Next Article in Journal
Independent Directors and Organizational Performance: New Evidence from A Meta-Analytic Regression Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
GIS Based Novel Hybrid Computational Intelligence Models for Mapping Landslide Susceptibility: A Case Study at Da Lat City, Vietnam
Open AccessArticle

Effect of Cover Crop on Farm Profitability and Risk in the Southern High Plains

1
Department of Agricultural Economics and Agricultural Business, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USA
2
Agricultural Science Center, New Mexico State University, 2346 NM 288, Clovis, NM 88101, USA
3
School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(24), 7119; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247119
Received: 27 November 2019 / Revised: 10 December 2019 / Accepted: 10 December 2019 / Published: 12 December 2019
Cover cropping has been promoted for improving soil health and environmental quality in the southern High Plains (SHP) region of the United States. The SHP is one of the more productive areas of the country and covers a large landmass, including parts of Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Texas. This region faces challenges in sustainable crop production due to declining water levels in the Ogallala Aquifer, the primary source of water for irrigated crop production. This study examines the impact of integrating cover crops in the winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L)-based rotations on farm profitability and risk in the SHP. The study combines experimental yield data with other secondary information, including market prices, to conduct simulation analysis and evaluate the risk involved in introducing cover crops in a wheat-fallow cropping system. The results show that, due to the additional monetary costs involved, none of the cover crop options is economically viable. However, when secondary benefits (erosion control and green nitrogen) or government subsidies are included in the analysis, one of the cover crop options (peas) dominates the fallow alternative. Moreover, when the secondary benefits and a government subsidy are combined, two cover crop alternatives (peas and oats) emerge as more profitable options than leaving land fallow. These results highlight the importance of agricultural research and extension programs that are making a concerted effort to develop more productive farming techniques and increase public awareness about the long-term benefits of adopting soil health management systems such as cover cropping in the SHP region. View Full-Text
Keywords: sustainability; subsidy; risk; profitability soil erosion; nitrogen fixation sustainability; subsidy; risk; profitability soil erosion; nitrogen fixation
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Acharya, R.N.; Ghimire, R.; GC, A.; Blayney, D. Effect of Cover Crop on Farm Profitability and Risk in the Southern High Plains. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247119

AMA Style

Acharya RN, Ghimire R, GC A, Blayney D. Effect of Cover Crop on Farm Profitability and Risk in the Southern High Plains. Sustainability. 2019; 11(24):7119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247119

Chicago/Turabian Style

Acharya, Ram N.; Ghimire, Rajan; GC, Apar; Blayney, Don. 2019. "Effect of Cover Crop on Farm Profitability and Risk in the Southern High Plains" Sustainability 11, no. 24: 7119. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247119

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop