Next Article in Journal
Top Management, Green Innovations, and the Mediating Effect of Customer Cooperation in Green Supply Chains
Previous Article in Journal
A Geoarchaeological Reading of the City-Overlap-City Phenomenon in the Lower Yellow River Floodplain: A Case Study of Kaifeng City, China
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/su11041030
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Climatic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Mushrooms: The Case of Spain

by
Emilio Martínez-Ibarra
1,*,
María Belén Gómez-Martín
2 and
Xosé Anton Armesto-López
2
1
Departamento de Análisis Geográfico Regional y Geografía Física, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Campus de Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain
2
Departamento de Geografía Física y Análisis Geográfico Regional, Facultat de Geografia i Història, Universitat Barcelona, Carrer de Montalegre, 6-8, 08001 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(4), 1030; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041030
Submission received: 8 January 2019 / Revised: 6 February 2019 / Accepted: 8 February 2019 / Published: 16 February 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fungi are some of the most diverse organisms on earth and since prehistoric times have played an important role in human society. In recent years they have become a strategic asset not only in the conservation and management of ecosystems but also as a resource for halting the exodus from rural areas in peripheral Mediterranean regions, such as inland eastern Spain. In view of this important ecological and socioeconomic role, in this paper we present a geographical analysis of edible fungi, paying particular attention to the Spanish case. To this end we carried out a bibliographic review of the climatic factors affecting the fruiting of these fungi and the socioeconomic aspects of their commercial exploitation. We also performed an online search for mycotourism-related activities and explored the statistical data on the cultivation of edible mushrooms and its economic impact. Our main findings include a synthesis of the international research on the effects of climatic variability on the natural production of macrofungi, and an assessment of the economic viability and the social importance of mushrooms in Spain, in particular in relation to the current and future potential of mushroom cultivation and the multifunctional management and use of forests.

1. Introduction

Fungi are some of the most diverse organisms on Earth [1]. They have played and continue to play a crucial role in the planet’s ecology [2]. This role can briefly be summarized in three main aspects: (a) as essential elements in the colonization of the Earth by terrestrial vegetation [3]; (b) as decomposers [4,5,6,7,8] and bioremediation agents (mycoremediation) [9,10,11,12]; and (c) due to the basic symbiotic relationship established between fungi and their host species through the mycorrhizas [13]. This relationship can be established with most plants [14] and protects them from disease [15,16,17], helps them in situations of hydric stress [18,19,20] and increases the productivity of forest species [21]. These important contributions have enabled fungi to become a strategic component in the conservation and management of ecosystems, such as those in the Mediterranean region [22].
Man’s relationship with fungi dates back to ancient times and in many cultures they acted as a “bridge” between the earthly and the divine [23]. They are also a source of food in themselves [24,25], and have enabled the production of such essential foodstuffs and medicines as bread, cheese and penicillin [26]. In recent decades their commercial use has also become increasingly important. In peripheral Mediterranean regions such as mountainous rural areas, their commercial exploitation can yield significant economic returns [21,27,28,29]. In fact, their direct harvesting together with mushroom-related activities in the tourism and restaurant sector can provide more income than that traditionally obtained from forests as a source of timber and wood pulp [28]. When used in this way, fungi have helped maintain rural population levels and have improved general social welfare in declining areas [30].
To this end, in this paper we present both a review of the bibliography on climatic and socio-economic aspects of mycology and the results of an online search for mushroom-related tourism activities. We also analysed the statistical data in order to find out more about the bidirectional relationship between macrofungi, society and the environment. Our main objectives were: (a) to assess how climatic variability affects their fruiting and phenology; (b) to analyse the current trends and situation of the cultivation and natural production of mushrooms and truffles at a worldwide level and in Spain; and (c), to describe the socioeconomic impact and future potential associated with the picking of wild mushrooms and their cultivation in forests. In this study we focused particularly on the geographical distribution of mushroom production and of mushroom-related tourism products in Spain.

2. Materials and Methods

In this paper we carried out an exhaustive bibliographical review of: (a) the environmental factors affecting the fruiting of wild macrofungi, especially those related with the climate; and (b) the multifunctional use of forest spaces, focusing particularly on the commercial exploitation of wild edible fungi, mycological or mushroom-related tourism and fungi as a part of silviculture (Figure 1).
We began by consulting Google Scholar to find articles on the various subjects on which we were focusing [31]. These included: (a) the influence of climate on the wild fruiting of macrofungi [32]; (b) the consumption, price and production of hypogeous fungi [33,34,35]; (c) the commercial exploitation of wild fungi in forest areas [36]; and (d) mycological tourism [28,37,38,39]. In these articles we found other references of interest, which in turn cited other important research on the questions being studied here, so providing a positive feedback loop within the bibliographical analysis.
With all this information, we selected various search terms relating to mycology, biogeography, climate, socioeconomics and tourism (Table 1). We searched for these terms in various bibliographic databases. For research about Spain we consulted the Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) database [40] and for international research we consulted the Web of Science (SCI) [41]. The search criteria were applied with Boolean operators.
We have also consulted various reports by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [42] and the Spanish National Statistics Institute [43] for information on the consumption and cultivation of mushrooms and truffles and the profitability of these crops. The data we obtained was analysed for possible trends and its coefficient of determination was calculated, from exponential trend line for global data and from potential trend line for Spain data. The data on the profitability of agricultural crops in Spain for the period 2010–2014 was obtained from the Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, Food and the Environment (hereinafter MAGRAMA).
In order to quantify and locate the leisure and tourism activities related to mycology we consulted various online information sources to find out more about the mycological interpretation centres, mycological parks and mycological fairs held during the 2016–2017 season in Spain. We applied the Hjalager classification system (horizontal, vertical and diagonal developments) for identifying the processes involved in the creation of tourism products [44] and extrapolated these considerations to mycological tourism.
The information was classified into the following themes or subjects: (a) environmental factors affecting the natural distribution of macrofungi; (b) the climate as a predictor of the natural fruiting of macrofungi carpophores; (c) phenology, phenological patterns and recent trends in the natural production of macrofungi, a symptom of climate change? (d) cultivation of edible mushrooms (especially saprophytes) in artificial environments and their consumption; (e) truffle farming and future potential for peripheral rural areas; (f) multifunctional management of the mycological landscape; (g) environmental income from forest resources, mycological tourism and mushroom-related silviculture.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Climate as a Predictor of the Natural Fruiting of Macrofungi Carpophores

In our analysis of the influence of atmospheric conditions on the fruiting of fungi we initially identified two large climatic groups, based on the available supply of water. In climates in which there are no water limitations, (e.g., oceanic climates in the temperate zone), the relationship between climate and the fruiting of fungi is likely to be more influenced by bioecological factors than by physical ones (such as climate). In these climates, droughts and heatwaves are normally less severe and shorter than in climates with limited water supply and therefore have less impact on fruiting [45]. In climates with a dry season or limited water levels, the climatic influence over the interannual variation in the production of fruiting bodies should be more evident. This has been demonstrated in the Mediterranean region [6,21,46,47,48,49,50].
We will now consider the effects of precipitation levels and temperatures separately. In the case of epigeous fungi, an increase in fruiting has normally been observed if there have been generous amounts of rainfall in the period running up to the fruiting season [6,47,48]. In this case it is clear that the moisture in the soil is the main conditioning factor in the appearance of carpophores [32]. It is also important to emphasize that the relationship between the fruiting of fungi and climate conditions is not always immediate [51,52,53]. As regards temperatures, if these are higher than usual, this can produce hydric stress in the fungi, so leading to a fall in production: this is what happens for example with Tuber melanosporum (black truffles) in the Mediterranean area [32,45]. However, if high temperatures do not cause hydric stress, they can extend the fruiting period and increase production [54].
Some researchers have divided the fungi into different functional groups (saprophyte and mycorrhizal species). In these cases, the results, although not identical, have displayed certain similarities [6,45]. As regards spatial distribution patterns, it would seem that a lack of water seems to have a stronger influence on the saprophyte species [1], given that they develop just below the ground surface and are therefore more vulnerable to drought conditions [55].
Table 2 offers a synthesis of the most representative results obtained at an international level. The different climatic areas and variables are specified. The data are offered at a general level without distinguishing between species of fungi. Only the papers that have analysed long data series are included. The research on epigeous species appears first, followed by the work on hypogeous fungi.

3.2. Phenology, Phenological Patterns and recent Trends in the Natural Production of Mushrooms, A Symptom of Climate Change?

Normally the fruiting of fungi follows a seasonal pattern and is affected by climatic factors, in particular temperature and rainfall [51]. In temperate areas in the northern hemisphere most of the fleshy mushrooms fruit in autumn, while a few species, above all the ascomycota group, have adapted their fruiting to the spring [32]. In functional terms, in Australia, Norway, United Kingdom and Switzerland it has been observed that the ectomycorrhizal fungi tend to have a shorter fruiting period than the saprophytes [32]. By contrast, one of the world’s finest delicacies, the black truffle (Tuber melanosporum) fruits in the winter from November to February [59]. In general, there are few references in the literature about the phenology of the mycelium. Nonetheless, the production of mycelium and the fruiting of the carpophores seem to occur at different times [60].
The phenological changes observed in the biome as a result of climate change are also being observed in fungi [2,32,45,46,49,53,57,61,62,63]. The evolution of phenological patterns and the tendencies observed in production vary according to the climatic context. A lengthening of the fungi fruiting season has been detected in temperate areas without summer droughts, such as Austria, the United Kingdom and Switzerland [2,61]. In some cases, for example in Switzerland, this leads to an increase in total annual production [45]. However, in situations in which there are limited supplies of water, the opposite has occurred. This is what has happened, for example, in such representative species as Matsutake (Tricholoma matsutake) in Asia [46] and Tuber melanosporum in Europe [49,61]. In view of the worldwide importance of Tuber melanosporum, it is interesting to note that given the climatic factors that influence its natural production [32,64], it is likely that global warming will reduce harvests in its current niche areas (as indeed is already happening), and that the most suitable areas will shift northwards to the calcareous regions to the north of the Alpine arc [47]. Table 3 offers a synthesis of the results obtained at an international level on the phenological changes for various different geographical areas.

3.3. Cultivation and Consumption of Fungi

We should begin by offering a general global overview of fungi cultivation (mainly indoor cultivation of saprophyte species) at a worldwide level. To this end we used production data for mushrooms and truffles (1961–2014) and their associated gross economic worth (1961–2014) for the whole world (aggregated data), according to statistics from the FAO [42]. The most noticeable trend is the continuous, very rapid increase over time in both variables (production: trend 18 million tonnes/10 years, R2 = 0.986 exponential trend line; gross worth: trend 36.4 thousand million constant US dollars/10 years, R2 = 0.9797 exponential trend line), especially since 1990, as shown in the figures regarding global production of mushrooms and truffles and their gross value (Figure 2a,b).
China is the world’s largest producer. In 2014, according to the same source and type of data, this country produced 74% of world production. Almost all (about 95%) of Chinese production was for domestic consumption [68].
Europe also plays an important role in the production of edible fungi and truffles. According to data from the FAO, apart from China, in 2014 the main producers were: Italy with over 600,000 tonnes; the United States with over 432,000 tonnes; the Netherlands with about 310,000 tonnes; and Spain with about 150,000 tonnes, slightly ahead of France [42].
According to data from the FAO (1964–2014), production in Spain has also increased fast (trend 19,600 tonnes/10 years, R2 = 0.9023 potential trend line), especially since the mid-1970s. The exponential growth of about 45,000 tonnes observed between 1999 and 2002 is especially noteworthy, as it appears in the figure about production of mushrooms and truffles in millions of tons in Spain (Figure 3). In addition, after a period of stagnation between 2006–2010, growth began again in 2010 and continued until 2012, after which production stabilized.
At a regional level in Spain, according to figures from MAGRAMA [43], the autonomous communities of La Rioja and Castilla-La Mancha together total 95% of national production, with 50% and 45%, respectively. Mushroom-growing in Castilla-La Mancha was concentrated in two provinces: Cuenca and Albacete, with 30% and 15% of total national production, respectively.
As regards the species produced worldwide, according to a report from 2015 (http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/mushroom-market-733.html), although there are about 2300 edible fungi, only about 200 of these are cultivated. The most widely produced and consumed fungi in the world are white mushrooms (in particular Agaricus bisporus), shiitakes (Lentinula edodes) and other fungi from the Pleurotus genus. According to the same report, these species together made up about 76% of the fungi sold in 2013.
In Spain the most popular types are Agaricus bisporus and to a lesser extent, species from the Pleurotus genus. Together they make up about 70% of total consumption [69]. According to data from the MAGRAMA, both production and consumption of fresh mushrooms rose steadily between 2004 and 2013, although per capita consumption in Spain remains below the international average (1.8 kg compared to 3 kg/inhabitant/year worldwide) [70]. There is therefore considerable margin for increasing consumption of saprophyte mushrooms in Spain, which together with apparent growing interest in the consumption of species such as shiitake and different varieties of the king oyster mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii) could provide a business opportunity for rural areas.

3.4. Truffle-Farming and Future Potential for Peripheral Rural Areas

In addition to the cultivation of saprophyte species, there is also growing interest in truffle farming [71]. In Spain this is a much more recent innovation and has appeared as part of a strong commitment to rural development. Truffles belong to the Tuber genus of fungi of which there are about 40 species. Four of these have great commercial potential [35]: (a) Tuber brumale, or winter truffle; (b) Tuber aestivum or summer truffle, also known as Tuber uncinatum; (c) Tuber magnatum or white truffle, the most expensive truffle in the world, although its cultivation has yet to be mastered; and (d), Tuber melanosporum commonly known as the black truffle or Perigord truffle. Of these, the black truffle is the one that has sparked the greatest interest worldwide in economic, social and environmental terms.
The production of black truffle reached a peak in France in 1892 when a total of 2000 tonnes were produced [34]. By contrast, total production today is only around 60 to 70 tonnes a year (when it is estimated that demand could reach 1000 tonnes/ year). The biggest producers of black truffle in the world are France, Spain, Italy and Australia with 31.3, 15.9, 11 and 4.5 tonnes, respectively [34].
From its aforementioned peak in 1892 the production of Tuber melanosporum fell into sharp decline until the early 1970s when techniques were developed for its inoculation in various different hosts [34]. This enabled the cultivation of Tuber melanosporum around the world. The area given over to truffle-farming is currently increasing by around 2200 hectares a year in the main production centres (Spain, France and Italy with 1000 ha/year, 800 ha/year and 400 ha/year, respectively) [35]. These authors estimated that production would continue increasing by about 5.6% a year until 2020 [35].
The data above show that over the last four decades the cultivation of forest species (such as Quercus ilex) for the production of black truffles is becoming an economic, social and environmental alternative for rural areas in decline in the Mediterranean basin. Various towns and villages in the Sistema Ibérico region of Spain deserve a mention in this sense in that they have seized upon black truffle farming as a means of combating the problems posed by a shrinking and ageing rural population [72]. It is worth noting that the turnover associated with the annual production of black truffles is around 20 million euros in France, 18 million in Italy in 1999 and 4 million in Australia in 2012 [34], and that producers of black truffles in Europe are paid around 150–800 euros/kg for their produce [34]. The price in retail outlets in Paris or London has been known to reach as high as 2000–4000 euros/kg [34].
As regards the truffle market in Spain, the production levels for the different species and the prices paid to the producer/collector have been estimated as follows [35]: (a) black truffle, with an annual production of 8–40 tonnes and a price of 250–850 euros/kg; (b) summer truffle, an annual production of 42 tonnes/year and a price of 50–150 euros/kg; (c) brumale truffle (Tuber brumale), with a production of 1 tonne per year and a price of 100 euros/kg.
In Spain the main production areas for black truffles and summer truffles tend to have limestone soils, which are generally of poor quality for agriculture, which means that truffle farming, without taking into account the associated subsidies, can produce incomes up to three times as high as traditional crops [35]. Indeed, in Spain, France and Italy, the annual return per hectare on the cultivation of black truffles ranges between 19,424 euros and 66,972 euros (prices vary greatly in line with supply and demand) with an initial period of about 10 years to recover the investment and start making profits [35]. A comparative analysis of the return from truffle farming and more conventional crops is shown in Table 4.
The most important truffle-farming area in Spain is the Gúdar-Javalambre area, in the south of the province of Teruel, which has a small population of about 8600 people. In the 2013–2014 season it produced about 36 tonnes of black truffles out of a total Spanish production of about 40 tonnes. This figure is only slightly below total French production of between 40 and 50 tonnes [72]. The Gúdar-Javalambre area, which had a rapidly declining population due to the difficulties affecting traditional agriculture, has transformed its landscape over the last four decades with the plantation of 6500 hectares of black truffles [72]. Together with other new opportunities, such as rural and nature-related tourism, this has enabled them to stem the tide of rural exodus such that the population has remained stable since the 1990s, according to data from the Spanish National Statistics Institute (NE).
An idea of just how important truffle farming is in Spain and its geographical distribution can be obtained via an online search of the nurseries selling host trees that have been mycorrhized with Tuber melanosporum. We counted a total of 24 nurseries, nine of which were in the Aragón Region. These are centred above all in the Sistema Ibérico mountain range and in particular in the town of Sarrión in the Gúdar-Javalambre area, which has six nurseries This would suggest that the presence of these nurseries is related to their proximity to black truffle cultivation areas (Figure 4).
Increasing interest is also being shown in the cultivation of Terfeziaceae, or desert truffles. Although these hypogeous fungi are not as highly prized as black truffles, they still fetch an attractive price. They grow in arid, semi-arid and dry atmospheres all over the world, between the tropical and temperate latitudes. In Spain consumption of these fungi has aroused most interest in Extremadura and to a lesser extent in Murcia, Andalusia, Aragon and the Canaries [33].
The interest in Terfeziaceae goes beyond their culinary or gastronomic qualities [33]. They also have a high nutritional value and are of economic and ecological importance in that they can be used as a complementary crop for introducing sustainable forms of agriculture in semi-arid and arid rural areas. In Spain the return on Terfeziaceae farming is often greater than that from other traditional irrigated crops (Table 4). Since the first plantation of Terfeziaceae in the world in Murcia in 1999, there has been growing demand for this crop (91) and there are now over twenty such plantations in Spain [91]. Experimental results are also being obtained in Tunisia, Israel and Argentina [92].

3.5. Multifunctional Management of the Mycological Landscape: Environmental Return from Wild Resources, Mycological Tourism and Mushroom-Related Silviculture

Forest resources are associated with a wide range of products and benefits. In Spain the income from these products in 2011 was over 992 million euros (Table 5). The main source of income was timber with 72.7% (Table 5), although various other products also made important contributions. These included mushrooms and truffles, which together made up 11% of the income from forest resources. Apart from their economic contribution, it is important to highlight the ecological, social and recreational role they play in rural areas [93].
When it comes to assessing the commercial value of wild fungi, it is important to bear in mind that only certain species of wild edible fungi can be marketed fresh. These species are regulated and specified by Royal Decree 30/2009 of 16th January [95], which established the sanitary conditions for the sale of mushrooms for human consumption. To briefly summarize, the most representative saleable species (and therefore those that can be used for business and tourism-related purposes) are: (a) Amanita ponderosa (found in Mediterranean grasslands and Mediterranean scrublands with Cistus sp.); (b) Boletus edulis and B. aereus (in forests and grasslands with Mediterranean leafy trees, Atlantic forests of leafy trees, Euro-Siberian pine forests and Mediterranean scrublands of Cistus sp.); (c) Cantharellus cibarius and the Craterellus group (in forests with Mediterranean leafy trees, Atlantic forests of leafy trees, Mediterranean pine trees and Euro-Siberian pine forests); (d) the Lactarius deliciosus group (Mediterranean and Euro-Siberian pine forests); and (e), Tuber melanosporum (open forests of Mediterranean leafy trees such as Quercus ilex) (Source: this research, from observations in the field in different environments in Andalusia from 2012–2017, and the following bibliographical references: [95,96,97,98,99,100]).
One of the most interesting insights into the social and economic importance of mushroom picking in Spain was the study conducted in Andalusia [36]. About 6.3% of the population of Andalusia enjoyed picking mushrooms [36], as compared to 35% in Catalonia [101] and an estimated 54% of the rural population of Castilla León [102]. The importance of mushroom-picking is evident if we compare these results with those obtained (for Spain as a whole) for other activities performed in “natural” spaces: 4.4% of the population go skiing; 2.9% like fishing; and 2.4% go hunting [103].
For the specific case of Andalusia in 2010 the basic data for the economic valuation of mushroom picking indicate [36]: (a) that the total annual income obtained by pickers comes to 43.2 million euros (public environmental income); (b) that the total travel costs of the pickers would produce income of about 2.05 million euros; and (c), that the owners of the land, in the event that the pickers would have to pay for a permit, would obtain 109 euros per every 100 hectares in the form of private environmental income.
In addition, the increasing demand nowadays for free-time and leisure activities has boosted the emergence and development of mycological associations (Figure 5) and to a large extent thanks to them the introduction of mycotourism, a new form of tourism that combines nature and gastronomic tourism and has both direct and knock-on benefits for rural areas [37]. This type of tourism has emerged from a drive to specialize rural tourism around a particular subject or theme [102]. Although in Spain this trend emerged later than in other European countries, the initiatives so far implemented are worthy of note.
Mycological tourism has also incorporated a range of horizontal development actions that have improved the quality of the product on offer. These include for example, quality standards such as the GASTROMYAS mycogastronomic seal of quality scheme introduced in Castilla y León [102], and the drive to modernize and commercialize mycological traditions through, for example, guided routes. An excellent example of this is the MICOCYL Mycology project in Castilla y León.
Those offering mycological tourism activities in Spain have also carried out vertical development actions, which in some cases have enabled mushrooms to be more than just a complementary aspect of the main product. These include creating tourism products centred around mushrooms and mushroom-picking (for example mycological weekends, especially during the autumn season and around Valentine’s Day). Other events combining mycology and tourism have also been organized, such as mycological and myco-gastronomy fairs. There were 58 such events in Spain in the 2016–2017 season, about 43% of which were held in Catalonia (Figure 6), a region with a long mycological tradition.
On occasions these activities are focused on one particular mushroom, as an iconic symbol of a particular region or area, such as the Amanita ponderosa or certain species of the Terfezia genus. This reinforces the identity and the popular traditions of the places where these events are held, so enabling the survival of an ancestral source of food or of income in rural communities. There is also a range of experiences in which visitors can participate in activities related with mushroom cultivation. For example, visits to the fields where truffles are farmed (as in the Sistema Ibérico) or to the towns where white button mushrooms are produced (as in La Rioja). Some of the most striking cases of rural towns specializing in mycotourism include Burgo de Osma in the province of Soria and Aracena in Huelva. The towns that want to promote mycotourism often have mycological interpretation centres or museums as part of the products or activities on offer to tourists. In Spain, we counted 23 such centres, over half of which (52%) are in Andalusia. Many of these were set up under the auspices of the Plan for the Sustainable Use and Conservation of Mushrooms and Truffles in Andalusia (Plan CUSSTA) launched in 2001 (Figure 7). These centres are often associated with shops selling mycological products, mycological fairs, markets or events, and restaurants and bars with a range of mushroom-inspired dishes.
Some areas have entered the phase of diagonal development of the range of tourism products [31], in which research, development and innovation projects (R&D projects) have been carried out with results for mycotourism: (a) the MYAS (Mycology and Sustainable Use) project in Castilla y León (the most important results of which include the creation of three mycological interpretation centres, the development of 15 mycological routes, the training of at least 40 mycological guides and the creation of a mycogastronomic seal of quality, GASTROMYAS) [71,104]; (b) the LIFE MICOVALDORBA project in Navarra (the most important results of which include the creation of mycological routes) [105]; (c) the CUSSTA Plan in Andalusia (noteworthy results include the creation of 8 mycological information points and a mycological garden, as well as two official mycological routes per province) [106]; (d), the MICODES Project, in the provinces of Albacete, Cuenca, Granada and Fuerteventura (main objectives include extending mycotourism-related activities throughout the year by encouraging rural hotels and guest houses to take part in the project and by creating signposted mycological itineraries and holding training courses for mycological guides) [107]. These initiatives and the resulting “know-how” would be easy to transfer to other regions.
As regards the demand for tourism products of this kind in Spain, a quantitative study was carried out in which they analysed the repercussions of mycological tourism, focusing above all on Castilla y León [28]. Their results showed that mycological tourism generated about 120,000 overnight stays a year in rural areas of the region (about 9% of the total for rural tourism in the region), attracting about 42,000 people. In certain areas of the province of Soria such as those belonging to the Association for the Endogenous Development of the Almazán area and other Towns (ADEMA), in good years for mushroom production, mycological tourism could account for as much as 16-17% of overnight stays [38]. These authors also estimated that mushroom pickers staying in the area contributed around 4.5 million euros a year to the regional economy.
In short, given the economic potential of wild edible fungi (as well as their ecological values), specific mushroom-related silviculture is required to conserve and enhance the mycological resources in our forests [108].
The use of mycological resources in Spain is not regulated at a national level, although the picking of wild mushrooms in woods is subject to the laws governing forests. The owner of the forest is the owner of all the forest resources it produces, such as mushrooms [109]. Some of the Spanish regions have introduced specific regulations on the use of mycological resources. These include the autonomous community of Castilla y León [110] and the Andalusian provinces of Almeria [111] and Jaén [112].
At a more local level, the use of mycological resources must be integrated into projects for the planning and organization of mountain areas [113]. The picking of wild mushrooms will have to be regulated [113], for example through public or private mycological reserves (one of the most important such initiatives in Spain is the Association of Forest Owners in Ávila, in Castilla y León), or mycological parks (such as the MICOSILVA project), in order to create greater added value in local communities and enhance their sustainable use. To this end the organizations and associations that regulate the trade and distribution in the value chain associated with the use of wild mushrooms also have an important role to play. These include for example the “Micobierzo Gourmet” Cooperative in León, and “Setas Silarche”, S.L. a company based in Aracena (Huelva).

4. Conclusions

Fungi play a crucial ecological role in the management of ecosystems such as those in the Mediterranean Region, and in Spain in general. Since ancient times, people have used fungi for a variety of purposes, such that they have come to influence their beliefs and, in some cases, have become a symbol of their identity and a basic ingredient in the production of certain essential food and pharmaceutical products. In today’s post-industrial and post-material world, new values and new socioeconomic potential are being assigned to these ancient products, which now offer excellent opportunities to improve the quality of life in peripheral rural areas, so halting the exodus to the cities.
Likewise, the cultivation of different kinds of fungi (epigeous saprophyte species and hypogeous ectomycorrhizal fungi) has created considerable expectations for declining rural areas. In the case of Spain, important opportunities have emerged in the cultivation of black truffles (Tuber melanosporum) above all in the Gúdar-Javalambre area in the Sistema Ibérico mountain range. In good years, the income from this crop per hectare of irrigated land can exceed that obtained from such profitable, albeit less sustainable, crops as greenhouse vegetables, which are cultivated in modified conditions and can have considerable environmental impact.
In addition to these new opportunities in mushroom cultivation, another interesting option is the multifunctional exploitation of forest resources and in particular wild mushroom picking, in which there has been increasing interest in recent decades in Spain and other countries. This trend is reflected not only in the food retail sector, but also in restaurants, leisure and most recently tourism. In specific cases, the returns from the combined use (described above) of this non-wood product may even exceed those earned from traditional forestry businesses such as logging [28,114,115].
The main weaknesses and threats to the country’s mycological resources include global warming and the associated changes in the climate, the inherent variability of the Mediterranean climate in the Iberian Peninsula and the de facto deregulation of the use or exploitation of wild mushrooms in certain parts of Spain. As far as is possible, these threats must be addressed in order to ensure important economic, social and environmental benefits for rural Spain.

Author Contributions

E.M.-I. gathered and analysed all the information and completed the results section, while X.A.A.-L. and M.B.G.-M. wrote the introduction and conclusion sections.

Funding

This research has been conducted within the framework of the R+D+i project with reference number CSO2017-88935-R (funded as part of the Spanish National R&D&I Plan of the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad) and with the support of the research groups 2017 SGR 25 (Grup de Recerca Consolidat Territori, Turisme, Canvi Climàtic) and SEJ170 (Paisaje, Planificación Territorial y Desarrollo Local).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Tedersoo, L.; Bahram, M.; Põlme, S.; Kõljalg, U.; Yorou, N.S.; Wijesundera, R.; Ruiz, L.V.; Vasco-Palacios, A.M.; Thu, P.Q.; Suija, A.; et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science 2014, 346, 1078–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kauserud, H.; Heegaard, E.; Büntgen, U.; Halvorsen, R.; Egli, S.; Senn-Irlet, B.; Krisai-Greilhuber, I.; Dämon, W.; Sparks, T.; Nordén, J.; et al. Warming-induced shift in European mushroom fruiting phenology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 14488–14493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Humphreys, C.P.; Franks, P.J.; Rees, M.; Bidartondo, M.I.; Leake, J.R.; Beerling, D.J. Mutualistic mycorrhiza-like symbiosis in the most ancient group of land plants. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Rayner, A.D.M.; Boddy, L. Fungal Decomposition of Wood: Its Biology and Ecology; Wiley-Interscience Publication: Chichester, UK, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ferris, R.; Peace, A.J.; Newton, A.C. Macrofungal communities of lowland Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karsten.) plantations in England: Relationships with site factors and stand structure. For. Ecol. Manag. 2000, 131, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ágreda, T.; Águeda, B.; Olano, J.M.; Vicente-Serrano, S.M.; Fernández-Toirán, M. Increase evapotranspiration demand in a Mediterranean climate might cause a decline in fungal yields under global warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2015, 21, 3499–3510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Romano, N.; Lignola, G.P.; Brigante, M.; Bosso, L.; Chirico, G.B. Residual life and degradation assessment of wood elements used in soil bioengineering structures for slope protection. Ecol. Eng. 2016, 90, 498–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Asplund, J.; Kauserud, H.; Bokhorts, S.; Lie, M.H.; Ohlson, M.; Nybakken, L. Fungal communities influence decomposition rates of plant litter from two dominant tree species. Fungal. Ecol. 2018, 32, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Hechmi, N.; Bosso, L.; El-Bassi, L.; Scelza, R.; Testa, A.; Jedidi, N.; Rao, M.A. Depletion of pentachlorophenol in soil microcosms with Byssochlamys nivea and Scopulariopsis brumptii as detoxification agents. Chemosphere 2016, 165, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esterhuizen-Londt, M.; Anna-Lena, H.; Stephan, P. Mycoremediation of diclofenac using Mucor hiemalis. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. 2017, 99, 795–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pozdnyakova, N.N.; Balandina, S.A.; Dubrovskaya, E.V.; Golubev, C.N.; Turkovskaya, O.V. Ligninolytic basidiomycetes as promising organisms for the mycoremediation of PAH-contaminated Environments. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth. Environ. Sci. 2018, 107, 012071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Igiehon, N.O.; Babalola, O.O. Fungal bio-sorption potential of chromium in Norkrans liquid medium by shake flask technique. J. Basic Microbiol. 2019, 59, 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Orwin, K.H.; Kirschbaum, M.; St. John, M.G.; Dickie, I.A. Organic nutrient uptake by mycorrhizal fungi enhances ecosystem carbon storage: A model-based assessment. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14, 493–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Brundrett, M.C. Mycorrhizal associations and other means of nutrition of vascular plants: Understanding the global diversity of host plants by resolving conflicting information and developing reliable means of diagnosis. Plant Soil 2009, 320, 37–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Branzanti, M.B.; Rocca, E.; Piso, A. Effect of ectomycorrhizal fungi on chestnut ink disease. Mycorrhiza 1999, 9, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bosso, L.; Lacatena, F.; Varlese, R.; Nocerino, S.; Cristinzio, G.; Russo, D. Plant pathogens but not antagonists change in soil fungal communities across a land abandonment gradient in a Mediterranean landscape. Acta Oecol. 2017, 78, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rowan, D.D.; Popay, A.J. Endophytic fungi as mediators of plant-insect interactions. In Insect-Plant Interactions; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1993; pp. 99–120. [Google Scholar]
  18. Vásquez-Gassibe, P.; Oria-de-Rueda, J.A.; Martín-Pinto, P. Pinus pinaster underextreme ecological conditions provides high fungal production and diversity. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 337, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Boyer, L.R.; Brain, P.; Xu, X.M.; Jeffries, P. Inoculation of drought-stressed strawberry with a mixed inoculum of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: Effects on population dynamics of fungal species in roots and consequential plant tolerance to water deficiency. Mycorrhiza 2015, 25, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hashem, A.; Abd-Allah, E.F.; Alqarawi, A.A.; Egamberdieva, D. Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Stress Tolerance. In Plant Microbiome: Stress Response; Egamberdieva, D., Ahmad, P., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 81–103. [Google Scholar]
  21. Baptista, P.; Martins, A.; Tavares, R.M.; Lino-Nieto, T. Diversity and fruiting pattern of macrofungi associated with chestnut (Castanea sativa) in the Trás-os-Montes region (Northeast Portugal). Fungal Ecol. 2010, 3, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Martínez-Peña, F.; Agreda, T.; Agueda, B.; Ortega-Martinez, P.; Fernandez-Toiran, L.M. Edible sporocarp production by age class in a Scots pine stand in Northern Spain. Mycorrhiza 2012, 22, 167–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dugan, F.M. Fungi in the Ancient World: How Mushrooms, Mildews, Molds, and Yeast Shaped the Early Civilizations of Europe, the Mediterranean, and the Near East; American Phytopathological Society: St. Paul, MN, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yun, W.; Hall, I.R. Edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms: Challenges and achievements. Can. J. Bot. 2004, 82, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Maser, C.; Claridge, A.W.; Trappe, J.M. Trees, Truffles and Beasts? How Forest Function; Rutgers University Press: New Brunswick, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  26. Ortega-Díaz, A. Setas de Andalucía Oriental; Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos de la Provincia de Granada: Granada, Spain, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  27. Martínez-de-Aragón, J. Productos forestales no madereros. Setas y hongos. In Evaluación de Recursos Forestales por CCAA; Beltrán, M., Vericat, P., Piqué, M., Eds.; Centro Tecnológico Forestal de Cataluña: Solsona, Spain, 2013; pp. 189–199. [Google Scholar]
  28. De-Frutos-Madrazo, P.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Esteban-Laleona, S. Edible wild mushroom tourism as a source of income and employment in rural areas. The case of Castilla y León. For. Syst. 2012, 21, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bonet, J.A.; González-Olabarria, J.R.; Martínez-de-Aragón, J. Mushroom production as an alternative for rural development in a forested mountainous area. J. Mt. Sci. 2014, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Martínez-Ibarra, E.; Villar-Hernández, R. Aprovechamiento micológico y desarrollo rural. In XXV Congreso de la AGE. 50 años de Congresos de Geografía. Naturaleza, territorio y ciudad en un mundo global; Allende-Álvarez, F., Cañada-Torrecilla, R., Fernández-Mayoralas, G., Gómez-Mediavilla, G., López-Estébanez, N., Palacios-García, A., Rojo-Pérez, F., Vidal-Dominguez, M.J., Eds.; AGE: Madrid, Spain, 2017; pp. 270–278. [Google Scholar]
  31. Google Scholar (search). Available online: https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/help.html#searching (accessed on 31 December 2017).
  32. Boddy, L.; Büntgen, U.; Egli, S.; Gange, A.C.; Heegard, E.; Kirk, P.M.; Mohammad, A. Climate variation effects on fungal fruiting. Fungal Ecol. 2013, 10, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Honrubia, M.; Morte, A.; Gutiérrez, A. Las terfezias. Un cultivo para el desarrollo rural en regiones áridas y semi-áridas. In Truficultura: Fundamentos y Técnicas; Reyna-Domenech, S., Ed.; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 365–397. [Google Scholar]
  34. Reyna-Domenech, S.; García-Barreda, S. Black truffle cultivation: A global reality. For. Syst. 2014, 23, 317–328. [Google Scholar]
  35. Morcillo, M.; Sánchez, M.; Vilanova, X. Cultivar Trufas, una Realidad en Expansión; Micofora: Barcelona, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  36. Martínez-Peña, F.; Aldea, J.; de Frutos, P.; Campos, P. Renta ambiental de la recolección pública de setas silvestres en los sistemas forestales de Andalucía. In Biodiversidad, Usos del Agua Forestal y Recolección de Setas Silvestres en los Sistemas Forestales de Andalucía; Campo, P., Díaz, M., Eds.; Editoral CSIC: Madrid, Spain, 2015; pp. 274–388. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lázaro-García, A. El aprovechamiento micológico como vía de desarrollo rural en España: Las facetas comercial y recreativa. An. Geogr. 2008, 28, 111–136. [Google Scholar]
  38. Martínez-Garrido, E.; Sánchez-Urrea, J.; Torija-Santos, R. Turismo micológico y desarrollo sostenible del medio rural en Soria. In XII Coloquio de Geografía del Turismo, Ocio y Recreación; Fernández-Muñoz, S., Fidalgo-García, P., Gámir Orueta, A., García Álvarez, J., Manuel-Valdés, C., Marías-Martínez, D., Morales-Matos, G., Puente-Lozano, P., Trillo-Santamaría, J.M., Eds.; AGE: Madrid, Spain, 2010; pp. 335–351. [Google Scholar]
  39. Büntgen, U.; Latorre, J.; Egli, S.; Martínez Peña, F. Socio-economic, scientific, and political benefits of mycotourism. Ecosphere 2017, 8, e01870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Índices CSIC (Documentos). Available online: https://indices.app.csic.es/bddoc-internet/pages/mtodocumentos/ConsultaDocumentos.html;jsessionid = 987F4CE7BFB153D7F8B052036C18925D?faces-redirect = true (accessed on 31 December 2018).
  41. Fundación Española para la Ciencia y la Tecnología (FECYT) (WOS advanced search). Available online: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_AdvancedSearch_input.do?SID = F5wMW1aoLgwkc7R42sv&product = WOS&search_mode = AdvancedSearch (accessed on 31 December 2018).
  42. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed on 2 March 2017).
  43. INEBASE. Available online: http://www.ine.es/inebmenu/indice.htm (accessed on 2 March 2017).
  44. Hjalager, A.M. A typology of gastronomy tourism. In Gastronomy and Tourism; Hjalager, A.M., Richards, G., Eds.; Routledg: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 21–35. [Google Scholar]
  45. Büntgen, U.; Peter, M.; Kauserud, H.; Egli, S. Unraveling environmental drivers of a recent increase in Swiss fungi fruiting. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 2785–2794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hall, I.R.; Wang, Y.; Amicucci, A. Cultivation of edible ectomycorrhizal mushrooms. Trends Biotechnol. 2003, 21, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bonet, J.A.; Palahí, M.; Colinas, C.; Pukkala, T.; Fischer, C.R.; Miina, J.; Martínez-de-Aragón, J. Modelling the production and species richness of wild mushrooms in pine forests of the Central Pyrenees in northeastern Spain. Can. J. For. Res. 2010, 40, 347–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bonet, J.A.; de Miguel, S.; Martínez-de-Aragón, J.; Pukkala, T.; Palahí, M. Inmediate effect of thinning on the yield of Lactarius group deliciosus in Pinus pinaster forests in Northeastern Spain. For. Ecol. Manag. 2012, 265, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Büntgen, U.; Egli, S.; Camarero, J.; Fischer, E.M.; Stobbe, U.; Kauserud, H.; Tegel, W.; Sproll, L.; Stenseth, N.C. Drought-induced decline in Mediterranean truffle harvest. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 827–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Le Tacon, F.; Marçcais, B.; Courvoisier, M.; Murat, C.; Montpied, P.; Becker, M. Climatic variations explain annual fluctuations in French Périgord black truffle wholesale markets but do not explain the decrease in black truffle production over the last 48 years. Mycorrhiza 2014, 24, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Laganà, A.; Angiolini, C.; Loppi, S.; Salerni, E.; Perini, C.; Barluzzi, C.; de Dominics, V. Periodicity, fluctuations and successions of macrofungi in fir forests (Abies alba Miller) in Tuscany, Italy. For. Ecol. Manag. 2002, 169, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Krebs, C.J.; Carrier, P.; Boutin, S.; Boonstra, R.; Hofer, E. Mushroom crops in relation to weather in the southwestern Yukon. Botany 2008, 86, 1497–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kauserud, H.; Heegard, E.; Semenov, M.A.; Boddy, L.; Halvorsen, R.; Stige, L.C.; Sparks, T.H.; Gange, A.C.; Stenseth, N.C. Climate change and spring-fruiting fungi. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. Biol. 2010, 277, 1169–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Eveling, D.W.; Wilson, R.N.; Gillespie, E.S.; Bataille, A. Environmental effects on sporocarp counts over fourteen years in a foresta area. Mycol. Res. 1990, 94, 998–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lindahl, B.D.; Ihrmark, K.; Boberg, J.; Trumbore, S.E.; Högberg, P.; Stenlid, J.; Finlay, R.D. Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogenuptake in a boreal forest. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Büntgen, U.; Tegel, W.; Egli, S.; Stobbe, U.; Sproll, L.; Stenseth, N.C. Truffles and climate change. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9, 150–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sato, H.; Morimoto, S.; Hattori, T.A. Thirty-Year Survey Reveals That Ecosystem Function of Fungi Predicts Phenology of Mushroom Fruiting. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 2006, 15, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mello, A.; Murat, C.; Bonfante, P. Truffles: Much more than a prized and local fungal decay. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 260, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. De la Varga, H.; Águeda, B.; Ágreda, T.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Parladé, J.; Pera, J. Seasonal dynamics of Boletus edulis and Lactarius deliciosus extraradical mycelium in pine forests of central Spain. Mycorrhiza 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Gange, A.C.; Gange, E.G.; Sparks, T.H.; Boddy, L. Rapid and Recent Changes in Fungal Fruiting Patterns. Science 2007, 316, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Rosenzweig, C.; Casassa, G. Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. In Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; Parry, M.L., Canziani, F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2007; pp. 79–131. [Google Scholar]
  63. Mohammad, A.B. Spatial and Temporal Aspects of Macrofungal Community Structure; Royal Holloway University of London: London, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  64. Callot, G. La truffe, la Terre, la Vie; Editions Quae: Paris, France, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  65. Diez, J.M.; James, T.Y.; McMunn, M.; Ibáñez, I. Predicting species-specific responses of fungi to climatic variation using historical records. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gange, A.C.; Gange, E.G.; Mohammad, A.B.; Boddy, L. Host shifts in fungi caused by climate change? Fungal Ecol. 2011, 4, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gange, A.C.; Mohammad, A.B.; Damialis, A.; Gange, E.G. Mushroom phenological changes: A role for resource availability? Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E333–E334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Wakchaure, G.C. Production and Marketing of mushrooms: Global and national scenario. In Mushrooms-Cultivation, Marketing and Consumption; Singh, M., Vijay, B., Kamal, S., Wakchaure, G.C., Eds.; Directorate of Mushroom Research: Solan, Indai, 2011; pp. 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  69. Larumbe, E. Estrategias push and pull de marketing en el sector de setas y champiñones. In Propiedades saludables del consumo de champiñón; Asociación Española de Cultivadores del Champiñon: Logroño, Spain, 2007; pp. 63–78. [Google Scholar]
  70. Roncero-Ramos, I. Propiedades nutricionales y saludables de los hongos. Available online: http://www.adenyd.es/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Informe-sobre champi%C3%B1%C3%B3n-y-setas.pdf (accessed on 8 March 2017).
  71. Martínez-Peña, F.; Oria-de-Ruefa, J.A.; Ágreda, T. Manual para la gestión del recurso micológico forestal en Castilla y León; SOMACYL-Junta: Castilla, Spain, 2011; Available online: http://www.micosylva.com/manual/files/manual_simp.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  72. Altares, G. 8.600 habitantes, 36.000 kilos de trufa. El País. 2015. Available online: http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2015/02/27/actualidad/1425060271_757109.html (accessed on 2 April 2017).
  73. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Herbáceaos 2010; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2013. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y prospectiva/Herb%C3%A1ceos%202010_tcm30-88513.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  74. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Herbáceos 2011; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2013. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Herb%C3%A1ceos%202011_tcm30-88510.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  75. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Herbáceos 2012; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Herb%C3%A1ceos%202012_tcm30-88507.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  76. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Herbáceos 2013; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014. Available online: https://es.scribd.com/document/372569753/Herbaceos-2013-tcm7-359284 (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  77. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Herbáceos 2014; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2015. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/herbaceos2014_tcm30-88500.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  78. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Hortícolas 2010; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2013. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Hort%C3%ADcolas.2010_tcm30-88515.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  79. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Hortícolas 2011; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2013. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Hort%C3%ADcolas.2011_tcm30-88512.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  80. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Hortícolas 2012; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Hort%C3%ADcolas.2012_tcm30-88509.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  81. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Hortícolas 2013; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Hort%C3%ADcolas.2013_tcm30-88506.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  82. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Hortícolas 2014; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2015. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/horticolas2014_tcm30-88501.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  83. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Leñosos 2010; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2012. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Le%C3%B1osos%202010_tcm30-88514.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  84. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Leñosos 2011; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2013. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Le%C3%B1osos%202011_tcm30-88511.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  85. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Leñosos 2012; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014.
  86. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos Leñosos 2013; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2014. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/Le%C3%B1osos%202013.._tcm30-88505.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  87. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos de Frutales 2014; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2015. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/frutales_tcm30-88502.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  88. MAGRAMA. Resultados técnico-económicos de Cultivos de Olivar y Viñedo 2014; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2015. Available online: https://www.mapa.gob.es/es/ministerio/servicios/analisis-y-prospectiva/olivaryvinedo2014_tcm30-88503.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  89. Danell, E.; Alexander, S.J.; Colinas, C. Aportación de la truficultura al desarrollo socioeconómico. Vida Rural. 2003, 181, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  90. Morte, A.; Zamora, M.; Gutiérrez, A.; Honrubia, M. Desert truffle cultivation in semiarid Mediterranean areas. In Mycorrhizas: Functional Processes and Ecological Impact; Gianinazzi-Pearson, V., Azcón, C., Eds.; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 221–233. [Google Scholar]
  91. Morte, A.; Andrino, A. Domestication: Preparation of Mycorrhizal Seedlings. In Desert Truffles. Phylogeny, Physiology, Distribution and Domestication; Kagan-Zur, V., Roth-Bejerano, N., Sitrit, Y., Morte, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 343–365. [Google Scholar]
  92. Honrubia, M.; Andrino, A.; Morte, A. Preparation and Maintenance of Both Man-Planted and Wild Plots. In Desert Truffles. Phylogeny, Physiology, Distribution and Domestication; Kagan Zur, V., Roth Bejerano, N., Sitrit, Y., Morte, A., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014; pp. 367–387. [Google Scholar]
  93. Oria-de-Rueda, J.A.; Garcia, C.; Martin, P.; Martinez, A.; Olaizola, J.; de la Parra, B.; Fraile, R.; Alvarez, M.A. Hongos y Setas. Tesoro de Nuestros Montes; Ediciones Cálamo: Palencia, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  94. MAGRAMA. Anuario de Estadística Forestal; Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2011.
  95. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Real Decreto 30/2009, de 16 de Enero, por el que se Establecen las Condiciones Sanitarias para la Comercialización de Setas para uso Alimentario; Ministerio de la Presidencia Español: Madrid, Spain, 2009.
  96. Moreni, B.; Gómez, J.; Jiménez, F.; Infante, F. Setas de Andaucía. Con Especial Referencia a sus Parques Naurales; Centro Andaluz del Libro: Sevilla, Spain, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  97. Sánchez Rodriguez, J.A. Los hongos: Manual y guía didáctica de micología; Instituto de Restauración y Medio Ambiente: León, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  98. Esteve Reventós, F.; Ortega Díaz, A.; Llistosella Vidal, J. Setas de la Peninsula Ibérica e Islas Baleares; Ediciones Jagüar: Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  99. Moreno, G.; Majón, J.L. Guía de Hongos de la Peninsula Ibérica; Ediciones Omega: Barcelona, Spain, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  100. Honrubia, M.; Figueroa, V.; Fajardo, J.; Verde, A.; Etxarri, X. Guía de Hongos Micodes; Grupo de Desarrollo Rural Altiplano de Granada: Baza, Spain, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  101. Ceres. Consulta Sobre Aspectes Relacionats Amb la Recollida de Bolets en el Marc de l’omnibus Catalunya; Ceres: Barcelona, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  102. Reyna-Domenech, S. Sostenibilidad de la truficultura: Aspectos ecológicos, económicos y sociales. In Truficultura: Fundamentos y Técnicas; Reyna Domenech, S., Ed.; Mundi-Prensa: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 51–73. [Google Scholar]
  103. García Ferrando, M.; Llopis Goig, R. Encuesta Sobre los Hábitos Deportivos en España 2010. Ideal Democrático y Bienestar Personal; Universidad de Valencia: Valencia, Spain, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  104. Picardo, A. El proyecto MYAS-RC de Castilla y León: Resultados generales y del programa de coordinación. In Proceedings of the Simposio Internacional de Gestión Forestal del Recurso Micológico, Valladolid, Spain, 9–11 June 2011; Available online: http://www.micosylva.com/content/balance-del-plan-cussta-en-andalucia (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  105. MICOVALDORBA. Available online: https://www.valdorba.org/micovaldorba2/pagina.shtml (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  106. Moreno-Arroyo, B. Plan Cussta. In Proceedings of the Simposio Internacional de Gestión Forestal del Recurso Micológico, Valladolid, Spain, 9–11 June 2011; Available online: http://www.micosylva.com/content/balance-del-plan-cussta-en-andalucia (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  107. MICODES. Available online: http://sierradelsegura.com/proyectos/micodes/ (accessed on 1 January 2018).
  108. Oria-de-Rueda, J.A.; de la Parra, B.; Olaizola, J.; Martin, P.; Martinez de Azagra, A.; Alvarez, A. Selvicultura micológica. In Compendio de Selvicultura Aplicada; Serrada, R., Gregorio, M., Reque, J.A., Eds.; Instituto Nacional de Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria: Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  109. Boletín Oficial del Estado. Ley 43/2003, de 21 de noviembre, de Montes; Jefatura del Estado: Madrid, Spain, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  110. Boletín Oficial de Castilla y León. DECRETO 31/2017, de 5 de octubre, por el que se regula el Recurso Micológico Silvestre en Castilla y León; Consejería de Economía y Hacienda: Valladolid, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  111. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía. Resolución de 7 de septiembre de 2017, de la Delegación Territorial de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio en Almería, sobre recogida de hongos en los terrenos forestales de la provincia; Junta de Andalucía: Sevilla, Spain, 2017.
  112. Boletín Oficial de la Junta de Andalucía. Resolución de 1 de octubre de 2018, de la Delegación Territorial de Medio Ambiente y Ordenación del Territorio en Jaén, sobre recogida de hongos en los terrenos forestales de la provincia; Junta de Andalucía: Sevilla, Spain, 2018.
  113. Aldea, J.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Romero, C.; Diaz-Balteiro, L. Participatory goal programming in forest management: An application integrating several ecosystem services. Forests 2014, 5, 3352–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Martínez Peña, F.; García, R. Ordenación del recurso micológico en la comarca de Pinares de Soria-Burgos. In Proceedings of the Actas del XII Congreso Forestal Mundial, Quebec, QC, Canada, 21–28 September 2003; pp. 319–320. [Google Scholar]
  115. Aldea, J.; Martínez-Peña, F.; Díaz-Balteiro, L. Integration of fungal production in forest management using a multi-criteria method. Eur. J. For. Res. 2012, 131, 1991–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 11 01030 g001 550
Figure 1. Procedure followed in this research. *In case of various publications.
Figure 1. Procedure followed in this research. *In case of various publications.
Sustainability 11 01030 g001
Sustainability 11 01030 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Global production of mushrooms and truffles in millions of tons, (b) Global production of mushrooms and truffles in gross value (constant values 2004–2006 in US dollars). Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [42]. Created during this research.
Figure 2. (a) Global production of mushrooms and truffles in millions of tons, (b) Global production of mushrooms and truffles in gross value (constant values 2004–2006 in US dollars). Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) [42]. Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g002
Sustainability 11 01030 g003 550
Figure 3. Production of mushrooms and truffles in millions of tons in Spain. Source: FAO [42]. Created during this research.
Figure 3. Production of mushrooms and truffles in millions of tons in Spain. Source: FAO [42]. Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g003
Sustainability 11 01030 g004 550
Figure 4. Distribution of nurseries selling trees inoculated with Tuber melanosporum in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Figure 4. Distribution of nurseries selling trees inoculated with Tuber melanosporum in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g004
Sustainability 11 01030 g005 550
Figure 5. Distribution of the mycological associations in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Figure 5. Distribution of the mycological associations in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g005
Sustainability 11 01030 g006 550
Figure 6. Distribution of mycological and myco-gastronomy fairs in Spain in the spring-autumn season 2016–2017. Source: Created during this research.
Figure 6. Distribution of mycological and myco-gastronomy fairs in Spain in the spring-autumn season 2016–2017. Source: Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g006
Sustainability 11 01030 g007 550
Figure 7. Mycological interpretation centres in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Figure 7. Mycological interpretation centres in Spain in 2017. Source: Created during this research.
Sustainability 11 01030 g007
Table
Table 1. Keywords used in our searches on bibliographic databases.
Table 1. Keywords used in our searches on bibliographic databases.
Mycological TermsSporocarp; Fungi; Macrofungi; Macromycetes; Mycelium; Mycoflora; Mycorrhizas; Mushrooms; Truffle; Tuber
Biogeography and Environment TermsThinning of forest; biogeography; time changes (in fruiting patterns); forest cover; chorology; fruiting bodies; diversity; age of the forest; endemicity; seasonality; environmental factors; phenology; fruiting patterns; habitats; hygrophilous; distribution models; niche; pending; production; sporocarps; thermophilic; geographical variation; xerophyte
Climate TermsGlobal warming; climate; climate change; weather; evapotranspiration; precipitation; drought; temperature; meteorological variables; Hydric Balance
Socioeconomic TermsEconomic profit; economic contribution; development; rural development; employment; gastronomy; forest management; socioeconomic impact; income; mycotourism; multifunctionality of forests; price; non-wood forest products; mushroom picking; truffle picking; edible mushrooms; silviculture; tourism; mycological tourism; economic value; economic variables; sales
Source: Created during this research.
Table
Table 2. Most representative studies of climatic predictors of natural production of macrofungi sporocarps.
Table 2. Most representative studies of climatic predictors of natural production of macrofungi sporocarps.
Geographical DataMycological DataMain ResultsReferences
SW Yukon, Canada
Climate: Dfc		EF (annual), 15 years
ECM and SAP		Biomass
r May P (tyear-1) = +0.75
r June P (to) = +0.68		[52]
Chanéaz, Switzerland
Climate: Cfb/Dfb		EF (annual), 36 years
ECM		Carpophores (number)
r annual T (to) = +0.92
(12-annual moving average)		[56]
Chanéaz, Switzerland
Climate: Cfb/Dfb		EF (annual), 36 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
r April and August T (to) = +0.72
r ∑ P (to) = +0.5		[45]
Higashiyama, Japan
Climate: Cfa		EF (annual), 30 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
r monthly T (to) ≈+0.5
r ∑ P (to) ≈+0.5		[57]
Soria, Spain
Climate: Csb (2)		EF (autumn), 15 years
ECM and SAP		Biomass
r ∑ P (t≥10 days) = +0.64		[6]
Pyrenees, Spain
Climate: Cfb/Csb		EF (autumn), 13 years
ECM and SAP		Biomass
r ∑ August–November P (to) = +0.86		[47]
Mediterranean, Europe
Climate: Cfa/b-Csa/b		HF (winter), 37 years
ECM
Tuber melanosporum		Biomass
r ∑ July–August P (tyear-1) = +0.6
r means July–August T (tyear-1) = −0.57		[49]
South of France
Climate: Csa (2)		HF (winter), 24 years
ECM
Tuber melanosporum
Tuber brumale (5%)		Sales from two main markets
r ∑ May-August HB (tyear-1) = +0.61 and + 0.68 (depending on the market)		[50]
Legend: Climate Köppen Climate Classification [58]. The numbers in brackets in Column 1 are the number of dry months; Mycological data (EF = Epigeous Fungi; HF = Hypogeous Fungi; ECM = Ectomycorrhizal Fungi; SAP = Saprophyte Fungi); Main findings (r = correlation coefficient; to = current year; t ≥ 10 = after at least 10 days; tyear-1 = previous year); Climate variables (P = Precipitation; T = Temperature; HB = Hydric Balance). In order to help readers interpret the data shown in Table 2 and Table 3, we will now describe the study in Yukon (Canada) in more detail as an example. According to the Köppen classification, this region has a Dfc climate (snowy climate, very humid, cool summers and cold winters). Researchers tracked annual biomass production of epigeous fungi (both saprophyte and ectomycorrhizal) against different climatic variables over a period of 15 years. Their most important results showed a relationship between biomass production and monthly precipitation in May (previous year) (r = +0.75) and between biomass production and precipitation in June (current year) (r = +0.68).
Source: Created during this research.
Table
Table 3. Most representative studies of phenological patterns and analysis of trends in the production of macrofungi sporocarps.
Table 3. Most representative studies of phenological patterns and analysis of trends in the production of macrofungi sporocarps.
Geographical DataMycological DataMost Important ResultsReferences
Norway and the United Kingdom
Climate: ET, Df, Cfb		EF (spring), 48 years
ECM and SAP (mainly)		Carpophores (number)
1.Phenological changes:tart of season has moved forward (3.8 days/decade)		[53]
Norway, the United Kingdom, Austria and Switzerland
Climate: ET, Df, Cfb		EF (autumn), 38 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenological changes: Lengthening of the season
(start delayed and finish delayed) with differences between species and countries		[2]
Michigan, USA
Climate: Dfa/b		EF (annual), 101 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenological changes: Start delayed (0.18 days/decade) with differences between functional groups and host types (deciduous vs evergreen)
2. Production trends ( = )		[65]
Chanéaz, Switzerland
Climate: Cfb/Dfb		EF (annual), 36 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenology: peak of production (September-October)
2. Phenological changes: Start delayed (13 days from 1975 to 2006) with differences between functional groups and host types (deciduous vs evergreen)
3. Positive production trends in both ECM and SAP		[45]
Chanéaz, Switzerland
Climate: Cfb/Dfb		EF (annual), 36 years
ECM		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenology: peak of production (September-October)
2. Phenological changes: delayed peak production (1975–1990/1991–2006: 10 days) and lengthening of season
3. Positive production trends(1975–1990/1991–2006: number of carpophores per week from 42 to 88)		[57]
Salisbury, United Kingdom
Climate: Cfb		EF (autumn), 56 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenological changes: lengthening of season: from 33.2 ±1.6 days in 1950 to 74.8 ± 7.6 days in 2005
(start brought forward and end delayed)		[66,67]
Higashiyama, Japan
Climate: Cfa		EF (annual), 30 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number)
1. Phenology: ECM unimodal pattern: peak production (July); small decomposers bimodal pattern:
production peaks (early summer and early autumn)
2. Positive production trends only wood decomposer fungi (due to aging of the forest)		[58]
Soria, Spain
Climate: Csb (2)		EF (autumn), 15 years
ECM and SAP		Carpophores (number) and Biomass
1. Phenology: start 40.4 ± 0.6 weeks, end 47.5 ± 0.5 weeks), duration (7.1 ± 0.7 weeks)		[6]
Legend: Climate (Köppen climate classification. In brackets in Column 1 the number of dry months); Mycological data (EF = Epigeous Fungi; HF = Hypogeous Fungi; ECM = Ectomycorrhizal Fungi; SAP = Saprophyte Fungi). Source: Created during this research.
Table
Table 4. Approximate average return (euros/ha/year) on other crops in Spain compared with truffle farming.
Table 4. Approximate average return (euros/ha/year) on other crops in Spain compared with truffle farming.
TypeRain-fedIrrigated Source
Herbaceous cropsCorn 2340[73,74,75,76]
barley510781
wheat589948
sunflowers323
dried peas267
Vegetablespeppers (greenhouse) 54,723[77,78,79,80,81,82]
watermelons 10,408
tomatoes (greenhouse) 53,136
melons 6441
Fruitoranges 4384[83,84,85,86,87,88]
peaches 7623
olives (Mill)9052040
plums 9138
nectarines 9327
almonds 699
Truffle farmingTuber melanosporum 5400
19,424–66,972[35]
12,000Production [89] and prices [35]
Terfezia claveryi 1028Production* [90] and price of 5 euros/kg
* The production of Terfezia claveryi varies a great deal from one year to the next. Source: Created during this research.
Table
Table 5. Estimated economic value of the consumptive use of goods from forested areas of Spain (2011).
Table 5. Estimated economic value of the consumptive use of goods from forested areas of Spain (2011).
ProductEconomic Value in Thousands of Euros% of Total Economic Value
Logging721,416 (Value in the loading bay in 2009)72.7
Firewood23,775 (Value in 2009)2.4
Cork51,2425.7
Resin41570.4
Esparto20.0
Chestnuts1200 0.1
Truffles12930.1
Other fungi108,35010.9
Other fruit, plants and products74430.8
Hunting and fishing73,228.217.4
Total992,106100
Source: [94] and created during this research.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martínez-Ibarra, E.; Gómez-Martín, M.B.; Armesto-López, X.A. Climatic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Mushrooms: The Case of Spain. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041030

AMA Style

Martínez-Ibarra E, Gómez-Martín MB, Armesto-López XA. Climatic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Mushrooms: The Case of Spain. Sustainability. 2019; 11(4):1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martínez-Ibarra, Emilio, María Belén Gómez-Martín, and Xosé Anton Armesto-López. 2019. "Climatic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Mushrooms: The Case of Spain" Sustainability 11, no. 4: 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041030

APA Style

Martínez-Ibarra, E., Gómez-Martín, M. B., & Armesto-López, X. A. (2019). Climatic and Socioeconomic Aspects of Mushrooms: The Case of Spain. Sustainability, 11(4), 1030. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041030

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop