Next Article in Journal
Achieving Cultural Sustainability in Museums: A Step Toward Sustainable Development
Previous Article in Journal
Forecasting PM10 in the Bay of Algeciras Based on Regression Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gender Equality and UN Sustainable Development Goals: Priorities and Correlations in the Top Business Schools’ Communication and Legitimation Strategies
Open AccessArticle

Towards a Rubric for Stimulating and Evaluating Sustainable Learning

Education and Learning Sciences, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 8130, 6700 EW Wageningen, The Netherlands
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(4), 969;
Received: 9 January 2019 / Revised: 1 February 2019 / Accepted: 3 February 2019 / Published: 14 February 2019
PDF [862 KB, uploaded 14 February 2019]
  |     |  


Preparing students for dealing with sustainability issues is a challenge in the field of education. This is a challenge because we don’t know exactly what we are educating for, as there are no defined answers or outcomes to the issues; the future is unpredictable. Dealing with these issues requires crossing boundaries between people coming from different ‘practices’, e.g., disciplines, cultures, academia versus society, thereby making the learning and working process a challenging but critical learning experience in itself. We argue that education for sustainability should not primarily focus on student content knowledge or development of certain products or answers. It should focus on stimulating students to go through boundary-crossing learning processes critical for getting a grip on the unpredictable future. This allows students to learn to work with ‘others’ around the boundaries, and thereby to develop the ability to co-create new knowledge and work towards innovation or transformation for sustainable practice. Building on the boundary crossing theory and using mixed methods and interventions, this design-based study iteratively develops a boundary crossing rubric as an instrument to operationalise student learning in transdisciplinary projects into concrete student behaviour. This rubric in turn can explicate, stimulate and assess student learning and development in transdisciplinary sustainability projects. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainable learning; boundary crossing; sustainable assessment; stakeholders; student learning; wicked problems sustainable learning; boundary crossing; sustainable assessment; stakeholders; student learning; wicked problems

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Gulikers, J.; Oonk, C. Towards a Rubric for Stimulating and Evaluating Sustainable Learning. Sustainability 2019, 11, 969.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sustainability EISSN 2071-1050 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top