Next Article in Journal
The Evaluation of the Project School Model in Terms of Organizational Sustainability and Its Effect on Teachers’ Organizational Commitment
Next Article in Special Issue
Corporate Social Responsibility and Corruption: Implications for the Sustainable Energy Sector
Previous Article in Journal
Motivational Landscape and Evolving Identity of a Route-Based Religious Tourism Space: A Case of Camino de Santiago
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Effects of Urban Sprawl and Industrial Agglomeration on Environmental Efficiency: Evidence from the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Urban Agglomeration
Open AccessArticle

A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Research from 2008 to 2018

1
School of Economics and Management, Southwest Jiaotong University, 111 North 1st Section of 2nd Ring Road, Chengdu 610031, China
2
School of Management, Guangzhou University, 230 Wai Huan Xi Road of Guangzhou Higher Education Mega Center, Guangdong 510006, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2019, 11(13), 3548; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133548
Received: 6 June 2019 / Revised: 21 June 2019 / Accepted: 22 June 2019 / Published: 27 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Energy Economics and Policy)
Increasing research interests in energy performance contracting (EPC) has resulted in a large number of publications over the past decade. However, very limited attempts have been made to map the global research in this area. To identify the state of the field and trends in EPC research, the VOSviewer software package was used to conduct a series of content analyses and examine global patterns among publications, including the distribution of core authors and institutions, high-frequency categories and keywords, journal and author contributions, highly cited papers, etc. Based on a systematical and deeply qualitative analysis on the 127 identified papers, five mainstream research topics in EPC were summarized, covering implementations of EPC, mechanisms for effective EPC projects, stakeholder behaviors and decisions in EPC projects, energy service company (ESCO) in EPC projects, and risk management in EPC. In addition, six main research gaps in EPC were identified, including lack of effective measurement and verification of energy savings, limited studies on EPC projects in the residential sector, ineffective mechanisms to ensure post-EPC energy-saving, limited research on the dual relationships among EPC project stakeholders, how to improve the energy users’ (EU) attitudes/cognitions toward ESCO/EPC, and lack of effective mechanisms to prevent risks in EPC projects. Furthermore, based on the current EPC research topics and research gaps in EPC, six potential research directions in EPC in future were also explored, which are how to develop effective methods for measuring and verifying energy efficiency?, EPC diffusion issues in the residential sector, effective mechanisms to ensure post-EPC energy-saving, effects of cooperative and competitive relationships between EU and ESCO on the performance of EPC projects, how to improve the EU’s attitudes/cognitions toward ESCO/EPC, and how to deal with risks in EPC projects. The outcomes would be useful for understanding the latest development of global EPC research and guiding future research in the subject. View Full-Text
Keywords: energy performance contracting; bibliometric analysis; VOSviewer; research trends energy performance contracting; bibliometric analysis; VOSviewer; research trends
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, W.; Yuan, H. A Bibliometric Analysis of Energy Performance Contracting Research from 2008 to 2018. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3548.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop