Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Academic Motivation
Previous Article in Journal
Mathematical Investigation on the Sustainability of UAV Logistics
Open AccessArticle

Residential Land Use Change in the Wissahickon Creek Watershed: Profitability and Sustainability?

1
Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
2
Department of Geography, Planning, and Sustainability, School of Earth and Environment, Rowan University, Glassboro, NJ 08028, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(21), 5933; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11215933
Received: 19 September 2019 / Revised: 20 October 2019 / Accepted: 22 October 2019 / Published: 25 October 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)
The Wissahickon Creek Watershed is one of five major watersheds in the Philadelphia metro region. The main objective of the work in this paper was to determine and compare the energy and environmental impacts of placing housing in the Watershed according to profitability and environmental sustainability criteria, respectively, in the context of increasing urbanization. Future population and employment for the Watershed have been projected by the Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission. Housing requirements for the projected populations in each municipality were computed, and their location was influenced by the local zoning ordinances. Suitability analysis using ArcGIS 10.6 generated areas for development based alternatively on profitability and local sustainability. CommunityViz 5.2 Scenario 360 software was used to place buildings within the appropriately-zoned areas. Using Argonne National Laboratory’s Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET1 2018) software and water quality monitoring information from the Philadelphia Water Department, impacts were directly estimated. The impacts were related to effects on ecosystem functioning, ecosystem goods and services, and broad value estimated for the latter. The effects were used to indicate what might be appropriate policies to reduce the negative environmental consequences of residential development in the watershed. Unexpectedly, the environmental impacts of the profitable and sustainable scenarios were not very different. This suggests that profitability and sustainability need not be mutually exclusive. View Full-Text
Keywords: Philadelphia metro region; watershed; residential development; urban sustainability; profitability; ecosystem goods and services; policy options Philadelphia metro region; watershed; residential development; urban sustainability; profitability; ecosystem goods and services; policy options
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sorrentino, J.; Meenar, M.; Wargo, D. Residential Land Use Change in the Wissahickon Creek Watershed: Profitability and Sustainability? Sustainability 2019, 11, 5933.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop