Next Article in Journal
Effect of YouTube Marketing Communication on Converting Brand Liking into Preference among Millennials Regarding Brands in General and Sustainable Offers in Particular. Evidence from South Africa and Romania
Next Article in Special Issue
Modeling with Stakeholders for Transformative Change
Previous Article in Journal
How to Reach the Eurocities? A Retrospective Review of the Evolution Dynamics of Urban Planning and Management on the Iberian Peninsula Territories
Previous Article in Special Issue
Designing with Pathways: A Spatial Design Approach for Adaptive and Sustainable Landscapes
Open AccessArticle

Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning

1
Aalto University, Otaniementie 14, 02150 Espoo, Finland
2
Finnish Environment Institute, Latokartanonkaari 11, 00790 Helsinki, Finland
3
University of Sussex, Sussex House, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RH, UK
4
SITRA, Finnish independence fund, Itämerenkatu 11-13, 00180 Helsinki, Finland
5
Consumer Society Research Centre, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00100 Helsinki, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(3), 603; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030603
Received: 30 November 2018 / Revised: 4 January 2019 / Accepted: 14 January 2019 / Published: 23 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Policy Pathways for Sustainability)
Sustainability transitions require new policy pathways that significantly reduce the environmental impacts caused by, for example, energy production, mobility and food production. Transition management (TM) is one of the approaches aiming at the creation of new ways to govern transitions. It uses transitions arenas (TA) as a key process and platform where new policy pathways are created in collaboration with multiple (frontrunner) stakeholders. TM’s ambitious and demanding agenda is not easy to implement. There is a continued need for testing and developing new ways of carrying out its key processes. We redesigned the TA process in the context of energy system change in Finland by 2030, focusing on interim goals, mid-range change pathways and developing a new notation system that allows participants to directly create the pathways. The resulting renewed TA process results in more specific and detailed mid-range pathways that provide more concreteness to how to implement long-term transition goals. It helps to bridge long-term national visions/strategies and low carbon experiments that are already running. The Finnish TA work created eight ambitious change pathways, pointing towards new and revised policy goals for Finland and identifying specific policy actions. Evaluation of the TA, 6–9 months after its completion underscores that an effective TA needs to be embedded by design in the particular political context that it seeks to influence. It is too early to say to what degree the pathways will be followed in practice but there are positive signs already. View Full-Text
Keywords: transition management; transition arena; sustainability transitions; pathway; codesign; energy policy; mid-range planning transition management; transition arena; sustainability transitions; pathway; codesign; energy policy; mid-range planning
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hyysalo, S.; Lukkarinen, J.; Kivimaa, P.; Lovio, R.; Temmes, A.; Hildén, M.; Marttila, T.; Auvinen, K.; Perikangas, S.; Pyhälammi, A.; Peljo, J.; Savolainen, K.; Hakkarainen, L.; Rask, M.; Matschoss, K.; Huomo, T.; Berg, A.; Pantsar, M. Developing Policy Pathways: Redesigning Transition Arenas for Mid-range Planning. Sustainability 2019, 11, 603.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop