Next Article in Journal
Spatiotemporal Changes in Evapotranspiration from an Overexploited Water Resources Basin in Arid Northern China and Their Implications for Ecosystem Management
Previous Article in Journal
Large-Scale Grain Producers’ Application of Land Conservation Technologies in China: Correlation Effects and Determinants
Article

Conceptualization of an Indicator System for Assessing the Sustainability of the Bioeconomy

Sustainable Resource Futures Group (SURF), Center for Environmental Systems Research (CESR), University of Kassel, 34121 Kassel, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(2), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443
Received: 16 November 2018 / Revised: 9 January 2019 / Accepted: 11 January 2019 / Published: 16 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
The increased use of biogenic resources is linked to expectations of “green” economic growth, innovation spurts through biotechnology, development options for rural areas, and an increasingly regenerative resource base that is also climate-neutral. However, for several years the signs for unintentional and unwanted side effects have been increasing. In 2015, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development was published at the international level in order to address this problem and deliver a starting point for a comprehensive sustainability criteria evaluation catalogue. Impact indicators to quantify the environmental burden induced by national activities in foreign countries are especially lacking. In this article a comprehensive framework for the evaluation of the sustainability of the bioeconomy, considering key objectives and relevant criteria for environmental, economic, and social sustainability is developed. A special focus is set to the intersection area of the three pillars of sustainability, where the particularly important integrative key objectives and the indicators assigned to them (e.g., resource footprints) apply. This indicator set can be used as a basis for bio-economy monitoring, which uses and produces differently aggregated information on different levels of action, with a focus at the national level but also including global impacts of domestic production and consumption. View Full-Text
Keywords: resource footprints; DPSIR concept; integrative key objectives resource footprints; DPSIR concept; integrative key objectives
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Egenolf, V.; Bringezu, S. Conceptualization of an Indicator System for Assessing the Sustainability of the Bioeconomy. Sustainability 2019, 11, 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443

AMA Style

Egenolf V, Bringezu S. Conceptualization of an Indicator System for Assessing the Sustainability of the Bioeconomy. Sustainability. 2019; 11(2):443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443

Chicago/Turabian Style

Egenolf, Vincent, and Stefan Bringezu. 2019. "Conceptualization of an Indicator System for Assessing the Sustainability of the Bioeconomy" Sustainability 11, no. 2: 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020443

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop