide a sufficient N source for nitrification–denitrification and promote the production of N2O [41,42]. N addition promoted the root growth of H. vulgaris, which could provide more C source for soil microorganisms during denitrification and thereby promote N2O emission [15,16]. Previous studies have shown that the peak of N2O emission after N addition lasted for a few days and then declined [20]. The accurate estimation of greenhouse gas emission may have been biased, as we measured the N2O emission at a low frequency during the experiment, which may have missed the peak emission of the N2O. In future experiments, continuous measurements during the experiment will be needed. It should be noted that this response of N2O emission pattern to the frequency of N addition did not affect the CO2eq estimates, because N2O emission was low, although the warming effect of N2O is 298 times higher than that of CO2 [3].
CH4 emission is related to the methanogens and methanotrophs in the soil [4,43]. N addition can increase the availability of soil N, thereby altering the microbial processes of CH4 production and oxidation [44,45]. CH4 emission significantly decreased with the increase in N addition. Studies showed that NH4+ may inhibit the activity of methanotrophs and NO3 may promote it [45,46]. In this experiment, we used ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) as an N source, which may promote or inhibit CH4 emission. In the high- and medium-quantity N addition treatments, more NH4+ was absorbed by H. vulgaris and more NO3 remained in the soil, which may have inhibited CH4 emission. There was a significant positive correlation between CH4 emission and the spike biomass of H. vulgaris. This may be related to the well-developed aerenchyma in the spike, where CH4 produced from the soil can be released directly into the atmosphere, reducing the amount of oxidized methane [47]. CH4-positive emission was observed under the condition of 60% soil moisture content, which was consistent with previous studies [26,48].
CO2 emission is related to the respiration of plants and soil. N addition did not significantly affect CO2 emission in our study. This may be attributed to the low soil C/N ratio (about 10) in our experiment. N addition may further decrease the soil C/N ratio, accentuating the limitation of C to soil microbial activity [12]. The meta-analysis also showed that N addition significantly reduced soil microbial respiration and increased plant root respiration, but had no significant influence on total belowground respiration [5]. We found that CO2 emission from the H. vulgaris microcosms was significantly positively correlated with the leaf biomass of H. vulgaris, while N addition did not significantly affect leaf biomass. This result was consistent with previous studies [26,49]. This may explain the gas exchange function of plant leaves, where the CO2 produced from plant respiration could be released into the atmosphere through the stomata [50]. The greenhouse gas emissions were affected not only by leaf and spike biomass, but also by other factors such as stomata number, stomatal conductance, and soil microorganisms, which needs further study.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, increasing the quantity of N addition was beneficial to root and stem biomass growth in the high-frequency N addition group, which increased the number of ramets and decreased the spike biomass of H. vulgaris, implying that high N addition can shift the reproductive strategy of H. vulgaris from sexual reproduction to clone reproduction. N addition quantity significantly promoted N2O emission and inhibited CH4 emission of the H. vulgaris soil system and did not significantly affect CO2 emission and CO2 equivalent. Further studies are needed to reveal the reasons behind these findings.

Author Contributions

J.-Q.G., Q.-W.L. and M.-H.S. designed the experiments and wrote the manuscript; Q.-W.L., X.-Y.Z., J.-F.L., and Y.Y. performed the experiments and revised the manuscript; Q.-W.L. and J.-Q.G. analyzed the data. Q.-W.L., X.-Y.Z., J.-Q.G., M.-H.S., J.-F.L., and Y.Y. approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571084 and 41871077).

Acknowledgments

We thank academic editor and five anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. We also thank Jia-Li Song, Xin-Yan Wang, Yu-Han, Chen and Yun-Xiao Bai for their assistance during the experiment.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kanakidou, M.; Myriokefalitakis, S.; Daskalakis, N.; Fanourgakis, G.; Nenes, A.; Baker, A.R.; Tsigaridis, K.; Mihalopoulos, N. Past, Present, and Future Atmospheric Nitrogen Deposition. J. Atmos. Sci. 2016, 73, 2039–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Galloway, J.N.; Townsend, A.R.; Erisman, J.W.; Bekunda, M.; Cai, Z.C.; Freney, J.R.; Martinelli, L.A.; Seitzinger, S.P.; Sutton, M.A. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 2008, 320, 889–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, H.; Yu, L.F.; Zhang, Z.H.; Liu, W.; Chen, L.T.; Cao, G.M.; Yue, H.W.; Zhou, J.Z.; Yang, Y.F.; Tang, Y.H.; et al. Molecular mechanisms of water table lowering and nitrogen deposition in affecting greenhouse gas emissions from a Tibetan alpine wetland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2017, 23, 815–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xiao, L.L.; Xie, B.H.; Liu, J.C.; Zhang, H.X.; Han, G.X.; Wang, O.M.; Liu, F.H. Stimulation of long-term ammonium nitrogen deposition on methanogenesis by Methanocellaceae in a coastal wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 2017, 595, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Zhang, T.A.; Chen, H.Y.H.; Ruan, H.H. Global negative effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbes. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1817–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, L.; Zhang, X.Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Lu, X.H.; Ouyang, X.Y. A review of spatial variation of inorganic nitrogen (N) wet deposition in China. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Liu, X.J.; Zhang, Y.; Han, W.X.; Tang, A.H.; Shen, J.L.; Cui, Z.L.; Vitousek, P.; Erisman, J.W.; Goulding, K.; Christie, P.; et al. Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 2013, 494, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Reddy, K.R.; Matcha, S.K. Quantifying nitrogen effects on castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) development, growth, and photosynthesis. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 31, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Romme, W.H.; Tinker, D.B.; Stakes, G.K.; Turner, M.G. Does inorganic nitrogen limit plant growth 3–5 years after fire in a Wyoming, USA, lodgepole pine forest? For. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 257, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, D.; He, H.L.; Gao, Q.; Zhao, C.Z.; Zhao, W.Q.; Yin, C.Y.; Chen, X.L.; Ma, Z.L.; Li, D.D.; Sun, D.D.; et al. Effects of short-term N addition on plant biomass allocation and C and N pools of the Sibiraea angustata scrub ecosystem. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2017, 68, 212–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Walker, J.T.; James, J.J.; Drenovsky, R.E. Competition from Bromus tectorum removes differences between perennial grasses in N capture and conservation strategies. Plant Soil 2017, 412, 177–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Song, M.H.; Jiang, J.; Cao, G.M.; Xu, X.L. Effects of temperature, glucose and inorganic nitrogen inputs on carbon mineralization in a Tibetan alpine meadow soil. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2010, 46, 375–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, L.L.; Greaver, T.L. A review of nitrogen enrichment effects on three biogenic GHGs: The CO2 sink may be largely offset by stimulated N2O and CH4 emission. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 1103–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mo, Y.; Deng, Z.H.; Gao, J.Q.; Guo, Y.X.; Yu, F.H. Does richness of emergent plants affect CO2 and CH4 emissions in experimental wetlands? Freshw. Biol. 2015, 60, 1537–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, M.J.; Tong, C. Effects of nitrogen enrichment on the greenhouse gas fluxes in natural wetlands and the associated mechanism: A review. Chin. J. Ecol. 2014, 33, 1969–1976. [Google Scholar]
  16. Yan, Y.L.; Ganjurjav, H.; Hu, G.Z.; Liang, Y.; Li, Y.; He, S.C.; Danjiu, L.B.; Yang, J.; Gao, Q.Z. Nitrogen deposition induced significant increase of N2O emissions in an dry alpine meadow on the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2018, 265, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Osone, Y.; Yazaki, K.; Masaki, T.; Ishida, A. Responses to nitrogen pulses and growth under low nitrogen availability in invasive and native tree species with differing successional status. J. Plant Res. 2014, 127, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, A.O.; Jiang, X.X.; Zhang, Q.Q.; Zhou, J.; Li, H.L.; Luo, F.L.; Zhang, M.X.; Yu, F.H. Nitrogen addition increases intraspecific competition in the invasive wetland plant Alternanthera philoxeroides, but not in its native congener Alternanthera Sessilis. Plant Spec. Biol. 2015, 30, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yuan, Q.Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, L.; Dong, B.C.; Yu, F.H. Root responses to nitrogen pulse frequency under different nitrogen amounts. Acta Ecol. 2017, 80, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ma, Y.; Qian, C.; Sun, D.; Deng, L.; Huang, G.; Lu, W. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions from soil in paddy field. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2016, 32, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
  21. Sapkota, T.B.; Aryal, J.P.; Khatri-Chhetri, A.; Shirsath, P.B.; Arumugam, P.; Stirling, C.M. Identifying high-yield low-emission pathways for the cereal production in South Asia. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang. 2018, 23, 621–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Murphy, K.J.; Rørslett, B.; Springuel, I. Strategy analysis of submerged lake macrophyte communities: An international example. Aquat. Bot. 1990, 36, 303–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, J.S. The Checklist of the Chinese Invasive Plants; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  24. Miao, L.H.; Ji, M.C.; Wang, Y.Y.; Qiao, D.D.; Chen, Y.C. Study on invasion risk of Hydrocotyle vulgaris as an alien species in wetlands. J. Zhejiang Univ. 2011, 37, 425–431. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, J.; Li, H.L.; Luo, F.L.; Huang, W.J.; Zhang, M.X.; Yu, F.H. Effects of nitrogen addition on interspecific competition between Alternanthera philoxeroides and Alternanthera Sessilis. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2015, 35, 8258–8267. [Google Scholar]
  26. Gao, J.Q.; Duan, M.Y.; Zhang, X.Y.; Li, Q.W.; Yu, F.H. Effects of frequency and intensity of drying-rewetting cycles on Hydrocotyle vulgaris growth and greenhouse gas emissions from wetland microcosms. Catena 2018, 164, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, J.Y.; Song, C.C.; Miao, Y.Q.; Meng, H.N. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Southward Transplanted Wetlands During Freezing-Thawing Periods in Northeast China. Wetlands 2013, 33, 1075–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. IPCC. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. In Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  29. Quan, H.; Dong, B.C.; Liu, L.; Li, H.L. The effects of habitat type and nitrogen deposition on the invasion of Hydrocotyle vulgaris in wetland plant communities. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2016, 36, 4045–4054. [Google Scholar]
  30. Bloom, A.J.; Chapin, F.S., III; Mooney, H.A. Resource Limitation in plants-an economic analogy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1985, 16, 363–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Niklas, K.J. Modelling below- and above-ground biomass for non-woody and woody plants. Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Reich, P.B. Root-shoot relations: Optimality in acclimation and adaptation or the Emperor s new clothes? In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2002; pp. 205–220. [Google Scholar]
  33. King, J.S.; Albaugh, T.J.; Allen, H.L.; Kress, L.W. Stand-level allometry in Pinus taeda as affected by irrigation and fertilization. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19, 769–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Coyle, D.R.; Coleman, M.D.; Aubrey, D.P. Above- and below-ground biomass accumulation, production, and distribution of sweetgum and loblolly pine grown with irrigation and fertilization. Can. J. For. Res. 2008, 38, 1335–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Herben, T.; Sera, B.; Klimesova, J. Clonal growth and sexual reproduction: Tradeoffs and environmental constraints. Oikos 2015, 124, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kleunen, M.V.; Fischer, M.; Schmid, B. Effects of intra-specific competition on size variation and reproductive allocation in a clonal plant. Oikos 2001, 94, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tang, W.G.; Chen, D.X.; Phillips, O.L.; Liu, X.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Y.D.; Xi, D.; Zhu, F.F.; Fang, J.Y.; Zhang, L.M.; et al. Effects of long-term increased N deposition on tropical montane forest soil N2 and N2O emissions. Soil Biol. Biomchem. 2018, 126, 194–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fang, Y.T.; Koba, K.; Makabe, A.; Takahashi, C.; Zhu, W.X.; Hayashi, T.; Hokari, A.A.; Urakawa, R.; Bai, E.; Houlton, B.Z.; et al. Microbial denitrification dominates nitrate losses from forest ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 1470–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Xie, D.N.; Si, G.Y.; Zhang, T.; Mulder, J.; Duan, L. Nitrogen deposition increases N2O emission from an N-saturated subtropical forest in southwest China. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 243, 1818–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Tang, J.; Wang, J.J.; Li, Z.Y.; Wang, S.N.; Qu, Y.K. Effects of irrigation regime and nitrogen fertilizer management on CH4, N2O and CO2 emissions from saline-alkaline paddy Fields in Northeast China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, K.H.; Gong, Y.M.; Song, W.; Lv, J.L.; Chang, Y.H.; Hu, Y.K.; Tian, C.Y.; Christie, P.; Liu, X.J. No significant nitrous oxide emissions during spring thaw under grazing and nitrogen addition in an alpine grassland. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2012, 18, 2546–2554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lohila, A.; Aurela, M.; Hatakka, J.; Pihlatie, M.; Minkkinen, K.; Penttila, T.; Laurila, T. Responses of N2O fluxes to temperature, water table and N deposition in a northern boreal fen. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 2010, 61, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Angel, R.; Claus, P.; Conrad, R. Methanogenic archaea are globally ubiquitous in aerated soils and become active under wet anoxic conditions. ISME J. 2012, 6, 847–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tian, X.F.; Hu, H.W.; Ding, Q.; Song, M.H.; Xu, X.L.; Zheng, Y.; Guo, L.D. Influence of nitrogen fertilization on soil ammonia oxidizer and denitrifier abundance, microbial biomass, and enzyme activities in an alpine meadow. Biol. Fert. Soils 2014, 50, 703–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hu, M.J.; Wilson, B.J.; Sun, Z.G.; Huang, J.F.; Tong, C. Effects of nitrogen and sulphate addition on methane oxidation in the marsh soil of a typical subtropical estuary (Min River) in China. Chem. Ecol. 2018, 34, 610–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Xu, T.T.; Yin, L.C.; Han, C.; Deng, H.; Jiang, Y.B.; Zhong, W.H. Nitrate addition inhibited methanogenesis in paddy soils under long-term managements. Plant Soil Environ. 2018, 64, 393–399. [Google Scholar]
  47. Joabsson, A.; Christensen, T.R. Methane emissions from wetlands and their relationship with vascular plants: An Arctic example. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2010, 7, 919–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khahil, M.I.; Baggs, E.M. CH4 oxidation and N2O emissions at varied soil water-filled pore spaces and headspace CH4 concentrations. Soil Biol. Biomchem. 2005, 37, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hirota, M.; Zhang, P.C.; Gu, S.; Shen, H.H.; Kuriyama, T.; Li, Y.N.; Tang, Y.H. Small-scale variation in ecosystem CO2 fluxes in an alpine meadow depends on plant biomass and species richness. J. Plant Res. 2010, 123, 531–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, F.L.; Gao, S.M. Plant Biology; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2008; p. 103. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Effects of the quantity and frequency of N addition on the biomass of H. vulgaris. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Effects of the quantity and frequency of N addition on the biomass of H. vulgaris. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Sustainability 11 01520 g001
Figure 2. Effects of the quantity and frequency of N addition on the growth of H. vulgaris. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2. Effects of the quantity and frequency of N addition on the growth of H. vulgaris. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Sustainability 11 01520 g002
Figure 3. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on greenhouse gas emissions from the plant–soil system. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on greenhouse gas emissions from the plant–soil system. Bars and error bars show means ± SE (n = 6). Different letters indicate significant differences between quantities of N addition treatment (p ≤ 0.05).
Sustainability 11 01520 g003
Figure 4. Relationships between greenhouse gas emissions and the growth of H. Vulgaris.
Figure 4. Relationships between greenhouse gas emissions and the growth of H. Vulgaris.
Sustainability 11 01520 g004
Table 1. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on the growth of Hydrocotyle vulgaris.
Table 1. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on the growth of Hydrocotyle vulgaris.
VariableFrequency (F)Quantity (Q)F × Q
F2,45pF2,45pF4,45p
Total mass0.430.6530.250.7802.880.033
Root mass2.600.0853.730.0322.320.071
Leaf mass1.520.2301.080.3481.560.202
Stalk mass1.240.2981.650.2030.840.507
Stem mass1.270.295.450.0082.730.041
Spike mass0.200.81921.78<0.0012.200.084
Root/shoot4.020.0255.300.0090.710.59
No. of ramets0.880.42220.84<0.0010.180.948
Leaf area0.850.4339.51<0.0010.930.455
SLA0.620.5425.060.0101.140.348
Note: F, degree of freedom and p values are shown. Values with p < 0.05 are in bold.
Table 2. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on greenhouse gas emissions from the plant–soil system.
Table 2. Effects of frequency and quantity of N addition on greenhouse gas emissions from the plant–soil system.
VariableFrequency (F)Quantity (Q)F × Q
F3,56pF3,56pF3,56p
N2O emission8.450.00155.75<0.00111.14<0.001
CH4 emission2.200.1226.750.0030.600.665
CO2 emission2.310.1110.140.8711.820.141
CO2 equivalent2.560.0890.660.5241.250.304
Note: F, degree of freedom and p values are shown. Values with p < 0.05 are in bold.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Q.-W.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Gao, J.-Q.; Song, M.-H.; Liang, J.-F.; Yue, Y. Effects of N Addition Frequency and Quantity on Hydrocotyle vulgaris Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wetland Microcosms. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061520

AMA Style

Li Q-W, Zhang X-Y, Gao J-Q, Song M-H, Liang J-F, Yue Y. Effects of N Addition Frequency and Quantity on Hydrocotyle vulgaris Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wetland Microcosms. Sustainability. 2019; 11(6):1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061520

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Qian-Wei, Xiao-Ya Zhang, Jun-Qin Gao, Ming-Hua Song, Jin-Feng Liang, and Yi Yue. 2019. "Effects of N Addition Frequency and Quantity on Hydrocotyle vulgaris Growth and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Wetland Microcosms" Sustainability 11, no. 6: 1520. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061520

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop